jakee

I think you're confused about what you were just cheering on. It's literally the opposite of allowing the city to police itself. I wonder what you think about his directive to the capitol police to beat up anyone that disrespects them, in contrast to his mass pardoning earlier this year of anyone who physically attacked capitol police officers? You must be outraged by at least one of those things - which is it? The DOJ even hired as a consultant one man who exlicitly called for capitol police to be murdered while participating in a riot. Would it now be resonable to assume Trump wants the police to raid the DOJ so that they can find and beat up that guy in retribution?

How does it feel to enthusiastically support the death of constitutional seperation of powers in your country? Presumably you had very different principles once before falling into the orbit of the orange god-man, I wonder if you can remember what they were.

From companies that knew he would weaponise the federal regulators against their business plans, yes. But still, he remains an adjudicated rapist. Lol what? Watching you create an argument you think sounds convincing by referencing a bunch of random schools of philosophy is like watching the David Attenborough clip of Orang-Utans trying to hammer nails into a plank. They've seen other people do it and they recognise the overall appearance of the process but really they have absolutely no idea what's actually going on. Well there was a paragraph that started with Q, followed by a paragraph that started with A. To put it another way, it was a Q&A with Grok. Are you sure you can't break that cryptic cypher without one of your Youtube talking heads telling you what to think about it?

How do you figure that, since I have the facts and you’re lying about the facts? I think you even admitted that some of the facts you started with were wrong, but didn’t change the conclusions you drew from them. So what does that say about your opinions? Have you?

If only there could have been some prior indication that Trump thinks servicemen/women are suckers and losers. As it is they can’t possibly be held responsible for this thing that just came outta absolutely nowhere. I wonder how much more the inevitable lawsuit is going to cost than just doing right by people in the first place.

The ‘disposable income’ argument is almost always specious. You don’t make the money to have the money, you make the money to get the stuff. Making more money, getting more stuff, then wondering why you don’t still have more money doesn’t really make sense. Presumably, you are making mortgage payments on a much more expensive house that is a major long term asset for you. Presumably they are paying rent on a smaller, cheaper, objectively worse place to live that is a long term asset for a landlord. If you wanted to, you could sell your house, rent the cheapest apartment you could find and have loads more disposable income than them… but you probably really don’t want to do that. This is before getting into all the other things that are often not counted as disposable income in peoples minds, eg are you supporting a family that they’re not? Are you making payments on expensive cars they don’t have? Are you making payments on other expensive retail finance items eg furniture and appliances that they’re not? All the things that come with upscaling your life to fit your income instead of living a benefits style life with lots of income. Because why would you?

I don’t really get how you think you would be able to sue him for things he said about Trump. Though I suppose it makes about as much sense as anything else you’ve ever said.

Why? Was that the bit where you thought it was funny to joke about women being grabbed by the pussy? Was that the bit where you defended the right of powerful men to grab random women by the pussy because some of them might be ok with it? Was that the bit where you unintentionally highlighted how the MAGA rapist president behaves exactly the way Andrew Tate tells men they should behave? He's still alive in prison, isn't he?

So you still think it's funny to walk up to women and grab them by the pussy because some of them will be ok with it? Doesn't sound like you are hardwired to 'protect and defer to women' now does it? Sounds a lot more like the despicable Andrew Tate manosphere that MAGA legitimises and celebrates. How many times did you lie about the murder of George Floyd? Don't worry - the violent convict fraudster is still in prison, vulnerable to the rough justice you think those kinds of people should be ubjected to.

See, you joke about the US President saying men should just grab women by the pussy whenever they can, but blame the left for legitimising Andrew Tate? You see how grotesque and disgusting your statements are, right?

Is he? It worked at the DoD. It worked at the DoJ. It worked at State...

“Did he drop the ball? You’d have to ask him. I don’t know anything about that, you’re telling me this for the first time…” Yeah, I’m sure he’d claim to be as clueless about what his caddies are doing as he is about what his administration is doing…

What analogy? Anyway, it's always amusing when the modern racists claim they're not racist, they just oppose the modern civil rights movement that's become downright Marxist and Martin Luther King would be ashamed of them! But can anyone remember what the racist segregationists of the 50's and 60's said about Dr King? Oh yeah... they called him a Marxist. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

So what makes you think Trump in his first term did a worse job at tackling child sex crime than Obama did? What makes you think Trump now is doing a better job?

Why would we agree? You've just demonstrated that you have absolutely no idea whether the US is currently doing a good job.

We know you do, because you said you wouldn’t spend a cent on prison reform and you don’t want prison conditions to be better or safer for convicts. Exactly like Trump, who has emboldened police to be more violent with suspects by encouraging them to dole out summary justice during arrests, but who is also a gigantic crybaby who can’t even cope with the kid glove treatment he has received during his arrests for his many felonies.

Why would we agree?

Why is it bullshit? She's an illegal immigrant - just because she didn't get caught at the time does it wipe the slate clean? If you shoplifted something and didn;t get caught, would it be bullshit to call you a thief? If you cheat on your fiancee but she doesn't find out and marries you anyway is it bullshit to call you an adulterer? Although to be fair to you I guess that is the true message of Jesus - anything you can get away with is fair game.

So you think illegal immigrants should be allowed to become US citizens instead of being deported for breaking the law?

Was that date before or after the Abraham accords?

Even if? Because Israel has been so peaceful ever since...

Yes, and you said that because you think it’s fitting for convicts to get shanked and it never even occurred to you that other people don’t. Just like you think it’s fitting for cops to cause grievous bodily harm to people in the street as a first resort.

50 days leaves a long time to figure out the exemptions.

When AggieDave used to post here he was fond of describing himself and his fellow police officers as sheepdogs protecting the sheep. I always had an issue with that - not only because it was arrogant as fuck, but also because everyone knows the primary job of a modern sheepdog is to control the flock, not to protect it. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to assume that those fine officers epitomise the sheepdog mentality.

See, this is exactly how I know you are happy that Chauvin, a convicted violent murderer, was shanked in prison.