georger

yeah... all this tough talk about lawsuits but nothing ever happens. That's OK though, most litigation is a huge waste of time and money. It's better used as a threat than a weapon. I welcome Blevins and still support Jo's right to be here, although I disagree with her all the time. It's a numbers game. Cooper was a real person, not a Sasquatch. He lived somewhere. He had posessions. He had friends and relatives. Somebody somewhere has a valuable clue that has not yet been processed in the investigation. It could be a vehicle that was deemed abandoned and towed, a person who went missing right after Norjack but escaped FBI attention, etc. All this digging, even by Jo, widens the net. It doesnt guarantee that we will solve the case but it ups the odds as more people are contacted and are asked about events that occured around that time and in that area. I do think the Norjack case will be solved in my lifetime and that Amelia E's plane will be found as well. Just hunches from an optimistic jumper and aviation nut. 377 Thank God there is somebody here with a brain! Yours is the best post in a long time imho.

If the chute found buried at Amboy was pink I doubt if it was a stock military chute. Riggers: do you agree? 377 Thre UPI/FBI release said the Amboy chute: was made of silk not nylon, and did not have a "harness container," which Cossey's specially packed NB6/28ft had ... experts cited are Cossey and "other parachute experts". Color of chute is not even mentioned in the press release.

And the very same could be said of you. Duane asked you to STOP! in 1 9 9 5 . Georger chill: Watch your Blood Pressure - what side of the bed did you get up on today and what are you referring to? Duane was angry in 1995 because I didn't understand who Dan Cooper was and what he was talking about. If he had intended to take this to his death he would NOT have told me. If "others" had been forthcoming when I did learn who DAN COOPER was - perhaps I would have STOPPED, had they provided me with a valid reason to do so...but, I was lied to so I went public. Georger, what really bothers you about my claim and why do you not get our of sorts when it is other suspects being talked about? Duane Weber is the only suspect that upsets you! Wrong again! Duane has never upset me as a suspect. Duane never announced to the world he was DB Cooper. YOu are the Duane Weber case, not Duane Weber! Go figure. Bring your experts out of the closet, Jo. All kinds of people would love to talk to them IF THEY EXIST AT ALL which everyone doubts? Again it's all your words which always prove to be empty. Otherwise, go peddle it here at Dropzone and at the Senior Centre. Dont get your blood pressure up! Is there any real difference betwene you and Jerry Thomas?

Keep up with the times and the news. It was on National TV new programs. And the very same could be said of you. Keep up! Smarm Obsession is not proof! Duane asked you to STOP! in 1 9 9 5 .

List of DNA tested mummies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNA_tested_mummies Cretaceous dna and mtdna: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7973705 and you are informing ME dna from multiple sources 37 years extant is no good? I question your credentials! GET A LIFE! Bleach destroys DNA and so do other cleaning substances. But read the first paragraph you posted at the being of this. I will repeat it for you. "Therefore if the FBI has viable repeated DNA that they KNOW and can prove belonged to Cooper. Let's have at it."

I think you are confusing me with someone else - no problemo.

Therefore if the FBI has viable repeated DNA that they KNOW and can prove belonged to Cooper. Let's have at it. If you really have any connections you can arrange this - if not then go feed the cows....by the way do they still put out the salt blocks. List of DNA tested mummies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNA_tested_mummies Cretaceous dna and mtdna: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7973705 and you are informing ME dna from multiple sources 37 years extant is no good? I question your credentials! GET A LIFE!

Jo, We have been over this ground before. Duane's looming PKD. Your remarks tonight are consistent with everything you have ever said about this here at Dropzone. By 1977 Duane obviously knew he was in trouble. He confirmed it to you in 78. Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a genetic disorder characterized by the growth of numerous cysts in the kidneys which may infiltrate and involve the liver. I dont know if Duane was feeling symptoms in 1971? You basically say he wasn't and was fit. Duane however, was carrying the genetic markers for his form of PDK in 1971. I will leave it at that, knowing you have no faithe in the genetic profiles you think the FBI has.

Georger - go back and read what I ing about?finished putting to the post prior to this...you might find some more to jump on me about. All about Max, his book and our conversations and exchanges...regarding Cooper. I always saw Max as a consumate liar and opportunist, in search of a life - with a phony lifestyle to support.

Someone explain to me the remark he made which I took the liberty of highlighting in red above. Name Withheld because the "WIFE" is still alive? Would it not be to their advantage to bring this OUT while the wife IS still ALIVE? You guy try to take my story apart - now do your thing on this one. Plus nothing he said actually answered the question the FBI wants answered. More than ONE FBI agent has told me that I have to "Physically" put the suspect on the plane by means of a "souvenier" because individuals who comment crimes of this nature "usually" keep souveniers. And so, by implication, your Duane kept souveniers. He had a whole antique store full of souveniers, but you cant produce any of them (they vanished mysteriously), all except for the photo Duane did keep which is a photo of Tina Mucklow, or Mary Marbel. or Sally Kloon, or Harry James the trumpet player, or Duane's friend Al Capone? Have you any photos of Jesus passed down to Duane and you? Here's what he looks like! Any such photo is lilely to have Waterstains from the Great Flood or the Parting of the Waters at Sinai. Any dna of Jesus would go a long way in putting him on the plane! moseltov'

Many wander into the wilderness. Some return with a vision, but it scrambles their brains. Round pegs pounded into square holes? Here's the photo of Burnworth nobody bothered to post here during the long fruitless discussion of that. This crap isnt covered in Bamma's Health Plan, or is it?

Could you give a physical description of Dick B. anyway? Something about his background. Any connections in Utah? Thanks, G.

spoken, not spoke. Spokes are things in wheels. You won't get far in this world on bad English.

Personally, I think the Seattle FBI should update their website and admit it didn't work. I have this information from Skipp Porteous, that is, that the attempted DNA profiling from the tie sample did not work out as the FBI had hoped. You can't know that except as a lay person. And your data is very limited. I'm sure you understand that. It's nice to have opinions. Don't we all - I am sure Jo's A-team is on it, in any event. We now have the FBI and the JoBI. Jo and the FBI will keep us informed through Jo, on a daily basis.

As for my grammar and spelling, I will leave that be. ........................................................................ nor have I spoke with spoken, not spoke. Spokes are things in wheels. You won't get far in this world on bad English.

One more question - have you ever spoke with the FBI agent in charge of the Cooper File at this current time? (I don't mean Agent Carr). That's very strange. You have always said the FBI only lies to you. Maybe they are lying to you now too? Maybe they take your calls not for the reasons you think? And the correct form of the verb is 'spoken'.

IT'S COOPER-PHELIA FOR SADISTS ... BY AND FOR SADISTS.

Looks to me like what he has here is at least one 1995 'Rubin' bill - see attached. The 8A, 10, and Rubin seem to match ? and the spacings match? You were correct to look at the spacings. Both 1963A Kennedy and 1969A Schultz bills are mentioned at: http://www.check-six.com/lib/DBCooperLoot.htm I attached a 1969 bill in addition to your 63 /...

attached - Georger, Could you please explain the attachments in the post you've just made. Are the inserts of a 20 dollar bill some kind of inversion of the bills purportedly under a log as shown by autodetailpro? Thanks So far as I know ... all Cooper bills were 1963 series A twenties. The photos Ive posted include a genuine 1963A bill pasted on a capture from the gentleman's video. I have used the highest resolution best contrast capture I could find on his video. At the top of his video you will notice a comment about what setting to use for best resolution ... The pristine 1963A $20 I have pasted IS NOT a rendering or conversion or extrapolation of any of the videographed money purportedly found by Stinky le Peu. I posted these photos so people could try to estimate if these are authentic 1963A serie $20 bills. good luck on the contact.

Heres a link to his other video http://www.youtube.com/user/theautodetailpro

attached -

Hi Robert... funny ... nice post. Well, I wont be there but Im sure you can carry forth without me. It's between you and Galen. There are rumors a few 'seekers of truth' may show up but I predict it will all be civil in any event. Hopfully you can all go out for a steak afterwards - and remain on speaking terms. I blame Geof for starting all of this (that's a private joke if Geof is reading

The book is VERY rare and worth a read to anyone who is seriously seeking the answer to who Dan Cooper was. I was never able to find the author of the book - it is a BIG secret. [ Total Nonsense above. The book was written in 1983 following the money find by ______________________. It is a well known spoof and that is all it was ever meant to be. The name of the author is no secret! He signed half the books in his real name. ISBN 9780140285000 | 9780743273565 | 9780061120060. I found 13 for sale through Amazon alone. Two mint SIGNED BY THE AUTHOR WHO IS _____________signed by author. If Jo has a signed copy then they aren't rare, are they! Go figure. -below - Price + Shipping Condition Seller Information Ready to buy? $17.00 + $3.99shipping Used - Good Seller: tacbook Rating:(3613 ratings) 100% positive over the past 12 months. In Stock. Ships from WA, United States. Expedited shipping available. International & domestic shipping rates and return policy. Paperback. First Printing. Very Good to Near Fine Condition. Tight bright attractive copy with no markings to the book. $27.95 + $3.99shipping Used - Good Seller: vogelmusic Rating:(2650 ratings) 100% positive over the past 12 months. In Stock. Ships from OR, United States. Expedited shipping available. International & domestic shipping rates and return policy. Mass Market paperback $34.00 + $3.99shipping Collectible - Good Seller: Bookie Nookie Rating:(1967 ratings) 97% positive over the past 12 months. In Stock. Ships from CA, United States. Expedited shipping available. International & domestic shipping rates and return policy. paperback text tight signed by author

It is questionable if Amelia could make a successful ditching. She was not an overable capable pilot in the first place and she had already exposed her lack of knowledge when she asked the Coast Guard ship at Howland to give her a DF steer and then didn't give the "long count" that was necessary for that steer. In the planning for the Howland landing, Amelia did not attend the meetings in Washington with the Coast Guard. Instead, George Putnam, her husband and without any aeronautical qualifications, attended and he was specifically informed of the radio frequencies that the Coast Guard ship would have for communications. Nevertheless, Amelia asked the Coast Guard ship to transmitt on a frequency that she should have known the Coast Guard didn't have. Perhaps the metal in the engines would be more detectable than the aluminum airframe. But the general consensus of opinion, excluding the group that is looking several hundred miles south of Howland, is that Amelia went into the water probably not more than about 50 miles northwest of Howland. But the flight was very poorly planned, since as has already been pointed out, trying to locate Howland Island, a very small island, at sunrise with the sun in your eyes and having been awake about 24 hours and flying about 20 of those hours, is really pushing your luck. Robert99 What of the report Earhart was arguing with Noonan during one transmission? .................................................................. from wiki: During Earhart and Noonan's approach to Howland Island the Itasca received strong and clear voice transmissions from Earhart identifying as KHAQQ but she apparently was unable to hear voice transmissions from the ship. At 7:42 a.m. Earhart radioed "We must be on you, but cannot see you—but gas is running low. Have been unable to reach you by radio. We are flying at 1,000 feet." Her 7:58 a.m. transmission said she couldn't hear the Itasca and asked them to send voice signals so she could try to take a radio bearing (this transmission was reported by the Itasca as the loudest possible signal, indicating Earhart and Noonan were in the immediate area). They couldn't send voice at the frequency she asked for, so Morse code signals were sent instead. Earhart acknowledged receiving these but said she was unable to determine their direction.[102] In her last known transmission at 8:43 a.m. Earhart broadcast "We are on the line 157 337. We will repeat this message. We will repeat this on 6210 kilocycles. Wait." However, a few moments later she was back on the same frequency (3105 kHz) with a transmission which was logged as a "questionable": "We are running on line north and south."[103] Earhart's transmissions seemed to indicate she and Noonan believed they had reached Howland's charted position, which was incorrect by about five nautical miles (10 km). The Itasca used her oil-fired boilers to generate smoke for a period of time but the fliers apparently did not see it. The many scattered clouds in the area around Howland Island have also been cited as a problem: their dark shadows on the ocean surface may have been almost indistinguishable from the island's subdued and very flat profile. Whether any post-loss radio signals were received from Earhart and Noonan remains controversial. If transmissions were received from the Electra, most if not all were weak and hopelessly garbled. Earhart's voice transmissions to Howland were on 3105 kHz, a frequency restricted to aviation use in the United States by the FCC.[104] This frequency was not thought to be fit for broadcasts over great distances. When Earhart was at cruising altitude and midway between Lae and Howland (over 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from each) neither station heard her scheduled transmission at 0815 GCT.[105] Moreover, the 50-watt transmitter used by Earhart was attached to a less-than-optimum-length V-type antenna.[106] [107] The last voice transmission received on Howland Island from Earhart indicated she and Noonan were flying along a line of position (taken from a "sun line" running on 157–337 degrees) which Noonan would have calculated and drawn on a chart as passing through Howland.[108] After all contact was lost with Howland Island, attempts were made to reach the flyers with both voice and Morse code transmissions. Operators across the Pacific and the United States may have heard signals from the downed Electra but these were unintelligible or weak.[109] Some of these transmissions were hoaxes but others were deemed authentic. Bearings taken by Pan American Airways stations suggested signals originating from several locations, including Gardner Island.[110][111] It was noted at the time that if these signals were from Earhart and Noonan, they must have been on land with the aircraft since water would have otherwise shorted out the Electra's electrical system.[112][113] Sporadic signals were reported for four or five days after the disappearance but none yielded any understandable information.[114] The captain of the Colorado later said "There was no doubt many stations were calling the Earhart plane on the plane's frequency, some by voice and others by signals. All of these added to the confusion and doubtfulness of the authenticity of the reports."[115]

Got it. I can do this. My suggestion is to let Robert get his ducks in a row then follow his lead whenever he's ready and comfortable ... Im in no rush here. Thanks! G.