Farflung

Heck, we can’t even assign gender with a 50% hit rate on this thread. Why? Utter lack of reading comprehension, education or grip of a common language perhaps? I dunno. Within two tiny segments of linguistic artifacts is utter discourse regarding the sex of the primary subject. Lemme give ya an example, show whatta mean. The attached file contains some screen shots of this thread where some photos were sent to ‘him’ in one comment. In the next comment the gender of the ‘new’ witness becomes female. Well, OK then. Below that is an excerpt from the article RobertMBlevins posted, where the person who carried the money on board 305 is now a ‘guy’ or ‘man’. I had thought the person who carried the sack of money was nun other than - Sister Tina Mucklow. Who is unmistakably among the most noticeable of females to have ever graced the universe and beyond with her full lips, pixie nose and smoldering eyes. This witness stated that a man carried the money sack and may somehow be in possession of finer details about Cooper? Really?? Really???

I wasn’t endorsing the lack of skinny black ties, just the opposite. So much ‘evidence’ is presented as significant like the black tie being uncommon on Flight 305. I found this bemusing considering what the cockpit crew was wearing that night. Just another paradox of this discussion where in order to make a point, a larger ‘given’ is often ignored. Skinny, black ties being unusual in 1971 is one such example. Additionally, Cooper put on his sunglasses just after showing the first Stewardess his ‘bomb’ and kept them on for the balance of the flight. If this is true, I don’t see how other witnesses could comment on Cooper’s eye color (but they will). I would have expected one (just one) of them to have made some comment about how Cooper looked at them, which they recall because he was wearing sunglasses at night. So far, no such luck. Weird. Even after forty years there is an infantile desire to claim some sort of super secrecy associated with this crime, all the while some school girl teases are inexplicably published on the ‘world wide web’. Weirder. Nothing in this vein will pass any muster outside the Sasquatch, MIB, Roswellian UFO Crashologists and DB Cooper, school of intertwined conspiracies. But it has such amazing stamina. Weirdest.

No matter which of the passengers observed Cooper on one or more or their trips to the facilities, I hope none of them even mention eye color. No matter who ultimately is or has been interviewed about this episode, by the time they would have seen Cooper he was….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxIwRDs1Yc8 Is it strange that these stories which include such painful detail in many areas are oddly devoid of mentioning this fashion accessory when the sun had long sunk deep into the Pacific? Why would Cooper wear these things at that time? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UMUSxBZhjA Is this really a good recipe for a crime? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHa_jqxnn4o Well I still think that was just another fluke. Skinny black ties, dark suits and sunglasses just weren’t that common. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa3RzOWWh80 That proves it and it is verified and confirmed (sans sources of course, I just like using that phrase).

Innocent Man? What would he be ‘guilty’ of exactly? Sitting across the aisle from Cooper, waiting to use the restroom (as was published in the article)? How’s that reading comprehension? Was the title “Wild Assed Guess Here” too vague, oblique or impossibly indecipherable for even the most informed of observer? My computer monitor is flooded with the artifacts of awesome investigation techniques. I guess that Flight 305 was teaming with people (perhaps thousands?) sitting across from Cooper (there are presently at least 3) and waiting to use the lavatory while scanning Tina (something understandable) and the hijacker. Let’s see here, there is now the lawyer from Gray’s book, the man from the article published last August (I did supply a source document) and ‘your’ own super secret witness-ette who has become the Rosetta to who Cooper….. isn’t. Sounds good to me. I would like to take this moment to apologize for adding a link to an article which features a man who sat across the aisle from Cooper and was waiting to use the toilet. What on Earth was I thinking? There are no similarities between the ‘person’ of ambiguous gender identification which Jerry has hinted about and the person who was so maliciously exposed by me and me alone, in an article published on the world wide web. I hate me.

I’m not sure how an attorney’s name, address and phone number got posted in regard to the ‘latest’ Cooper witness. Feeding frenzies are typically not very discriminate or discreet. I don’t dive into a vehicle and drive aimlessly from one half-baked piece of Christian Science evidence to another as it has proven to be an expensive and error induced path to follow based upon my life experiences. But a frenetic approach is commonly viewed as ‘doing something’ therefore is laudable based on nothing more than architecture and the appeal shown by the least informed on the subject. The fact that the person was across the aisle from Cooper AND used the can appears to match another person’s story more closely who may or may not have been in Gray’s book. Here is an article on witness ‘X+1”: http://livermore.patch.com/articles/livermore-man-recaps-encounter-with-db-cooper I’m not as aligned with the practice of taking multiple ‘wild stabs in the dark’ on subjects as I’m concerned of one day receiving one myself; figuratively or literally. At minimum, this latest episode certainly exposes a few weaknesses which I don’t believe were acquired this week.

