georger

[skyjack71] Another article over the yrs ID'ed one found skull as an indian woman. G replies: Thats correct.

I vaguely remember this. Sluggo posted about it years ago. I dont remember the dispensation except it was not DB Cooper, I guess. Its probably buried in the thread. We can do a search and see -

Mainly I questioned the email because Georger claimed it came from an *alleged producer* at Decoded...but refused to name this person. He was either a producer or he wasn't. I think it's total BS all the way. Then the email he produced was redacted worse than a government doc on Roswell or the Kennedy Assassination. Give me a break. It wasn't like I was going to contact this producer you know. But Georger probably figured out pretty quick that IMDB would list the names of ALL cast and crew for every episode of Decoded. So...it would be an easy matter to determine if the email-er was ACTUALLY WITH THE SHOW. That has not been proven of course since no person was named. Besides, I could tell from the wording of the message it was very unlikely to have been created by a producer on the Decoded show. Let him UN-redact the name and if that name appears on the IMDB list, then I will believe him. Otherwise, no. I already know all the producers and most of the crew from the Cooper episode. Some of us still keep in contact through Facebook. None of them would write a silly message like that one. They all believed that the Cooper episode was the best of the entire series. They could be right. It was the highest-rated one of the season. I didn't say I don't trust anyone here. I said I don't trust EVERYONE who regularly posts. This is because I know two of them were involved in seriously nasty comments to outside Cooper articles, I mean REALLY bad stuff. But to keep the peace I decided not to name them. But when people do that, well...you know...I have to be cautious on what I say publicly. Comes with the territory in Cooperland I guess. I'm no longer angry about it, just more cautious. Think we can move on from Blevins/KC stuff now? I'm sure many find it boring. Sometimes even ME. To Robert99: Did I SAY there was impropriety in the sale of Margie's ranch? No. I said I would give the benefit of the doubt on that. Where do you get this stuff anyway? I said I wondered why Margie instructed the bank officer to not reveal her present whereabouts. I just wondered about it. And stop saying it's because of me. I told Margie in October 2010 we were finished with interviews. And I never tried to contact her again. Whatever reason she did that with the bank officer, it wasn't because of me. If I had to take a guess, (and it's strictly a GUESS) I would say maybe her ex-husband. After he kicked down the door the month after Kenny died and stole all that stuff, she actually installed padlocks and hasps on doors INSIDE the house. I was amazed she would feel so threatened as to do that, but she did live a bit off the beaten track. I don't think I put it in the book, but the first time I went to her house, she answered the door with a shotgun in hand.

The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner. Blevins must be a very busy fellow. Robert99 Do you see anything of interest in the WHS document, or is it too early to tell ? For me at least, it is a bit to early to tell. I have been through it but want to compare it in detail with the other transcripts. But from what I have seen so far, I think it is going to make an excellent contribution to the Cooper database. Hopefully, I will be able to devote more time to this starting Wednesday. Robert99 agree -

The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner. Blevins must be a very busy fellow. Robert99 Do you see anything of interest in the WHS document, or is it too early to tell ?

So "here at AB" AB's best witness Margie has vanished? You/AB say her lawyer is a crook. Are you implying her lawyer or someone else has brought harm to Margie? Or is this just one more Blevins/AB straw man, being floated to see what floats or sticks to a wall? Should someone call authorities? Will NPR break the news that Margie has fallen to fowl play because you passed that info to NPR rather than calling the cops!? If 'Luuuuucy...you got some 'splainin to do...' who or what is Luuuuuuucy .... and are you saying Margie is the victim of foul play? Something doesn't make sense here. What are you saying!?

I'm done with that. But a guy does have the right to defend himself against unwarranted character assassination from obviously phony sources. On a more Cooper-related note, (even though I've seen posts about spamming NPR regarding their upcoming KC investigation) this is what NPR plans to do: First, they're not coming to see me until they finish. Second, they will be interviewing the available witnesses and doing their own research. Third, I have no control over this or any further imput except at the last. Finally, the results will be in the form of a radio program I suppose. I will let you know how it progresses. I get the idea we are looking at a program to be broadcast at least a couple of months out, not like next week or anything. Unless you are afraid or something, you should WANT this program. They might find out that KC wasn't the guy, you know. Or that it cannot be proven. I am well aware of this possibility, which is actually MORE likely to happen than anything positive regarding whether Kenny was Cooper. no comment - just proof you demand. now be quite for a change, Guy!

Look what came to MY inbox today: 'An alleged Director addresses the tactics Blevins uses at Dropzone' ***'We found Blevins to be forthright and honest, even when he is under attack at Dropzone. In fact, all of us think he's the greatest thing since Gouda cheese and zippers. Not only do we believe that Kenny Christiansen was the hijacker, but that his main squeeze Gayla is the most beautiful woman over the age of fifty we've ever seen...' And if you believe that was a REAL email, then I have some beachfront property in Arizona that may interest you... Real as Rain. Keep feeding the fire.... (attachment) But we now know where you real motives have been all along. Not DB Cooper. Not the case. But a damned movie script just like Lyle. Content be damned!

+1. Have a good day.

Hey...what is good for the goose is good for the gander. And you cut out the part where I said WHY I wouldn't reveal the names of the current posters at DZ who made some of the comments. It's because it wouldn't accomplish a thing except trouble. So...how about going on the record then? Do you believe that Georger actually received that email he quoted from an *alleged producer* at Decoded? If so, why? Seen any name attached to it? Does it sound real to you? Will you just agree with it because it's anti-Blevins, without asking for proof? I thought you were big on proof and documentation. Maybe not, I guess. How about a response that doesn't involve some kind of double standard? I'll tell you what. If someone posted up an alleged email like that about anyone here, I would have responded the same way. I think you should look at it again. Does it read to you like it was created by anyone with half a brain? I think not: 'We'. 'Us'. LOL Blevins your trolling has reach absurd levels again - in case it matters to you.

Watched your vids. Lets see if I can sum them up: Cooper's plane went right over here. Cooper landed then hopped a Cessna north. Had a wet suit. Jet ski. Cessna. Oh, and obviously young trees you say are one hundred years old. Trails that go back to .... Columbus? (or Pleistocene) Are you the Vancouver guy who said several years back that each of Cooper's chutes came with a self-inflating life boat (and wet suit) ? Have I missed anything? Welcome to Drop Zone.

Sounds like the person has actually been reading the thread and has made an obvious observation. Georger, I seriously doubt Blevins could be that objective and the wording does NOT fit the Blevins we all have come to know. Why would Blevins himself...create such a statement? Remember Blevins is like a spoiled child who does bad things and then storms off out of the door when things do not go his way....but, all he has done is walk into the closet! oh I can assure you Blevins did not create this - what Im having a problem with here, is believing anyone could make such elementary mistakes over the interpretation and meaning of basic realty documents. Obviously someone not familiar with basic transactional docs (in life!). I took Blevins at his word for these transactions. however thought from time to time: 'this or that's peculiar'. Then Smokin actually looks at the docs, and .... Are we sure Kenny was a male? Maybe that needs examination?

No mutilations for me. I love animals. You just posted an entire quote allegedly from an alleged producer on Decoded. I don't believe a word of it. I think you typed the whole thing up yourself. Yes. I think you MADE THE WHOLE THING UP. This: ***'An alleged Producer addresses this tactic he has witnessed Blevins using here on Dropzone, saying: 'We are aware that there are multiple suspects in the case, backed by certain people. This one fellow, Robert Blevins, wrote a book, but we don't see his co-author Skipp Porteous ever coming to his rescue. It seems that Mr. Blevins can't keep his stories straight... keeps changing his pitch and by now who is listening? While Mr. Blevins appears to have no problem calling everyone else's suspect a "fabled" account, it seems rather clear to us that the real fable is the shifting accounting Mr. Blevins gives of his own suspect. There is an abundancy of proof of this, coming straight from Mr. Blevin's own contradictory writings and postings which are prolific on the Dropzone...' Face it. These are your OWN words, not a quote from a producer. Tomorrow is Sunday. Sunday is church and the confessional for you. You're not much on semantic analysis are ya! A two year old would not think this was my fucked up proto-Emnglisch! I merely copied from an email - copy/paste. Sorry dude. Face what you say you can face ..... Who is the "real" RobertMBevins? ..... "We are aware that there are multiple suspects in the case, backed by certain people. This one fellow, Robert Blevins, wrote a book, but we don't see his co-author Skipp Porteous ever coming to his rescue. It seems that Mr. Blevins can't keep his stories straight... keeps changing his pitch and by now who is listening? While Mr. Blevins appears to have no problem calling everyone else's suspect a "fabled" account, it seems rather clear to us that the real fable is the shifting accounting Mr. Blevins gives of his own suspect. There is an abundancy of proof of this, coming straight from Mr. Blevin's own contradictory writings and postings which are prolific on the Dropzone." ps: I will probably catch hell for having used this (copied and pasted from an email) here! But what the hell. All Things Considered (NPR) the guy won't mind! If he does then I guess my deal with him is off. I have better things to do anyway -

*ALLEGED* producer? That's a good one. BS. Is that like an alleged astronaut or something? Or did you cook up that quote yourself? You are seriously funny. So ... you admit you and Porteous were comunicating with potential producers! Skipp must be trully pissed with you blowing it all!

Get real. They have the PDF's from over 400 filthy comments and the articles that go with them, the emails between me and WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenburg that include IP addresses and names, the KC report, the book itself, my notes on same, they already KNOW about Dropzone posters, and a number of other things. I've lost count. Truly. The reporters working on this are AWARE. I will leave it at that. Warn them all you want. It doesn't matter. They want to speak to the witnesses, check out the evidence for themselves, and they will not listen to Cooperland on this one. You can trust me on this. This is what I have talked about all along. Cooperland is a bit different than entities exploring other unsolved cases. So take your best shot. (*Laughs*) Do I smell fear around here or what? A bunch of old women. Can't handle the truth no matter which way it goes. And afraid to find out. Not me. Sorry, guys. First Amendment is still in place, no matter what the protest. I always like to remember people died for that. So should YOU. Well... if the Big Leagues and DB Cooper fails fer ya, there is always the Minor Leagues and ... animal mutilations. That should provide subsistence in the upcoming season ... but of course you will be years older and less agile in your thumbs at the keyboard [HIT ENTER > REPLAY SCRIPT].

Yeah. Kind of hard not to notice that, huh? And the letter from NWA congratulating Kenny on 25 years of service with a silver bowl and a pin on the very day the Statute of Limitations was due to expire on the hijacking. LOL. I wonder why he skipped the free flight to Minneapolis for the banquet, even though his family lived nearby. I don't know if he was the guy but sometimes I think about what WSU prof Buddy Levy said about Kenny on Decoded: I just love this NEW addition by Blevins: "I don't know if he was the guy but sometimes I think about what WSU prof Buddy Levy said about Kenny on Decoded:" An alleged Producer addresses this tactic he has witnessed Blevins using here on Dropzone, saying: "We are aware that there are multiple suspects in the case, backed by certain people. This one fellow, Robert Blevins, wrote a book, but we don't see his co-author Skipp Porteous ever coming to his rescue. It seems that Mr. Blevins can't keep his stories straight... keeps changing his pitch and by now who is listening? While Mr. Blevins appears to have no problem calling everyone else's suspect a "fabled" account, it seems rather clear to us that the real fable is the shifting accounting Mr. Blevins gives of his own suspect. There is an abundancy of proof of this, coming straight from Mr. Blevin's own contradictory writings and postings which are prolific on the Dropzone." I await the Blevins post which reads: I don't know if I was the guy or not, but sometimes I think I was DB Cooper and on Decoded both!: Not a bad achievement I would say!"

It must be worth something more than that....Were 100% LTV mortgage notes available in 1972? I don't know - Blevins didn't understand that the mortgage he kept saying was for the adjacent lot was actually for the property with the house and it seems that he still doesn't get that in this case the 10.00 + is like a legal placeholder - it has nothing to do with the actual price of the property. Oh well. I've given up trying to tell some people on this forum anything because they are so much damn smarter than anyone else. If you look at the warranty deed tax stamp, that will give you an idea of the price of the land. I do think it was sold for the 14,000-ish that was originally stated based on the amount of taxed paid and based on the fact we can guesstimate the tax rate in effect at the time from other documents. Why did the Grimes sell? Ummm... maybe to double their money, maybe they bought the property to turn it, maybe they bit off more than they could chew. There are several valid reasons for someone to mortgage their property right before selling - especially if they needed cash to make a down payment on another piece of property and they were not expecting a quick close. You would really have to know when they bought the property and did they buy anything else in order to be able to take a guess at their motivation. And it would still be a guess. We also know, if I remember correctly, that the warranty deed referenced a mortgage (the one that was satisfied in the 90s), AND a promissory note. I'm pretty sure that the wording was AND but the documents are on another computer so I will have to waffle on this one for the moment. Like I've said - it's about the data. I plan to make sure that NPR knows that they need to do some serious fact checking if they are going to put this story out there again. As of the present time, there is no documentation of any cash payouts or loans that Gray, Blevins, and Porteus have written as fact. Not saying it's not out there - just that no one has provided it to date. As a point of fact, the exact opposite of this has been determined by documents that we currently have -- and some on this thread are in the process of ordering the rest of the documents. In addition, there is ample documentary evidence that there are other more likely explanations for Christiansen's net worth at the time of his death than anything that was obtained from hijacking a plane. The value was likely from property that he bought in the 60s and sold a couple of years before his death for a huge profit. Like it or not, these were primary aspects of the case for Christiansen and therefore the record needs to be set straight. And I don't need to email Geoffrey Gray with this because I have no doubt that he reads this forum. He's hooked for life like the rest of us. And yes, if GG is a legitimate investigative reporter then he needs to come clean with his sources on what he alleges. This ain't deep throat shit for crying out loud. It's just a 40 year old mystery. No governments are gonna topple and no one's gonna make a million dollars if they find the skeleton clutching the briefcase or otherwise solve the case. 2 weeks then it's history. I believe that anything to do with DB Cooper is infinitely more valuable as long as the case remains unsolved. But that's only an opinion based on my amateur study of the fickle nature of man and my opinion that the mystery of it is the allure for many of us. Gray, Blevins, et al can either prove their stuff or they can't. I don't get the high-level, double secret, can't enter without your decoder ring and knock-knock handshake bs that we have to go through whenever someone thinks they know something that no one else does. Funny creatures, us humans. Rest assured a number of people will *notify NPR to flag anything coming from RobertMBlevins - that goes without saying. It takes a village ...

You are entirely correct. Inflation began in two stages. First during the oil embargo during the Nixon admnistration, then in a serious way during the Carter Administration. Most economists point to the Carter adminstration as the point where serious inflation became entrenched leading directly to the Stockman policies of acceptance and privatisation under the Reagan administration. (Thatcher in England) The normal check to large scale inflation is recession and depression. The Volker-Stockman solution (continued by Fed Chair Greenspan) was simply to deny the existence of inflation and promote a transfer of wealth through privatisation (which absorbs failed middle class wealth/holdings as people go broke under inflationary pressures) ... and we have been skating that basic course ever since. Kenny's financial picture looks very stable to me, no large ups or downs, coupled with growth (in realty holding) due to national inflationary trends. Had he lived longer the value of his holdings would have increased further. There is nothing in his financial picture that remotely suggests a sudden large influx in his wealth during the period 1971 ...

Check modified post, last one I did above. Someone should print those docs up, ask Gray what the deal is next Saturday when he appears in Tacoma. I don't have all the answers. As far as your other questions, I've been asked not to speculate on anything new regarding KC for the time being, until the NPR people do whatever it is they have in mind. I would present these things to Gray myself, but I think it should be done by someone more neutral on the case. Speaking of 'mind,' I wouldn't mind if we moved on to another Cooper subject other than KC. Georger: If you don't think KC's the guy, and you don't like what I post...then why do you keep re-quoting my posts in their entirety and giving flippant comments? All you do is bring more traffic to those posts. (*laughs*) I can just see a book review from you at Amazon. Maybe you read Catch-22 or something and review it. Your review: He asserts "WHY" (again) from the room in his head? Because you aint the boss of me or anyone else, Bud. Get over yourself! You dont like my posts? - then don't read em or reply to em. It's simple. Get over your personal problem! Thats why you are here in the first place! The obsessive-compulsive thing. It's funny/sad you keep attacking Marla. It's pathetic. We dont allow one patient to attack all the others for supremacy! No patient owns the ward! Now go pee in the little cup and be quiet! Pull your light cord when you are ready for Nurse Marla to pick up your cup!

blevins reply - - -

Robert says: I'm going to try and answer your questions, because I think they aren't insults, but legit questions, and you deserve answers. It's tough to fill in all the blanks on what happened, but I will try. First...no I haven't read History Decoded. It was Skipp Porteous who theorized that perhaps Geestman ('Mike Watson' in the book) and Christiansen drove from Bonney Lake to Portland, and then after KC was dropped off in Portland, that Geestman went back north to Paradise Point State Park and waited there for KC to show up. I don't know. Seemed reasonable at the time with the lack of any other information. I have some experience in that area, in fact, I once hiked out fifteen miles out of that area down to Woodland when my truck got stuck. It was January when that happened, and I made it out easily using trails along the river and Forest Service roads. And in the early version of Blast, I said Paradise Point. I actually deleted that version of the book file, but I think that's in it. Checking today, it's also in the revised version. I suppose it should be changed. Timing is everything. By the time I discovered that Geestman actually owned that property down in Oakville, the revised version was already in print, either that, or already uploaded for print. Or...I simply forgot to change that part when I added the sections about Helen Jones and working with History Channel. Probably that is more likely, because I didn't find out about the property until the very last interview with Mrs. Geestman when she showed me the document Bernie Geestman used to order his house plans for the property. So...yes...that is MY fault it was never changed. There's also the possibility that even though Geestman may have WENT to Oakville, that maybe Kenny got a phone call through to him at the shop property and then WENT to Paradise Point to meet Kenny there. I've always thought the men would have established a meeting point known to both of them, and this would NOT have been Oakville, or out in the middle of the woods either. Reason: Oakville is miles on the west side of the Interstate 5 freeway and it's unlikely Kenny could have made it that far on foot without being picked up. In the woods? Impossible. How would you know where to go, where to wait? Just not likely at all. This is the testimony from Mrs Geestman's last interview, and some from Helen Jones, Dawn Andrusko: 1) Bernie purchased a station wagon from a used car lot in Elma, WA about six weeks before the hijacking. At the same time, he was put onto a bank sale repo of an Airstream trailer formerly owned by a friend of his named Dick Blume. So, Bernie bought that too. He used the wagon to bring the trailer to the shop and property in Oakville. Shop builiding, no house as yet. We don't know if there was a phone installed there or not. 2) Mrs Geestman says that her husband then left the trailer there and drove the wagon back to Bonney Lake. When she expressed her concerns about possible break-in on the trailer, he told her not to worry about it. This was approximately six weeks prior to the hijacking. 3) On the Monday or Tuesday (she's not sure) before the hijacking, that Mr Geestman suddenly announced he was going camping in the Airstream over Thanksgiving. Mrs. Geestman was highly pissed off about this, but Geestman took the wagon and left. Didn't say where he was going, who he would be with, etc. Mrs Geestman attended Thanksgiving dinner that week at the Jones' place anyway. Mrs Jones and her daughter testified in their interviews that Mrs Geestman definitely made her unhappiness about this whole thing known to them. She was pissed off royally about it. They all heard about the hijacking on the radio (Jones said they had no TV at the house at the time) but did NOT associate any of that with Geestman or the trailer. 4) Mr Geestman returns with the trailer and wagon the following Monday, parks them at the house in Bonney Lake. Everyone knows now he made it at least to Oakville, because he has the trailer. Won't say where he was for those days, whom he was with, or anything. 5) January 1972: Mrs Jones runs into Kenny Christiansen at the Sumner Laundromat. She asks him if he went back to Minnesota for Thanksgiving. Says no, admits he was with Geestman, but won't give any other details. 6) April 1972: Mr and Mrs Geestman have had house guests for a few months now, Mr Geestman's sister Dawn Andrusko and her kids. They had recently come out from Minnesota after Dawn divorced her husband there. She asks Bernie to approach Kenny Christiansen for a loan so she can buy her own place. Bernie ends up delivering the money, and his sister pays back the $5,000 over a two-year period, although KC had actually given her three years to pay. 7) November 1972: Jones testified that Kenny and the Geestmans' showed up for Thanksgiving. No mention is made of the men going missing the previous year. Jones noted in her interview that Kenny seemed to be doing better financially. 8) Christmas Eve, 1972: Jones family has a house fire and the house will have to be repaired. Geestman takes the Airstream and drops it off their house for them to stay in until repairs are complete. Afterward, he comes and gets it, and then sells it (according to Mrs Geestman) to a buyer from Arizona. The majority of this story comes not from sales documents, but from the testimony of witnesses. Is it all true? Well, here is one key point on that: All four women (Dawn Andrusko, Helen Jones, Mrs Geestman, and Jones' daughter) gave the same basic story, the same basic details on everything, even though none of them had been in contact with each other for many years. (Exception: Jones and her daughter, of course) These kinds of things are why I agreed to let another entity sort it all out without my interference. I just don't know if any answers will be found. It's hard to get around the idea of Mrs Geestman consistently pointing to her husband so many times that he was involved in the hijacking. She is sure on this, but at the same time I could tell she was afraid of the FBI, and that somehow she wanted to keep Kenny's name out of the whole thing. She had denied Kenny was involved for almost a year. But in the end, when she knew Decoded was filming the story, and she saw the book, she finally admits it was Kenny with her husband that week. My view on this whole scenario hasn't changed. The FBI could easily get to the truth on Kenny by putting the women in one room, Geestman in the other, and start asking questions. They would find out the truth in minutes. That's all I know. Geestman tried lying quite a few times, but the only place he REALLY screwed up was when he told Decoded that he thought Kenny could be the hijacker. And I think that if the FBI ever questions him, they should run that clip for him and ask why he would say that...when everyone else says he was WITH Kenny the week of the crime. I'd personally like to hear him answer that question. Hmmm. So! It IT is personal with you? Know wonder all the venom! Geestman 70 - Blevins 0.

Jo, IF you are serious about moving to Russia just follow the instructions below. 1. Contact the Russian Embassy in Washington, DC (the phone number is probably online), explain your reasons for wishing to move to Russia, and ask them to issue you a visa for that move. 2. Also, ask the Russians to pay for your one-way moving expenses. If they refuse, contact WikiLeaks and ask them to pay for your moving expenses in return for your giving them all the dirt you think you have on the FBI. 3. If WikiLeaks also refuses to pay for your moving expenses, come back to this thread and explain that you have a visa from the Russians and just need some money to get there. I am sure that there are a number of patriotic people on this thread who will gladly help finance your one-way move to Russia. Time is of the essence, so hurry and get this move over with prior to the next government shutdown in early 2014. Bon voyage. Robert99 +1

that's another problem you have. you rely too much on what someone tells you. LD was a surveyor, but after the crime. his movements were documented. something someone wouldn't do while in hiding from the FBI. researching his background proved this. researching where he was after told even more. perhaps the next time you "go on record" with them. tell them you will be sending the tapes to the FBI. you will see smoke rising from the floor after a loud noise of the door slamming shut Yeah, well that would be from the Dumb School of Interviewing, wouldn't it? 'Rely too much on what people tell you?' You're kidding, right? How do you think reporters get to the bottom of stories? They don't do it by sitting on their asses and using their credit cards to do US Search. That's only a PART of it, and the easy part. The hard part is going out into the real world and hitting the bricks with people. The best way to get results from interviews is to be polite and come prepared. You talk to them, you record, you take notes. You LISTEN. Then get a second source on everything they say. The hardest interview I ever did had nothing to do with Cooper. It was with Gary Derks, the search director representing the State of Nevada when they were looking for Steve Fossett. Derks was SO sure they would find Fossett at Silver Peaks when I interviewed him. When they finally discovered the wreck near Mammoth Lake, California, I felt bad for him. What the heck. I had held out hope they might find Fossett alive, too. I was heavily involved in that incident and participated in the Amazon Mechanical Turk app where they used online volunteers to foot-by-foot search Google Earth maps. I searched areas until my eyes went blurry, but like everyone else I never found a thing. Turns out Fossett hit the mountain at full speed and the wreckage was spread out for maybe a hundred meters. Probably a downdraft, they said. To Paul: No, I'm not calling you. And you shouldn't post up your phone number on a public forum. My email is adventurebooksofseattle AT G frickin' mail dot com. It's in my DZ profile. Woahhh! No wonder you changed your first version facts of the Kenny-Geestman rendevois at Paradise Point! Park Ranger sayz: (quote): (really); (trust me!): "Yes.... I worked at Paradise Point Park during the time this Blevins is talking about. It was different than he describes. For one thing in 1971, PPP was too small to fit an Airstream into, and there was no camping in the park after 11:00pm. These guys would have had to park along the bushes near the Interstate, as the gate would have already been up. We were a little fussy about people pulling in there and folks who refused to leave that area usually wound up dealing with a deputy, quick. That would have brought questions as for example: "Why are you here? What are your names? ID and driver license please." And the like. That old Airstream very likely would have been inspected. That would have brought more questions. Any funny noises and ... you get my drift. Two older guys in a trailer? We kept a close eye and talked to everyone camping at PPP. So it's not the easy solution Blevins said it was......very likely these guys would have wound up taking to a Deputy" But, no way did they ever park inside our park with that thing Blevins says. NO WONDER BLEVINS CHANGED HIS STORY! I will be there at 9:00 o'clock tomorrow to ask the Ranger Its still the same.I will shoot video and post it maybe I will interview him about the history if hes willing but Cooper left in a boat to woodland airport then back home.It was fast JT remembers me showing him the spot on the Lewis river were I claim the money was found before Mr B wrote his book. That day at Frenchmans bar not T bar.He claims to still have the map that I marked on the hood of his truck. So maybe he was first to know were I claim the money was found and he called first so in the end he did figure it out first. If he agrees in the end.... but he's not right now. He is willing to look at all of my stuff at one time and that I would shoot any video he wanted free of charge GC148 I always said Cooper got away in a Russian submarine! Is the boat currently docked in your shed? Das Boot? Hey! I know the other kids who found money on Frenchman's Bar too! They took their money to Tina's Bar too, in a parallel conspiracy. Blevins know all about it - he reads this thread.

LOL. Get real. Paradise Point as the meeting place was just a guess by Porteous and yours truly early on. We found out later that Geestman bought property and a shop down in Oakville, WA...and that the trailer he had purchased prior to the hijacking was actually parked THERE. Some time after the hijacking, the Geestman's built a house there from plans, moved there from Bonney Lake, and then later ended up buying a ranch in Twisp. They lived there until they divorced in the 90's. You already knew that, of course. I've mentioned it several times. Exactly. Get real. Write for camels and fish. How about naming the ranger you allegedly spoke to? Or would that be too much to ask? You like to quote people, but sometimes when you do, I check with the source and discover you aren't exactly being honest, at least according to the source. For example, you multiple-quoted Geoff Gray with stating I was 'untrustworthy' and 'unstable'. When I asked him about this, he denied saying it, which makes either HE or YOU a LIAR. Do you understand this concept? I don't give a shit whether you talked with some ranger down in Battleground or Ridgefield or whatever about policies in that park back in 1971. I already know where the first stop was for Mr Geestman and Kenny Christiansen and it wasn't Paradise Point State Park. They went to the shop building and property that Geestman owned in Oakville. You have personal issues going and that is not my problem. One post after another, one shit insult after another. Blah, blah, blah. I've turned everything over to NPR. Let them sort it out. Let them discover the truth. I swear it's like you sit at the keyboard and WAIT. I ignore most of your posts. Yet you keep leaping up with multiple posts saying "Look at me! Respond to THIS!" Mostly Alice-in-Wonderland insults. LOL. Raising your hand to the nun in class and waving it around. Really, it's pathetic. Any credibility or objectivity you may have had in the case is LONG GONE. Gone with the wind, destroyed by your emotions and the responses that go with them. That is a personal problem and not my concern. Your baiting is getting tired. Not only to me, but probably others on this thread. It's like you have Blevins Obsession Syndrome or something. Frankly, it's creepy. Turned everything over to NPR ! Wow! Thanks for the donation. I will send in a matching .20c. How about a contribution to MAAD? Which you said was founded in your town Auburn .... which IT weren't/aint. You never issued a retraction. Are you going apologise to NPR for flooding them with das spam uber alles?

LOL. Get real. Paradise Point as the meeting place was just a guess by Porteous and yours truly early on. We found out later that Geestman bought property and a shop down in Oakville, WA...and that the trailer he had purchased prior to the hijacking was actually parked THERE. Some time after the hijacking, the Geestman's built a house there from plans, moved there from Bonney Lake, and then later ended up buying a ranch in Twisp. They lived there until they divorced in the 90's. You already knew that, of course. I've mentioned it several times. Exactly. Get real. Write for camels and fish.