georger

'the FBI has reportedly said' and 'Himmelsbach has reportedly said'? Really? I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat...never mind. You've seen the film, I'm sure. Blevins, Why don't YOU give a source which ties Soderlind and NWA or even the FBI to the origins of the map you love? Robert99 Sourcing is as Sourcing does! And to think Blevinaide has FurMan and Kittsbuel and a Grey on his side! Or he could just read the thread! But that would be too easy and bypass GRANDSTANDING.

'the FBI has reportedly said' and 'Himmelsbach has reportedly said'? Really? I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat...never mind. You've seen the film, I'm sure. Source please.

I suppose I should comment on having eaten a BBQ pork sandwich tonight, not to mention another one two weeks ago Sunday, and the car ride I took to the Farmer's Market on Thursday ... not to mention buying lettuce on Tuesday. Tom mentions a process of elimination through weighted arguments, a method SafecrackingPLF tried to use also. Cooper could simply have lost some of his money while making his way near the Columbia looking for a route of escape. Some money then arrives on Tina Bar at some date as yet uncertain. Palmer thought 1979. [no plant required - no FP amendment required - based on new weighted arguments concerning novice survival in an NB8] I'm going on a car ride tomorrow. Just thought yawl would want to know.

Fuhriman's response to your so-called theory, is in no way, shape, or form a certification of it ... but merely a polite response to you in a bar! Fan of the FBI that you are! You are The evidence on it that is limited. Tell us about the chemistry of the Cooper US paper money.

Jerry, You statement above is absolutely correct. And a falling body without an open canopy is going to land very close to the flight path, as well as his jump point, of the aircraft he departed from. Robert99 If you believe Cooper was a no-pull, or a couldn't-pull, then the idea he landed near Tina Bar is virtually impossible. I will present testimony in a few weeks on that subject. If you believe Cooper managed to pull the ripcord and land successfully, it's still a stretch that he would have drifted so far off the flight path. We're talking more than six miles here, all the way across to the west side of the Interstate 5 freeway. This drift would have begun from an absolute maximum of 9,600 feet, and unless Cooper pulled right off the airstairs, it would be even lower. Bill Rataczak has said: 'We (he means the 305 flight crew) know WHERE Cooper jumped. We just don't know where he landed.' There are also some recent comments on this subject. As some of you know, I had Bruce Kitt at NWA present him with a map that had some added notes. The map shows the location of Tina Bar with a blue 'X'. It also shows the 'official' flight path as designated by the maps on Sluggo's website. The question to Rataczak was simple: There is an answer to this question. I've been slammed pretty hard on another point, but I still stick to it because I think it makes sense. (So did Cooper FBI agent Bob Fuhriman) The point is THIS: If this money was ever in the Columbia River at any time, then how the heck did an amount equal to more than ONE bundle of the cash end up in the same damn spot? If you found a great deal of the cash, you could say Cooper landed nearby and died. One bundle or less? It floated there somehow. But explaining three together (at least) is pretty tough to swallow unless you believe the bundles were attached to each other somehow - and they were not. Remember that nothing else was ever found, and has not been found since in that area. No other money along the riverbank, no body, no chutes, no briefcase, NOTHING. There is no conceivable way the money could have drifted to that spot without coming down the Columbia. Some people have suggested the Washougal River, but if Cooper had gone into the Washougal, they would have found something of him by now. Any other scenario requires miles of river travel and the idea that three bundles of the money would somehow end up in the same spot after such a long water trip does NOT make sense. Researcher Tom Kaye is quoted as saying he believes human intervention was involved somehow in the arrival of the money at Tina Bar. In the lack of any other evidence to the contrary, I have to agree. But in the end, it may come down to Reverse Engineering to discover the truth. In other words, if it is discovered WHO Cooper actually was, then you might be able to go back and figure out what happened. My personal belief (and it's just an opinion) is that the money was PLANTED there by Cooper sometime after the issuance of the John Doe warrant in November 1976. You have to remember something here: If Cooper made it down alive, he would know that the Statute of Limitations was due to expire at that time. And when the FBI side-stepped that statute using that friendly Federal judge in Portland, he knew the FBI would be searching for him the remainder of his life. Must have been a real disappointment, I'm sure. This is more than enough motivation for the hijacker to attempt a red herring with the FBI in the method of a deliberate plant of some of the ransom. But the problem really would be HOW to do that without tipping off the FBI that it WAS a plant? You can't just leave it on the ground somewhere. The FBI would search the surrounding area, and if they don't find anything else, they would know right away what you were attempting to do. You could leave it in the forest, the mountains, somebody's back yard. None of that would work. The FBI would find nothing else and they would know it was a plant, or at the very least, that the hijacker was still alive and perhaps just dropped the money. Any plant, in order to succeed in fooling the FBI, would have to be done near a major water source. The Columbia, for example. You could go to Tina Bar and actually BURY the money, but then perhaps no one would ever find it. If Brian Ingram hadn't done a little digging, then within a few years that currency would have completely degraded to nothing. So what happened? I think the most likely scenario is that Cooper placed at least three bundles of the ransom cash into another container and then left it somewhere it could be found, either in or near the waters of the Columbia, and not far from Tina Bar. And somehow...it ended up at Tina Bar. Or...maybe he did go to Tina Bar and actually bury it. There's no way to tell for sure. If Cooper was really trying to do a red herring on the cops, he would have been better served to plant an amount equaling one bundle or less of the ransom, not more, because this increases the odds tremendously that the money did not float to the same spot on its own. I actually asked Bob Fuhriman in 2010 if the FBI ever considered these things back when the money was found. He said no one thought of it, but that looking back now, it made sense. In any case, the FBI began scaling back its search for Cooper after the discovery of the Tina Bar money. So if that's what Cooper intended, he succeeded. After all of this, I will agree that the Tina Bar money is still a mystery that created more questions than it actually answered. You are just guessing! It is patently obvious you don't know anything about the money find at Tina Bar, you are relying completely on your interpretation of what other people have said about the Tina Bar money, and you never cite the Palmer report because you don't know anything about the Palmer report because you have never-ever seen it, as you claimed! You keep throwing out Agent Fur-Man's name, as some kind of testimonial over a drink at a bar, that you are a great thinker who has stumbled on some deeply held secret of Nature & Philosophical Psychometry regarding the Cooper case, that not even the FBI thought of. That Agent FurMan has confirmed your theory! Please continue with your recitation and tell us how Psalm 33:45 and Tutankhamen fit into all this, and what did Agent Fur Man say about that! ? You and Tutankhamen might be on to something important! You cite Annelies Marie "Anne" Frank also! 'How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world...' Anne Frank Did you know 'Anna' and Margot well at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp ?

I know what Porteous told several people about his hookup with Blevins. You must remember, Porteous' first relationship was with Lyle and Gray - Blevins did not exist. Porteous was shopping for a script writer and exploring movie options with producers in Hollywood. One of those producers actually called Mr. X for advice and counsel in this whole affair! (Blevins and Porteous may not even know this). What is not certain is to what extent Porteous was still working for Lyle, when he and Blevins hooked up. But Porteous was definitely having contacts with people in Hollywood completely independent (and unknown?) to Blevins. Porteous was shopping when he and Blevins hooked up. Porteous told several people (a) he needed a free script writer at no cost to him, (b) he needed a free publisher at no cost to him, and (c) he wanted a movie script. Once Blevins got in the picture three things happened: (a) Gray got cut out of the picture, for which Blevins has publicly apologised, and (b) Porteous abruptly stopped all communication with Cook and several others apparently at Blevins' insistence. And (c) Blevins formed some kind of formal relationship with Lyle independent of Porteous! Blevins has bragged here how he and AB books owns certain rights to Christiansen family photos etc.

Yeah...well that's because I caught somebody on your 'approved list' feeding your other 'approved list posters' a load of hogwash. Then you not only installed the blockers, but went so far as to ban my IP address so I couldn't see any more of the lies being posted and take screenshots for evidence. Yep. That's what I call transparency all right. Funny how you would actually take advice from a guy (Bruce Smith) who was vacationed out of Dropzone for posting sexually harrassing remarks. Yeah. That shows REAL honesty and sincerity in your selection and decision-making process. Besides, I can check out your site anytime I wish via Greg the Techie Guy. I haven't done it for a while though. I was mainly concerned with the Cook BS, and when you made that right, I no longer have a problem. That's why I removed all negative references from the AB site about you. I just wish you'd stop coming by here and touting it as 'fair' or 'the place to go' because that's a load. It's nothing more than a convention. With some George Orwell tossed in. But believe it or not, I hope you guys work through that and come up with something positive on the case. Here's a surprise for you. I've finished the Final Report on Kenny Christiansen. It's expanded from 29 pages to more than fifty pages. Bet you'd like to see it. (Not that you'd actually ADMIT that, LOL) Not a chance. You can wait until August 9 like everyone else. Your site can't be trusted, and I don't feel like having Greg waste his time monitoring comments there about its content, especially before the theater event. So I'll wait until after that is over and then release it at AB. Then if anyone wants to whine about it, or make more insulting comments, they can do it then. Your guys over there trying to move the flight path to explain the Tina Bar money? You might want to re-evaluate that theory. Unless you believe the co-pilot on 305 doesn't know what he's talking about. Details at 9. (August 9) My recommendation goes to Dropzone for public discussions on the Cooper case. So, who's stopping you? From discussing Cooper here? You can discuss Cooper all you want, if that is now your pleasure. With Jo, Danielle, Amazon, Quade! Discuss away. You have this whole forum to yourself, except for Jo. So discuss Cooper all you want. Just not over there. Don't be shy! Discuss away. I am sure people will flood here to discuss Cooper with you! It's only a matter of time. Oh yea there is 377. You said Gray said he would join here if I didn't post here. So discuss away. Get busy! Just not over there - All these worlds are yours now except for Over There. Attempt no landings there.

Well, I gave you what I consider honest and realistic answers. You come back with the lyrics to Over The Rainbow. I gave you better, and more well-thought-out answers than you deserve. It's obvious you haven't the slightest clue how to handle that. Your agenda is based on hate, and has little to do, if anything, regarding Kenny Christiansen or even Cooper for that matter. With you, it's a 'Blevins' thing. Always. Blevins you ARE over the rainbow! Your claims about KC are over the rainbow. Your claims about Cooper are over the rainbow! Your claims about everything are over the rainbow. Mine is a polite way of telling you "you are full of shit". Now I get it. It's a blanket rejection of everything. Come on, you don't have to sugar-coat it for me. Give it to me straight.

Well, I gave you what I consider honest and realistic answers. You come back with the lyrics to Over The Rainbow. I gave you better, and more well-thought-out answers than you deserve. It's obvious you haven't the slightest clue how to handle that. Your agenda is based on hate, and has little to do, if anything, regarding Kenny Christiansen or even Cooper for that matter. With you, it's a 'Blevins' thing. Always. Blevins you ARE over the rainbow! Your claims about KC are over the rainbow. Your claims about Cooper are over the rainbow! Your claims about everything are over the rainbow. Mine is a polite way of telling you "you are full of shit".

I stated the facts and my thoughts on this whole matter years ago - and Blevins has read them and still chooses to ignore it. Blevins is asking me to be responsible for what Geoff Gray said about him? Blevins is milking this cow now for 4 long years because he somehow believes this impeaches my credibility?! It is well known that Tom and others had serious problems with Gray. Grays issues with Blevins are a separate matter. Gray has told numerous people that he wants nothing to do with Blevins or the Blevins-calamity. Who knows what Gray said to different people or what he is saying today. It's Blevins problem in any event and I am merely the messenger. Blevins for his part has claimed that the conversations between me and Gray never happened, and, ‘Gray never said what I say he said’. He has tried the same tactic with the Fitzsimmons interview and every other issue he wants to make disappear etc. So Blevins make up your mind! The calls never happened, or, the calls did happen but Gray never said what I say he said? Decide what your next version of other people's truths will be. Or STFU and leave people alone for a change and mind your own business if you have any? And the very same applies to Jo Weber. You cultists are all alike. Nobody owes Blevins or Aamazon or Jo Weber - anything. Nor could anyone ever satisfy them. Better to buy a boat with a hole in it and take off for Hawaii! A guaranteed disaster. Why is anyone even paying any attention to these __________s? For someone who has a history of convoluted personal attacks on other posters there Jerry, You do appear to be a tad bit thin skinned to get so fucking butthurt so often..... Harden the fuck up Nancy!!! I think you mean 'here' not 'there'. Oh well. Bruce gets banned for 'sexual harassment'? And you get a free pass! The glaring double standards here are firmly established. Carry on. Maybe the problemo is your perceptions?"