I didn’t suggest anything about sex regarding what Bernie’s sister association was with the loan. Just that it is stupid for either of them to have engaged in the transaction. Get it? (Would YOU have made such a loan?) Now the chance that Bernie and Kenny were having buttseks in the Airstream (not that there is anything wrong with that) rather than hijacking Flight 305 is a distinct possibility. You have made numerous statements about the location and disposition of Bernie’s penis many times. You are a self proclaimed expert on this subject and I grant you that without the burden of photographs or testimony, both of which you must possess. The release (Bernie’s dink photos) remains a mystery, but I understand your hesitance. Why would Kenny loan someone $5,000 who he barely knew, regardless the source of the money? Was Kenny a monster tard and if so, how could he have pulled off this crime? They simply don’t live together.

RobertMBlevins admits: “I don't know what to tell you about Bernie's sister and the loan. She didn't know KC very well…” Well there you go…… her ‘testimony’ is worth bupkis since she had no idea of his spending or savings (WTF is that?) habits were and the loan is a non-issue. She did not know if he was broke, in fact she somehow had the idea that he had money thus asked for a loan. What is strange is not the loan, but the fact that he made one to a person that did not know him very well. That’s just stoopid. Stoooooopid with extra dumbness and stuff. Bernie was an alleged ‘accomplice’ but had no money to loan to his own sister? I say double bupkis with obvious on top. This needs a fork stuck in it because it sucks as a story. Bernie should have made the loan from his ‘cut’ from being an accomplice in the Airstream provided for the purpose of NOT being a haven for sodomy or butseks. At least according to RobertMBlevins, who tracked the use of Bernie’s penis since 1972. Have I got this latest story straight?

I don’t understand all this Bernie is a criminal because ‘I caught him in a lie’ stuff. There is more than enough creepy behavior to go around for this flock of losers. IF Kenny was sooooo broke that he had to dig ditches to make ends meet….. then what sort of moron would approach him for a loan for the down payment on a house? Moron or crook or fairy tale weaver that is. I mean really, who does this? Oh, you have been on strike and don’t have any money…. ummm…. yeah…. ahhh…. Could you loan me some money for a house? I ask because I’m an idiot. Yeah, that story held water. IF this story is true, then the person who asked for the loan KNEW that Kenny came into some money from nefarious means and is as dirty and filthy as anyone involved. What a cretin. She should be exposed as an accessory after the fact and scorned with ridicule. I certainly would never associate with such a piece of human garbage or social bottom feeder. What a piece of work. Publish her phone number, address and photo so descent people can know what to avoid. I’m getting sick just thinking about what it must have been like talking to such a monster. Good thing I just use a computer and am old and don’t do anything. Gosh.

The Cooper story evolves more than Donatella Versace. There is pattern which is common with DB and Donatella (notice: same monogram). Where a little change or enhancement initially results in a refined outcome then continues to morph into more bizarre renditions. Cooper went from an unsolved crime with a desperate criminal to a fable which includes dozens of strange suspects and stranger suspect handlers. Cooper has gone from man to woman, from bald to Sasquatch-y, from dwarf to giant and skydiver to Whuffo. Donatella has evolved in a parallel fashion, probably due to the same feeble feedback loop used with Cooper data or more likely the utter lack of one in the first place. Yeah, you look good baby, very hot. Flares would give this story some flair; that looks good too. What’s next? Either way, they are both interesting (droll) to watch as they mutate in a way which defies every tenet of Darwin’s theory. They are freaks which are neither repeatable nor sustainable, but are continuously replaced with something weirder. Does the fact that Donatella once served as Mary Travers’ doppelganger whom performed this song solo simply a coincidence? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFMd_xY9HD0&feature=related Any intelligent person can clearly see the staggering and profound implications of this little song in relation to Cooper. Enter the next suspect.

