rehmwa

No issue with this comment. But you do have to admit that there's a consistent proprietary attitude towards this president amongst the left. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

1 - who said "everyone"? the comment is 'various groups' (I was thinking specific subsets of the liberal team - he's pandering really badly to 'green projects' for example, and unions) 2 - who said "black" - why do you automatically think race? (do you see something I'm not? I'd say it's less about color, than about a very specific subset of uneducated entitlement class people of all colors - your personal biases might equate that to 'poor black folk', but I've lived all over and I see every demographic and it might be disproportionate by race, but it's certainly not exclusive) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I like you, you're funny. We're talking about your application of a tool. The human chooses to use a gun or a dog. take care, I have a meeting I also don't find it acceptable if either you or your dog shits on my porch and if either of you do, you're the one that takes responsibility in my mind (YMMV, apparently) - your dog isn't allowed in my house. Dogs are outdoor pets - as they should be. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

a simple matter to say the same thing about your take on it - one understands your view, but are pointing out another take on it that you are unwilling to consider at all forget the specific example from the OP - pretty much everyone agrees that the story, as it is reported anyway, indicates an undesirable vigilante theme that no one agrees with. we've been on to something else for some time now ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

sure - you are perfectly happy to INDIRECTLY inflict damage but lack the balls to own up to doing it directly a consistent position with your gun position would be to have the 'Beware of Dog' sign but no dog. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

that whole statement says volumes about certain attitudes towards our president various groups really do feel that he is "their" president and will take care of "them" in spite of others I wonder if he agrees with that or would be upset about it of course, I'm generalizing - in this case the 'group' happens to be 'family' ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

and you don't see the irony of the italics when talking about a test concerning unreasonable bias...... ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

yeah, totally different ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I suspect that if the test doesn't immediately call everyone a racist, then someone will protest the test as inadequate and racist. I didn't take the test - does it ask what your race is? (for half the crowd here, I suspect that a racism test only requires that one question - despite the irony) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I'd agree that R party advocates are looking for material to slam Obama with - just like Dems did with W. I love how the parties are exactly the same and you all continue to show that it doesn't matter what the actions are, just the D or R you worship ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

She's a real religious nut apparently (or at least pandering to religious nuts). Cause really, every TRUE BELIEVER knows that an earthquake and a hurricane is actually evidence of global warming. amen yup - both parties have their fanatical religious types we need to guard against ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

then why are you arguing for the other side - you're right in line with the self defense crowd - none of which state anything about laying traps - in fact, for example, they state that the use of the attack dogs is wrong - just like laying in wait for express purpose of murder is also wrong the whole contention was about laying down and not defending yourself at all ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

this is absolutely true. but this conversation has evolved from these illegal vigilantes to a point about self protection - supporting the rights to defend yourself and your property doesn't automatically mean one thinks vigilantism is right - that strawman is weak ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Ok - that's hilarious ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

ABSOLUTELY not. All you know is the person is stealing chronically. How do you know they AREN"T on drugs and homocidal? The only thing that's absolutely proven by the actions in front of you is they they don't respect the law. The safer assumption is that they WILL attack you if you try to protect your property. Once they run, though, you are done (unless you brought nets). here's a hypothetical - assume they are running, but they are also shouting that they are coming back with more guns and friends and will 'get you and your family' is it now ok to shoot? (please note I wrote "hypothetical" and that this is not in any way an assumption about the actual scenario) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

why do i even bother replying to such an idiotic question.. it's a fair question - why is having a gun that you can control "immature protection of property" but having a lethal dog that you have little control over "responsible home protection"? this beast you brag over could do a hell of a lot of damage even if he doesn't kill the poor, sad, burglar that just wants your stereo to feed his family. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I suspect most of us prefer whatever we have right now. And everyone can be different and there is no correct choice for everyone. My only statement on it is that whatever a student uses starting out, that they stick with that style all the way through (at least) the A or B license before changing. just to keep it simple for them ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

You act like everybody's supposed to know that shit. Sonofabitch, that's what that shit was? I knew it seemed familiar somehow. I just couldn't quite put my finger on it. this just shows how stupid politicians ACTUALLY think the 'little people' are. that's why Obama's speeches (and all the others) are so tedious and patronizing they really do think the public are total mental infants ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Like the old joke - "we've already established you are a whore, now we're just haggling over price" so? what's your price to finally choose to protect your own rights and property? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

You act like everybody's supposed to know that shit. it's not an act ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I'm fine with whatever method VB and Co want to use since we've already established they consider this to be a dollar value argument between standing up for yourself vs rolling over and taking it in the rear. rather than a matter of right or wrong. Edit: but I like your comment - it brings up a funny image. "you see, Officer, he broke through a window and took my stereo, so I just sat back and watched. I offered him coffee and cookies. Then he took my TV - so that's only about $1000 so far. no issue. BUT, then he went to take my WII. Now, we're over $1300 bucks and DAMMIT, I can't afford the deductable - so I shot and killed him right there." "If it was only a car stereo, I'd have let him go, shooting him would be immature since it was less than my deductable anyway." ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

that's a good idea - it would be traumatic for the kid ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

That's why the cap is way too high. Everyone should pays up to enough to provide a 'minimum' level of assistance (and 'minimal' means 'minimal'). But same benefit for all, but everyone pays into it. No free rides. those that make more, can privately invest their own funds to supplement the total for themselves only, with the extra when they get above the cap. If not, they the return one gets really should be proportional to their contribution, and not penalized for contributing more like it is today. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

this is completely the wrong way to approach this - you are just advocating for those that pay more but don't get a proportionate return for their investment - it's just a bid for more artificial transer what you should be doing is using the cap to argue for those that want to privatize SS. by noting that people that can afford to invest for themselves are able to - they contribute to the public fund "up to a point" - once past that point, they now have available a period of time where they have extra take home pay that they are able to use for private planning for retirement. Frankly, they should lower the cap to allow more people to use their own money for private retirement supplemental planning. Lower to the point where we can significantly help the middle class in this area. That means take it down from the current limit (what is it now 85-100K?) down to like 40K. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

no one does that in Speaker's Corner - everyone has well thought out points that don't leverage bias or stereotypes ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants