georger

Is this above in the Blevins Encyclopedia under 'Facts on the Cooper Case' !? Hey Bullshitter, Name one person or entity to prove your assertion! Just one! Cite your source. You cant because you dont know one. But you will spin a yarn of bullshit 500 miles long and then chase somebody like Knoss' around, like a wolf after a the last Big Mac .... And you have the gall to tell the world this forum has gone to hell!? Your statement above is nothing more than your personal opinion of-the-moment) and you have no facts at all to back it up with. And this is precisely why you are now a Charter Founder of the Cooper Bullshitters' A-Team. Hey Tom! Let Blevins post to your website! Uh, Special Agent Larry Carr, you know...former case agent thingie guy...for the DB Cooper case...said that...IN HIS RADIO INTERVIEW. Unlike you apparently, I actually LISTENED to it. It's been on the Wiki Cooper page for at least two years now. Kinda near the bottom of your screen, under that thingie part called 'External Links'. *Cites requested source* I am 100% aware of what Carr said. Carr wasnt running the case in 1971 or did you think he was!? And that you bring this up is just one more example of how you build a whole litergy out of one supposed factoid, is it not? But you are not alone in this practise of Cooper Alchemy. Now who is OBSESSED?

I did. You are just too uneducated to understand it! That I can do nothing about. Read it again. Maybe you will get the drift ... because at length it applies to Duane and your case too! We know Knoss is 'challenged'. His technical remarks are a joke. He and you and Blevins have more in common than you apparently know. Thats ok. Your case is closed. If you (plural) want to waste people's time with this pre-school level bullshit ... that's your affair.

The hijacking happened before the days of personal computers, so the list was issued to all Federal Reserve banks, most banks in the Northwest, and casinos in Reno and Nevada, I believe. RobertMBlevins esq says: "The hijacking happened before the days of personal computers" RobertMBlevins may tell you the FBI, banks, and the rest of civilisation had no computers in 1971, and therefore no way to communicate or do data processing!. RobertMBlevins would be wrong. Just because Blevins is an unschooled person who hates education does not mean the rest of the world was blind, deaf, and dumb in 1971 - as Blevins asserts and wants anyone gullible enough to believe it, to believe! Blevins is an ideologist with a personal agenda of shit. He is factually wrong most of the time. FACT: Historical document: First ARPANET IMP log: the first message ever sent via the ARPANET, 10:30 PM, October 29, 1969. This IMP Log excerpt, kept at UCLA, ... C is a general-purpose computer programming language developed between 1969 and 1973 by Dennis Ritchie at the Bell Telephone Laboratories for use with ... PL-1 is a ......................... Fortran is a ......................... Snobol is a ........................... DOS is a ............................ Ada Ada 95 Ada Home Page AdaPower Special Interest Group on Ada Ada Information Clearinghouse ALGOL The ALGOL Programming Language AWK The AWK Programming Language by Alfred V. Aho, Brian W. Kernighan, and Peter J. Weinberger APL Apl Language APL B The Programming Language B (abstract) Users' Reference to B by Ken Thompson BASIC The Basic Archives Visual Basic Instinct Visual Basic & Visual Basic .NET Resources True BASIC REALbasic BCPL BCPL Reference Manual by Martin Richards C The Development of the C Language by Dennis Ritchie Very early C compilers and language by Dennis Ritchie The C Programming Language (book) Programming languages - C ANSI by ISO/IEC (draft) C Programming Course C++ The C++ Programming Language (book) C and C++: Siblings (pdf) by Bjarne Stroustrup C++0x - the next ISO C++ standard by Bjarne Stroustrup C# Visual C# Language by Microsoft. Caml The Caml language Objective Caml The Objective-Caml system CLU CLU Home Page COBOL IBM COBOL family COBOL Portal TinyCOBOL COBOL User Groups - COBUG CORAL Coral66 Computer On-line Real-time Applications Language Coral 66 Specification for Compilers (pdf) CPL Combined Programming Language (Wikipedia) Delphi Delphi 2005 by Borland Pascal and Delphi A brief history of Borland's Delphi Delphi Treff: Delphi versions (german) Eiffel Eiffel EiffelStudio by Eiffel Software Visual Eiffel by Object Tools SmartEiffel EiffelZone Flow-Matic Flow-Matic and Cobol Forth Forth Interest Group Home Page colorForth by Chuck Moore Fortran User notes on Fortran programming Fortran 2000 draft Fortran 2003 JTC1/SC22/WG5 Haskell Haskell Home Page Icon The Icon Programming Language Icon History of the Icon programming language Unicon, the Unified Extended Dialect of Icon J J software A management perspective of the "J" programming language Java Java by Sun Microsystems Java Technology: an early history Programming Languages for the Java Virtual Machine James Gosling's home page JavaScript Cmm History by Nombas JavaScript Language Resources from Mozilla Standard ECMA-262 Lisp The Association of Lisp Users An Introduction and Tutorial for Common Lisp Mainsail Mainsail from Xidak. Mainsail Implementation Overview by Stanford Computer Systems Laboratory. M (MUMPS) M technologies M[UMPS] Development Committee What is M Technology? ML Standard ML Standard ML '97 Modula Modula-2 Modula-3 Home Page Modula-2 ISO/IEC Oberon A Brief History of Oberon A Description of the Oberon-2 Language The Programming Language Oberon-2 Oberon Language Genealogy Tree The Oberon Community Platform Objective-C Objective-C Objective-C FAQ Introduction to The Objective-C Programming Language by Apple Objective-C: Links, Resources, Stuff Pascal ISO Pascal (document) Pascal and Delphi Perl Perl Home Page Perl Larry Wall's Very Own Home Page PHP PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor PL/I Multics PL/I IBM PL/I family by IBM Plankalkül Plankalkül PostScript PostScript level 3 by Adobe PostScript GhostScript PDF GhostScript Home Page Prolog Prolog Programming Language The Prolog Language Python Python Home Page Rexx IBM REXX Family by IBM The Rexx Language Association Ruby Ruby Home Page Ruby programming language (Wikipedia) Ruby - doc Sail Sail (Stanford Artificial Intelligence Language) Sather Sather History Sather GNU Sather Scheme Scheme by MIT The Revised5 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme (in PostScript) Schemers Home Page SCM Self Self Home Page from Sun Sh The Traditional Bourne Shell Family by Sven Mascheck Korn Shell by David Korn Bash from GNU Zsh Simula Simula by Jan Rune Holmevik Smalltalk Smalltalk Home Page Smalltalk FAQ The Early History of Smalltalk The Smalltalk Industry Council web site VisualAge Smalltalk from IBM VisualWorks from Cincom The history of Squeak ANSI Smalltalk SNOBOL Snobol4 Resources by Phil Budne Introduction to SNOBOL Programming Language by Mohammad Noman Hameed Snobol4 Tcl/Tk Tcl/Tk Information

Well, knowing that pretty much everybody gave up the search against the list within six months...yes. [. Is this above in the Blevins Encyclopedia under 'Facts on the Cooper Case' !? Hey Bullshitter, Name one person or entity to prove your assertion! Just one! Cite your source. You cant because you dont know one. But you will spin a yarn of bullshit 500 miles long and then chase somebody like Knoss' around, like a wolf after a the last Big Mac .... And you have the gall to tell the world this forum has gone to hell!? Your statement above is nothing more than your personal opinion of-the-moment) and you have no facts at all to back it up with. And this is precisely why you are now a Charter Founder of the Cooper Bullshitters' A-Team. Hey Tom! Let Blevins post to your website!

If anyone has anything to add about this, it would be welcome. This is all the limited information I have on it. . Laughable.

Can't really have it both ways. Funny you throw it back at us! The message is for you, as you very well know. I apologise. I just have to convince myself beyond all shadow of doubt that you are nothing but a troll\ and totally hopeless/worthless. Your staged attacks on Knoss are over the top, considering he is the most vulnerable tool in the the whole Cooper kit. You seem to be a tool who has a deep seated grudge against other tools - like you see them as competition or something. Why dont you attack Brian Ingram instead ? Or ant farms and Chia pets?

12) Unless you can provide at least a couple of pieces of evidence besides 'cause I say so.' then your story on the Cooper hijacking must be relegated to fantasy. It must be nice to have another wacko to go after - since your own thingy failed. Keeps you in the media with something to say/type. GOT ANYTHING NEW - ! ? NEW BLAME ! PLAY IT AGAIN - SAM. 11) You have a history. It's known you've gone onto several forums and articles on Cooper and driven those forums and articles into trash. The interactive page at Facebook on Cooper was closed because of you.

nice job Bruce.

Think about it for a second. How come THEY did not think of this? It's left to some guy who mostly writes sci-fi and scrubs floors to come up with this idea? You're a sick guy.