RobertMBlevins proclaims: “I'm expanding on my personal experiences in the investigation, including Dropzone, Ariel, etc.” This sounds very similar (read identical) to the format used by Geoff Gray in his debut opus codex, ‘Skyjack, The Hunt for DB Cooper’. The theme where author becomes part of the story (as they all deny) since the machinations of the research are more interesting (relatively) than the subject matter (Kenny Christiansen). Once Gray realized he was saddled with a loser suspect he turned the table and portrayed his interactions with the various individuals associated with the case. Perhaps the latest review (12 Feb 2012) of the book on Amazon explains it best: “I use to be so interested and intrigued by this story. That is until I read this mess. To a person, everyone involved in this saga can be summed up in one word, pathetic. After reading this I truly hope that this case is never solved and rest be sured I have lost all interest in the subject. I thought this book might provide some answers to this long unsolved mystery. All this book does is throw inane,speculative, conspiracy theories at you which involve people who are truly the dregs of society. Not only was I completely confused after reading this book, but I actually felt a little dirty after being exposed to the seedy "people" that make up this story.” DB Cooper has long been little more than a foil for whatever agenda is being pushed. Bigfoots, Roswell Aliens, Space NAZIs and a bevy of gubbermint conspiracies are but a few gems from the past. Yep, everyone is writing a book which will not answer questions that have not been asked, regarding tangential trivia associated with non-sequiturs, in an eccentric orbit around Flight 305. A bald employee who wore a toupee certainly covers all hair styles, colors and even the lack of the stuff. You are never wrong here. Colored contacts cover any eye descriptions and everyone knows height is impossible to judge. But if a suspect matches some eye witness account then this witness becomes the most reliable and honorable sources of information which will not be questioned (Bohan). This appears to be the new trend in Cooper commoditization. But then, I’m just looking for deception and lies.

How silly of me to assume that people would not confuse which performance of ‘Are You Lonesome Tonight?’ This is not the version with Whitney’s mother as a background singer but three men instead. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EclQVQGqnZ0 Whew, think I caught that just in time. You know how easy fables and lore can be created on this thread. Sorry for the potential confusion.

Had the family pipes for sure and so many advantages from her family. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XflaJjYae_g&feature=related You may remember this version (sort of a Floyd Cramer-esque piano) of a classic by Elvis (or just E!). That backup singer, who was unfazed by Elvis’ laughing, is none other than Whitney’s mother. Small world, smaller industry.

Georger responds with expected petulance: “Rev. Farfluodinni intimates the flight never occurreed at all!” Nope georger, I asked what flight number was used since there was an extremely narrow window of possibilities (code for one) which required a number of dependant variables to fall in place to occur. It’s called validation or vetting and something that was required in my first semester of college and I’m a 2.0000021 GPA graduate of a bottom feeder, institution of higher learning. So you can imagine my shock at the resistance constantly displayed by those who continually regard themselves as intellectual, financial and chick magnet superiors to everyone else. All you have to do georger (for once) is attach a source for the 80 knot winds you have such a diamond cutting, boner for and it will be entered as evidence. Then you can reveal your brilliant solution which so clearly and desperately needs those wild ass winds which you will deny, deny, deny. Until someone bites and then they will be smart and heroic because they have ‘found’ this fact which supports your guess. Isn’t this what is being played out here? Why the deception and false cooperation? You were giving Hominid’s backside a constant ‘cat bath’ until he started to conclude that the weather was nothing neither notable nor extreme. Then you began to use your tongue (OK keyboard) for other purposes and lashed out brutally and savagely at Hominid’s analysis in spite of the sources he included. I mean, I was totally shocked that you would welcome a stranger that you hadn’t groomed with PM’s and flowery compliments that could have been interpreted as rather ‘lavender’ on your part (not). Gosh, I’m so confused.

Duane could have totally made an electronic vibrating girdle which resonates from signals transmitted from VOR stations which were powered by wind generators requiring at least 80 knot winds to turn the prop driven generator. There I said it. I’ve seen it, seen it many times and have all the documents needed to prove this but I don’t have time now to post them even though it is an electronic process which requires but mere seconds to complete. I’m simply too busy to do that even though it took me longer to explain why I’m too saturated with work than it would have taken to complete the task. This makes eternal sense on this thread and in every facet of day to day life. So there. Now could we get back to the supremely intelligent analysis of how Cooper jumped into 80 knot winds wearing a vibrating girdle and why this proves that Duane or whoever was Cooper? Otherwise this will continue on an oblique orbit around the subject, like incest which everyone knows exists but won’t discuss. There were 80 knot winds, blasting the skies of Portland and Duane was more than capable (hello, he used a chicken band radio folks!) of designing, manufacturing and wearing an electronically heated, vibrating, butt plug which was integrated into a girdle and was tuned to the Portland VORTAC. It has NOW become true. True I say whilst my dignity walks tall.

