skyjack71

Thank You - seems like you have to walk me thru this ever time. Like I said the brain is shutting down - I just cannot learn new things and some of what I know is slipping away from me. Rewriting the transcripts would probably confuse everyone - I know it would me. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

WOW it is usually me (JO) who gets the flack, but you are correct in what you stated. I like Bruce, but he does seem to have the tendancy to bottom feed. I call it Enquirer Syndrome! He could actually be a great journalist if he would just REPORT instead of taking things apart and putting them back together the way he see it. Like myself - the way I see things is in prospective of a woman and a 17yr marriage. Bruce goes for the drama with his own bais thrown in - it reads better. Bruce does seem to alienate individuals he interviews and he needs to NOT let his bias get in the way nor to expound on individuals or what they say - putting the person in a negative prospective. That process usually does NOT result in a second or third interview. I am going to quote your paragraph below in bold as NO one could have said that any better: Georger Stated: What we are left with is confusion. And no good source(s) to help straighten the confusions out, including the reporter's bias on top of the other confusions ... It's not a good model for writing history. Well.... Don't come down on me - I ain't writin NO book and I ain't tryin to divert the facts. I just want to know the truth! Do U realize I spent 18 yrs married to Weber and now 18 yrs more trying to figure out who I was married to. What a ride this has been! Married March 1977, Died March 1995 and now March of 2013 has come and gone. I'm tired! I'm exhausted and used up! I can't even do the math anymore. Did Duane and I have our 17th or our 18th anniversary the day before he died? My thought processes are just about gone! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

I do NOT know what PDF is and it goes to my pictures and I never figure it out at all. Acrobat is what I have, but can't read some of those. Shutter and Blevins can usually get it in a format I can read. I know VERY little about computers and the programs. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Oddly enough Robert if you knew me that is ONE thing you would not say. Yes, there has been 'some bullshit' BUT 99.5 % of the time - I tried to keep it to what I did know. I did play with the theories and investigate all of the things everyone else did on the thread....but other than that I have simply recited my life with Weber and what he told me and the places he took me and the things he said. Could the things he told me be bullshit? I am sure some of it was, but the rest of it (95%) matched the facts of his life as I have come to know them. The more I learn about the past of Weber the more the pieces fit! I expected and actually HOPED that someone would prove he was NOT Cooper. You didn't known that, did you. Had you have been family or a close friend you would have known that I truely hoped he was NOT quilty of this Bastardly Act. What I did find indicates he was (that statement is referring to Duane telling me about his life in third person) and the facts we learned about Weber over the last 18 yrs. I am more convinced he was Cooper today than I have EVER been and I did NOT talk myself into it - the discoveries and records did that! Without the FBI admitting they missed certain records like the WA arrest record they ignored or didn't find Jo is just a tree falling in a forest and there is NO one there to hear it. As the FBI agent said - "You can put him in a chute, but you have to put him on the plane!" Witness ID after all of these yrs - I expect to be useless. Now it is in GOD's hands - I have the watches- but if the FBI has NO DNA belonging to Cooper there is NOTHING to compare to. The witnesses said he wore no jewelry - but a watch was NOT considered jewelry in 1971. I doubt the FBI will make the witnesses review the photos of Weber even with the compelling before and after we have now - it has been too many yrs. The next best thing is to have a group make a presentation of the photos to Tina - but then if she does NOT participate - it goes NO where. Florence really spent very little time with Cooper. I have done all I know to do - and if anyone has a suggestion about how to go further - then speak up! All I can tell you is that it is NOW in the hands of the FBI or will be in 3 days. Then it is up to them or the public. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

