georger

Yours is a good question. It is trumped by Blevins Rule No.4476 which states: all criminals name their accomplices, always. Has anyone bothered to check NWA records to see if Kenny was flying that weekend?

Same as it ever was... Once again you dodge the real issues. And post another Blevins Editorial! In an endless succession of Blevins editorials. Don't you want to know what else Kitt said?

I think Robert can be excused from driving the outcome of Decoded. After all, they sent him away to eastern Washington during the filming of the Geestman segment. Well the "outcome" of Decoded was zilch! Those people couldn't agree on anything. I am sure Blevins will float a different result just to take up more editorial space.

Your opinions are WRONG! Your facts are WRONG! You found out about Kitt's truth feelings _ THROUGH ME! If you didn't already know them. Meltzer knew about them. Kagin knew about them. Others knew about them. You twisted and used his one statement filmed to your advantage! It doesn't appear you cared too much since you never apparently personally interviewed one of your own *key witnesses whose statement you manipulate and then use countless times as you see fit, taking it completely out of context.! It is clear you were by fault or omission part of the cover up .... and you continued this deception for years! ... and you have the gall to accuse me an innocent party of some kind of dirty trick? Remember_you're the guy with the book and all the claims, four years worth of claims and accusations calling people LIARS ET CETERA? All you have is propaganda and editorials and personal attacks you dream up ... The day you assume some kind of moral high ground will be the day water does flow up hill! So you can "can" the phony editorial about tricks (you know literally nothing factual about!)

There was no dirty trick? involved in calling Kitt. Blevins had railed on and on for over a year about Kitt backing Blevins' case so I finally called Kitt to verify Blevin's statements, which did not pan out! Where's the dirty trick in that? The "dirty trick" is in Blevins misrepresenting what Kitt said and thinks and the factual history of the Decoded program which Kitt participated in and clearly feels was engineered to achieve a biased outcome. The engineers of the biased outcome appear to have been Blevins and producer Marissa Kagin. The liar and the trickster here is Blevins! Blevins has used Kitt's words as part of his case for years! Then it turns out Kitt neither said or meant what Blevins says Kitt said or meant, etc etc etc. The dirty trick is Mr. Blevins'. How Mr. Blevins can say the dirty trick was mine is just one more piece of Blevins-speak Blevins is promoting to divert attention away from himself and his own tricks and misdeeds, possibly trying to intimidate me and others? Moreover: the transcendent truth is, this kind of film-flamery is representative of Blevins' whole case and everything he's done since joining Cooperland. It's a political campaign.