It happened again a few days ago with a man getting killed with a propeller strike. It’s amazing that this happens and typically under some false economy like saving time or some such malarkey. This guy was at the San Diego airport, which has every service a pilot could ever want, and his plane would not start. Apparently he attempted to hand start the engine by throwing the prop like the old timers did on aircraft which had no electric systems. Then ‘something’ happened and this pilot ended up in the morgue. Back in December some other guy was giving night flights so his friends could see the Christmas lights in the area. He landed after a twenty minute ride and has his passenger (23 year old female) deplane with the prop turning so another passenger could enter. He hears someone yelling ‘Stop, Stop!’ and cuts power. In this situation the young woman survives but will spend the balance of her life without a left eye and hand as a result of this ‘accident’. Two prop strikes in two months is truly astonishing. A brand new Hartzell prop is around $12,000 or about as much as what a day in an ICU would cost. What sort of risk/reward equations are these people using? Is it too much Hollywood, where the audience is desensitized from exposure to Delta Force and SEAL operations where Special Ops soldiers are portrayed as constantly jamming magazines into rifles and pulling the charging handles with that distinct metallic crack while yelling ‘locked and loaded’? Then they hold conversations behind the prop wash of a C-130 before launching their secret mission? Here art imitates nothing I have ever observed. Where would these people get the sense that a propeller is a benign force? I’ve never read an accident report without groaning at least three times at the chain of events which lead to these incidents. The woman was flying in an Aviat Husky which takes more effort NOT to walk into the propeller arc than to find a path away from harm’s way. The San Diego incident would have required some hangar bragging about how hand starting a 180 horsepower engine is ‘no big deal’ and it has been done thousands of times before. I’m confident the San Diego pilot knew how to find the ‘sweet spot’ for a cylinder to be on the compression stroke, had the wheels chocked, then yelled ‘switch off’ (just like in the movies), turned the prop to a suitable position taking advantage of leverage while maintaining balance and yelled ‘contact’ with a similar reply before the engine roared to life. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDIiMJn9xuo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSyeiEgA7kk&feature=related I guess people want to believe this so desperately in the first place that there is a suspension of common sense which takes place facilitating such incidents. Losing a life or limb are terribly high prices for saving something which is always in ample supply after the fact. This sort of parable helps me understand what drives an individual to manipulate or fabricate data to validate a pre-selected answer. After reading about the cavalier approach to life with such permanent and painful results, what chance does anything resembling the ‘truth’ have? Might as well have as many experts look at the weather reports as is required to produce the answer a person really, really wanted from the start. Same for an electric girdle which detects VOR stations as this story won’t die until it is verified by anyone….. anyone will do…. just please step forward and place this tale in the depository. Please anyone, I’m begging for some relief on this matter and no one will admit culpability, but they will highlight anyone who will verify this data. You don’t need any qualifications as long as you are willing to agree that the weather was gale force or greater on the night of the hijacking combined with a super secret experimental garment which used antennas to secure flares inside. Oh, and it the girdle had a toupee pocket would make for a better piece of science. Never had a problem doing this many times before and everyone does it anyway. Same with people around a propeller, never had a problem before, therefore I never will. Contact!

Look whose feelings are hurt. You’re so butch. Complaint not filed. I’m a man. Not a complaint filer or serial comment editor denier.

This is an edit for my above comment. Sorry about this (extremely unusual for me): Nothing has changed, so you won’t see an edit time stamp on the bottom of this posting like most of georger’s; because I’m not a coward and don’t say things I want to change minutes later. I’m a man.... always been one. Go ahead and look at what percentage of georger’s comments are edited after the fact. Why? He didn’t mean to confess his desires for the company of family members? Company being code for…. well…. you know. He said something even less intelligent than the edited version (hard to believe, but frequent)? Decide for yourself. Arrogant, self important, megalomaniac and ‘Norman Bates-ian’ are but a few of the adjectives which fit perfectly into the puzzle which fancies himself as heroic.

You are officially in a position where you have NOTHING left, but to lose georger. Knock it off and issue a mea culpa for you recent BS and take the century off to reflect on a lifetime of the same. You have promoted yourself to some plane which can only be achieved through hubris, luck and/or inheritance which you have misidentified as skill. Go ahead and check the theory, you will see what I’m talking about. I knew a psychic (a military flight instructor) who predicted that a ‘student’ would kill himself and others, but his ‘celebrity’ allowed him a pass on a check ride (twice)……. He (the flight instructor) was ultimately proved correct (silently). He will be buried with that experience being ignored. I know why this crap happens and the answer is above your bathroom sink, go look. You are as irrelevant today as you were on your first comment on this and any thread. Shame on you for trying the same type of deception more than once, shame on you, so called (by you) professor.