In 1971 - did they actually refer to someone like that as a Dirtbag. Strange as I believe that is the first time I have ever read that word on this thread. You are right - he was a DIRTBAG, but perhaps a little over-board with the word 'terrorist". But when one rethinks the word "Terrorist" - I agree he did terrorize the crew and one young lady to the extent she did not have the life she would have had otherwise. The crew thought it was a bomb. Be it a real bomb or not was completely beside the fact - yes, it was an act of a terrorists. I would surely HOPE that was NOT the birth of Terrorism as we know it today. Thinking of it in those terms makes me feel sick to my stomach! BUT, you are right! I concede my first thought in thinking perhaps the teminology was over-board. Not excusing the behaviour, but if one has faced rape in a prison and other unthinkable things - Cooper just did NOT think about the damage that could and did occur. He himself (Cooper) was damaged goods due to his past - be it Weber or some other DirtBag! Himmelsbach used that terminolgoy about Cooper...It finally popped into my head! He also used the terminology Scumbag! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

GUYS When some of U post you do reply and it repeats every reply the post you are addressing replied to. The name of the poster is at the top and when you read down it gets very confusing. How about you guys use quote - but delete all of the posts you are nor referring to. This is just getting to tedious for people to follow. Sometime you end up not knowing who said what or even WHY for that reason. Perhaps the DZ needs to provide a tutorial on how to use the new system. They have to realize there are A lot of us old foggies in here that are NOT geek smart! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

What Theory would that be Georger? The Lost Butts! Quote Jo Weber does NOT have a clue, but if the FBI actually does NOT have them - SHAME on the FBI! Frankly I hope the FBI finds the BUTTS! I would be ELATED! My mission would be complete! A yes or a no! It would make NOT one iota difference. The FBI would have to swab the watches for DNA (the only item I have that might still have RELIABLE Weber DNA). Those butts would also have prints on them. Today THOSE butts could solve this crime - and that does NOT mean it had to be Weber! Vickie's Dad is missing and the mysterious connection between Duane and another man are puzzling. I never thought about having someone run the man's name thru the data bases to see if he had a record and his age. Would love to see a pic of this man! In fact there are 3 men I would love to know more about. One had an antique shop in AL near Ft. Benning. The other one the only place I can peg him was a Kisok is BelAire Mall in Mobile, AL in 1980 - 1982. A Plummer and the BIG guy I already know where connected to Weber thru N.Orleans - can I prove it? Hell NO, but I was there and I actually met these guys! I know a writer in the N.E. was connected to Weber, but can I prove it? Hell NO. Strange that the FBI actually confiscated this man files after he died in recent yrs. The people I met who turned out to be Mafia, Coverts, Political activists, Excons, and the woman whose letter Max Gunther took to the FBI. Only to be dissed. Regarding Max's book - The syntax used in the letters supposedly written by Cooper is similar to syntax used in letters and resume's of Weber. The letters and calls to Max by Clara reflect his wife of the day. She used the same quote with me she used in the letter to Max. The similarity is UNCANNY! Word for word! I could go on and on with the pros and the cons, but that is a pure waste of my time at this stage. The FBI dropped the ball....for many yrs. By design or carelessly. If by design - then we know it was a covert action. As time evolved the left hand did not know what the right hand had done and the yrs created mass confusion and then there are those who held the secrets who were still alive and then it was a matter of time.

