Farflung

What hubris to tell me you already addressed something I specifically asked for, after you post that utter nonsense about Carolyn Tyner, and her beyond reproach reputation as she is married to a Boulder Cop, a total of 22 times. Twenty two and you did not lament how you already brought that up, I presume because nobody ever asked you for that information. How many times have you posted Kenny’s bank statement (10 -12 examples)? You must be exhausted dragging out that irrelevant image of a bank balance of $200,000, over a quarter century after the crime. Is one to assume that Kenny spent none of the money on his wild spending spree with the four breasted woman? Why do all questions about source references require so many revisions and restatements that it makes the Treaty of Versailles look like a bid on eBay for a Beanie Baby? Is it because the only path of thought is the one you are laying out and as long as there is quiet compliance, then you are happy and feel accomplished? You may have sold yourself a bill of goods there RobertMBlevins. Do you think I would have a ‘special’ interest in this phenomenon involving the mind altering effect the interior of an aircraft may have on height estimation? I certainly don’t know everything, but as soon as the man with a pile of crap in front of him asks me what sort of bread I would like, it is time to go on a diet; a starvation diet.

What can’t be proven is that height is difficult to judge in an aircraft, as reported many, many, many times by RobertMBlevins who refuses to name his source. Third iteration.

Nice work from the 99’s (big surprise again). I measured my entry door and the door from my garage (The Garage-Mahal, as I insist everyone call it) and came up with 69 ½ inches for both (Stanley doors, both pre-hung). I was never a member of a military organization; I was however in the Air Force. Before admittance there was a little ‘ol thing called a physical which had to be passed first. The doctors had you stand on a scale and measured your height so they could reach in the correct bin and grab half a dozen uniforms to throw at your face. They did not take your word for it. So if Kenny did lie on his driver’s license as has been reported, then the US Army also lied in his service record. According to Gray’s book, which some people just love, love, love to quote; Kenny was recorded as being, five foot eight. Well perhaps the Army was part of this future deception where Kenny would go to the DMV and lie about being shorter, because that’s what men lie about. Then the stewardesses got all confused in the fuselage because height is difficult to judge according to….. I guess there are a few more iterations which must transpire before that question can be answered. But so far the score is: Driver’s License – LIE US ARMY – LIE Estimates by eye witnesses – Unreliable due to an undocumented visual illusion. The height of a door’s hinge is about the only thing which makes sense in the universe right now, I wonder why. Oh well.

OK, so perhaps Cooper had an ‘unconventional’ form of locomotion which made it difficult to estimate his height. It ‘could’ happen. I found it very difficult to estimate the height of the person in this video, and imagined Cooper doing pretty much the same thing as he boarded Flight 305. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--4pQX-jnX0 It would be foolish on my part to argue that establishing an accurate height would be difficult in this situation, even though height was exactly the last thing on my mind. So I’ve decided to surrender to science, limited photo interpretation and the American building standards to guide my next experiment. Attached is yet another stepping stone to facilitate the journey towards the truth. Kenny is standing in the doorway of his apartment, which is not the fuselage of an aircraft or the driver’s license upon which he submitted information which was lies, regarding his true height. All one has to do is see the hinge on the door and where it is in relation to the toupee-less head of Kenny. He is barely past the threshold so any distortions should be minimal. Here’s where everyone gets to play scientist if they have the required equipment: A. A Tape measure. B. A Door (roll top garage doors and pocket doors won’t work here, nor shower doors, oven doors, refrigerator doors, cabinet doors, dryer doors, car doors, pet doors, odors, sliding doors, screen doors or medicine cabinet doors) Just a regular, human opens and walks through it door as found in most rooms and entrances to homes. Now all you have to do is take ‘A’ and measure the distance to the bottom of the top hinge on ‘B’. See how easy? But since this is the Cooper thread, be prepared for at least half a dozen iterations before NOT measuring the height of a door hinge, found in most homes. Good luck.

