mrshutter45

Why are you putting me on trial. didn't you have a problem with "inquisitions" a couple weeks ago?

Georger has a issues with a lot of people. you don't like him, he don't like you. This is not the discussion. once again you skew off topic to insult and try to attack my character. the SUBJECT was Eric and his video's.

Robert, I'm hardly in a position to apologize for showing stats or explaining them. if anyone is wrong it's you. nothing offensive or bad was remotely stated in my reply. it was simply showing what can be seen. you are attacking me for pointing data out? that's a not allowed now?

Just speaking the truth. I'm not allowed to have an opinion. I'm simply showing what I see. here you go again attacking me for showing what anyone can seen? I never asked you to defend anything. I'm showing facts. are you one of those who downplay facts? not allowed to show or discuss data to back up a statement as I just did? I seen a video last year of a college student yelling out "stop giving us facts" was that you?

Actually, his video's are not doing that bad. he's only been around a couple months and has up to a hundred plus views on some of them. you have a video running for a month with 150 plus views. 44 subscribers is pretty good vs 253 over about 5 years on yours. Eric has been getting news media coverage that will probably help. It will be hard to reach big numbers because not everyone will view them all when you post one everyday. I only watch one channel that does daily video's. he travels around the country so it's not the same type of redundancy. seeing Flyjacks responses stops me from viewing them along with not believing a western path and his logic following the path.

It's not becoming a star...it's the public? you should also be putting your video's in 16:9 aspect ratio too. we are discussing view count, right? the second best search engine is YouTube. that's your public you always claim to know...thumbnails are in as well. 5 billion videos watched a day.

Actually, it's harder than I thought becoming a partner... Have at least 1,000 subscribers. Have at least 4,000 hours of watch time within the past 12 months. Channel/content must adhere to the YouTube Partner Program policies, YouTube Terms of Service, YouTube spam policies, and the Community Guidelines. You can do this avenue.. YouTube's partnership program helps users to develop their video-making skills, increase their subscriber count and boost their revenues. However, if you're not a YouTube partner, you are not exempt from the money-making. You can still monetize your videos by using a Google AdSense account, which is free. When your visitors click the ads displayed on your videos, the earnings are deposited in your AdSense account and paid to you after they reach a given threshold.

My point was I wouldn't pay someone who wasn't a real business or associated with the subject be it Alcatraz, Hoffa, Cooper etc. someone certified. especially on water. lots of liability. you take that risk promoting your company and camping trips with no liability insurance. YouTube partnership should be your major goal. more views, better placement. reaching people is your other goal. you worry about someone else's views when you could triple your own. I don't think they have a limit on video's but again you seem to like promoting video's. you have to keep the interest going. you don't make enough to achieve that goal. basically, it sounds like we need to work on yours as well?

I might like the escape from Alcatraz case more than Cooper. I doubt I would pay $50 bucks to someone who isn't really associated with the park. besides the fee's were removed...never heard the turnout.. Why haven't you become a partner on YouTube?

Have you even spoke with Eric about this. are you just taking the video's off of YouTube for a promotion for yourself basically? He works more with the media... https://www.azfamily.com/news/hunt-for-db-cooper-phoenix-man-says-feds-miscalculated-landing/article_48b539e0-9a12-11e9-9704-63997938de94.html

The temps at 10,000 reported by the pilots were -7 Celcius which would be 19 degrees F. this was noted in the area just before the Lake Merwin. it's always been mistakenly reported as -7 F. McNally had zero skills and jumped going almost a hundred knots faster. he did a free fall count of 30 seconds before pulling. he said he went into a spin with just a movement of his arm. claims his goggles pushed into his eye sockets as soon as he hit the stream. his story is a little wild. he claims he was holding onto the stairs with his body off the stairs and said if an agent would of came into the back, he could of taken a shot at him. then he watched the money separate from him on the way down and thought about releasing the harness and ending it. then while drifting decided he was going to do it again but was soon caught. he also found out the money landed close by to where he was. no training, no military. just read some books and did some recon and off he went. pretty simple. for some reason Cooper needs to be special opts. experience skydiver, master criminal etc.

It doesn't really matter if you discuss Kenny or not. I'm basically telling this board my opinion. similar to you speaking about Peterson. claims of holding things back and fairness? isn't that what you accuse the FBI of with the Amboy chute by not telling everything? other people with suspects say they hold things back as well. they never say they can't discuss the suspect though. $20 bills dated from the 80's. it's not evidence of anything. anyone could of buried that money. it's a wooded area. lots of people would be around there. even though it was private property. Kenny wouldn't have any need to bury money dated from the 80's. not a sole was looking at or for him. I remember Buddy saying Bernie wasn't the accomplice. that kind of destroys the whole thing. The FBI story makes no sense. why would they close the case because Kenny is dead. they spent a long time working with Marla Cooper. LD is dead. why would they bother with any suspect that was dead? they spent 4 decades looking for him. they want a conclusion just like anyone else. why would they work the Kenny angle alone. did they contact ANY of his family or friends in the past 5 years? instinct, assumptions only? they had Marla Cooper take a polygraph. Where did Kenny launder the money he was giving out so quickly after the crime or did he give out $5,000 of the ransom? The production company seems to suffer with budget. you have claimed so many things. it's been starting for the last two years, three really. a year ago you claim to speak with them monthly or weekly. why wouldn't you have all the answers? I thought they found a writer a year ago as you stated on The Mountain News? even a year ago the stall was waiting for another production company to come on board. that happened and has also come and gone. lots of conflicts in this story. that's why questions come your way. it has nothing to do with my opinion. I think a movie would be cool but not much different than all the other shows over the years. it will fade away like the rest. personally, I don't think enough people really care about Cooper. the film would require top notch actors to reel people in. 10-20 million right there alone with just one actor or top role. it must be backing as one of the issues. is this a box office movie or made for TV movie?

If we are to believe the memory Flo has some 17 years later. one could believe all the photo's in the past she looked at were not Cooper. she seems very convinced she knows what he looks like, even years later. I've always said if they ever really see a picture of him the hair will raise up on the neck and arms...looks similar won't work.

Her new composite looks more like LD.... Her original statement surrounding his hair was that it was parted on the left. her new sketch shows it combed straight back.

Flo said eyes were brown,, in this video she remembers the colour of his eyes.. and the first composite does not look like Cooper. 17:30.. Agreed, but it's somewhere in the 302's where she does claim she wasn't sure.

It fits much better than Kenny, who worked for the very same airline did this over strikes? a guy who appears to have never made a threat to anyone in his life? a guy who doesn't match the description other than being male? bald, short, pale skin. Tina couldn't tell he was the same height? you go after Sheridan about the eye's. if you read the 302's you would notice she claims she wasn't sure. If you read the 302's about the bomb and the statements made by the witnesses they don't match what the Sheriff wrote in his notes but match what your witness said. that sends a red flag IMO. you always go by the witness statements to the crime. the Sheriff obviously was mistaken or even the agent. his flight path notes are misleading as well. not intended but none the less. Making a bomb out of rolls of quarters makes no sense. wood dowels would work much better. add up the amount. it's a lot of money for a person you claim was as poor as they come. even though it was well known that Kenny was good with money and purchasing property. this would cost Kenny $320 to make in quarters. a roll of quarters weight one half pound. that's 16 pounds of fake bomb. then the battery. this would be flimsy and very noticeable since he carried it around for an unknown period. probably end up in a "S" form/shape. $320 in 1971 to today is $2,023.44. The $5,000 loan you say Kenny gave out would be like me loaning you $31,616.30 today. His mortgage was $18 a month, if not mistaken. it sounds funny but was equivalent to $113.82 which again is a lot of money in 1971. Flo stated the following " the bundle consisted of 6 or 8 reddish colored sticks...she believed they were taped together" (reference to all the sticks bundled. not pieces like rolls of quarters taped and bundled) no mention of color with the wire. Tina's statement..."approx. 8 cylindrical objects about 6 to 8 inches long with 4 of the items being placed on top of the other banded with some sort of tape" (this again is in reference to the sticks being banded together.) These statements were taken shortly after landing in Reno. fresh in there minds. Lots more to add, but you guys get the idea. lets not forget that Kenny remained at Northwest earning "low wages" for two more decades after the hijacking. I don't believe Peterson or Kenny was Cooper but I would bend more towards Peterson IMHO.