Georger Stated: Well, Georger - SORRY NOT Jo Weber's theory! HOW many different statements have been made about what happened to the butts? Jo, did not form any opinion, merrily stated the possibilities and what others have said. THE FBI themselves - Larry Carr stated the butts had been LOST! No explanation - none at all? SO - WHY Professor Warren don't U tell us what happened to the BUTTs? If U are so much in the KNOW - explain to the thread why they have heard few stories about the missing Butts! Larry Carr was the last agent to mention them. NO explanation from the FBI only leads others to form their OWN opinions. PERHAPS it is TIME for the FBI to fess-up to the BUTTS! U Think! Where they lost? Where are they if they are NOT lost? Did they destroy them in the process of trying to obtain DNA? Well, they NEVER made it to the DNA lab or so the FBI wishes us to believe. Jo has NO opinion one WAY or another. Did the FBI lose them as we have have been told - or NOT? Simple question for the FBI - WHERE's THE BUTTS! Professor, why don't you make a solid statement about this. YOU are capable of doing so -OR are U a big ole PHONY and actually have NO in with the FBI or access to any privileged information? You - are the mole? You have lost your way. Maybe you should go back to Texas! Why do you still continue the charade? Jo Weber's OPINION! If they had the butts why was the TIE such a BIG deal? Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Blevins in the face of ALL of the facts stated this about Weber: WELL, now that opinion stated by Blevins is PURE HYPE! In the light of the last few days and the things happening I have NOT discuss, I would say Blevins will need to bury his head in the ground like an Ostrich. Even going back to the postings of an FBI agent on this thread - one can see the infromation was so convoluted and twisted by the agent and by others that the truth was buried beneath the rubbish. Too many individuals - FBI and others buried their head in the sand. Be this preservation, an attempt for glory or by orders - that question is yet to be answered! Always thought a Ostrich was a dumb animal! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Ckret - Agent LARRY Carr stated the above and yet you guys have continued to debate it. So I guess Carr either new this for fact or did he make it up? See what I mean - fact or fiction? Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Ditto dumstuntzz. This has been "our" problem all along. We never know what is fact and what is myth or mis-interpretation by the media. Maybe, being "on top of it" this time, we can ultimately get the truth out of the noise. Sluggo_Monster Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