Don’t forget to contact Bruce Smith so he can update that worthless interview where you threw the Co-pilot under the bus because the internet confused you. That way Bruce can issue an amended version which updates the information and identifies you as the offending party who appeared more concerned about hiding the truth than the impact you had on Bruce’s credibility as a reporter. Low, very low; you should publicly apologize and send him beef jerky for nothing more than the raw irony.

Now that we all know who screwed the dog regarding Captain Scott talking to Cooper. It’s time to play another game. Who was the brain dead loser that told you that height is difficult to judge in an aircraft? Not as stupid as saying that Captain Scott talked to Cooper, then dodging the issue for years, but it is still moronic. The stewardess who was 5’ 8” had to look up to Cooper and therefore knew he was taller than her. No weird and freaky optical illusions involved like that idiot told you. What’s his name? Same jerk who said Dan Cooper comics were on Shemya in 1951? You know, that goof ‘historian’ from Northwest. No wonder that airline is defunct, quality personnel everywhere. Don’t make this some long drawn out issue this time, who was the pants peeing, shoe clerk that wanted to be all ‘Sky Stud’ by making up some more shit like height being difficult to determine? Hard to believe it was an airline employee since they know the ‘secret’ markings on the designs separating the compartments. Name this dork so he can be soundly ridiculed, scorned and debased for felony assclownery. Was it Skipp again?

Here’s an article where Special Agent Larry Carr of the FBI of the United States of America, Earth, said: “It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, ‘He’s our guy.’ No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you.” http://www.startribune.com/local/11592341.html?refer=y Then Special Agent Robbie Burroughs FBI spokeswoman for the FBI of the United States of America said, regarding Kenny Christiansen: “He’s not a viable suspect.” But what did Special Agent Burroughs mean by that? Interesting how the stewardesses estimated Cooper’s height which did not involve any silly visual distortions claimed to exist in the fuselage of commercial airliners. Hard to judge indeed. Embarrassing. You can see by the publication date of Halloween 2007, that Kenny had some chlorine thrown on him and was eliminated from the DB Cooper suspect pool. No ambiguity at all. Unless someone is going to get aggressive like Special Agent Carr of the FBI wisely said, which any intelligent person would have to agree with unless they are friendless eunuchs. I just want to stay objective and cool.

It took me a long time, but thanks to all the deflection and over-quoting of Rataczak, I was able to find the source of a Cooper mystery. It has everything; pride, braggadocio, self importance, misused technology, deflection, denial and boundless buttholery. Truly the Mother Lode of BS, hard to believe it was discovered on this thread. I never suspected because everyone is so honest and accurate and humble; so you can imagine my surprise. Anyway…… thanks to RobertMBlevins constantly reminding everyone how he interviews LIVING witnesses and carefully records their conversations with electronic devices, so they can be loaded on the internet for everyone to hear once and for all, we now have proof. Thank you RobertMBlevins for recording your insightful and firsthand interviews with LIVING witnesses so all the world can bathe in the afterglow of your genius. For you have been quoted and electronically documented on the very thread on - 31 May 2010 at 2:24 PM, post #17669, of which an extract of attached which clearly states: “As for the book’s statement that Captain Scott left the cockpit and sat next to Cooper to ascertain the reality of the bomb, Robert said……..” This is so exciting; I just had to induce a delay for some extra goose bumps to form…. “that he got that from Porteous, who got it from Bill Rataczak in a taped phone conversation.” Oh mah gawd! BUSTED!! It was Rataczak who made up that crap! So if Rataczak said the aft stairs opened whatever inches, then it is CRAP! Pure CRAP, because Scott never left the cockpit. RobertMBLevins now is your time to shine! Post a link for all of us to hear the debauched treachery of Rataczak as he told Porteous (a good, honest and decent man in your view) how Scott looked at Cooper’s bomb. He deserves the humiliation of making up such a tall tale and expecting a pair of well meaning, but doltish, individuals to actually digest that crap. Shame, SHAME, I shout and will continue to comment on such asshattery for this is an outrage against all things descent, like freedom, puppies, beer and women. We all anxiously wait to hear your taped conversation which you have constantly used a an earmark of your quality of work.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTSAZAHiOa8&feature=fvwrel In the spirit of selecting those things which only support a pre-selected conclusion while at the same time suppressing any and all data to the contrary, I found this article which should make two camps happy. Attached is an article which quotes another DB Cooper letter sent to newspapers AND lays claim to Cooper wearing a toupee. This will and must be used by those solely focused upon Cooper writing confession letters taunting police with vague clues, and by those with suspects who are bald as bowling balls. What a bonanza! I look forward to seeing this article posted again and again and again.

Mr. Science, I’m an expert DB Cooper researcher who just happened to have spent my high school years wearing a size 30 butt helmet and a Star Trek shirt so I would never know the gentle touch of a girl. I have a theory about how Cooper exited the aircraft and would like some advice on the best way to brag about what I and I alone, know to be the one true solution. Can you help Mr. Science? Mr. Science would be glad to help now that he has a moment between girls. Your subject is one ripe with hubris, ego and abject fantasy cobbled by those who struggle in restrooms which have no attendants. They yearn for recognition for things which have already been demonstrated many times before. Mr. Science suggests that you read the reports on hijackings where there was a successful egress. Heady, McNally and McCoy would be good examples for the 727 and LaPoint could be used to compare and contrast the DC-9’s stairs. You see, nothing is new here and there is ample data available to those willing to look. Considering how you don’t have any time being used in the company of women, you should find your answer relatively quickly, if you can do a Google search or submit a FOIA to the FBI. Mr. Science has to confer with Jennifer now, so good luck and remember when you need a logical, simple and honest answer, you can always ask Mr. Science!

I guess my problem is; I think too much. Why can’t I just grab whatever serves my purpose at that time, without regard for the next step downstream? Who cares that Tena Bar is upriver from Paradise Point? I want Kenny to throw the money into the river there and the river’s direction of flow is another angle I won’t release. Plus, I don’t want to have to think about Kenny throwing the money in the river at Paradise Point Park when I want to reference how Tom Kaye threw a packet of money in the water and it fanned immediately which proves that the money was buried by Kenny. Or thrown into the river by Kenny who wasn’t engaged in forbidden mens-love, with a man he spent years and years with, alone on a frozen island, near the end of the Aleutian chain, where there was no buttseks; just drinking where they would get together at the bar and sing showtunes. I also won’t let the fact that there is no evidence what so ever to support the trailer was used for the hijacking stop me from bringing it up over and over again. Cuz I’m consistent.

Here’s some logic which could only exist and survive on this thread because it isn’t burdened with the frailties of the sting brought on by embarrassment or the loss of dignity. Try and follow along with this logic path ripped from the pages of DB Cooper: A. The DNA on the tie may not be Cooper’s but his wife or girlfriend who helped dress him. B. The Playboy Letter mentions a black tie and was sent to the newspaper BEFORE the black tie was public knowledge. I’ve got boners! C. The DNA from the Playboy Letter should be compared to Sheridan Peterson since he used the phrase ‘The system that beats the system’ and no doubt sent the letter which hints about the black tie! You’re a dead man with this sort of investigative prowess Sheridan or should I say Dan? See what happened? It’s only three statements which were delivered separately by someone who is playing the role of ‘truth seeker’ and turbo genius. Lemme break it down….. Hammer time. Well, if the DNA on the tie is from a wife, then it can’t be Sheridan because his wife was in Nepal. Or perhaps during Sheridan’s brief re-entry into the US with his duplicate passport, he meets a woman who becomes his girlfriend, who helped dress him before the caper, where he leaves and she never sees him again (cough, oh my god can anyone be this thick? Cough, cough). The tie MUST be Cooper’s since the Playboy Letter mentions a black tie so it is now inextricably linked via this warped logic. But the DNA on the tie isn’t Cooper’s so that doesn’t matter, but the tie does belong to Sheridan because he mentioned it in the letter he sent to Playboy which will have his DNA on the stamp or envelope seal because Cooper DID lick his own stamps. Unless the DNA on the letter DOESN’T match Sheridan, then he had someone else lick them. But Sheridan IS DB Cooper. Yep, the integrity of this thread has maintained a level of ridicule and scorn which is most certainly deserved, if it was delivered at an order of magnitude greater than in the past.