Robert: Yes, I think you SHOULD be held responsible, since you are the only source. I knew your statements regarding Gray were untrue from the start. I met Gray just once. We exchanged signed copies of each other's books. He invited me and a couple of other people for drinks. I mostly spoke to FBI agent Bob Fuhriman during that time about the Tina Bar money. That was it. Then you come with all kinds of statements supposedly made by Gray about me. I knew this was ridiculous, and frankly, I got tired of hearing it. ***'It is well known that Tom and others had serious problems with Gray. Grays issues with Blevins are a separate matter. Gray has told numerous people that he wants nothing to do with Blevins or the Blevins-calamity. Who knows what Gray said to different people or what he is saying today. It's Blevins problem in any event and I am merely the messenger.' Robert: In reality, you haven't been a messenger. You've been a constant attack dog on every post I've made here, and it made no difference the subject of the post. You persist. You are obsessed, without a doubt. One insulting subject header line after another. Scores of them. Go look for yourself. Robert: No. I said that when I questioned Gray on your statements, the ones you credited to him, he said he didn't make them and the whole situation was much of the reason he doesn't post at Dropzone. I didn't hear the 'Fitzsimmons Interview' where you claimed Lyle said he 'knew' his brother wasn't Cooper. This makes absolutely no sense anyway. Lyle doesn't know whether his brother was Cooper or not. But for years he's been sending every letter, picture, or document to AB in his efforts to help us discover the truth. He does this at his own expense and even was willing to sign a no-profits contract with us in exchange for us to work with him. This includes any film rights royalties. He has given the search for the truth on his brother every effort possible for about seven years now. He still does today. That goes completely against some alleged statement you claim now. And besides...like I asked you before...HOW EXACTLY would Lyle even KNOW one way or another whether Kenny was the guy? He doesn't. Neither does anyone else. This idea that KC and Cooper were one and the same is still unproven. Robert: Okay. My mind is made up. Gray never said what you said...etc. That's according to Gray. I'll post his email if you wish, but I won't like doing it. It seems cheap somehow. But if you ask me to do it, I will. If you hadn't disabled PM's I would have sent you the email privately a LONG time ago. Maybe I will just post up some of your comments over at AB with Gray's response and you can go see it there. I'd really rather not do it at Dropzone. Robert: Well, you've posted up more BS about me than I can keep track of. This easily applies to you, although I don't think you're in a cult. Robert: You are right. Nobody owes me a thing. But then I'm not asking you for anything. I've seen some of your posts at the alternate site and compared them to your posts here. It's like night and day. Over there, you speak reasonably about this or that. Over HERE...you think this is the place to take out your trash. It's either that, or you confine your garbage-dumping to HERE because Shutter doesn't allow it over THERE. It's a bit two-faced. To Everyone Else: Many of the latest postings come from folks who question the idea of Kenny Christiansen being Cooper. I understand this completely. Since I can't (and won't) provide any final update on this theory until August 9, maybe we should move on to something else. It's only eight weeks away anyway. At that time I will present the latest, most-accurate-as-we-can-make-it information on Kenny, have on hand a final version of the unedited PDF on him, and even provide two new videos. You'll just have to wait. None of those things, in and of themselves, will prove that Kenny was Cooper. My hope is that they will provide the tools enabling someone to find out. The reason the current PDF remains at the AB site is except for a couple of minor points, it is completely accurate. The reason it gets downloaded so much lately is probably because I incorporated a direct link to the PDF inside the Kindle version of the book. At the end of the book. This was done about a year ago. Did you think this all up on your own! ? ? ? Ok Columbus. Let Isabella know you're on the Moon. "Over The Rainbow" Somewhere over the rainbow way up high There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby Somewhere over the rainbow skies are blue And the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true Someday I'll wish upon a star And wake up where the clouds are far Behind me Where troubles melt like lemon drops Away above the chimney tops That's where you'll find me Somewhere over the rainbow bluebirds fly Birds fly over the rainbow. Why then, oh, why can't I? If happy little bluebirds fly Beyond the rainbow why, oh, why can't I? [Judy Garland]

I stated the facts and my thoughts on this whole matter years ago - and Blevins has read them and still chooses to ignore it. Blevins is asking me to be responsible for what Geoff Gray said about him? Blevins is milking this cow now for 4 long years because he somehow believes this impeaches my credibility?! It is well known that Tom and others had serious problems with Gray. Grays issues with Blevins are a separate matter. Gray has told numerous people that he wants nothing to do with Blevins or the Blevins-calamity. Who knows what Gray said to different people or what he is saying today. It's Blevins problem in any event and I am merely the messenger. Blevins for his part has claimed that the conversations between me and Gray never happened, and, ‘Gray never said what I say he said’. He has tried the same tactic with the Fitzsimmons interview and every other issue he wants to make disappear etc. So Blevins make up your mind! The calls never happened, or, the calls did happen but Gray never said what I say he said? Decide what your next version of other people's truths will be. Or STFU and leave people alone for a change and mind your own business if you have any? And the very same applies to Jo Weber. You cultists are all alike. Nobody owes Blevins or Aamazon or Jo Weber - anything. Nor could anyone ever satisfy them. Better to buy a boat with a hole in it and take off for Hawaii! A guaranteed disaster. Why is anyone even paying any attention to these __________s?

SO, what does that make you Georger? You are putty cat playing with the ball dangled in front of U! Better be careful kitty that ball might not be made out of soft rubber! JUST maybe the GAME is over! I think there is really a soft rubber toy... it came with the choking the chicken costume You have a one track mind - too bad since you once had better. What do you know about Amazon? Either from your Wayback Machine memory or from today? The same could easily be said of you, and there is much more evidence to support it. Your convoluted, hate-and-obsession-filled posts, for example. Your copy/paste of over 200 names from the Social Security website that took up a great deal of space and didn't even make a point. I can't believe I took a break from some late-night editing to read your pap. Webster's definition of 'pap': The truth is you've had an agenda ever since I called you out on your phony Geoff Gray quotes. 'Unstable,' you said. 'Untrustworthy,' you said, quoting Gray about me. Would you like to see Gray's email response to that? I can do copy/paste too, but what I did was copy/paste some of your quotes and comments in a message to him. Are these things true? I asked. There was a response. You have to ask to see it because I like Gray and I don't enjoy having to post his message. But if you say okay, I will. Otherwise, you should apologize for putting crap into a perfectly nice guy's mouth. Of course, you couldn't do that. Your obsesssions prevent any such action. I feel sorry for Shutter. Perfectly nice website working on the case. (I forgave the early-on bit regarding Galen Cook's BS there.) And he put you on the 'allowed' list there. But you're an embarrassment here for him. You have a one track mind and no intelligence. How much longer are you going to beat dead mice to death! ? Probably forever since you have nothing better. Don;t keep your neighbors up with your stereo, 59 year old child! I asked a question. And I don't have a stereo, I have an iPod, which is uncharged at the moment. You're quick at tossing around the lies, but really poor at dodging around those lies. An apology is in order. Both to me, and to Amazon. I don't expect we will get it. Message. Gray. You: Post or not? Take off the tutu and come to Jesus, or put a sock in it my friend. complaints filed - religious persecution. 'Take off the tutu and come to Jesus' ? You've outdone yourself Rev. Billy-Bob Blevins. They may not let you speak at all now at Good Ole Days. Our employees won't stand for your open persecution! How about it Quade! ?????

SO, what does that make you Georger? You are putty cat playing with the ball dangled in front of U! Better be careful kitty that ball might not be made out of soft rubber! JUST maybe the GAME is over! I think there is really a soft rubber toy... it came with the choking the chicken costume You have a one track mind - too bad since you once had better. What do you know about Amazon? Either from your Wayback Machine memory or from today? The same could easily be said of you, and there is much more evidence to support it. Your convoluted, hate-and-obsession-filled posts, for example. Your copy/paste of over 200 names from the Social Security website that took up a great deal of space and didn't even make a point. I can't believe I took a break from some late-night editing to read your pap. Webster's definition of 'pap': The truth is you've had an agenda ever since I called you out on your phony Geoff Gray quotes. 'Unstable,' you said. 'Untrustworthy,' you said, quoting Gray about me. Would you like to see Gray's email response to that? I can do copy/paste too, but what I did was copy/paste some of your quotes and comments in a message to him. Are these things true? I asked. There was a response. You have to ask to see it because I like Gray and I don't enjoy having to post his message. But if you say okay, I will. Otherwise, you should apologize for putting crap into a perfectly nice guy's mouth. Of course, you couldn't do that. Your obsesssions prevent any such action. I feel sorry for Shutter. Perfectly nice website working on the case. (I forgave the early-on bit regarding Galen Cook's BS there.) And he put you on the 'allowed' list there. But you're an embarrassment here for him. You have a one track mind and no intelligence. How much longer are you going to beat dead mice to death! ? Probably forever since you have nothing better. Don;t keep your neighbors up with your stereo, 59 year old child!