Exactly georger….. and you don’t have the faintest idea about a bunch of other stuff (beautiful women, success, humility). Know what a ‘bug smasher (bugsmasher)’ is? Know what a ‘Walter Mitty’ is? They represent the parlance of those who are in the ‘biz’ versus those who are too cool for school (shoe clerks). Please, have your specially selected (code for cabana boys) meteorologists analyze the weather based upon Bohan’s testimony which you have a bigger boner for than the cabana boys. The result WILL match the conclusion which you so desperately crave, over and over and over. Continue to ignore those who advise otherwise and keep the poorly hidden attack on data which is self evident. Gawd you’re cool.

You can see, even after reading the article about that walking scum, georger had nothing to say about a teacher who engaged in that practice. Why? Look at the utter lack of outrage from teachers unions or college professors. They all see that…… ‘there but for the grace of God; go them’. Yep, georger thought it was more important to direct me to bed (nice try party boy) rather than comment about what polite society views as abhorrent. One must again ask why? Obviously it must be so common place that it does not stir a single nerve of repulsion, from these long closeted animals who have worked tirelessly to be near children sans the fear of termination.

Why are you ordering me to do that? Waiting there with a spoon I suppose. Original, very original.

But Professor georger has sooooo much to contribute. Yeah, he’s talked about it over and over annnnnnnnd over. I guess when you are a teacher or professor you get or more likely, are born with some sense of entitlement (read tenure) that those of us in the private sector have never had nor thought about because we don’t suck at our jobs. I mean, who in their right mind would fire me if I’m making them bank? That’s right, no one. What sort of teacher would have to worry about termination? Well those who are raging pedos like this piece of work with tenure: http://www.freep.com/article/20120201/NEWS07/202010365/Elementary-teacher-arrested-after-photos-show-children-blindfolded-taped Yep, just make teaching a ‘game’. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djQdI1t9_Ag What say you georger for your colleague and ‘profession’? There’s a new game afoot now isn’t there? I guess you are old school in more ways than one. Tenure equals blindfolded games with kids I suppose. It’s good to be skilled and competent enough to never have worried about such a draconian and pedo creating attribute as tenure (read priest here). I’m proud to be a member of a profession that would, rise as one, and smite such an example of humanity from the planet without any physical evidence. But hey, keep that ‘tenure’ in your contracts because you know you are a loser.

Why are you so 'pee pants' afraid of that silly, little flight schedule georger? So afraid that it manifests in rage and hate and venom spewed from an appendage which must serve as a surrogate for some past fantasy which was never realized. I’m just guessing here (code for- no I’m not). Why did the timetable make you so unhappy? Did it remind you of some forgotten feeding or prepubescent birthday which was forgotten by a mother too busy with her favorite child? I can understand such a feeling, NOT relate in any way, shape or form because I like girls and people; but I can understand where you come from. Let all your rage and hate flow across the screen georger. We can see it and have seen it for years go unabated and without recourse. You are not alone, there are many like you in federal prisons and anger management courses who are destined for federal prisons. Be yourself…… just…. be…. oh please….. never change…… can you promise us that?

Annnnnnnnnnnd……. The FAA weather reports say there were no stinkin 80 knot winds, so using the ‘georger approved’, ethos of consistency (like the transcripts saying the airport is closed), the winds were light and variable with forecast s aloft below 40 knots. Bohan is therefore excluded as tangential and irrelevant, no matter the number of conversations with or data supplied by Bohan’s widow. So has georger written, so it is DONE! Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Why wasn’t the ‘discovery’ of a Continental Airlines time table from 31 Oct 1971, a good job georger? You are always looking for the truth and documented…. ummm…. documents and the time table is dropped at your cyber feet to behold. Praise be the internet! But noooooooooooo……….. You get a monster load of tude and act all, of course the airport was closed at 5:59, and that should trap the 6:10 departures. Weird, really weird and freaky that a time table would cause such a reaction from a ‘self proclaimed’ genius and smarty, McSmart, Smart. I would have assumed that you would be delighted at the very sight of such an artifact which may have even cause you to be engorged, which as you know would be a welcome experience after the last few decades. You bought the ticket, now enjoy the ride. I did not fabricate or counterfeit that time table did I? Do you have proof or evidence otherwise? I will face your data like a man and answer all queries like a manly, man who is hunky and cool; instead of a sniveling, pusillanimous Walter Mitty who sits to pee. So ask away about the source of my data which I already supplied a URL for any and all to review. I am genuine in the questions I ask and the information I seek. Ask me georger what confused or frightened you about the Continental Airlines schedule which I gleaned from cyberspace that caused you to lose control of your bowels before lowering your pants. I’m man enough to answer and not be evasive or run silent.