Skipp the same person who had Captain Scott talking to Cooper and thought Paradise Point Park was the ultimate hide out for Bernie and Kenny to not have buttseks, is going to search for Sheridan? How droll, how very, very droll. I guess your reservations about working with someone you have never met and is on the opposite coast has passed for some reason. Is it because you are ‘stuck’ in a five year contract in the role of his bitch or equally subservient position(s)? It’s just typically inconsistent and weird. Just like how Sheridan was certainly the author of the Playboy letter because it has mention of “The system that beats the system” and somehow mentions a black tie, although that remains visible to just one person. But now the number of letters has suddenly swollen to four (me so surprised) in something that should not be viewed as a Hail Mary play by someone who is utterly checked out and desperate enough to squander resources on wild assed guesses. Please, don’t let the cat out of the bag that the FBI has dozens and dozens of Cooper letters, the nation is in enough financial trouble.

I believe that was georger’s point regarding the use of the search box. Here we are on a thread with thirty five thousand comments on the subject of DB Cooper, with every sane and lunatic theory assembled for all the world to review, should the world be so starved for a cerebral aneurysm. So with all the investigative genius and self proclaimed research abilities, why can’t anyone find the title of Sheridan’s book, the URL to the book or his autobiography written for an unsuccessful run for public office? It would seem that would have been quite simple to obtain. That is all.

I think this information on Sheridan was posted by someone earlier, if only there was a way to check….. must reach search dialog…… strength fading fast….. keyboard difficult to arrrrrhhhhhghhhhghhh…slsdhd$@%#@

I notice there is a propensity for the ground pounders to use MPH and miles based upon what they presumably see from their Prius or Chevy Cruze. In the interest of accuracy and because the two rarely mix (WX reports), I’ve generously crafted an explanation. You’re welcome. Way, way back in time, someone who would be referred to as having too much time on his hands or having ‘no life’, decided to measure the planet. By then the state sponsored concentration camps and gallows were closed to those who dare suggest the Earth was spherical, which allowed this advancement of science. He cut the sphere in half and named the incision, the equator leaving a northern and southern hemisphere. Each hemisphere was festooned with 90 degrees of latitude from the equator to the pole which was at the apex of the halves. Each degree was subdivided into 60 minutes which has a 1:1 exchange rate with a nautical mile or roughly 6076.12 feet. A foot is 12 inches long just like every foot you’ll meet, except a woman’s, which is always a dainty little size 6. Now there is a standard measure which can be used when traversing Earth. Speeds based upon this measurement are called Knots which is slang that makes someone who is already cool, even cooler. The nautical mile was shortened to mile because humans are lazy when they speak, and develop jargon to ease communications or feel superior. So flying due north at 120 knots will take 30 minutes to travel 1 degree or 60 nautical miles. See how easy? So when I see knots and MPH being used interchangeably, a little piece of me is amused just before it dies. Same for miles being mixed with nautical miles. So where did it go so horribly wrong? As usual you can bet there was some royalty involved in this one. So like 9,000 years ago some queen in England wanted to invent her own mile and declared it would be eight furlongs or you should find yourself with a hemp necktie. Being loyal (obsequious), the church and subjects agreed to this measurement and used it thus creating a parallel universe of miles. Oh thanks your highness, love ya queenie, just luuuuuuuv yah! Kissy, kissy, muah, muah! (bitch) So the Colonies use this statute mile to mark and measure what would become the greatest nation the world has ever witnessed, and it was all done sans royalty. Cuz Americans don’t have a royal family, except for the Kardashians. While inventing wheat thrashers to feed the world and light bulbs so they could see what they were eating, we took a break from being awesome, and invented airplanes. Just after the first flight, the Wright brothers decided they needed someone to operate these aircraft. They decided to use ‘Cool and hunky men that were honest and humble chick magnets’ but shortened the name to - pilot. They naturally used the nautical mile for distance measure and knots for velocity. Then there were around 50 or 60 years of unpolluted and continuous coolness, experienced and enjoyed by all in the field of aviation. Then some marketing genius decided to put an end to that shit, and try to attract people to aviation who couldn’t handle a different measurement system. Enter MPH in the cockpit. We may not have royalty, but that doesn’t stop us from making royal screw ups. Now we have MPH on the airspeed indicator so the wannabe can be comforted that it’s just like his car, except time won’t match the nautical miles on aviation charts and DME is a nautical measure with slant range. Calgon take me away. Now the cockpit has some visual clutter with the airspeed indicator chocked with rings and arcs which have to be converted in some utterly unnecessary mental gymnastics. All this so Mr. ‘Works at some job where he secretly prays for the early arrival of sweet death’ guy, can brag how his Cessna does 110. Never mind that it’s 110 MPH because that’s a larger number than 95 knots and that’s what’s important, having the ‘bigger one’. So there you have it in a nutshell, the painful evolution of the mini-mile and how it has been misapplied in aviation. The number nine is pronounced ‘niner’ as not to be confused with the German word for ‘NO’, and because niner sounds cool to say and chicks dig it.