SO, what does that make you Georger? You are putty cat playing with the ball dangled in front of U! Better be careful kitty that ball might not be made out of soft rubber! JUST maybe the GAME is over! I think there is really a soft rubber toy... it came with the choking the chicken costume You have a one track mind - Should I be impressed?

Mother Jo is calling you - yooo whoooo Bobby! Come home! Mother Jo is calling you - yooo whoooo Bobby! Come home! 'You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life...' Winston Churchill

If you can include a child and three people who weren't born at the time as witnesses, maybe Bruce's time traveling psychic stuff isn't so unreasonable after all! Do you know how your parents got their first house as a family? I do, regarding mine. And so do those folks. It's a Family Affair. The Androsko family now knows everything we do regarding the loan and Bernie Geestman's participation in it, as well as the evidence against Christiansen. This is what they say: Bernie is a liar and a crook, and they believe he was involved in the hijacking. This family has been comparing notes, you know. Robert, Honestly, I can believe you're actually saying this. Dawn's daughter was likely too young to know the details of any such loan. Dawn's daughter's source for the information is Dawn. Her grandchildren's source is also Dawn. You count those as five people cooborating a story, but that's really only one person. Well now, let's see about that! 1! = 1 0! = 1 Hmmmmm. That's weird. Something is going on here! 5! = 120. Holy crap. That is suddenly 120 possible witnesses. Blevins now has 120 possible witnesses to the house sale, in the Blevins counting system. Let's name them all! Dawn Sophia Emma Olivia Isabella Ava Lily Zoe Chloe Mia Madison Emily Ella Madelyn Abigail Aubrey Addison Avery Layla Hailey Amelia Hannah Charlotte Kaitlyn Harper Kaylee Sophie Mackenzie Peyton Riley Grace Brooklyn Sarah Aaliyah Anna Arianna Ellie Natalie Isabelle Lillian Evelyn Elizabeth Lyla Lucy Claire Makayla Kylie Audrey Maya Leah Gabriella Annabelle Savannah Nora Reagan Scarlett Samantha Alyssa Allison Elena Stella Alexis Victoria Aria Molly Maria Bailey Sydney Bella Mila Taylor Kayla Eva Jasmine Gianna Alexandra Julia Eliana Kennedy Brianna Ruby Lauren Alice Violet Kendall Morgan Caroline Piper Brooke Elise Alexa Sienna Reese Clara Paige Kate Nevaeh Sadie Quinn Isla Eleanor Aiden Jackson Ethan Liam Mason Noah Lucas Jacob Jayden Jack Logan Ryan Caleb Benjamin William Michael Alexander Elijah Matthew Dylan James Owen Connor Brayden Carter Landon Joshua Luke Daniel Gabriel Nicholas Nathan Oliver Henry Andrew Gavin Cameron Eli Max Isaac Evan Samuel Grayson Tyler Zachary Wyatt Joseph Charlie Hunter David Anthony Christian Colton Thomas Dominic Austin John Sebastian Cooper Levi Parker Isaiah Chase Blake Aaron Alex Adam Tristan Julian Jonathan Christopher Jace Nolan Miles Jordan Carson Colin Ian Riley Xavier Hudson Adrian Cole Brody Leo Jake Bentley Sean Jeremiah Asher Nathaniel Micah Jason Ryder Declan Hayden Brandon Easton Lincoln Harrison Taylor Kayla Eva Jasmine Gianna Alexandra Julia Eliana Kennedy Brianna Rubb Blevins get busy - check them all out!