KC was NOT Cooper - last reply I will ever make to any post you make! You only post for the "hits" and the money! The FBI's problem is How they are Going to Handle this! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Well, YOU BEST check your source! Other SOURCES tell a different story! Fred Gutt is an ASS! Fred Gutt is responsible for Weber being DISMISS before the DNA. Fred Gutt is part of the SYSTEM that failed. Sorry, but his name is a BAD word to use around me! THE FBI does NOT know if the TIE actually was COOPERS! The FBI does NOT know if they have any of COOPER'S DNA. THE FBI does NOT know if they have WEBER's DNA. The only reliable sources I have of Weber's DNA I did NOT give them and a good damn thing - because they kept the DNA from 2003 to 2007 before they even checked it. OVER 5 yrs. That watch would have disappeared just like the butts did! The can have both items swabbed at the BANK, BUT they they CANNOT take the WATCHES out of MY SITE. The ONLY condition they can come anywhere near those items. The things I provided I TOLD them had been cleaned and that I didn't know if there would be any DNA on them. They never told me which items they got the same DNA off of - but if they named 2 of the items then I would have KNOWN they didn't have Weber's DNA. Out of all of those items the same DNA besides mine should have been only on certain items. Everything they took had been cleaned and handled by multiple individuals....2 items I do not think Weber ever touched...they were Christmas gifts. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Sluggo Monster made these statements in 2008: NINE (9 yrs ago) This is What Sluggo had to say and at least the thread had some intellectual discussions - now it is just Blevins making claims he himself cannot support....and without adequate knowledge to make most of the statements he declares.. There was NO one left in this thread that actually has the skills to help solve this case...or so I thought. The changing of the quard did provide a chance for Newbies to explore the subject and for some to actually make some progress. My fear is that they got caught up in all of the Gobbly Gook and that the truths will be forever buried in these 1000's of posts. Mrsshutter - managed to explore the flight with an assimilation but what puzzles me is where did he get the fight documents and which documents did he use? Perhaps I misunderstood Sluggo's comments about the data being lost. Who provided the data to Mrsshutter for the assimilation? Just who is Robert99 and why does he contradict Sluggo in his statements? The Newbie's brought a lot of myths to the thread and some brought the ability to search and research things - no one even gave a thought to do back in 2006 when the first thread was started. There have been many changes since 2006....then this thread started in 2008 and continues today - but with the quality of the thread being reduce to promotions and useless trivia - NO one wants to be here! Not the indivdidual who actually are seeking answers and have observations to contribute. The ones who preservered the hecklers and naysayers and the false information provided by those who didn't know better or those who only wanted to change the facts to meet their own criterior or motives. They are the survivors! Look what Shutter did! I liked him and then I didn't like him - he had this attitude of the young folks that come to the thread to see what they can get started. I didn't know his age and figured he would have moved on a long time ago....but, something held him here. The more he seemed to absorb the more absorbed he became...but like some of the others over the past - he managed to get a grasp on some of the things. I still do NOT know what to think about the assimilation - but, whatever it is or was and what information and who provided the information that is yet to be known. Sluggo was indicating the information was lost. So who provided the information to Shutter? How many different sources are there as to the actual flight pattern and the notes? Regardless - that is something I leave up to you that know what you are talking about. How or WHY Shutter found those 1966 prison files that others have NOT been able to find is still a mystery. Look at all of those who tried and failed. Safecrack, Doug Pasternak, Geoffrey Gray, Galen Cook, Sluggo and many others who I have forgotten and yet Shutter finds them. Frankly I think he was HOPING to shut Jo Weber up and lo and behold - he is speechless along with a few others who only read the thread, but do not post. I wonder what Sluggo has to say about those 1966 pictures. The fact that Carr and the agents before him and after him did NOT produce these files makes it seem deliberate or did they actually NOT know how to do so. Maybe the FBI needs to hire people like Shutter - but their entry age is pretty rigid - wonder how old Shutter is? Right now after certain individuals learned of this file photo - the question being asked is WHY did the FBI not make the file available to me and why did they NOT use that photo since it was the closest to the crime? The photo they used for the media was a photo the brother had and it was distorted and no one knows where it came from. The photos the FBI should have used and made public should have been Weber's last known incarceration.... along with pictures prior wives might have been able to provide. VERY puzzling WHY they used a picture with NO known source. Wonder what PHOTOS the FBI used to show the witnesses? They claimed that Tina had seen pictures of Weber - WHAT pictures? Same with Florence. FRANKLY I do not think the FBI even showed pictures to any of the witnesses! Good Job Shutter and yet I know the only reason you even did it was hoping to SHUT Jo up. I was reading an old note from Doug today - one in which he talked to Galen Cook about me. Galen wanted to know what Doug's conversation with the artist was and Doug gave him a brief synopsis and told him that my story actually had NO flaws in it. Yet, Galen would pursue his subject with a vengance and like others using parts of things I had stated about Weber and adapting it to his own suspect. I will NOT discuss KC! That is one suspect that was a NO GO from the beginning and for anyone to try developing a story with the "evidence" he had was NOT a good idea. Precisely why I kept the things I needed and wanted and made my search a very public thing. I had everything and I had nothing. The FBI ignored me and I refused to let anyone write a book or do a movie...I did protect myself legally, but when I am dead - it is anyone's best bet. The emails and the phone calls - "HOW did Shutter find that? ". Obviously it was NOT available in the past or these individuals did NOT know how or where to look! Question of the day! Why did Larry Carr not make that file public? I kept asking for it and did so many times right here in this thread! THANK YOU MRSSHUTTER! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