Robert99 your phased approach with various construction sites and therefore probabilities is the most logical I’ve seen so far. Unfortunately that typically means a very short lifespan around here. There was some Russian or Ukrainian skydiver who took one step beyond in the relatively developed area of Perris, CA (you would have to see this place to appreciate relatively developed) and with choppers and dogs and equipment with little flashing lights they were not able to find the guy (a farm worker noticed some fabric months later). I get the feeling that people have some vision of a person making a massive mess when they smack the ground because they view themselves as the center of the universe. The footprint is extremely small and things which go through ‘rapid deceleration’ don’t resemble themselves. Same with this talk about bodies floating on the Columbia. Big difference between Cletus having too many mimosas while on his Chris-Craft, then tripping over his own feet while trying to undo his fly and landing in the drink, going hypothermic and taking a water nap. Bodies falling from 10,000 feet may (just may) have a different appearance when they hit the water with the intestines getting completely ruptured. Case study of the number of bodies from Flight 007 showed very few end up floating. I’m sure 377 and about a thousand other jumpers could relate just what they were exposed to as they jumped from a DC-9. I’ve been at the aft of a C-130 with the ramp down and can say I have experienced more wind and noise on this thread. But I’m sure someone will feel the need to portray the experience as something so unique, that they are the only ones on Earth to possess such expertise.

That’s what I’m not so sure about Mrshutter45. With all those mens and their huge equipments just mauling and clawing at the bed, of the river, would anything have been noticed by the glistening mens? They were likely contracted to strip everything on that island bare (oh my), and had to transport the overburden somehow. From 1970 to 1989 there were four marinas constructed so all the Portland area pirates would have a place, to slip their sloop (I feel faint again). Someone strapped to one of those throbbing beasts for eight hours a day is not looking for any suspicious debris and the view is not like that in one’s car. How many murder victims found their final resting place in a municipal dump? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdov2UIjUpY I’m not saying it did happen, but ignoring something as vast as that project which is directly below V-23, in favor of something less likely (more complex) violates Occam in ways I’ve only dreamed about. How was that overburden transported? Heaped in a barge and moved by Tena Bar? I don’t have a clue and was soundly told, with amazing authority, that there was no clamshell dredging on the Columbia and the Army Corps of Engineers is the only organization to do that anyway, so there. This was going on while I was gazing at aerials of Tomahawk Island being molested with all those mens and their equipments. But that was over a year ago, so it has been erased from reality again. I don’t put a high probability on such a situation, but I most definitely assign a value greater than zero. But with all the panic and unbridled fear of the subject, it’s best to stay buried, deep in some dark recess. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyl5DlrsU90&feature=related