Thanks Robert. Investing facts provides a welcome detour from fantasy land. Keep us posted. 377 What planet are you on?

Thanks Robert. Investing facts provides a welcome detour from fantasy land. Keep us posted. 377 By all means keep us posted -

Robert: Cooper was given the $200,000 ransom in a canvas bag marked 'Seafirst Bank'. He may have disconnected the container for the parachute after landing, and transferred the money to the container. Walking along with a marked bank bag full of cash might draw a bit of attention...' Go back and read Tina's testimony?

My understanding is that the Amboy chute was unearthed by a grader that was doing some road work. The grader operator reportedly pulled the chute out of the ground rather than dug it out. So who knows, maybe the harness and pack are two feet from where the canopy was found. and his children went back and pulled it out altogether after he reported it home. The road is an access entrance to a field he was improving/ grading and widening. He caught the chute with his blade during a pass, just off the edge of the road. Buried may be an over statement - whether it was under old dirt from previous grading or new dirt or actually buried-buried. It was 'buried' just off the side of the road, in any event, hardly a thorough hiding place. I previously posted Google photos of the location (with a coordinate) and the field/road. I will not post them again. My understanding is, Larry talked extensively with the owner of the property and the (FBI) determined an excavation was not warranted. Forensic tests for a situation like this have been available since the 1950s.

Your thesis is that if the Amboy parachute was not the one used by Lt. Walling, then it must be the parachute that Cooper used. That is not a valid assumption. Echo-of-him-that left (Anah-tzi-mish-kut-qui) is also holding out that it means: Cooper buried the cash at Tena Bar", Anahtzimishkutqui has asserted this association this in the past. Which frame in the Cooper comic this does fit with?

Its not over analyzation. What it is, literally, is Blevins playing catchup and finally catching on to questions people have had, since the beginning. Just because people didnt announce it in the media or go on Newsvine and make some big "thing", doesnt mean the questions did not already exist! Since when it is the role of anyone to keep Blevins up to speed, on anything!? Or Tom Kaye either!! And this hack Blevins is going to "force the FBI" into answers or a statement about it? And then Blevins tells people to "take a pill"? Hey Blevins! "Look at the two asssholes on that camel in front of you in traffic!" Get it?

Calm down and take a chill pill, as the kids used to say, Georger. I contacted Kaye yesterday about his theories on the money. That's called 'verification with the source'. I don't care what Kaye says on his website, I care about what he says personally, today, IN 2012. He stands by this: His water tests show that the idea the money floated down a river or was dredged from the Columbia isn't viable. He believes the money was *probably* delivered to the spot on Tena Bar by 'non-natural means'. He reinterates that, although he says the Gray quote from the book about the ink running together on the bills is inaccurate. So I took that part out of the article. Here is a quote from the article, which Kaye says now accurately represents their stand on the Tena Bar money: If you think this theory is inaccurate, you should be taking this up with Kaye, not me. And we all know one good reason why your opinions on Kaye might be slanted. I won't say why publicly, but I think you know what I mean. If Kaye says he doesn't know how the money ended up at Tena Bar, that makes sense. Who does? He only says he doesn't think it was by floating down or dredging, and I agree. That theory leaves fewer choices, most of which point to human intervention. I'll assume you actually read the whole article...and again...you didn't even bother to respond to any of the real points about it. It was more about the Amboy parachute, which you ignored. Maybe you swallowed that story by the FBI, too? I showed in detail why their version doesn't make sense. You never even noticed. And there it was in the headline thingie and everything.

Im going to post this ONLY ONCE, so pay attention. Tom Kaye quote from his website as currently devised, quote: "This research did not, however, uncover a better explanation for how the money ended up on Tena Bar". 0 minus 0 = 0 Blev thingy quote: "More recently, Tom Kaye ... and his team of experts were allowed to examine samples of that money and they came to a different conclusion. Kaye believes the money arrived at Tena Bar by what he calls 'non-natural means'. ... In a nutshell, Kaye's water tests with identical bundles of money do not support the F.B.I.'s theory on how the money arrived at Tena Bar." In other words, the Blevins' Thingy is at odds with Tom's own words on his website. Or maybe at this point we should approriately call it: Tom's Thingy? Kaye's own words are: ""This research did not, however, uncover a better explanation for how the money ended up on Tena Bar"." Now if Kaye wants to equate that with "non-natural means of arrival" I have no problem with that. Its better than some propereller-thingy, which I do (and did) cringe at. So Blev-Thingy, please stop putting words in people's mouths, as is your natural inclination always leads you to do over and over again? You really are broken record of incompetence at this point! My interpretation of this and based on personal conversation with Tom Kaye is: 'Tom Kaye has no fucking idea at all how the Tena Bar money got to Tena Bar. He literally, after years of research, doesnt have a clue!' He has repeatedly stated this to me many-many tymes. Now either he is lying to me, or he hasnt a fucking clue! And he says on his website .... "This research did not, however, uncover a better explanation for how the money ended up on Tena Bar." Tom is referring to the FBI explanation(s), or the Palmer Explanation. Better than what? Tom is referring to the Washougal Washdown and/or Dredging theories he says were the FBI's two competing theories of how money got to Tena Bar. ""This research did not, however, uncover a better explanation for how the money ended up on Tena Bar"" - Tom Kaye, etalles

