mrshutter45

Those are childish remarks similar to what Derek does. kind of like the threats of law suits you pull. you really believe those guys on Bruce's site. I have a pretty good idea who they are and it's not Georger. you are letting this get the best of you. how many times have they showed up to an event you've had. who has been harassed outside of yourself? you claim most were friends from the eclipse camp out. how many were ID'd and harassed? pretty lame excuse. no pictures of any other tents set up. almost a dozen people and all you say was it was fun? it doesn't make much sense IMHO. Should I call the police about Derek. should I get a bodyguard. those are serious accusations? it's not "that person" it's Derek. You have been told time after time about the Amboy chute. it's still considered part of the case regardless of it's involvement. I'll ask you once again. who was suspect 3 and why won't they tell us. he was eliminated so why won't they tell us? you fail to understand basic procedure. they will not discuss anything in an open case. most LE have this set in place. it's not there job to tell you exactly what they did with anything.

Derek, was just wondering about you today. I see you still haven't grown up. these childish games only work in school. boy, you sure got me this time, right? what is a "private laptop" you would be better off saying desktop as I don't own a laptop. perhaps a tablet. can those be "private" too lmao.

It's not really the point of not finding anything north. it's whether or not they were looking in the right spot to begin with. as time progressed, even the FBI admits it might be further south than first thought...doscuments even back then put the possibilities all the way to the Columbia..that's a lot of ground and tells me they really didn't know. I think they did the best they could for that period...

The 8:10 statement has an asterisk with it. that means the statement could be off by up to 3 minutes. could be. nobody knows. the radio transmission shows 8:12 PST.

It could still reflect to what Carr stated by mixing up the oscillation with the pressure bump. it's 5 -10 minutes after the last contact. that gives a window down to 8:15...closer to Portland proper or the vicinity thereof. closer to Ariel doesn't make sense with the statement of the suburbs...

It's the only location with a parachute near by marked on the sectional chart..has to be that area. it's specific...

It doesn't matter what I think about the adventure. it just doesn't make sense that you censor the trip. who does that on a fun outing? that's my opinion. Names are not the subject. it's okay. I'll just put in the nobody showed file. it's all good. What should we do at other events. show an empty stage where dozens of people will be and not show them?

Good catch. this sounds like a statement coming from the Portland radar operator and clarifies how they knew about Scoll's airfield or the area close to it with skydiving. it is marked on the sectional map.

lol, so you promote camping trips every other post and have a rule not to take photo's of the trip. how is that any good with regards to helping the case by hiding everyone. is this China?

here is the whole portion of the statement...

If you read the 302. it states that the plane veers to the east. this could be the 8:12 location. then he claims the plane makes a right turn. this would be the 8:15 location and very close to the parachute icon on the sectional map he states. this would be Scholl's airfield. 8:10 -8:12 it veers to the west. The radio transcripts are set in perfect time. the other set of transcripts have the faults of up to 3 minutes +- marked with an asterisk. the others are +- one minute. The radio transcripts show 8:12 PST. this could be Cooper on the stairs and not jumping yet. then the plane makes a right turn....

where is the photo showing all involved. where are there tents and set up?

Robert, get off your high horse and stick to the case. you are breaking the rules here in several ways.

I don't need to do anything Robert. If it happens it happens. I'm not going to sit here all night talking about nonsense.

I have no idea what he's doing...IT'S NONE OF MY BUSINESS.

You are attacking his character. if you are not involved in the conference then you really have no say about it. it's none of your business what he does. you dropped out. it's a never ending loop of drama...

None of this nonsense belongs on here Robert. FYI, a conference is a conference. nothing more. it's limited to "the public" since it's in a local area. perhaps you should start a tour around the states to get the word out properly? televison programs, and internet carry the load much more or better. no, I'm not saying they have no meaning either. The first one by Grey was to promote his book. the second one was to promote WSHS. you are trying to make it out like some large corporate move. It's a conference. When I read the emails you say you had a very small part..either let the cards fall where they may, or take it over and show the world how it's done? try actually discussing the case and not the members. filling up pages with with personal attacks is why this thread was closed the last time. yes, you are attacking a member. repeatedly.

He says others use "poison pen tactics"

Silver Nitrate is not going to stay dormant for years until light hits it. the lab probably did this during testing. nobody knows if they decided not to touch any of the bills prior to handling or separating of the bills. the lab will handle the evidence much different than the agents. Tom said it turns immediately. he see's no value in it and claims they had dyes back then they could of used. I don't believe SN will transfer they way you believe it will. About silver nitrate Silver nitrate (AgNO3) reacts with the chlorides in skin secretions to form silver chloride, which turns gray when exposed to UV light. Developed prints must be photographed immediately because the reaction will eventually (and permanently) fill the background. Silver nitrate is useful on paper, cardboard, plastics, and unvarnished, light-colored woods. It is not useful on items that have been exposed to water. The lab probably knew this as well only checking a few of the bills.

Robert, this would be considered..."instigating" if you don't stop I will report the postings now... I'm tired and going to bed. if I see multiple postings in the morning I will report them. we need to stop the bickering....

Robert, plenty of proof was shown. you replied to them and it repeats. it takes more than one to account for multiple postings. I've said the subject was done, and you have also said it. now, if postings were made by one person continuously it would then be a problem. I replied, you replied...

Robert, this is a debate. it has nothing to do with stalking. that would imply making articles, following someone around the internet. the is a Cooper forum. I have never been on a forum that is not connected to Cooper where you post. that is not a fair accusation or assumption!

You bozo's should of contacted the police. going to someone's house that time of night? you screamed for months when Georger called you at midnight. that's an hour half past your stunt. scared of dogs lol. he told me he was always scared of someone jumping him..the Ariel conflict was also believable. Bruce has no reason to lie. Robert, your tactics of law suits are very well known. I have NO reason to doubt Bruce...Bruce even posted your emails with the threats. "if we observer anything being presented, we will immediately file suit against the Portland Yacht Club for personal damages, and supporting the presentation of such slander" Notice anything missing in the threat? you fail to even mention Eric who would be responsible for things said more proof of malice. love how you glossed over the truth from 377 as well. no break down? I agree. this matter should be closed.

Now, would you like to stop playing the victim and calling people liars? You read into things wrong more than anyone I know. the articles don't mean anything to me. it's used as an example of what you do. you have been making them since 2014. just more malice to add to the pot. I haven't read one in some time, over a year. the comments from Bruce and 377 explain it all.

Bruce Smith wrote: Here is why I think Blevins is dangerous:1. He came to my home uninvited and unwanted at 10:30 at night, with a buddy who was armed.2. He threatened me with physical assault if I attempted to attend the Ariel BBQ in 2016.3. He alerted the Auburn PD in 2015 and told them I was a probable suspect in the bombing threat they had received earlier in the week prior to the Auburn Days festival, and provided them with headshots of me.4. Unrelenting character assassinations in print and verbally for over ten years at the DZ chat rooms and elsewhere.5. Numerous threats of law suits, especially if I printed my findings about Christiansen and runaway boys. Bruce also wrote: The following is a comment from our esteemed 377, Mark Metzler, via his email to me: “The explicit threat to file suit against innocent hosts for something a conference speaker might say, had a certainly foreseeable and likely intended consequence: to instill fear in the hosts and cause cancellation of the venue rental. “I and others find this bullying behavior offensive. Is hate or scorn the right response? I don’t think it is. Pity comes to mind as more appropriate. “Those who cause frequent groundings and collisions while navigating the channels of social exchange are usually lacking something essential. Their blunders and misbehavior are often seen as purely malicious when in fact the primary component is simply a lack of consciousness.”