I can see why you'd skip over that. Nobody likes to be mocked. But, then, I looked at it another way. Why does Robert get so much vitriol? There are others on here who are passionate advocates for their suspect. There are others on here who will massage any facts so they fit the result they want. There are others on here who disagree with others and will argue about it. They don't get the kind of response Robert gets. Why is that? I think the post from Yellow Oxide pretty much nailed the perception others have of Robert. Not sure if seeing that can make others disagree without being disagreeable, but it might be a start. It's only a few users at Dropzone who actually give me a hard time. Most of the emails I get regarding Kenny or the Cooper case in general are nice. Of course...these days I have to tell people that the book and the tee-wee shows are only a general guide on KC and that there ARE errors in them. However, I don't think these errors really detract from the recorded testimony of the witnesses or the things we discovered. I can be reasonable, but not so much with unreasonable people. Or...people who I feel can't totally be trusted. That's why I had to put a freeze on any outgoing information regarding the current investigation with Geestman's extended family, and the work we're doing with some other folks. But that doesn't mean I won't announce some results of all that. It means I won't do it unless EVERYTHING PRESENTED on a particular point can be absolutely, without-a-doubt, VERIFIED. No more maybe this on a point, maybe that. I also think some people, because of personal issues and not so much about their interest in Cooper...play dirty tricks. For example, when I mentioned that Bruce Kitt had said on Decoded that yes...there was a chance Kenny might not have been recognized by the flight crew if he did only the Orient routes. He was only working a couple of times a month anyway and other employees interviewed by Geoff Gray basically called Kenny a 'shadow. Harry Honda, others. Whatever. I know that Himmelsbach said they didn't even suspect employees. And when Kitt said that NWA did their own internal investigation, that is a maybe. Kitt has told me that Cooper was before his time and he didn't know much about it anyway. So...Georger calls him and Kitt obviously didn't think Decoded represented him or his views well. I'm sorry for that but I wasn't there to see it. I never had any experience like that. TV is just that. TV. I thought they did a pretty good job considering. I say I'm going to do the slideshow on Kenny next month. Then I get a bunch of flak for 'using' the media to my own advantage. Okay...so I cancel the slideshow. I leave the PDF on Kenny a free download for over a year and people call it a pack of lies. So...I take it down and start going over it, looking for better avenues and better evidence. People bitch because I took it down. You just can't win with certain people. At this point, the new report on KC is more or less finished with the exception of the family's imput. They kind of came along rather recently, so I am working with that. But I need two questions answered and one is more important to me than the other: 1) Exact arrangements on the house. (Less important) I already have the loan to Dawn Androsko verified by more family than you can imagine, and I know what she did with the money. That will be in the final report. 2) Where were Kenny Christiansen and Bernie Geestman between Tuesday, November 23, 1971 and the following Monday. (Most important) There are a few minor items I need to know as well, but the truth on Item Number Two will tell me everything I need to know. And I will find out. All Geestman has to do is provide a suitable, rock-solid alibi and I think you have to write off KC as the hijacker. The reason is although I believe it's possible Kenny was the hijacker, that if these two men have a verifiable alibi for the week of the crime then there is NO WAY you can hang it on them. I am certain the two men were together that week because I don't peg witness Helen Jones as a liar. If she says Kenny told her he was Geestman that week, then I believe her. I think that's as honest an assessment as it gets. Working through the family on this is the best way to find out. Not Shown on Decoded: When they asked Geestman where he was the week of the hijacking, he just sat there and looked at them without saying a word. They tried a couple of times, and then they moved on. Associate producer Peter Berg told me later the whole thing was bizarre. That's why they wanted Helen Jones to go on camera. They were going to shoot her testimony about Kenny and he being together the whole week, and then ask him again. But she wouldn't do it. She lived alone, she said. And she was afraid of Geestman. That's right. I broke the facts on Kitt. You didn't, even if you could have! Kitt gave a totally different set of facts than you have. Oh! And I am entitled to call people on a telephone. Don't need your permission, whoever you are. Looks like you have sour grapes and an anger management problem. Im thinking about clicking the SPAM button on three of your most recent off topic posts. Should I? Be back tomorrow night - you have a long long lonely night ahead of you here.

NOT what I was saying...just some things are happening and I will not discuss them....suddenly the pieces of the puzzle are falling together. Such things happen when we have to go deep within ourselves and we face the end stages of our lives... Georger is a STRANGE fellow! That is what I was referencing when using him as my example...and because of somethings he has said in many of his posts.. GEORGER does KNOW more than he states, but over the yrs one learns when he is fishing & when he is throwing real bait....George may well know more about this than anyone on the thread, but then perhaps he likes to make others think that... Sometime I get the feeling Georger is a sentry - one who has to guard himself and the situation...he has to control and he sometimes does that by confusing everyone....he is very artful in doing this. Outside of 377 he is one of the primary intellectuals on this thread, but he has his flaws. Frankly I would like to meet the old baboon in person someday...he is a interesting fella.. I have to get some rest - very little sleep recently due to health issues & thing going on! If you wish to call him the BRAINS I guess that is OK with him...as for being involved in the skyjacking - no, but he has more knowledge of it than he has let on. He hides behind this wacky persona he presents. Duane was the skyjacker or the skyjacker is deceased and Duane and another party or parties buried him....I just know that Duane was there.....! I have had so many scams come my way in all of this & it is difficult for an old woman to keep up with 18 yrs of research... I do know that Georger is more than what he portrays himself in this thread...The link I had to Georger was BEFORE he ever appeared on a thread...it was a story I was told by Duane....what a small world we live in. Things Duane told me - they were scattered over the yrs...the pieces are starting to fall in place... P.S. I was aware of who Georger was but not his name...I was told about Georger's hobby yrs ago before Duane died. When Georger exposed himself to the thread - I do not believe he was aware of my memory abilities...plus he didn't mention his hobby - that was introduced by someone else...later on and then I wanted to KNOW more about Georger. In fact GEORGER even at one time denied this fact about himself - (his association with the SKY)! YET his amazing photography made it evident. I knew who Georger was before he was exposed by the thread - and Georger knows I know this. This goes back many yrs ago before 1970. Georger does like to talk about himself and his background. Attention Georger: Georger, do you remember a group of guys going on a hunting trip? The man who footed the bill - do you remember him? Fantastic man and a very wealthy man. Do you remember the hunting rig they had? YOU know who I am talking about and how I knew your name before anyone else did...a name out of the past...but, then your name is very common, but not your passions. Two unlikely companions in a man of the same name. Oey vey! Ich habe nicht die geringste Ahnung wovon sie reden. You have me confused with ... Frank Sinatra or Mamie Eisenhower ?

I have seen this behavior in postings by Georger as well. But I don't think his job is to do a coverup on Cooper. In my opinion he simply dumps his garbage at Dropzone occasionally. He may be trying to deliberately sabotage the thread because he wants everyone to post at the alternate site. Traffic there is fairly light, and mostly the same faces. Source: Google cache of the homepage, which is updated about every two or three days. The problem I have with this behavior (I don't have a problem anymore with the alternate site itself) is that it reveals two separate internet personalities. One legit, one rather vindictive. well spoken conspiracy theory! with ten tablespoons of sour grapes and 'how the fuck to do get out of this now that I got myself into it!?' Blevins, maybe you will have a Divine Revelation.

I have seen this behavior in postings by Georger as well. But I don't think his job is to do a coverup on Cooper. In my opinion he simply dumps his garbage at Dropzone occasionally. He may be trying to deliberately sabotage the thread because he wants everyone to post at the alternate site. Traffic there is fairly light, and mostly the same faces. Source: Google cache of the homepage, which is updated about every two or three days. The problem I have with this behavior (I don't have a problem anymore with the alternate site itself) is that it reveals two separate internet personalities. One legit, one rather vindictive. Blevins & Jo Weber: The above nonsense is actually laughable. And I'm not kidding. Your posts on KC and Duane Weber take up about half of the space on this thread. While in reality, neither KC or Duane had any connection whatsoever with the Cooper hijacking. Both of you are desperately searching for straws that would even hint that you candidates could have been involved in some manner with the hijacking. And both of you have failed to find those straws simply because they don't exist. I can state from personal experience in working with Georger that he wants to solve the Cooper hijacking. He has done an enormous amount of original research that I am aware of that has not been reported on any thread. Maybe he knows who Cooper was and maybe he doesn't. But with Georger having repeatedly posted on this thread that neither Duane nor KC was the hijacker, I think it is funny that Jo is apparently admitting that it wasn't Duane. On the matter of the number of posts on the two threads, how many months, or maybe years, has it been since a serious post related to Cooper appeared on this thread? Just running your mouths about your candidates does not constitute research. Robert99 And, I could return the praise your direction too! It was a high point for me when you arrived at Wayne's site and of course Wayne saw an immediate affinity. Your seriousness and willingness to keep an open mind have not diminished in the meantime. There have been a lot of fine people who have entered the debate during the years and you definitely are one of them in my opinion. Sailshaw presented an interesting theory the other day! It is work from fertile minds that keeps this going. We all wait for a breakthrough.

I have never asked any such question! Don't call me, you wanting one more reason to post your propaganda tonight.

Actually, I don't. Your pithy, without-any-merit, and empty response is noted. Added to the others...which are many and legend. Robert, you are the one who is making all the claims as if you have all the answers. how long was the chute in the ground? can you verify Cossey looked at for 10 seconds and left? I'm also reading the owner claimed "part of the chute was white and conical shaped, remains buried in the ground" You automatically assumed the FBI concluded it was Wallings chute. this was a week after they found it. it's very possible they already concluded it wasn't Cooper's chute, so, why would they care to look into it belonging to Wallings. the title reads as follows. Suspected D.B. Cooper Parachute MAY actually be from 45 military crash. "FBI spokeswoman Robbie Burroughs said it's "definitely possible" Walling's chute is the one they have, but the bureau does not plan to further investigate it." So, once again I can assume you speak for the FBI? you are certain they checked this lead on Wallings and ran with it? or is it possible she agreed to an extent because of the date? your very own website spells it out like this was the official explanation by the FBI. you got all of that from "it's "definitely possible" ? I have a feeling if someone told you someone was missing in November of 1971. you would take it as November 24, 1971. Sounds to me like you need to go to Google News and research out all the media articles, copy them, print them up and compare them. There are a great number and this is what I did. Search between March 24, 2008 and April 8, 2008. Keywords: Cooper, parachute, amboy, etc. Why should I do your research for you? You're the one with the website actually dedicated to Cooper, right? You have a lot of nerve even coming to Dropzone and ASKING me questions. I won't mention why, but I will say that if you didn't want me around from the start, or to even VIEW your site (*laughs*) that what you're doing now could be considered hypocrisy. You have no right to ask me questions now. Send somebody else please. Besides, I can see we have two different views on this subject and I don't think these views can be reconciled. You say you are *positive* the chute is nylon (among other things). You say much of your surmise is due to the fact 'silk would deteriorate rapidly in WA's rainy environment and this chute is obviously in good condition', therefore is nylon even though you have never seen the chute up close nor have you presented anything to prove that the chute is nylon! You have never seen the chute, but you claim you read everything Google has to offer on the chute. Cossey said the chute is silk and NOT nylon. You call Cossey a liar based on what God only knows! Well... since you claim to have digested all available Google info, how did you miss the number of statements by people who have seen the chute including Cossey and Ms. Burroughs who say the chute is in "badly deteriorated condition" - the very requirement you yourself require of silk vs. nylon ? And still you say it is nylon! You contradict yourself! This is just one example of why everything you say falls under the heading PROPOGANDA vs. reasoned thought. You don't seem able or willing to follow your own thoughts and accept them, when they disagree with - yourself! It's no wonder your whole story relies on selective picking of anecdotes vs. consistent thought, since you aren't even consistent with your own thoughts and stipulations. Nothing any of us can do about that. Lastly Blevins" on the subject of websites and who is where and why et cetera. We are here, and there. We are members in good standing on both forums. You are not in good standing on Shutter's forum and been lifetime banned. You are apparently on shaking ground here. Why is any of that anyone's fault but yours? Maybe its the anger management problem you keep accusing others of having? Just as you require a silk chute would be badly deteriorated then you disallow experts who have seen the chute saying the chute "is" badly deteriorated ... which you reject simply so you can say chute is nylon? That kind of double-speak is propaganda on your part. Why? Well the why is quite easy, I feel. You want the chute found in the official dropzone to be in a place you can claim you have linked to Kenny Christiansen and Geestman ... no matter how much it violates your other stipulations previously argued. You see evidence means nothing to you when your primary agenda is connecting dots in ... propaganda. You will then say what you always fall back on which is: "I never said that!" Everything you say and do is Propaganda. Even the undoing of everything you say and do saying "I never said that" (when you clearly did say it) - is Propaganda! Camels in a used car lot? For the Wage Earner Sheeple?

