MikeMcLean

Members
  • Content

    541
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by MikeMcLean

  1. Huh ? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  2. Thank you for posting this. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  3. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  4. Did someone say Caturday? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  5. I was wondering if anyone on this site knew him. I hope it's found.
  6. Reminds me of when I was in college and had a fake wedding ring that I'd wear to bars. Worked nearly everytime
  7. Awesome show, season 1 was terrific. I've been counting the days this week till season 2. If you like Burn, you'll probably like In Plain Sight also, totally different premise (US Marshall running WitSec versus burned spy) but alot of other similarities, main lead character with smarts, attitude, and flaws and the occasional voice-over narration. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  8. Well you might have been, but now that you've shown it to me you won't be the only one. That's some funny shit, Thanks! It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  9. Oh but don't you remember from a month or two ago where certain people argued that user-generated content sites don't generate value, are the hardest to run, etc. At least we now know the motivation behind the huge crackdown on "fun" in Bonfire It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  10. MikeMcLean

    The look

    No Skymama posts yet ? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  11. As usual, Bruce Schneier says it best: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/06/carrier_pigeons.html It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  12. Ditto! I've usually kept my facebook only to people I've met in person, but this is as good a reason as any to be different. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  13. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=786402641 It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  14. Interesting, so not only are our eyeballs for sale, but in "accidental" cases our hard drive space is also ... and this isn't a "business" and we're not "customers" how? Rhetorical question. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  15. Umm, no. I have pointed out some truths in the legal and economic environment that surround running a community driven website. From those I have extrapolated (a very few) suggestions. That's it. Discussion is healthy, that's it. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  16. I've participated in less than 5 threads on the subject in the past year (the decline period). How exactly is that "going on and on"? Additionally, how do you figure that the community being silent, with collective heads in the sand, is a good thing? And who are you to tell me what I would do or not do if I cared? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  17. Maybe because they remember the old day and/or care about what happens? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  18. MikeMcLean

    Whoa

    FTFW It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  19. Corporation? So this is definitely a business then? So I'm not crazy when I point out that we are "customers" not "guests"? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  20. Assuming the law passes, it's up to the wording of the final passed bill. This law aside, failure to pay a fine becomes a bench warrant. The bench warrant in enforceable as soon as the police get their hands on you. If the website owner is out of country, the police (normally) can't go to your country of residence and extradite you for a small offense. You are still at risk if you visit the place where the warrant is. Are there any dropzones in Kentucky? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  21. Why speaker's corner? This isn't "politics, guns, religion" nor a soap-box address. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  22. If the Kentucky law passes, then possibly. You will be liable for anonymous posts - a Kentucky based user could file a police report if he/she reads an anonymous posting. The Kentucky courts will fine you (if you don't show up in person to defend yourself). If you fail to pay the fine, a judge may well issue a bench warrant. If you are identified in the state of Kentucky for any reason (a small speeding ticket, for example) then once they identify you, you will be arrested. Note also that one of the unintended consequences of the new RealID program could well be that the bench-warrant identification could apply across state lines (i.e. boarding an airplane you could be identified as "the website operator with a bench warrant in Kentucky" and an arrest could occur). Scary isn't it It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  23. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." It's already illegal to scream "fire" in a theater (left as an exercise to the reader how that fits w.r.t. the definition of abridged). So clearly there is a legal precedent for placing some limits. Is "anonymous" versus "non-anonymous" another reasonable limit? Who knows, it's an interesting question either way. It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention
  24. http://www.wtvq.com/content/midatlantic/tvq/video.apx.-content-articles-TVQ-2008-03-05-0011.html Thought experiment: If this bill becomes law, do we all still believe that websites are "someone's house"? Could a law requiring all homeowners to identify guests pass? If not, why is a website different? It wouldn't hurt you to think like a fucking serial killer every once in a while - just for the sake of prevention