Ayn Dietrich and Larry Carr made those statements long before any investigation by Porteous and yours truly emerged. SIX years ago at least. It's ancient history. Easy for you say 'some of your witnesses have credibility issues,' but you offer nothing else on that. The only one with any REAL issues is Bernie Geestman because I broke several of his lies. Mods to the PDF are actually quite minor. A small adjustment to the details regarding the purchase of his house in Bonney Lake. Everything else is pretty much the same. Lies? This comes to me from the same person who allowed lies on his OWN website, and then not only backed them up (laughs) but didn't even question them? Did you REALLY believe Cook's claim that Porteous and I had a falling-out and don't get along? I have to Paypal him his royalties and he owns half the rights to everything Blast-related. If you had any brains at all you should have figured out right away that Cook was lying. Porteous and his girlfriend keep inviting Gayla and I to fly down and spend a week at his house just off the beach. We've never actually met in person, and he would like to do that. I may do it someday. Porteous has seen what goes on at Dropzone. And like Geoff Gray, he has more sense than I do. This was enhanced even more after he saw Galen Cook's idiotic comments on your website. Neither will post because neither of them wants the drama. After I screen-shotted some of Georger's 'Gray said this about Blevins' comments to Gray himself, Mr. Gray posed that as part of the reason he doesn't post to Dropzone. Too much drama, too much BS. When I asked Georger (repeatedly) if he would like to see the original emails on that, he danced around that like a ballerina in a tutu LOL. I like Gray, and I hesitate to post his emails publicly unless Georger specfically asks me to do so. This is because I can then email Gray and tell him 'Sorry I had to post your email, but Georger wanted proof'. Then I would. I gave you a perfectly legit answer to your question back there. You just don't accept it. This is more than you deserve, since you had your mind made up about me long ago. I haven't even made mention of your website in a negative way lately, and I no longer care what you discuss over there. The only objection I had all along was Cook's BS post about Porteous and myself, and I see you addressed that. I've also said many times I hope you guys come up with something substantial on the case. So do that, instead of wasting your time on me. Your 'official pronouncements' regarding KC mean absolutely nothing, since you haven't checked out anything on those witnesses personally. Not that I would give you or any other Cooperland folk the actual contact info on the witnesses. I prefer someone without an axe to grind. Say...legit members of the media or law enforcement. This only PROVES I have the truth in mind, and I am not afraid to let outside entities check out the information on their own. But they have to be non-slanted, which nobody in Cooperland is, frankly speaking. ... and the Eskimows are watching the Bulgarians, and the Kelts and watching the Smores. And the Greys are watching Dropzone too - they will land on Earth August 9th just in time for Blevins' public assignation. And the cow flew over the Moon !Moooooooooooooooooo! This old man, he plays one He plays knick knack on my thumb With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays two He plays knick knack on my shoe With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays three He plays knick knack on my knee With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays four He plays knick knack on my door With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays five Don't play knick knack on that hive With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays six He plays knick knack on my sticks With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays seven He plays knick knack up in heaven With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays eight He plays knick knack on my gate With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays nine He plays knick knack on my vine With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home This old man, he plays ten He plays knick knack all over again With a knick knack paddy wack Give a dog a bone This old man comes rolling home Is there a tonsillectomy in the house! ?

Here we go to another circle jerk of the greys . . .

A couple of reasons. First, the PDF doesn't get updated until August. And I'm not going to discuss those updates because YOU want to discuss it on another site. Second, it isn't about The House. It's about The Witnesses and the Other Evidence, but I'm not re-hashing all that again here. Even if Kenny DID buy the house for 100% cash (=not true) it doesn't prove he was Cooper. I will do the slideshow in August. I will update the PDF and the book at the same time. This will include Bill Rataczak's response to my recent inquiries. The updated book, as well as the updated PDF will be made available free at the AB website soon afterward. Then...I will post two videos. One on KC to replace the one currently running about him at YouTube. (I'm getting some help on that. First one I did by myself and it's a bit sloppy.) The other video will be about the slideshow presentation itself at the theater, and will also be at YouTube. That's just for anyone who is curious about what was actually presented at the theater. Then...I am OUT of the DB Cooper business. For good. The only other thing I will do is have my AAR agent shop around the screenplay (85% complete now) only because I promised my co-writer Tina R. and Skipp Porteous I would finish the project. You cannot imagine how much I am looking forward to this. Not the screenplay, but just getting out of the Cooper biz. Frankly, I've HAD it. Porteous has given me the same reason as Geoff Gray does for not posting at Dropzone. He doesn't need the drama or the headache. He doesn't even care much about Cooper anymore, Porteous says. After five years of checking out KC/Cooper, and after everything that's happened in that time, I understand this concept completely. Contrary to that pack of lies Galen Cook posted up at the other site, Porteous and I communicate on a regular basis. Which makes both Porteous and Gray a lot smarter than I am, since I am the only one of those three posting at DZ, or even the other site.

Jo is not connected to BLEVINS in anyway! Please stop referring to us as such. Obviously you did NOT read my last 3 postings...perhaps you need to do so. Both Georger and Cook know exactly what I am talking about - they have been part of the concealment. To redirect and divert. I haven't known what you are talking about since the day I joined this thread. PLEASE DON;T EXPLAIN!

And you certainly won't get them. But you sure whined a lot about what we said about your site at AB, didn't you? This is what I think. People with common sense will see through that whole thing for what it is all about. Mostly Cooper Royalty with agendas. The reason the posts are sometimes few and far between is because they aren't allowed to jack people around there or slander them. But the problem is that some of your MAIN posters spend a lot of time doing that here. This is phony as hell. Censorship is easily seen for what it is. You want to pick and choose on what voices should be heard, that's up to you. But don't expect the public, especially in the Good Old USA, to buy into that thinking. Trust me. It's a futile effort. Everyone wonders WHY that is done. Big Brother is Watching You and all that stuff. All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

kind of depends on the person, the interview, and the circumstances - eh? Nothing is black and white and red all over; only a newspaper ?

I don't think those were the results of my last MMPI, but I would have to check. (*laughs*) Since when does handing out shrink tests for the state forty years ago give you the experience to start rendering analysis or diagnosis on people via the internet? You've never even met me, I haven't taken any of your dumb tests, and I'll bet you don't have any kind of medical degree. You're simply an obsessed personality who has a morbid fear of being corrected on anything, or challenged on anything. You toss out cheap slander like a high school cheerleader tossing candy from a parade float on the Fourth of July. And again you are wrong on all counts. But you never read the thread. And you don't know me at all! So you took the MMPI more than once. That's interesting. You don't just walk into MacDonald's and get the MMPI. There has to be a reason: voluntary or mandated. And in most States a licensed psychologist has to score and certify it. Example: application for work in law enforcement. I just think Bennett's observation is interesting: that you are vastly different here (more confrontational here) than you are on your long tedious video, at least to the untrained eye. I actually saw similarities! In fact what I see is an exceedingly nervous person who speaks poorly, speaks not too logically, you lose your train of thought, with a very bland affect which made me wonder if you were medicated? I'll go look at the video and again see what I think a second time. You also refer to the MMPI as "dumb tests". That sounds hostile. Where's the same hostility on your video? Right below the surface? I'm guessing you don't think much of psychologists? Or like them? Blah, blah, blah. I didn't say I took the test more than once. You did. The MMPI was required at the school I went to many years ago. It's been around since the 40's, you know. I have nothing against shrinks or psychologists. I just have an objection to a guy who tries to analyze someone they've never even met ... and hides behind claims of professionalism in a veiled attempt to engage in cheap slander. Get real. If you're thinking about sending me a bill for services, forget it. As far as the video, I had just returned from a forty-mile hike in the Olympics, so I was a little tired there.

I don't think those were the results of my last MMPI, but I would have to check. (*laughs*) Since when does handing out shrink tests for the state forty years ago give you the experience to start rendering analysis or diagnosis on people via the internet? You've never even met me, I haven't taken any of your dumb tests, and I'll bet you don't have any kind of medical degree. You're simply an obsessed personality who has a morbid fear of being corrected on anything, or challenged on anything. You toss out cheap slander like a high school cheerleader tossing candy from a parade float on the Fourth of July. And again you are wrong on all counts. But you never read the thread. And you don't know me at all! So you took the MMPI more than once. That's interesting. You don't just walk into MacDonald's and get the MMPI. There has to be a reason: voluntary or mandated. And in most States a licensed psychologist has to score and certify it. Example: application for work in law enforcement. I just think Bennett's observation is interesting: that you are vastly different here (more confrontational here) than you are on your long tedious video, at least to the untrained eye. I actually saw similarities! In fact what I see is an exceedingly nervous person who speaks poorly, speaks not too logically, you lose your train of thought, with a very bland affect which made me wonder if you were medicated? I'll go look at the video and again see what I think a second time. You also refer to the MMPI as "dumb tests". That sounds hostile. Where's the same hostility on your video? Right below the surface? I'm guessing you don't think much of psychologists? Or like them?