mrshutter45

Fail, want to try again?

Okay, lets see how many days you can go without trying to talk negative about someone connected to the active boards about Cooper. I just looked and nobody is talking about you. been that way for a long time. lets see how long you can stick to the case. it's what you just asked for, right... Mark the time....

You constantly try to make me adjust my forum to your standards. you have tried a dozen times to run your own forum and failed, miserably. you steal idea's from others, or do the samethings we do to try and one up the issue at hand. you accuse others of shilling when I have a dozen screenshots where Farflung roasted you. you do everything you preach against. I started ONE forum in 2014 and it's still running. what you think about it doesn't concern me. You write all these negative articles about people and speak negative to producers and media sources and get events shutdown that people paid money for and become confused as to why nobody wants to work with you on a project, or even be connected to you. really? then you try the olive branch thingy and tell people you removed all the bad articles. a month later new one's take over. it's another never ending loop. you threaten people with law suits and zero grounds to do it. according to Bruce Smith you went as far as threats of physical violence. Nobody hates you. they hate the things you do...you can't even accept blame for anything..

You seem to divert from the original topic..where you played a dirty trick. now, you bring up things from almost 10 years ago? you have yet to prove anything. you speak a lot about those ridiculous comments from 2011. who cares about those. remember, your own words about thing from the past..."that's old news nobody cares about" only when it's attached to you. The issue is getting you to finally admit you played a dirty trick yourself. Does everyone have to speak out and praise a site for having a Cooper thread. one that ends up stuck in a rut dealing with you? it's a never ending loop. why are you bringing more garbage to this forum? because you don't want the attention surrounding the original issue? You were deceptive by saying you couldn't contact Eric and voice your concerns about someone speaking out of line about Kenny. you sent an email diverting Eric to disrupt the conference. sure, people have spoken bad about you. you take things outside of the internet into the real world and play serious dirty tricks. it's not the first time either. I have dozens of screenshots with you calling people names, the moderator of your forum calling people harsh names. it's a two way street that you always try to make it appear to be a one way street. always the victim, right?

I don't read online novels...my guess is you are trying different angles to divert from the truth of failing to contact Eric Ulis to resolve any issues you might of had. truth is we already know...

I don't expect you to agree. convicts have the same rule (wasn't me, I never did that). actually, it doesn't matter whether you agree or not. I will do you a solid for once. just let me know when ever you need to get a hold of an active member on these boards. I'm pretty good at finding contact info. it's complicated but it can be done. even a new member can't get by me Hint: if you are ever on the same board as the person you are trying to contact. you can simple ask them in a post on that board. it works. I've seen it done. Operators are standing by.....

You don't need ears to read?

I never claimed to be perfect. that has nothing to do with your actions. just more diversion tactics. I did show that you were far from perfect in being honest about how or why you sent the email. pure malice. that's a fact. has nothing to do with PM's, or emails, or the price of milk. it has to do with being honest, which you were not. Yes, had to slam the hammer down on you several times. the constant begging was getting old along with 5-6 emails withing an hours time gets old quick. the nerve of me using language lol. your coming after me like I sent a letter to disrupt a function or something, oops, sorry.

Famous quotes? "You can't handle the truth" I guess we are even. you have been blocked on emails for years... I never PM'd you. they were always from your direction..

I would run from the issue as well. it's very obvious....

I'm not trying to convince anyone. the evidence speaks for itself. you tried to claim that the email was sent because you couldn't contact Eric. you give the illusion that Eric was new and you had no idea who he was or how to reach him. you then attempt to make it appear you had no choice but to send an email. you knew very well what you were doing. the exposure of this shows the fault in the entire plan. who wouldn't contact the source to try and discuss something like a man. instead you play tricks by diverting Eric completely. isn't that your own policy, "go directly to the source" ? thumbs up, you got us good. not only was it a dirty trick, it's something you often accuse others of. you are scared to death that people are like you. that's why you hide everything. To put any REAL truth into this. you should of made attempts to contact the source of the event (Eric) by either emailing or calling him as millions of people do daily. if these avenues didn't work then it's possible you would have to try and contact the Country Club. only as a last resort and all the other options were exhausted. this of course would be the case for someone actually concerned. failing to do this supports my case further of the actual intentions. you didn't want to contact Eric. no drama involved. it would of been between you guys only. it would of been the proper way to handle this. no other way around it. The bottom line here is people like Johnny Green, Ted and a few others did make statements of Kenny being a child molester. this is clearly an attempt to retaliate against those accusations. you even threatened Bruce with a law suit prior to the email. you had no grounds for that either. you are trying to make two wrongs a right. it's not working....sorry.

Robert, the allegation are not mine. they are documented in the 2007 article. you are trying to sweep it under the rug. this occurred almost 50 years ago. the article was made by Gray, not me. I realize you believe this is my fault too. they are troubling allegations. I already told you Kenny probably didn't do any harm. that doesn't mean it never happened. You are not law enforcement. not even close. talking with friends and family helps support your version but it's far from what the possibilities could of been. calling him a child rapist is wrong but you can't just ignore the allegations. people talk. it's part of life. people are mean, nasty, nice etc. you can't control it. The conference was all your fault Robert. you lied saying you couldn't contact Eric. you are not being honest speaking for him by saying he had no idea what happened. you seen the post above what Eric stated. it's miles from what you stated. not one person or hint was given about anyone discussing Kenny at the conference. why, because it was never going to happen. you invented the idea. it's called "fake news" malice is visible as can be and the evidence backs that up. who was going to speak about all the liable, Tom Kaye, Eric, 377? that leaves Bruce. do you really think people would spend money just to gossip about Kenny? it's total nonsense. Eric pegged you perfectly. How many times have you posted how easy it is to find someone "dropping a few bucks on a website" it was free in this case. you could of easily made a post on TMN asking Eric to contact you. his name is all over the place. Eric Ulis. the intentions were crystal clear.... Stick a fork in it...she be done

Eric's statement... I posted the following comment (blue text) on MN regarding the discussion about Robert Blevins:My vote would be to permanently block Blevins from this forum. Blevins’ threat was grounded in malice. He knew that the yacht club wasn’t organizing, funding or sponsoring the DB Cooper Conference. That would be me. However, he hasn’t threatened me. Why? The answer is because Blevins hoped that he could stir the pot and that the yacht club would cave. He was right. Furthermore, he knew that he could not intimidate or silence me. Once again, he was right. The event is called the “DB Cooper Conference” and not the “Robert Blevins Conference” for a reason. Blevins is not that important. DB Cooper is important. The conference is about Cooper, not Blevins. This and other sites should be welcoming to people with differing opinions and theories regarding the DB Cooper mystery—even those espousing Kenny Christiansen as Cooper. This task is impeded when people like Blevins are permitted to operate unchallenged in any manner they see fit. It is neither right nor productive. Free people are not required to tolerate malice. There is no honor in willingly forfeiting the rights that we all enjoy as Americans, chief among these freedom of assembly and speech. The 2018 DB Cooper Conference will take place; the new venue will be announced soon. Cheers! You can stop the games giving the idea that Eric didn't know who you were and the tricks you pull..even after you apologized Mayer said you had plans for the next location. obviously, you backed out of that idea. as Eric stated. it was pure malice.

I feel sorry for Eric. He probably didn't even realize what was going on, and the reason his event had to be moved. I would have contacted him directly, but at your website, where he was doing most of the advertising, only registered members can view any links, pictures, profiles, etc. I didn't even know exactly who he was until afterward. Very deceptive. Eric knew exactly what happened. he received the email you sent. he also posted on The Mountain News where you were also posting prior to being perma-banned.. you could of easily contacted him. Eric posted the event updates on both sites. you couldn't figure out how to contact an active poster that was on multiple sites, really? You had no intentions of contacting him directly.

Here is a simple question. had you not sent the "email" would the conference be at the Portland Yacht Club?

Remember this part? something you had no authority to do? a little different to how you explain it above. you can't hold anyone liable for what you did. that's nonsense. you threatened them.. If we observe anything slanderous being presented, we will immediately file suit against the Portland Yacht Club for personal damages, and for supporting the presentation of such slander

Then you all had the nerve to blame it on me and whine about it when you got dumped by the Portland Yacht Club. You mean the letter you sent causing the country club to not allow Eric to hold the convention there. the one you apologized for doing, that one. yes, I remember it well. the one you apologized to Eric about. that's a lot of apologizing for something you didn't do? What was the letter about. threats of a law suit. you are crossing the line here with honesty Robert. you know why it got shutdown. it was because of your actions.

I never claimed to be a lawyer You should look into these matters before tossing law suits around and making claims the family could sue as well. you have been told this multiple times but keep posting similar comments and threats. Now, I've said this multiple times as well. there is a "shred of evidence" suggesting Kenny's behavior was not normal. this started right out of the gate. it's documented that Kenny took in under age runaway's (boys). he bought them gifts, took them to restaurants etc. some, might suggest this would fall under the category of "grooming". the whole town was talking about it. personally, I doubt it was anything bad, but it's questionable. certainly not something someone trying to hide should be doing even with good intentions. also, in a lot of cases friends and families are the last to find out. Today? they would most certainly look into this matter. that's a fact. a lot has changed since 1971. You have to realize that Kenny is not perfect either. he's subject to criticism just like the others. the very same one's you go after. This has noting to do with Producers. they have lawyers to make sure things are done right, most of the time...

Why of course there is "Is there a point to your rather bitter post?" nothing bitter about countering something false said by you... ".If they presented slanderous material in that book, they could be sued. Not by AB of Seattle, but by the family" Correction = bitter? I don't think so...

Survivors or descendants of the dead have no legal claim on behalf of a deceased relative’s good name, nor can they collect on behalf of their own interests relative to that person’s reputation. Likewise, the estate of a deceased person cannot be liable for the defamation of the dead. Good luck trying to sue someone for liable against the dead. you guys are too busy accusing Kenny of being a terrorist. the court system would laugh you out of court. Kenny can't even defend himself against you guys.. Dead Cannot Be Defamed "You can't defame the dead" is an often-repeated legal chestnut that restates the general rule that only the living can sue for damages to their reputation. The continued force of this rule explains why many defamatory "tell-all" biographies appear after a famous figure has died. Georgia's law is typical -- it recognizes no cause of action for slander of a dead person, but allows the person's family to continue to prosecute a legal action for slander that the deceased started before he died.

You don't follow very well at all Robert. I answered the question several times in the last couple days. Tuesday 7:08 " I don't believe we are any closer to finding Cooper then we were in 1971" 14 hours ago "I also believe they will jump out of there seat if a picture of Cooper every gets shown" 6 hours ago " if you followed along I also mentioned that Cooper has not been found yet." please show where I said the show was great? Did Tom put the team together for the show. not that I'm aware of? You want people to work with you? that isn't going to happen Robert. you have done considerable damage. you write articles about people. you actually believed we would pay money to set up a conference to talk bad about Kenny that caused Eric to be kicked out of the country club he was going to have his conference at. you talk bad about people to producers and media outlets. this is just a few things. then when you want help you appear confused as to why it never happens. where ever you go this always happens. the thread gets stalled to talk about how bad things are for you. you threaten law suits that are not justifiable. you don't own Kenny Christiansen. you own the rights to your book. big difference. I also explained why I posted the names of the people Tom had on his team. you made a remark that you have done more than anyone else with the Cooper case. this had nothing to do with my beliefs towards Rackstraw or Tom. you made that assumption all by yourself which was completely wrong, as usual. I consider this matter closed.

I have to go to bed now. you stay up till 6 am pounding away at the board. even before "semi retirement" ever occurred.

I will talk about Kenny any time I wish. it was brought to your attention while posting negative against Rackstraw when you fail to look at yourself. Kenny was 5' 8" and bald. lol. zero pictures of any hair piece that would pass for real hair in the 70's. you can spot them still today. see how this works. you can be negative about others but call foul when it points in your direction. it's called an example and not considered discussion....

So what you are saying is that even though all these people were supposedly involved...the best they could do was point the finger at a guy with blue eyes, who was about twenty years YOUNGER than the descriptions given by witnesses to the hijacking? And that now you are convinced beyond a doubt that Rackstraw was Cooper? Sounds like that's what you're telling us here. How do you speak for the public when you can't even get things right here? try and stay focused. I, meaning me. never claimed that Rackstraw was Cooper. showing his team does not invite that idea. you still with me? it was a post showing you how many people was on his team. you still there? you claimed in the past, just a few pages back that you have done more than anyone else. the post was a wake up call showing you that you are pretty amature when it comes to organization and capabilities that Tom has over you, and most of us. it had nothing to do with me believing Rackstraw was Cooper. if you followed along I also mentioned that Cooper has not been found yet. Getting a movie deal is not going to solve the crime. hard investigative work does the job. it's good to have those things but it's not going to solve the case. how would it be any different than the hundreds of shows about Cooper?

only thing in the description that Kenny matches is the fact of being a male. it appears Colbert has you on this, no?