Robert, I'll make this clear as I can. I really don't care what you do in regards to my forum. it's of no concern of yours. what happens on The Mountain News is not NEWS here either unless it has something to do with Cooper. those comments made there are not funny. I have no control over it anymore than you do. suck it up. deal with it. you don't see me reporting Derek's comments all over the place. they were nasty comments but it is what it is. we move on. You have a short memory. nothing was mixed up in regards to accusing someone of being from Bruce's site. who else would make such a comment. me, fly, Eric? not many here. wonder why. possibly filling up with drama, again? I don't have the luxury you have of staying up till the sun comes up. I have a business to run. I can't sleep the day away. this is not my life nor is it a job. it might be for you since it appears to be all you have. I don't have anymore time to deal with you. I guess I will see you in the morning.

Report what you wish. Anyone researching your off and on appearances at Dropzone will soon notice that your first post often refers to me, or something AB of Seattle is doing. The post with the comment above has also been reported. it's another false allegation/ character assassination. you are far from the main topic on my forum. you haven't been discussed in a long time. you were mentioned yesterday due to accusing another member from here of being from Bruce's site. all he did was ask about the camping trip and got the third degree. you dredge up old comments and repeat them over and over. I suggest you either discuss Cooper or hangout with the truck boys at Nissan. if you don't want questions coming your way. I suggest you don't post anything you wouldn't want to be confronted about. this is a public forum. questions are asked, in case you didn't realize that.

The topic was from your post. a recent one. a legit question was asked. you always show empty camps but claim many are there. you decided to go off topic whining about other forums. I will be reporting the personal attack "that's why I called you a phony" Robert, if none of this bothers you we wouldn't constantly read about it. more than half the comments here from you are pot stirring. putting the thread right back to where it left off.

where at in the file.

Try and focus on Cooper and less about what others are doing elsewhere. I only commented on Bruce's site to explain that Eric is not posting as Lynn on my forum. that's a little above the typical trash talk. this constant bickering and accusations are what got the thread shutdown the second time. you are curbing it to the third with the off topic rants.

You were banned in 2014 due to your OWN actions. my site doesn't concern you. in fact, you recently stated that you no longer go to those sites. even though this will be the 20 or 30th attempt. You flip the coin and you will see that a lot of people hold back from posting here due to the presents of yourself. you are looking for the perfect world. it's not going to happen. you piss and moan about others and explode when the fuse it lit near you? you are more negative than anyone I've seen online. it's constant with the off topic rants. constant. it's 5 AM and you are pounding away. I have to go to work in the real world while you live here in this world. you would never hide behind another profile to stir the pot, would ya? it's funny how you do the very same things you preach against..

I am not full of it. those are facts you REFUSE to acknowledge. now, you twist it around bring up old news. my site has nothing to do with the discussion.

Robert, your whole life surrounds what people say about you. it's in almost ever post. you break the rules here by doing so. I have dozens of screenshots showing hatred from you and past members. stop playing victim.

It is NOT there job to tell you anything. they hold a press conference if needed. they have explained what they have and know about the chute. you are putting them on trial based on media coverage. when they tell you they can not discuss an open case that gives them the right to NOT tell you anything as I mentioned 100 times before. Similar to not showing photo's. you have similar rules that apply...do you ever go to bed before the sun comes up?