The FBI knows the "evidence" on the tie was compromised and that is confirmed by the 'butts' being lost. They know that one of their own had access to that evidence and supposedly showed that tie to McCoy's family - that means it left the evidence room ... and the state of WA. Is this when the "butts" came up missing? WHY they did not release any pictures of the tie at that time? 36 yrs later the tie suddenly becomes evidence that can excuse individuals - minus the "butts". What would a court of law do with that? I believe the agent before Carr was disciplined for telling me about the 'BUTTS BEING LOST" several yrs ago. The agent and his superior refuted the statement and now it comes out yrs, later that they REALLY are LOST. Note: This loss had never been announced to the public until Ckret post that on this forum. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Hopefully the DZ will not stop me from posting as things progress, but no one needs to deal with some of the posting I have had to filter through tonight. The FBI needs to re-examine Weber ASAP. I believe that the things that Shutter found that had NOT been made public and what I know that has not been made public needs to be presented to the PUBLIC and the WITNESSES. A RE-examination regarding Weber needs to be done: The Witnesses - everyone who was on that plane that saw Cooper -should see the prison picturea along with other pictures before and after the 1966 composite. The chin being more pronounce with an explanation by a dentist who could explain the structure of such and to demonstrate with videos regarding individuals who have experienced a similar dental problem. The views of the forehead and how the slant makes that part of the body more or less prominent due to position of the viewer. The FBI has the capabilities to do this with the technolgy they claim to possess. I will NO longer take any calls or emails from those who have a story to tell and those individuals who are trying to HOAX me with false story. They need to contact the FBI - not me! Have NO idea who is behind the recent influx in the last 6 months of these stories - but, it is time the FBI checked this out. The FBI can put an end to Cooper or this case is going to haunt them for another 40 yrs. They would serve themselves better to re-examine some of their methods. This case makes the FBI look REALLY bad. It is beginning to sound like a government COVER-UP. They could end all of this with a proper re-investigation - not only of Weber, but other suspects. I did NOT and still do NOT want to believe the FBI had a hand in a cover-up, but their refusing to address many things over the last 20 yrs makes it appear that way! Going to try to get someone to make more pics tomorrow. I was NOT happy with the ones I paid for today and then there are those a woman made for me and SHE never produced the product. Maybe she mailed them to the FBI herself - I dont' know. I did NOT know who this woman was other than the card she gave me and then told me she would contact me on Monday May 20th - she never did and I have not been able to get her to return my calls. I told her they related to this old crime - I did not give her my REAL name, but a way to contact me...to set up a meeting for me to receive the pics. She was supposed to contact me this past Monday and I( waited until Thur May 24 to approach someone else without telling them what the crime related to. The 2 pics he made do NOT look like they would be a good example of the 2 items....they are only on regular paper and way over sized. HE did NOT take a pic of the knife or the other item. Just the 2 I felt might be of use to the FBI. He had no way to burn a disk. The other woman photographed all 4 items, but like I said she did NOT provide me with a disk or the photos. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

I am repeating part of the following post (edited) hoping we can GET back on Target! P.S. Got some pics made today, but NOT happy with them. This has been a PAIN day and I come to the thread and things have gone WACKO! Makes one wonder if some of U guys are just trying to shut the thread down! Perhaps some of you need some TIME OUT. Georger and Blevins - both! All I want to do is get the photos to the FBI with a return receipt and then to go public with them! Then MY mission is complete because I know NOT what else one woman can do to get the truths out there. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

U are a book writer - able verify your souces and you have the knowledge and the means. ME - I am just stupid when it comes to photos and obtaining sites. Most I can't read I am sent to. Tried to down -oad an upgrade to my browser - guess I don't even know how to do that. Maybe it doesn't work with dial-up! I just wanted to see some of the things you guys talk about, but can't take on a bigger monthy bill and the installation charges. Need to reinforce my house for storms or I am going to be in BIG trouble! . During Ivan in 2004 there were NO houses across the lake and NO fences. Now there are houses over there and wood fence (not supposed to be here) and out-door sheds (not supposed to be there) but, I have NO say and I am the oldest person in several blocks and the one whose home is in the most danger of the fences and sheds. These item (plus all the kiddy stuff) have NO place to go from those locations other than RIGHT at me. I do NOT leave during a hurricance - I bunker down and crawl in a closet...but I have never been in this much danger. I cannot leave even with a mandatory evacuation. Severe allergies and low immunity (the shelters will not work and motel rooms are difficult to come by and expensive). I roughed it after the last hurricane for 7 days without electricity, but I was almost 9 yrs younger and in decent health. All I can do now is just hope a severe one will not be comming my way! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

UhOh! I knew it would be something bad! Do they inspect bridges in WA? In FL they are inspected regularly, but the bridge near me gives me the willys crossing over to the Gulf. Keep wondering why they continue to spend money to fix a 2 lane bridge that is heavily used. There was NOTHING on our news tonight - here in the South. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