The reason no one agrees with any two things is because they already have their answer and refuse to admit to this simple fact. There’s information which is confidential and for some bizarre reason given greater weight for being accurate. If you already know the answer to who Cooper is, then I don’t understand why you would waste one second on this thread, if not to sell something. I wouldn’t take a history course to learn who fought in the Battle of Big Sandy Creek if I already knew the story. So why are the Kenny and Sheridan torchbearers even on this thread? That makes the LEAST amount of sense. Unless there is some warped view that keeping everything else in chaos makes their candidates more viable. I’m open to any and all subjects that can be supported by fact, science or theorem. As soon as some subject is discussed which does not align with some pre-existing belief system, it then must be killed. Killed. No source attribution or evidence, killed. None asked for either, killed. Could Cooper’s body have pranged into the environs of Tena Bar? That money find supports that line of thought. Could Cooper have been preserved on Tomahawk Island before being dislodged by heavy construction? The fact that Tomahawk is directly below V-23 and the massive construction efforts support this also (also). Could Cooper have jumped and drifted to Guam? There aren’t any case studies or scientific data to support such a theory. Ultimately if I believe that Cooper is some guy named Dave who survived, then I must kill any discussions which involve his death. Kill it. Same for those who ‘know’ he died, any suggestion of surviving must die. This is the dirty tango which has been repeated for years under the self proclaimed banner of searching for the truth. How loud was Flight 305? I’d say the same level as Heady’s, LaPoint’s, McNally’s and McCoy’s aircraft. Were any of them disturbed by the jets? Does anyone ever try to check existing data first? Why can’t anyone get an FBI file on those losers? Too un-sexy, I guess.

Well lookie, lookie here RobertMBlevins. I was proven wrong with some source attribution and stopped from making a raging fool out of myself. I now have two avenues to pursue….. A. Deflect, deny and minimize as a simple misstatement, which anyone could make and go on to say how it is all moot and trivial anyway. This is the most popular approach, but should I use it as part of the group dynamic? Hmmmm………………. B. Wow, I really screwed the dog with that statement and feel purple in the face. This is an unpleasant sensation and will serve me well in the future, thus guiding my actions should I be desirous of NOT feeling this loss of dignity again. This WILL be of a long term benefit as I will be more careful about what I rush to judge and may take pause and crosscheck the data. At minimum RobertMBlevins, I thank you for the correction and facilitating my intellectual development by exposing the sophomoric error which I crafted so effortlessly. It’s almost like this stuff is work and not some game involving trumping, manipulating or beating someone to the punch. I will pledge to use this lesson to become a better person and perhaps pass this experience on to someone who thirsts for the truth with honor. Yep, I’m going with A. So what, the investigating officer is no longer relevant and it’s just some silly side note at best. Move on.

No need to be afraid of saying anything ‘stupid’ 377; that goes on constantly with gold mines and private aircraft and rivers sucking the Pacific Ocean dry. Let’s not overplay the sensitivity card when some others were working just as hard at dulling and blunting the forums leading edge. Nope, I have a problem not with being silly, mistaken or even felony stoopid; it is deception, manipulation and steering that crosses me. Strange how not a single person has ever owned up to being a first class BS shoveler. Not one. Yet when I ask for a source or quote or any attribution for the tiniest thing, all of a sudden everything becomes trivial or misspoken where before it was used over and over and over. Wonder why. I’d say check out Proverbs 28:1 and there may be an answer. But if you think inferring that black ties are mentioned in the Playboy letter, the DNA on the tie is just as likely a woman’s, the capital of Kentucky is pronounced Lew-wee-ville and the eye can discern the human form at 10,000 feet, then please associate your reputation and education with those statements and support them. What use is sitting on the side and doing nothing while KNOWING different (with a source)? As has been my life’s experience, when a person has made a genuine mistake they acknowledge it, display some type of embarrassment and actually thank whoever for the correction. This leaves the other side of the pendulum swing. The dark side, if you will. When confronted with the obvious. For example, I was watching some sort of game warden documentary, on one of the animal mating channels. A pair of California wardens found a mountain lion’s GPS collar in the ding weeds and used their computers to trace where the cats last heartbeat was recorded. They drive into the Santa Cruz Mountains, down some dirt road to the future asshat’s; excuse me, suspect’s trailer. Knock, knock…. Yes? Did you shoot a mountain lion? So the innocent, sweet, shirtless suspect says after a loooong pause. No. That’s about as terminally stupid as you can be where you’re sitting in the woods alone and some game wardens ask a direct, pointed and painfully precise question, which would clue in the densest, dumbest, oxygen to carbon dioxide converter, that they MUST have some powerful evidence. But in spite of the free preamble and knowing full well what he did, Mr ‘As Featured On TV As A Creep Forever, His Parents Must Be Proud’ guy, decides to lie. What a total loser. My life’s experience has these people showing anger while portraying themselves as victims, all the while knowing full well what they were doing. Issue a mea culpa and apologize? Never. Psychopaths can’t do that. In the face of overwhelming evidence, up to and including video, they will deny, deflect and minimize. I don’t know who would actively seek being around such individuals, as a man is judged by the company he keeps. Perhaps it’s better to just keep quiet and let everyone stay stupid about Frankfort. I dunno.

