NCclimber
-
Content
4,456 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by NCclimber
-
I don't know. Perhaps you could ask the people who control Congress.
-
You have boobies? Just last night I was watching the Seinfeld episode about George's dad having man-boobs. What a coincidence?
-
And the recently popular - DENIER. According to the perfesser, there are three levels of DENIER. I'm still trying to figure out what they are.
-
I'm sure she appreciates the respect you show for her sacrifices. Blues, Dave We all do our part.
-
Oh yeah, I'm sure she's trembling. She'll probably be forced to swallow her pride and go ask Bush on how he dealt with such an indomitable force.
-
The queen of attention whores wants your job. Six weeks ago, Cindy Sheehan announced: Now she's taking on Nancy Pelosi: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8Q9VKI01&show_article=1
-
You should get back to explaining why "artistic license" is a solid rationale for telling lies.
-
Yup with below prime mortgages. I am just waiting for that bomb to burst.... I don't think you have to wait. You mean it actually started in September 2002?
-
Yes. I'm not sure. I think it's quite possible, but I'm not convinced. If man-made pollution is the primary cause for rising global temps we should attempt to remedy the situation immediately. Sorry to burst your bubble, sport. Loved the PA, too. So, based on my answers, which kind of "Denier" am I? I, II or III?
-
I only checked out the first three. None showed proof of the Republicans getting illegal votes and stealing the election. 1 - The Volusian error was caught and remedied on election night. 2 - Oh look. Ballot tampering by a Democrat 3 - Even if Feeney tried to rig the vote, there's no evidence of it occurring. You keep hanging on to your conspiracy theories and telling yourself you know better, implying I'm blind because I ask for actual proof. Did you know the collapse of the Twin Towers was actually a controlled demolition? It's true. Google it.
-
Bill has done it several times already. Well good. It shouldn't be too hard for you to find. As usual you avoid giving an honest answer to a straightforward question. Sorry dude. It's hard to answer a question, when you don't know what is being asked. How about clarifying what you mean. Then I'll answer the question. Or are you just interested in childish games of "gotcha"?
-
Clearly that is weaseling.
-
What's that saying about practicing what you preach?
-
If you say so. What evidence is there of election fraud in Florida? How about a mainstream source on the subject?
-
Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? I guess you are the expert on the topic of unproven claims. Clearly that was a joke. Sorry you seem to have such a hard time with that one. Now some people around here just seem to be pathological liars. They make unsupportable claims and then seem incapable of owning up when their bullshit is exposed. Scary.
-
Bill has done it several times already. Well good. It shouldn't be too hard for you to find.
-
That horse has already left the stable. I am against the attitude that "it's OK for my side to have nukes, but not for people I don't like". I'd call that gross hypocrisy. The USA has a FAR FAR worse record of aggression against other nations than does Iran. Nice dodge.
-
Oh really? Let's hear it. The OP was bait thrown out to start an argument. Like just about every original post in Speakers Corner, including "I want my jet". That's just stupid. Do really think all thread titles (intended to stimulate discussion) are nothing more than troll bait? What really floors me about some people is, on the one hand, they will fill in some pretty big gaps (we're talking chasms) to reach some pretty inane conclusions (that support their particular worldview), and then turn around and try to discount the most reasonable of arguments (that don't support that worldview). It's as if they are so caught up in defending the own ideology, that they're incapable of having an honest discussion. Some might even use the word "pathological" to describe such behavior.
-
Can you imagine the wailing and moaning we'd hear if a Republican won the Presidency in '08?
-
Oh really? Let's hear it.
-
I'm guessing a number of posters would give some pretty foreign perspectives.
-
I think the BBC was just reporting on what was published the Royal Society of London, which is a respected scientific organization.
-
Do you still beat your wife? I don't have one. Now how about an honest answer from you, if you can manage it. You... lecturing me... on honesty. Good one, perfesser. That's definitely a 10 (out of 10) on the irony scale. Tell you what... you post the definitions for Denier I, II & III... and I'll see which, if any, applies.
-
Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? Perhaps we should use your posts in the "When is a speed up a slow down" thread as the standard for staying on topic... or not. BTW He does raise a valid point. Oh yeah, love the Gonzalez, Cheney, Rumsfeld lied bit. Perhaps you should post some quotes and then imply they were intentional lies. That's always fun.
-
More Proof GWing Alarmists are Running Out of Time
NCclimber replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Subtle as it was...