FLYJACK

He admitted to a domestic violence diversion program... stemming from a "charge" which is actually written on the document but he claims it isn't a charge and it didn't happen.. and it is libel to mention the truth.. because I am a troll and he has something really big that will take something to a bank for something or some such nonsense. Well I hope so, underpromise and overdeliver is my motto..

WOW, you are quite the objective sleuth..

It actually wouldn't surprise me if you paid and convinced a confused and senile old man to say he was Cooper... lots of people have claimed it near death... How did I do, close? I give credit for credit due,, I have just never seen anything from you that isn't confirmation bias,, but I'll keep an open mind.

Meh.. waste of time... clearly in denial.

Blevins, How do you write so much? He had an agenda the entire time, to ingratiate himself into the Cooper community gain cred take control with the CooperCon and leverage it sell his so called Sheridan narrative for $$.. He used people and their work to backfill Sailshaw's well known theory and added his own extreme speculation... He attacks anyone that points out facts that challenge his highly speculative narrative. His Sheridan narrative is baseless drivel. IMO. The extremely aggressive attacks against me indicate he is afraid. He should be, he has no idea what I have.

No, I didn't get it from Blevins, a link came from somebody else.. It came from here and they seem to have more claims about your character.. I haven't looked into them. It isn't a lie, it is also backed up by the newspaper.. you admitted it.. and still deny it? this guy gets a Cooper program? Is there a CooperVirus eating peoples brains.. https://sonoranalliance.com/12813/ You have been calling me a troll for almost a year, you STOLE my research twisted it to fit your biased narrative and claimed you had figured it out. I don't mind you using it but you got the facts wrong. The tie was not from 1963. Get right if you use it. You started calling me a troll when I challenged your Sheridan narrative with facts.. that pissed you off, you ran away and yelled troll. Well you kept calling me a troll and now it bites you in the ass. Your posts have exposed you..

Those are really excellent questions, I LIKE IT. Why didn't you ask before instead of crying troll and wasting everyone's time. But don't steal any of it this time.. 1. Cooper's initial demand was anyplace in Mexico nonstop in US, FACT. His initial demand was airstairs lowered in the air, FACT. That was changed during negotiations with crew to lowered on takeoff, FACT. Then they decided lowered in air, FACT. He was described as Swarthy, Latin American Mexican in features, FACT. He told Tina "US" currency and pilots asked for "American" currency FACT. My conclusion is that those facts do not indicate he wanted to jump ASAP initially. He changed his LZ to jump ASAP when the planes destination was changed. His plan boarding the plane was to jump much later based on the the facts above most likely outside the US. 2. The Willamette river valley was a theory, one of many. 3. The dump, another theory of many. I may have about 5 of them.. 4. The chutes. The evidence from the FBI indicates that the chute left on the plane doesn't match Hayden's packing card. The colours of the chutes described doesn't match Cossey's claim or Hayden's. Hayden rejected the FBI claim and description of chutes,, got that so far,, now if the chute Hayden got back and the one left on the plane don't match as the FBI data suggests then Cooper did not jump with either of Hayden's chutes, easy logic,, So Cooper must have used either Cossey's or McChords. I don't know which, I am trying to figure it out. A witness claimed an FBI agent brought a chute onto the plane, Bruce claims other witnesses say the same thing,, honestly I am not sure I am trying to work out the timeline. I think there was less than 10 minutes between the landing and Tina going to get the chutes. 5. Tina, this is another theory of many, a good one. It would take a while to go through all the details they have been posted before,, but we know the story Tina asked for some ransom money, returned it claiming no tips allowed referencing Cooper trying to tip all of them. Cooper later offered the other stews ransom money and tried to tip them from his pocket.. This story from Tina makes no sense, Tina used the no tip excuse referencing an event that occurred later, Cooper tried to tip the stews after he received the ransom money and after Tina informed him they don't take tips. Cooper tried to tip the stews drink money change about $18 four hours after he got the change, after he received the ransom money and after Tina told him there was a no tip policy. It makes no sense, there is a lie there somewhere. Now, the money Cooper offered the stews was the only money (packets) we know of that he separated from the rest of the money. There is no evidence Tina handed back the money to Cooper other than Tina's statement. Only Cooper and Tina know... Tina was moved to Gresham Or, just a few miles upstream of TBAR in about 1978 to 1979.. That is the window for the money deposit on TBAR. It is a reasonable theory that Tina may have kept that money and it was tossed/discarded it into the Columbia River around 1978/79. But, it is just a theory. Those are mostly theories.. and don't have anything to do with a specific suspect. They aren't that big a deal.. The extensive research and facts I have are related to Hahneman. The best suspect by a long shot.. but we all have the problem of putting somebody on the plane and since we don't control the forensics that is a tough thing to do for anybody,,

So you finally admit you were in a domestic violence diversion program,, thanks, that is why you didn't sue the newspaper because it is true.. but back to Cooper, what do I have wrong in the Cooper case.. please enlighten me. I always want to learn more.

Hahneman was an electronics engineer, he worked on contracts for NASA radar tracking and as a manager at an electronics (electron tubes and capacitors) manufacturing firm in Korea. There is no evidence Cooper worked at Boeing.

Good grief, you still at it.. it wasn't libel, you are clueless. You need to get a lawyer and get schooled on the law. You just aren't good at this. Don't call me a troll for a year then. All I did was set the facts straight that you had wrong about TBAR.. this is your MO, I state facts than you ignore, run and call me a troll.. then attack my character with smears. This is a fact... Police records and a newspaper claimed you were charged and attended a domestic violence program. You call me a troll to distract... (and have no clue what libel is.) this repeats over and over.. I can see you getting mad,, but frankly, it is your own fault. "Hoist with his own petard" comes to mind You kept attacking my character (like a troll), so I laid out the facts. I didn't make it up. I don't make up stuff like actual trolls. I'd like to focus on the Cooper case, your faux libel claim and troll accusations have made for some neat highlights but are petty nonsense. You have shown the world your true character and it isn't pretty.

I am only a troll to you because I figured you out and you feel threatened.. so you try to discredit me with that label.. Honestly, I don't care about your fictional program, I think you did well.. seriously. But no it isn't libel, pal.. the fact is you attended a domestic violence program, were you there to give a Cooper speech? End of story but nice try. I didn't make it up.. I don't BS. You just aren't that bright are you. Do you have any other charges out there we need to know about, maybe in Washington State. I could have sworn I recall something... I haven't seen this nasty side of you, based on your recent attitude and vile behaviour I think you need another diversion program of some sort... just a suggestion.

I never claimed you were convicted,, you did a domestic violence diversion program or is the newspaper lying? Tell us what a domestic violence diversion program is like, most of us have no idea. What did you learn there?

You attended a domestic abuser program. Did you read the article.

Ok.. I take it back I wasn't specific enough, it was criminal damage related to domestic violence and given your aggressive arrogance I believe it. You agreed to attend a domestic-violence diversion program... What was that like.. did you learn anything. Between you and me, I didn't libel you and in my opinion you still have an attitude issue.

There is no evidence Cooper worked at Boeing. Hahneman spoke english with no accent and traveled through the PNW. You'd know that if you did basic research instead of wasting time spamming.

I just corrected your error. This is what happened before, I corrected your misinformation with facts and you called me troll... you have been calling me a troll for a long time now.. you can't admit you have the facts wrong and your narrative falls apart so you attack the messenger.. you should be thanking me, that error would have been BIG.

This has been common in the Cooper Vortex, it makes people mad, like gold fever, bloated and threatened egos need to be justified. For the record, I think Eric Ulis's Sheridan narrative is fact-less and bogus.. and I congratulate him in selling it, that takes skill and determination. Eric is a great salesman, Cooper researcher, not so much.

Are you the word police,, I can use any words I like. Getting the truth and facts right is my priority... not taking advice from a domestic abuser. Selling a BS Sheridan narrative was your goal from the get go.. you used people with purpose... Congratulations, I am happy for you and can't wait to count all the errors.. then you can move on to your next scam.

Woah, you go with the elitist attitude, have you been drinking? That is the arrogance and condescension we know and may I say love. Debate, you can't debate, when I challenged your crazy theories with facts you ran away and yelled "troll".... "troll" Your Sheridan narrative is garbage, it is so bad it doesn't deserve attention. There are NO facts, what you didn't steal from others is just layers of conjecture and assumptions you wove together with confirmation bias spittle.. You are the CooperCon..

Ouch, such aggression, I must have hit a bullseye. That is the thanks I get for saving your ass and saving you from a massive factual public embarrassment, you may be smarter than G, but you aren't smarter than me... TBAR was not almost an island in Nov 1971 when Sheridan was in Nepal, the flushing channel didn't exist yet, neither did the 400 ft land bridge you claim. oops. Can't wait to see the rest of your pseudo-facts. Send me the script and I'll check for other factual errors for you, no charge. I hope you don't misrepresent my tie research that you stole, it wasn't 1963, I can prove it. Otherwise, good luck with your whatever it is... docu-fiction or something. I am proud of you, you found a sucker. And I never said Tina buried the money on TBAR, that is a lie.

I didn't get the impression he was actively listening for it.. there is no evidence Cooper's chutes or money had a beeper, but the FBI does hide info.. It would be consistent with a McChord chute, Notice though, this doc was handled by Tom Manning, the FBI man in charge of the search... it must have been important. I'll add a reference,, 6 months later hijacker Hahneman got his chutes from Andrews AFB and they had beepers. The beepers had a 24 hour minimum and 15 mile range.

Vancouver Lake flushing channel was built in 1983. TBAR "was" not (almost) an island for Norjak.. The land to the south "was" approx 4500 ft wide at narrowest. (Eric Ulis scrambles to rewrite script) thank me later. What is really interesting is the faint beeper heard west of Vancouver, probably the ALCOA plant. 7:25PM URGENT 11/26/71 TLA TO: – SEATTLE (C164 – 81) FROt-1: PORTLA ND ( 164-41) UNlSUB; HIJACKING OF NORTHWEST ORIENT AIRLINES FLIGHT THREE ZERO FiVE, ELEVEN TWENTTYFOUR SEVENTYONE:” CAA -HIJACKING; EXTORTION 00: SEATTLE. ________________ OREGON AIR NATIONAL GUARD, ADVISED THAT AT APPROXIMATELY THREE THIRTY P.M. TODAY AS HE WAS MAKING APPROACH TO PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AiRPORT IN F-ONE ZERO ONE FIGHTER: HEARD A FAINT RADIO TONE SIGNAL BEING BROADCAST ON TWO FOUR THREE POINT ZERO MC. A FREQUENCY RESERVED FOR EMERGENCY AIRCRAFT RADIO TRANSMISSIONS. SIGNAL FIRST HEARD NEAR EVERGREEN AIRPORT, JUST EAST OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON, THEN HEARD SECOND TIME NEAR REYNOLDS ALUMINUM PLANT WEST OF VANCOUVER. SIGNAL HEARD FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE MINUTES, DURING WHICH TIME __________ ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN RADIO FIX ON AUTOMATIC DIRECTION FINDER EQUIPMENT WITHOUT SUCCESS AS SIGNAL FADED OUT. SIGNAL WAS OF END OF PAGE ONE TYPE TRANSMITTED BY EMERGENCY LOCATED BEACONS CARRIED BY GENERAL AVIATION AND MILITARY AIRCRAFT. NO SUCH BEACONS KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN IN OPERATION, EITHER ACCIDENTALLY OR FOR TEST PURPOSES, AT TIME. FOR INFORMATION. END HANDWRITTEN NOTE “MANNING HANDLING” ---- Evergreen field was East of Vancouver. But, the Reynolds Aluminum plant was near Troutdale East of Government Island next to the Columbia far from Evergreen Airport and very far East of Vancouver. The pilot stated West of Vancouver, ALCOA was the big Aluminum plant West of Vancouver on the Columbia about 4 miles upstream of TBAR. Did the pilot mix up the name of the Aluminum plant.. Alcoa was west of Vancouver but Reynolds was very far East. Since he described Evergreen as East, he was more likely referring to Alcoa as West.. but called it Reynolds by mistake. red line = railroad tracks yellow circle = Alcoa Plant

Robert,, Sheridan's book is between Snow and Sheridan, it really has nothing to do with Shutter.

Would it be worthwhile to check the WSHM chute for DNA in case Cooper did handle it.. It was handled by many since but modern DNA analysis can detect a touch... You might get a dozen profiles... but one might be Cooper.

The harness is a Pioneer "quick fit" date April 1957.. more pics here.. https://themountainnewswa.net/2011/10/25/db-cooper-case-heats-up-again-with-controversy-over-parachutes/