Cossey also said he determined it wasn't Cooper's in 'less than ten seconds'. He wasn't correct on it being silk. Silk is biodegradable and would have rotted in the ground. And you have to ask yourself why someone would bother to disconnect the container and harness (they were not found after additional digging) and bother to bury the thing. A human being did this, not a piece of cargo. However, if the chute actually IS 34' feet in diameter, that would certainly eliminate it. Maybe someone should ask the FBI if it is. We have only secondhand information on that via Bruce Smith. But...countering that are those pesky 'it's the right size, it's the right color' statements by the Seattle FBI. NBC interview with Larry Carr on the Amboy chute: Quote from Cossey, March 28, 2008 via Associated Press...a quote we already know is NOT true: Chute actually jumped with belonged to Norman Hayden of Kent, WA. From the Citizen Sleuths.com: New York Times, March 27, 2008: That's a yes and a maybe no. As you can see, there are many conflicts associated with this chute. It's found in the right place. Cossey says it's made of silk. In fact, this is pretty much the MAIN reason he gives media on how he made his determination. And we know that is wrong. (It's almost certainly nylon) As far as the size, there is only secondhand information on that via Bruce Smith. Is it possible that Cossey would speak to dozens of reporters and leave out the size to everyone except Bruce? That also seems unlikely. Cossey has also repeatedly stated in the media for years that the chutes belonged to him, which is also untrue. You figure it out. Don't you find it strange Ms. Burroughs didn't just say: "Ask RobertMBlevins, he knows, the truth of everything!"

You can quote me on that. How did Kenny pronounce his name: Christiansen? How does Lyle pronounce the name? Another Christiansen from MN wants to know. As a self-proclaimed professional Editor, surely you can handle that one? ps: we all know you are still hear reading-plotting. so answer the question if you know.

Blevins, pardon my morbid curiosity, but how long do you think it would take the FBI to conclude that the late Andre the Giant was not Cooper? Do you think they would even bother checking his finger prints or DNA? And the same with Cossey and his fast rejection of the Amboy parachute as being related to the Cooper case. Do you think Cossey would do lab tests on the canopy to confirm something that he could see by a 10 second inspection of the canopy? Robert99 We're not talking about Andre the Giant or the Amboy chute. I didn't say the Amboy chute was Cooper's. I said the way it was dismissed without a single reason given as to WHY was a bit lame. 'It's the right size. It's the right color'. That was an early FBI quote on the chute. Another article stated the chute was sent to the Seattle FBI's lab for analysis. But it was the very next day when they dragged it up to Cossey's. I don't have all the answers. And frankly I no longer care about the chute. Last time I contacted the Seattle FBI about it with questions was 2013 - five years after they found it. Guess what they said: They couldn't discuss because it was evidence. That's a funny thing to say on something that was dismissed five years previously on the case, wouldn't you say? My only focus lately on this whole thing is very simple. We will continue our investigation into Geestman and Christiansen until we either run out of leads, eliminate them as participants in the hijacking, or confirm that they were involved. Our main focus is finding out what they were doing the week of the hijacking. I think everything leads up to that point. Doesn't matter what others think about that. This is where we are concentrating our efforts for now. We are all waiting with baited breath to read your version of what you say Tinman, Dorothy, the Lion, and Big Bird say you say they said you say they say you say they said! RobertMBlevins 99 layers of Christiansen Hell! What happen on Floor-44, in the elevator? Do the four Clydesdales abreast get rescued from the elevator stuck on Floor-44 ? As Clydesdales Turn - a daily production from and by ... Again, it's good you have something to do with your time. Otherwise . . . Question: which side of the bread did Kenny butter on?

Blevins, pardon my morbid curiosity, but how long do you think it would take the FBI to conclude that the late Andre the Giant was not Cooper? Do you think they would even bother checking his finger prints or DNA? And the same with Cossey and his fast rejection of the Amboy parachute as being related to the Cooper case. Do you think Cossey would do lab tests on the canopy to confirm something that he could see by a 10 second inspection of the canopy? Robert99 Andre the Giant !? That's NEW!

Well whoever runs ADVENTURE BOOKS! you sure seem to have a lot of idle time on their hands with nothing better to do than make stuff up and defend yourself 24-7. Smarm in - smarm out. And nothing but smarmy claims from your control booth in Oz. Better switch from Kenny to Dorothy, in your DB Cooper Fantasy!

Sounds like an anger management problem on your part! Yes you have 'posted up' all kinds of post-ups claiming someone said this or that, meant this and that, when in fact it doesn't and they don't. You are fond of finding in people's words what you want to find and hear. That's an anger management issue on your part, if I ever saw one. It will all go away if you close you eyes and think of elephants dancing with butterflies. Good dreaming!

RMB is fond of saying things that have no foundation in reality. But of course RMB claims to run something called "Adventure Books. It could be an Adventure management problem! You know like diamond mining in the Columbia River. And selling camels on used car lots. Nobody these days is going on I5 in or on a camel!

RMB says: "the FBI has admitted multiple times that they've never even done a minimal investigation of him as a suspect." Where has the FBI has admitted multiple times that they've never even done a minimal investigation of Kenny as a suspect? You've said this many times but never produced your evidence. Because you have no evidence of what you are saying! Sounds like you have an anger management problem?

I would call those quotes accurate. We aren't sure. '85-90%' is not 'sure'. But here's the problem with your opinions regarding Kenny Christiansen and Bernie Geestman: Your opinions are always negative, from start to finish. And you've occasionally been called out on this by others here. I get emails sometimes about you, mostly not flattering. You've made fun of our cleaning business, Gayla Prociv (head of AB of Seattle), and engaged in minor personal attacks. When that didn't work, you started responding to legitimate Cooper posts by copying song lyrics off the internet, quoting the post, and then adding the lyrics as a response. So basically...your opinions mean nothing to me, or anyone here at AB working on the case. In fact, I had to finally warn you that AB staffer Phoebe was actually my oldest daughter, so that you might refrain from going after her as well. I figured if you knew, you might have enough common sense to not stoop that low. Yes, there is an article titled '25 Best Reasons KC Might Be Cooper' at Newsvine. I haven't checked it lately to see if it needs to be edited, since it was done at least a couple of years ago. It probably needs updating. And the same thing with the article on Geestman, 'Is This Man an Accomplice in the D.B. Cooper Hijacking?' etc. Investigating Kenny and Bernie has always been a fluid thing. Sometimes you get it right, sometimes not. Sometimes you have to correct your information. Anyone who says it's easy to investigate a possible suspect in the Cooper case has rocks in their head. If it were easy, if any particular suspect were simple to confirm, Jo Weber would have succeeded long ago. Or Galen Cook's suspect Bill Gossett. Both of them have been investigating and trying to prove their case for many years longer than we've been working on Christiansen. And neither of them have succeeded to date. And the same thing goes for us and Kenny Christiansen. We cannot yet prove he was the hijacker. But unlike some others, we are now once again in the field and trying. We're hitting the bricks, driving around, meeting people for new interviews...and re-interviewing old witnesses. Geestman's extended family has also stepped forward and offered to help. We have accepted that help because again...you would have to have rocks in your head not to take advantage of an offer like that. This investigation into Christiansen and Geestman has cost us more than you can possibly imagine. By March of 2011 I was considering closing AB down, paying off our authors on all sales, and returning the rights to their books. And even after all of that, I still turned down the money from Adrenaline Hunter, and refused the film rights offer. (The History Channel offer was refused the previous year, and we were not in financial straits so much at that time) Fortunately, we have recovered from all that, no thanks to either Cooper or Kenny Christiansen I assure you. I may not have much personally, but money is not a worry for me and it's none of your business why. It would sound cheap if I told you anyway. When you invest so much time and emotional effort on a big question such as whether KC was Cooper, you get to a point where you don't care about MONEY, but The Truth. To me, that's the only thing that matters at this point. Screw the money. No one's ever got rich on Cooper yet, and I don't think they ever will. So...no matter how many disparaging comments you post, one thing remains certain. We will continue to investigate Geestman and Christiansen until we either run out of leads, or we discover the truth. We are not afraid of that truth, only that it IS the truth. Sure, we would like our suspicions confirmed and find out we were right all along. On the other hand, no one around here will jump off the Ballard Bridge if it turns out we were wrong. We will move on with the knowledge that we eliminated a suspect who was (partially) the subject of a New York Times bestseller, (Skyjack), another book specifically about the suspect, (Blast) two TV programs, and endless discussion on this suspect. That would have to do. But you can bet on one thing. Unless we finally reach a dead end, we WILL get to the truth on Geestman and Christiansen. And we will discover where they actually were and what they were doing between Tuesday, November 23, 1971 and the following Monday. This is the time block previously established by Margie Geestman that she claimed her husband left the home in Bonney Lake and was in the company of Kenny Christiansen. Have a great day.

Everybody gets it wrong about editors. They think editors are hovering with the red pencil and live for cutting, hacking, and slashing a ms. In reality, the best editors know their job is simply to make you look good on paper. It's like you kiln the pottery and the editor puts the color and polish to it. There's an old saying in the writing/publishing business: 'Even editors get edited...' I consider myself reasonably talented, but even I wouldn't be dumb enough to release anything without an editor working with it first. So was your book "Blast-The True Story of DB Cooper", your first pdf sent to the media and the FBI, and many of your posts here at DZ ... an 'exception' to your rule? A number of people have commented about the poor grammar, lack of logic, and intelligibility of these documents ? I'm sure they have. I get that a lot from Cooperland. The public (or folks with common sense who don't have an axe to grind) might have a different opinion. Currently, a local paper has picked up on the story (they were provided all updated info) and are investigating the allegations. I never said I was sure Kenny was Cooper. I said the only thing I was interested in was the truth. It's a simple concept really. Either he was, and Geestman assisted him or he wasn't and Geestman didn't. It isn't rocket science and whichever way it goes I can handle it. Aren't you even the least bit curious?

Everybody gets it wrong about editors. They think editors are hovering with the red pencil and live for cutting, hacking, and slashing a ms. In reality, the best editors know their job is simply to make you look good on paper. It's like you kiln the pottery and the editor puts the color and polish to it. There's an old saying in the writing/publishing business: 'Even editors get edited...' I consider myself reasonably talented, but even I wouldn't be dumb enough to release anything without an editor working with it first. So was your book "Blast-The True Story of DB Cooper", your first pdf sent to the media and the FBI, and many of your posts here at DZ ... an 'exception' to your rule? A number of people have commented about the poor grammar, lack of logic, and intelligibility of these documents ?

Funny. I edited it for you above, no charge!

I saw that Pawn Stars episode too - just chuckled. I'll bet a lot of people called them over that twenty. On the other hand, the Antique Archaeology American Pickers have never had a Cooper twenty walk into their lives, yet. Who knows! They may call on some guy some day only to find a box of twenties in some barn ... In Florida! ? I love it! Jo ...... HIDE THE TWENTIES! Mike Wolf is in your neck-o- the-woods. Are Cooper twenties being forged yet?

Funny Georger. That's EXACTLY what my wife was doing to get this 21st century Maytag to wash with hot water. Of course I had to find an electronic solution. I never did see any particulars on JTs claim that at least one of his Washougal launched balls ended up at T Bar. What ever happened to JT? I miss his posts. Maybe he retired on his gold mining income and is just kicking back. Wouldn't that be nice to have gold in your back yard? Here in Silicon Valley all you find when you dig is toxic waste like trichloroethlylene. The T Bar money find is corrosive to my brain. It eats at it. I just cant figure it out. I though Tom K did a good job of examining the possibility of natural transport to T Bar. He basically says no way. 377 JTBear is still around. Frosty as ever! Still mining his claim. Can;t say more due to .... well just can't say more, sorry! You know! Yes JT's claim about ppballs dropped in the Washougal only to showed up at Tina Bar is still unproved. Can;t say more due to .... well just can't say more, sorry! You know! Yes I remember the old ringer washers well. We had one in the basement for years. Next to fire and the wheel that washer was a Godsend. Modern agriculture would never have happened without those old washers ... Maytag, Amana, and a brand Sears sold (cant remember the name) ? Do you remember the Sears catalog in the outhouse? I sure do! I had every page memorised, until I used it ... going out there in the winter at -20 below. Can;t say more due to .... well just can't say more, sorry! You know! Later if all goes well . . . 73.