I of course cannot view U-tube. I even tried to update my browser to see if I could view it in segments like I used to, but no more. Doug Pasternak spent almost 2 hours with Roy Rose about the composite, so I would love to know what Rose said in this interview and when that interview took place. Doug's Interview was in 2000 or 2001. I NEVER forgot what Doug told me the night he told me about the interview. According to Rose he could NOT portray something about the mouthto satisfy the witnesses. The hair line has always been a dispute - an irregular hair line NOT a widows peak as the TV artist did yrs later (the one the Mayfield people used). The mouth action was describe as pursing. Which is exactly the motions one used to a hold particial in or a temporary in. This description came from the witnesses who helped provided him the description for the composites! I understand he could NOT get the mouth to satisfy all of the witnesses! So they went with the generic and the witnesses tried again to describe the mouth to the TV program artist. That artist went way over with the WIDOWS Peak but he did a better job of the mouth. Some of the Rose composites not used do show that pursing of the lips - (if one is able to draw a pursing) - would take to different composite showing both positions (relaxed and firm and then the pursing or motion use to hold the temporary or prosthesis in place. Doug and I discussed Duane's particial at that time - but that is all. I have viewed that 1966 prison photo over and over and over and looked at pictures of Weber before and after that. Weber's chin was stronger in the prior and after pictures than in the 1966 prison -photo. The only things that can account for that is position of the camera - but it is more! I put money on the fact that in 1966 Weber did NOT have any teeth in the lower front. He probably had in 1971 an ill fitted particial - could even have been made out of plastic like the old false teeth. I never EVER saw Weber without his lowers - which were in a white gold frame with porcelain teeth that matched his other teeth. Since Duane had good teeth other wise - it makes sense he lost those teeth in a fight prior to 1966. Did Jefferson make intake and outtake photos? The Canon file shows intake photos and out take photos - so we know he had his teeth in 1962. Where was Weber 1962 to 1964. We can account for 1965 - he was selling insurance under the name of John Collins for Pyramid Life in Ks. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

The adendum: A few days ago I heard yet another story about a woman, a white caddy and an old man. Bruce had told me this story the other day and me thinks it ODD the two stories used a White Caddy. Now me thinks the first story about the guy who contacted me is connected to the story Bruce told me. Someone is out there planting different versions of the same story, but why? To confuse and defuse if my theory is correct. I will let Bruce tell his story about his woman, old man and white caddy. I was curious but it took only hearing a voice on the other end of the phone to know it was a set-up! I needed to go any further than a voice message on the other end of the line. Someone is tooting different versions of the same story to others and few will actually get their hands that DIRTY! Vickie and Jo are NO ones fool! I get tired of the games people play and the stories they tell me. I can understand why Vickie has a laid back attitude to all of this....She is a jewel of a girl and one would be proud to call her daughter. Duane pointed out a cemetery and told me he knew someone buried there. My research back then found a grave site dated 1971 (I have looked for the research I carried to WA with me and I don't remember what it said). t was pouring down the rain when I was there in 2010 and somewhere I still have the papers. The cemetary was so old I wondered if I was in the right place. I even went so far as to tell JT about this yrs ago - because I wonder if there might not be 2 bodies buried in one grave. Time has erased many memories and this one becomes confused....I wanted to find out who the friend was that was buried there - but seems like it had only a date and no name. I know this was found when Elisa was doing some research for me in the Washougal area in the archives. The memory is very vague because I never got to follow up on it. As you guys know I was not well when I went to WA and I have had 3 surgeries since then. I did what I could afford to do in 15 days and what I could do on my own. I needed to be alone - to deal with the memories and the things Duane told me. I did NOT need or want Sluggo or anyone with me - I needed to do that by myself and I did! I would love to go back, but my health dictates my mind set. I become more and more aware of that as time goes by. Never let anyone tell you that getting old does not hurt - it hurts like hell. If you are still healty do all you want to do - before you know it you turn around and your body does not want to do what the mind can. In my mind I am young and can do anything, but then realization sets in. One never knows what each day will bring. Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

+1 (Nailed it!)