RobertMBlevins quoted a source with: “Retired FBI agent Fuhrman (sic) was there and we talked about how the money at Tena Bar might actually support the idea the hijacker survived the jump, and guess what...wait for it...don't faint now...he AGREED with my concept that finding three bundles of the money together in the exact same spot, with nothing else being found might be evidence that the money was a plant. If you don't believe me, you can ask him yourself. He's the agent who interviewed the witnesses in Seattle, the passengers.” Once again another Cooper expert is leading their efforts with their chin. I’ll assume (assuming here) that “RETIRED FBI AGENT” Fuhrman is one, Mark Fuhrman; who is the former LAPD detective who perjured himself during the O. J. Simpson trial. He was never in the FBI, which in turn makes it difficult to ‘retire’ from the organization. But as has always been the case, RobertMBlevins was rendered ‘title blind’ and used a clear piece of deception to lead with his statement. Check his statement by calling the former “FBI” agent yourself, or the Northwest historian who said Dan Cooper comics were on Shemya in 1951, or ask the woman who was the ‘First to drive four Clydesdales abreast', or ask the woman who is married to a cop from Boulder, or ask the ‘CEO’ of AB Seattle who is ‘Chief’ of a tribe of zero, it never stops, he never learns. So someone posing (a poser) as an FBI agent agreed with RobertMBlevins and that is the proof he wants to flaunt like Captain Scott talking to Cooper during the flight according to another quality RobertMBlevins find. Just like everything else there will be denial, deflection and bet your britches….. minimization to follow what was clearly embellishment, deception, inflation and third degree buttholery.

Sailshaw proved his cognitive ability with: “I say: The DNA on the tie and tie clasp are not know to be from DB Cooper and could have been from his girl friend that dressed him the morning of the caper.” Where does one begin with this? So sailshaw wants the world to know that the DNA from the tie and clasp is not capable of even narrowing down the person’s gender. Astonishing. Truly astonishing. Mmmm good banana, gooood banana. Other than TV (where America gets 99.999% of its education) I’ve not witnessed this ritual where the female of the human species constantly assists the male with donning his neckwear. It was used as a vehicle for conversation on ‘Leave it to Beaver’ so that makes it part of reality. I’ve never been ‘helped’ with my ties, shoes or any activities in the bathroom, but then I’m young and strong where things like Depend undergarments are the punch line to a joke, instead of being framed in a euphemism of ‘auxiliary butt warmer’ which sailshaw is so familiar. B-a-n-a-n-a good. Sailshaw continues to dazzle with: “To compare the DNA from the stamps/envelope flaps with Sheridan Peterson would show that Sheridan was not in Nepal as his perfect alibi indicated. Caught in this lie to the FBI he could be sent to jail for the rest of his life or bargain with to get him to confess to the DB Cooper crime and solve this old puzzler.” Oh dear, now I have navigate this warped and twisted wreck which is posing as a dung heap. If only it actually looked that good. I’ll try to monkey around with it as see what can be made of it, because I’m cool. Apparently sailshaw has always held that whoever created this ‘Playboy letter’ IS DB Cooper. For you see his is willing to send Sheridan to ‘Camp Pounded Ass’ for the rest of his life if his DNA matches that which in on either the stamps or envelope flap. I feel this explains sailshaw’s venom, anger and terminal butthurt when he tried to infer that a black tie was mentioned in the Playboy letter, and was called out for conduct becoming a douche. Hey remember the girlfriend or wife or whoever that handled Cooper’s tie? You should, I just wrote about it a few paragraphs ago, but apparently girlfriends LOVE to help with ties and HATE to lick stamps or envelopes. That sort of behavior is however still practiced by some lower species who ooh oohhhhh ahhhh ahhhhh eeeee eeeee EEEEE EEE! Ahem, sorry about that, whew that was a big one. Be that as it may, girlfriends will help with ties but are worthless when it comes to any sort of licking. Here’s another thing which could NOT happen. Sheridan couldn’t have created the letter in Nepal (I know, just go with it a little) then sent it to someone in Portland to mail for him by the first of December, which is more than a week after the crime. NO, no, it’s not possible I say. If any DNA matches that envelope then you have Cooper. It’s all so clear once I remove any reason and begin with Sheridan as the guilty person. Plus I’m sure those apes in the FBI don’t have any sort of documentation from the State Department, which verifies Sheridan’s departure from the sovereign soil known as the United States of America or the soil of any protectorate or territory. I’m so cool that when I travel overseas, no passport is required and no problems are created by not having one. If you have your passport stolen while in a foreign country, don’t worry about it, just show up at the airport and tell the ticket agent you’re wicked late. It always works. Well it sure looks like the Cooper case has been cracked once again with little more than some logic, pluck and a displaced sense of ability. Why those FBI people insist on buggering up this case is beyond me since sailshaw has all the information needed to blow the lid of this case, the way Jimmy Olsen would have found a scoop for Superman. Has anyone actually seen sailshaw and Superman together? I’m guessing they never will and for good reason.

You guys are correct in assuming the letters could have been processed for all anyone knows. It’s this silly presumption that all four letters ARE from Cooper and how one contains information not known to the public if you make seven or eight assumptions. So let’s assume Cooper is a mastermind criminal who rages against the machine known as the United States government for a moment. Now Cooper, the mastermind can’t find the correct postage to mail a letter which he has constructed entirely from…. Oh what were they…. The Economist?... No, ahh…. US News and World Report….nope that wasn’t the periodical…. ummm Mother Jones…. gosh what was that magazine that oozes intellectual rebel and independent thinker, favored by engineers designing the system that beats the system? Of course….. Playboy. Yes, Playboy would be the natural choice by someone who isn’t some ‘Joe Six-pack’ jerk-off who can’t find an 8 cent stamp, looking to play some beer fueled prank. Cooper was so careful to have his handwritten note returned that it makes sense he would now expose his penmanship by addressing the envelope. Plus he would imbed secret messages associated with the ads and articles from which he created his missive. And what was Cooper’s SECRET message? That he drank bourbon, wore a tie and smoked. Newsflash DB, the entire planet already knew that, so thanks a million Captain Obvious. If he really wanted to set the news wires on fire, he should have mentioned that missing $5,800 or where he hucked that placard, but nooooooooo, he decides to admit to well dressed, smoking and drinking. Then Cooper would do the exact same thing, only entirely differently, by making his next letter from some newspaper which has no hidden messages, which proves just what a master genius he is. Who else would go to such lengths to hide a message, then do virtually the same thing without any subtext or message? Only DB Cooper, of course! Gosh, he sure is a smart one, that for sure.

Straight from the DBCOOPERDECODED web site which you give such credence sailshaw. It’s a leading ‘cold reading’ which is favored by fortune tellers and psychics advertising the ability to speak with the dead on the high numbered channels on cable TV. I did not reference this activity, you did and got caught, the character ‘W’ is NOT a tie. Now you want to deflect how I added some attribute when I say they are all malarkey since they are fruit gleaned from a poison tree. That letter makes no mention of any tie, but you see one somehow. A rational thinker would compare the DNA from the envelope or stamps to the DNA on the tie first, but you wisely want to compare it to Sheridan…..weird. Don’t worry your bias is well hidden. I need to take a pill now.