Who is TOG? Thanks n! = 6 3! = 6 take your choice.

You beat the dead horse, I see. I see, you beat the dead horse.

- read the thread -

Near XXX and in the same neighborhood as JC, MJ, EH, VR, PRB, and NE. Robert99 and Blevins were given their phone numbers by PO and FR - and of course BG. GG and CA know! Kaye agrees!!

There was an overcast at 5000 feet in the Portland/Vancouver area and additional heavy cloud layers below that. No one on the ground in the Portland/Vancouver area could see the airliner when it passed over. And the flight crew has been quoted as saying they could not see the lights of Portland/Vancouver when they flew overhead. Play it again - Sam. Green eggs and ham.

I think it is safe to assume at this time, that no flares were shot into the blades of the chase helicopters. I will acknowledge that objection. We certainly don't want to create any injuries at this late date. Obviously I'm tired, bedtime here in the deep dark woods. Wolves are howling and the log fire is flickering. Time to shut off Jo's new wide screen and call it a day. Which helo. whose helo? Yes. Your 6 hour cycle is catching up on you. Time to bed. nighty night

Coming to terms with Bob Knoss is part of the DB Cooper experience. Either what he says is true or not true, and we have to decide for ourselves. If what he says is true, and that his recall is altered by the mind-control activities of MKULTRA-Bluebird AND his re-telling is hounded by fears of retribution, then I suggest that we need to explore his comments from those angles. If what he says is not true, then his motivation for his ever-increasing postings here is fueled by another agenda. Ultimately, we get to decide how to proceed. Seeking clarity, I asked his wife what she thought of these commentaries, and she declined to comment. I asked Bob for the phone number for his attorney, as have many, and I have not received it yet. I also contacted Jim Rataczak, who was cautious and gentlemanly in his response, and although he did not give me any definitive statements about Bob's truthfulness, Jim did acknowledge that he knew Bob and they had discussed the skyjacking. It might be worth noting, if you had something better than Dropzonem you probably wouldnt be here at all. Few rational people would. That illuminates the real issues. Quade has stated multiple times anyone is free to go elsewhere if you want to - Everyone here seems to understand that, and acts accordingly as much as they dare, according to each person's personal agenda. Each person's personal agenda seems to rule much of what goes on here, and nothing more. Personal agendae are what drives virtually everyone here ... in case you didn't know? The only exception are those (who say!) they come from God and a higher commission, financed by some even more etherial (publisher?) - how else can dirt-poor people become rockstars throwing money and facts around ? In that, I was sent here by Kisi Mu & the Oblivions. I stated that the first day I was here. I even have a photo of my commissioning at the 1997 Oblvions Symposium in Reuven, in case Blevins and Gray and Kaye and Robert99 would like to see it ?

Why? You lack perspective. You werent here during the early days of Jo Weber's stuff. Knoss is like sheep grazing compared to that! It permanently ruined Jo;s case ... as FBI SA Larry Carr can personally testify. Then comes "Billy the Blevins". Latest-greatest sharp shooter and attack artist in the Dropzone Truthwatch programme! But Blevins cant figure out which end of the thing the truth thingie comes out of! His best virtue is he doesnt mind blowing his own head off - nightly. Shape shifters simply pull whatever molecules are left back together, and post 30 seconds later anew - as if nothing had happened. It would appear you like blood on the ground but cant stand harmless fluff? Maybe get your fix in some less destructive way? Just ignore Knoss. You arent going anywhere anyway. Knoss isnt damaging anyone but himself. Why do you demand more? In a DB Cooper forum no less - now that really is perverse!