You nor anyone else here is aware of how many kooks who have contacted me over the yrs. About 3 wks before Cossey was murdered a person contacted me about a story. He started off with the name of a person (a first name in my story of Weber - a person Duane knew). He kept fishing for the last name - but I would NOT give it. Wasn't born yesterday although I could wish. Since that name had possible WA connections - NO WAY I was I telling this man a last name or an initial. Then a few days later he is working another angle telling me he had been contacted by a woman from WA who claimed to have seen Weber. Supposedly he arranges to meet with her - why would a person who has info involving this crime contact this man? As far as I know this man was never a part of the Cooper saga...he was a voice over the phone with a story to tell. He did claim a person of interest who worked with him read this thread. His story was all over the place. He WARNED me not to discuss this in the thread! Then this woman has another person she is bringing to the meeting - she would just coincidently be travel in his direction and he claimed to have recorded the interview. An older man was also privey to this on behalf of the woman. Claims of a white Caddy. I had heard a similar story yrs ago, but could not remember from whom or where...so I went along for the ride but not for long. I copied every email I sent him. He was sharp, but I have met sharper - when it comes to Cooper world. I was already getting nervous about the man - 2 plus 2 was not adding up to 4. He would get agitated with me when I balked on him - he wanted me to take the cookie and eat it and wash it down with a milkshake I guess. Well, I have had more temptations than what he put in front of me and still held my own. He would claim he had contacts in a specific area and the man was working with him - but I had already contacted some of the enities before and I didn't follow up because YOU have to go there - their files are NOT on a site. YOU actually have to go to these places and shift thru hundreds of photos that are not filed in any specific order. If I talked about this the man would not help and it would cause this man a problem with his job. Who was this man and why would witnesses contact him? Why did he have a marshall on his side and then someone who lofts in this thread telling me to beware of a set-up. WELL, I have been at this for 17 yrs and I do NOT scare easily - the only set-up was he and his buddies if they exist. A theory -The MARLA COOPER bunch - because he claimed no knowledge of her or her side kicks. Yet, his story came down just like hers - a marshall and also someone who monitors this thread. How damn naive did he think I was. I didn't say one damn word to the thread, but when Cossey got killed I did get nervous...and with good reason. The man would get REAL agitated when I didn't agree with him. So I backed off. After NO contact initiated on my part he seemed to go away. NO phone calls or emails on my part or his part. He professed to be a Christian and played that angle. If he was real I blew it, but he kept claiming his contacts in the midwest and it just started to SOUND like MARLA and that group. Anyone so hungry they would attempt to discredit me by dangling bait - WELL, what can I say! His was basically a Boeing angle and a white caddy. Some things he would say and I would wonder how he knew that - but all of it was suspect....his co-conspirators sounded like the MARLA group. Wonder how she is doing with her book? Is it true she took an upfront and has to produce? That is the rumor I heard, but so far no book and no evidence and her story is really really thin. She like others have borrowed from the things I say as has Galen and others, but that is OK because I know I was the 1st person to voice anything about certain aspects of a suspect. If you are true to your heart there is NO fear! Why I have hung in here for 18 yrs now. Also why I have played some dangerous games with some dangerous people over the yrs....the death of Cossy was a signal that NO one is invincible. I have stayed true to myself and my word - with ventures such as the one above and does any of it bring closure? Well, there are a lot of KOOKS out there and a lot of wanna bee's...but I am the real thing. I have told a real story about a man I lived with for 17 yrs and whose history I have studied for 18 yrs. I am not working with the memories of an 8 yr old child nor have I tried to SELL my story. I have sought NOTHING, but the truth and now I am unable to continue this journey much longer. Will I give up? - NOT until I take my last breath and this has been an a long journey! I have spent a lot of money not to mention 18 yrs of my life on this - but if there are rewards for the true story - I will receive those on the other side! Where ever and what ever that is! I have an adendum to make to this post, but will have to do it later. About the old man and the woman and the white Caddy! Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber