georger

BS Farf. I have no idea who she is. Sounds like she and her husband have been following the case for a while. If you think Hobson is a shill, why don't you comment on the review itself instead of bringing it to ME? Address it to the reviewer. I have no control over what millions of possible reviewers at Amazon post up. Next thing you'll be asking is if I WROTE all the books Amazon sells under a bunch of different names. Post Spot post. Run Spot run. Shill Spot shill. Troll Spot troll. Chase your tail. - your what hurts! ?

"Works alongside Skip Porteous" - ex Sherrif's Deputy from Massachusetts ? Alongside side? Well ... not quite. Not hardly. Not for some long time. ELVIS LEFT THE BUILDING! Blevins/Gayla are on their own! NO MOVIE DEAL - REJECTED. Kenny Christiansen Chain Saw Massacre - Part XOPII

Its just more Blevins double-triple-speak. Sham Wow Nice! As the facts BEHIND THE SCENE are being concealed? Can anyone say: "Spot. Come dog run. Spot run. Dog Spot. Run spot run. Hide the macaroni. Hide Spot hide. Come sucker come. Spot sucker read. " Full Sham Wow Peddle to the Metal SHAM WOW hide the facts create a facade of mirrors with many reflexions! All the better to reflect and divert. A hall of mirrors and deflections-reflections-facade. No shame. No ethics. No movie deal! "Run Spot run. POST AND THEY WILL FOLLOW BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO. THEY ARE A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE! THE MODERATOR SAW TO THAT!". Run Spot run. Read Spot read. Post Spot post. Dumb Spot Dumb. Stupid is as stupid does. Deniability. Escape clause. No shame No ethics. No rules. Smoke & mirrors. Elvis left the building more than a year ago! And Blevins keeps it going! He must! No Porteous. No Gray. No Lyle. No Kenny. Office closed. Read sucker read. I didnt say that! Sell yourself! I have much to say and do - you will follow. What's your major malfunction - anybody in there? - I admire Marilyn Monroe - all illusion - I rock on YouTube - Gayla in the Toast - Adventure in the Toast. Read sucker read. I have much to say. Im lonely and have no friends. If you build it; they will come. Come sucker come. Run sucker run.

Sometimes deferring is a good strategy, but, on this one, I couldn't figure out the upside for Notre Dame deferring either. I'm sure they had a plan - just not sure that plan factored in how high the Tide was gonna roll. The only problem with a game like that is you pretty much know who's gonna win 30 - 45 minutes before it's over but you feel like you still have to watch it til the end.

My son says he's rooting for the SEC but Notre Dame would make the better come back story. I said, Jeez, son, we're not in some frilly, frothy, Lifetime movie here. This is FOOTBALL. Take no prisoners!!!

1) I never said that the Sun article meant the hijacker was bald. I only questioned why the FBI thought so at that time, according to the article. 2) The article was not listed in the Available Evidence category in the report we sent to the FBI. It is merely mentioned in a single paragraph, and I asked them a question about it. 3) No one here at DZ said anything about it being linked to the attempted scam, even after I mentioned it several times...until now. 4) Reference to the article was removed from the report after this fact about the scam came to light. Adventure Books posters posting under the name of RobertMBlevins, can't keep track! One post contradicts the one before it, contradicts the next one to come. All of these different writers need to stick to one explanation, explain what it is they are saying or not saying, and settle on one version or two or five, of THEIR facts! 1) I never said that the Sun article meant the hijacker was bald. I only questioned why the FBI thought so at that time, according to the article. Of course you did. see Brem1-4 in AB's own words below! 3) No one here at DZ said anything about it being linked to the attempted scam, even after I mentioned it several times...until now. Well, Snowmman did clear back in 2008 and Sluggo addressed you directly on your fantasy about Coop wearing a wig, back in 2010. (See S1) Since when did Dropzone become AB Books' caretaker! ? Espec- ially when you challenge our credibility and make personal attacks against us at every turn, since you arrived with your kit of confusions and claims? Let 377 answer answer allof your questions from now on since he is your friend and sponsor. 4) Reference to the article was removed from the report after this fact about the scam came to light. Right here is an example of the confusion you generate: which REPORT are you talking about? The report you sent to the FBI a month ago, or the Public Report you just posted (twice), saying "Last Chance!". Last chance? Last chance for what? You mean another revised-revision-revision is already under way-way-way-way-way-way way? You are a Drama Queen, Mr Blevins, and you cant keep track of your own drama. See your own avatar! You are the "idiot", not us! People have been very tolerant. Your credit card has expired. How many more mailings can we look forward to: from "The Lunatic" ? And one final question: WHY release multiple revised versions to the public when you have (you say) already sent the FBI another final version? Which version of versions will you be citing from in the furture, to who? Who is to keep track for whom for what purpose for Who? Is Who on first, second, or third, or now playing home base? Americans want to know! IS THERE ANYBODY IN THERE!? who?

Does that include RobertMBlevins ?

Recommendation: You lay off the bold function when you get angry or frustrated. Damn. No funding? That's a bummer. The bolding was yours. I dont even know HOW to use the bells and whistles Strange how you always blame others for your error - along with a lack of shame and ethics on your part. Your truth has the fastest half-life on record. And now you've cut tail and run away - again!

Well, I've always been known to give as good as I get. That's just the way I am. We must have missed it ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz' zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz'

Didn't ask you to look at at, since I hadn't RELEASED it at Dropzone yet, right? I asked if you thought it was a good idea to release a public version here, ---------------------------------------------------- "I asked Georger his advice on it three times, without a reponse. so I got together with the AB staff and we decided to release it. No big deal. Most of the people who post here have already seen the information anyway. " -----------------------------------------------------. Stop yanking people's chains. How is anyone supposed to give advice on something they havent even seen ? Well now Ive seen this piece of trash you posted here. Its amateurish in the extreme - just like everything else you've ever had a hand in that Ive seen and read. Recommendation: This person might work well in a controlled environment where supervision is direct - Service industry - Housecleaning, Hotel-Motel. Low level maintenance with direct supervision and long term training. Dot code: 529.684-018 asmbp. Funding: None recommended. Follow up: Normal verification of medications. Prognosis for Success: 20% depending on resources he can extract from support systems. Keep file active - he will be back 1wks to 6 mos.

Well, ... we have to settle for small victories here. The Bremerton info is NEW, once Smokin, Shutter, Sluggo etal put it together. Its something I had never thought about before, and I missed the force of Sluggo's early post about it entirely. I knew Sluggo had something in mind .. but I missed where it was headed. Who would have ever 'thunk it' that someone would jump saying: "The FBI said Cooper was bald" ?! Blev, or should I say AB Books, is showing their hand more and more. Blev comes here asking for advice on whether to send the FBI his document or not, chides me multiple times challenging me to look at it?, ... then turns out he/AB Books sent it to the FBI a month ago! Screw us. Itty bitty white lie. Now Blev has sole possession of Mr. Rattie's info! Rattie hasnt replied to anyone else. Or, maybe Blev is lying about Rattie reply to him? Who knows. Ashes to ashes. Sham Wow semper fidelus. Three cheers for Sham Wow. Maybe he will be pissing and moaning tomorrow. It isnt personal! America wants to know. Is there anybody in there? Bama 200 - Fr McIrish 0. - Blevins 49

If you had actually read the report, you'd know that we gave the FBI easy tools to either prove or disprove that Christiansen was involved. It isn't brain surgery. The names are there, the contact information is there, the available evidence is there. What they do with it, if anything, is up to to them. I have no control over it. Final score: Seahawks 24 - Redskins 10. (Psst...Atlanta...we're coming to YOUR town next weekend.

+1

Enough said. Media version attached.

Public version? Sent last month? How many versions-of-versions-of-versions does Blevins/AB Books have? How many shekels does it take to equal a dollar in Blevins-speak-math? "Im only interested in the TRUTH!" (RobertMBlevins -AB Books) Multiple versions = multiple deniability. Multiple versions = "I never said that". He, or whoever is posting here, doesn;t mention Porteous or Geoff Gray being part of this? Maybe Snowmman or Farflung have it sorted out - No hit singles yet however! Has Belvnis left the building? Or, are we just processing one repeat SPAM that keeps reposting itself here at Dropzone? The delusion may be ours! I didn't read it, but sounds to me he just made a carbon copy of what he has been saying on here? either way, still have a balled guy trying to be Cooper, no sale here..... Kenny ever have sideburns???? Well my original thought reading Blevins/AB Books' pdf was: 1. did whoever wrote this ever take a writing class? 2. a class in writing professional documents for govmtl agencies? 3. did anyoneat AB Books ever finish a highschool English course? This pdf Blevins is passing around reads like something out of a GED dropout box! He, she, or it can pick their paper up on Monday, which of course they never will ... Its something an idiot would put together - and we are lunatics for paying 30 seconds attention to this tripe. Are there some new Cooper Bremerton twenties to pass around with the pdf, a wig, and some snapshots, and some future claims! And! He claims he was only seeking to understand the Bremerton article (bald Cooper) - not use it! And he calls others liars?

Angelic my ass! You used it to claim the FBI has said Cooper was BALD! "The manipulator". I never could find any reference, in spite of your claim, to the FBI ever saying Cooper was bald. Now once again you say: I NEVER SAID THAT! Well yes you did, Mr. Obvious. Wipe your own ass from now on, Sham Wow Blevins/ AB Books... You have no credibility anywhere except as a con artist. What Blevs around ~ Blevs around! You should write at Newsvine and for AB Books! BTW: I will have my secretary find Rattie on Monday and if available I will talk to him personally. I will explain to Mr. Rattie the Blevins-Effect.

The topic was whether or not we should release a public version of the 16-page report we sent to the Seattle FBI last month on Christiansen. . " Public version? Sent last month? How many versions-of-versions-of-versions does Blevins/AB Books have? How many shekels does it take to equal a dollar in Blevins-speak-math? "Im only interested in the TRUTH!" (RobertMBlevins -AB Books) Multiple versions = multiple deniability. Multiple versions = "I never said that". He, or whoever is posting here, doesn;t mention Porteous or Geoff Gray being part of this? Maybe Snowmman or Farflung have it sorted out - No hit singles yet however! Has Belvnis left the building? Or, are we just processing one repeat SPAM that keeps reposting itself here at Dropzone? The delusion may be ours!

lol...I completely forgot that the bald discussion led to the reporter scam with William John (aka Jack) Lewis. Well you're not alone! You cant keep track of anything in this hell-hole for all of the bullshit that certain people post. Everyone that matters knows where to go in case it becomes necessary - #1: Blevins' claim that he found the Bremerton article FIRSTEST AND MOSTEST - is plain false. We have already proven that. Looks like it was Snow who brought it here from the other thread maybe in Jun of 08. Blevins wasnt even here! #2: It was Sluggo, I think in 010, who connected the Bremerton article to the Lewis-Murphy scam because as he says, he remembered the name Lewis .... and if I finally understand the drift of Sluggo's words, Sluggo is telling Blevins NOT to use that article as evidence that the FBI had ever thought or said that Cooper was bald; not to the Bremerton reporter or anyone else. My problem in all of this was that I had not connected the dots like Sluggo had .. from the Lewis Murphy scam to the Bremerton article. Lewis and Murphy were from the Bremerton area. The Bremerton reporter had no idea what was going on when suddenly the FBI is photographing some guy in front of a Bremerton wig shop! But, it had nothing to do with the FBI thinking COOPER HAD BEEN BALD - as our esteemed colleague RobertMBlevins, claims! It had to do with the FBi getting ready to charge Lewis & Murphy for their wig and Cooper twenties currency hoax they sucked journalist Fleming into! #3: Now Blevins sends the Bremerton article off to news media and the FBI sticking it to the FBI claim- ing the FBI 'itself' once said "Cooper was bald", when in fact they never did! This is what Sluggo is referring to when he chides Blevins saying, quote: " Oh yeah [whispering]... I don't think I'd use that Sun article in my book... it could have an adverse effect on your credibility." #4: Blevins will come back here after his game and say: I NEVER SAID THAT! Well frankly at this point, who cares? #5. Having received their package from "the lunatic" the FBI are going to look at it and ask: 'WTF is this!?' They may not even bother to reply ... which should leave Blevins/Adventire Books Staff more time for watching football games, repairing their old Subaru's, and polishing their 'tude. (Blevins-speak). What have I left out? (That I am idiot for being in this at all?) ps- sources and links ready if needed. Bottom line: The FBI never said "Cooper was bald". Only the Bremerton Sun reporter said that. And the reason he said it was he didnt know what was going on with the FBI photographing some guy in front of a Bremerton wig shop! The Bremerton Sun guy might as well have written: "Aliens with Wigs Invade USA!". ps: #6: What is increasingly obvious, as I have sensed before here at Dropzone, the socalled RobertMBlevins is in fact three if not four people at Adventure Books, Prociv, some guy named Nedler, Blevins, and some fourth person Blevins has referenced before but not named ... because in reference to THEIR submission to news media and the FBI, Blevins says "we talked it over ...". I guess what Blevins is saying is that Adveture Books of Seattle has gone public and challenged the FBI and submitted material as a 'business' to major news media. And have an account here at Dropzone under the name: "RobertMBlevins" ? With the full weight & authority thereof. With an old Bremerton Sun article that says: Cooper was BALD! Jesus wept! Adventure Books of Seattle is on a roll.

Maybe so.. Hopefully, you will get many questions. Hope they are all smart. Hope you do the interview and that it goes well. . If he doesnt fuck everything up as he always does, and drive Rattie off in the meantime. Im going back to the wig/bald/Bremerton story and try and figure this latest mess Blevins has created, out! Like you Smokin99, Ive been slow to put things together here and put this all together ... and I may have not full understood the full meaning of what Sluggo was saying re- the Bremerton newspaper story. I think what Blevins/Gayla/Nedler may have done here (and Blevins did say WE at Adventure Books) - is create one more 'strawman', taken something out of context and tried to apply it - just like Blevins has done since he joined this forum with the Dan Cooper comic - claiming its one thing when its another, leaving this board in total chaos .... then coming back with 900 comebacks saying I NEVER SAID THAT ... and now as soon as we figure this out he will come back one more time to say: I NEVER SAID THAT! Did he actually SEND his package of crap to major news media and the FBI? Anyone see him do it!? Or is he making that up too, and sitting waiting for researchers here to clear things up (for him!), then he will decide maybe: I NEED TO DO A REVISION. I HAVENT ACTUALLY SENT THE PACKAGE OUT YET! No wonder Blevins is referred to in certain quarters as: "the lunatic" and "the manipulator"

Just Google /lewis and murphy db cooper/ and you will get all the articles you want, and the FBI pdf. Lewis, Murphy, and reporter Fleming got nailed - it ruined Fleming. here -

this should help...... larger

RobertB replies: First, I would like to see where the Bremerton Sun article was posted here before I did. Not that I don't believe you, but I would like to see it. And how was it 'debunked'? Who inside the Seattle FBI in May of 1972 revealed to the reporter that the FBI thought the hijacker was bald? More importantly...why did they think this? What triggered this idea enough that they decided to send out agents on it? The issue as I understand the history, was 'makeup' and possible 'wig' .... not BALD! Just as I have outlined the history of discussion as I know or could find it, tonight. Having read many files, Gray or Tom may know more than any of us - ? Who said what, exactly? Nobody knows. It seems to have been a one-time comment because nobody that I know has ever found any other articles quoting other agents, to back the Bremerton article up with. On the other hand, its true that agents were chasing down all kinds of leads - literally. Maybe Gray's discoveryof 'marcelled hair' fits in with wig, or bald? Maybe the FBI's suspect list contained a high percentage of bald men? Queen Elizabeth was bald!

Ive always noticed that too. Finding basic errors like that in newspaper stories of the time is not unusual. Ever read the one where it says: 'the parachute Cooper took, a Navy parachute, included a collaps- able raft' . Im not kidding! I threw that at Thomas once just to see what he would say -

First things first.... I didn't say the article was debunked -- What is easily debunked are your claims that you did this first or that first or that you are the only one to do this or the only one to do that. Search options are tedious but for finding things are actually pretty good here and will teach you a lot that you don't know... Jun 22, 2008, 7:45 PM Post #2966 of 39659 (5764 views) http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3246892#3246892 Oct 22, 2008, 10:15 PM Post #4783 of 39659 (5822 views) http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3370815#3370815 You haven't proven any of your "missteps". You only know/repeat what you read in articles - of which I can show you more than one version of each of your examples. Someone writes it - you think it's true. Problem is this is why there are so many myths out there. Who said that they are under an obligation to "reveal" anything to the general public or to give away any information, sensitive or otherwise. You've given them nothing on Kenny Christiansen that changes the basic parameters that no doubt they need to establish - else they would be investigating 1/4 of Washington State. What can you prove that they have or don't have on LD Cooper or what can you prove that they did or didn't do in regards to the Amboy chute? You have no proof - only guesses. I gently ask....What part of the definition of proof do you not understand? Yes. The search function works well - Ive always said. Here's the chain as I recall it: its long. 1. Began on another website with discussions about FBI description, (Tina, Flo, Hancock re-McCoy vs Cooper) and whether a "wig" or "makep" had been involved/detected by any witness .... 2. Above discussion brought in possibility of "bald". 3. Myers & Dvorak began to dicuss possible makeup and 'bald' with respect to Teddy Mayfield, McCoy, and others ... (Snow was present/commented during some of those duiscussions) 4. Discussion moved to Dropzone and Ckret. 5. Old Thread Post No.1529 - Ckret comments about makeup and witness testimony re- physical traits, possibility of makeup ... and I think 'wig' came up. To quote post #1529 on the old thread, Ckret said: -He had olive skin (no make-up, neither Mucklow, Schaffner or Hancock made comment on make-up which would have been very obvious. Again, do the math, put dark makeup on someone then sit next to them with your shoulders touching, you can see the make-up.) -He had dark hair, receding with sideburns (no wig, this would have been painfully obvious, if a man was wearing a wig with a receding hair line and side burns everyone would have noticed, especially Mucklow and Schaffner.) 6. New Thread: Mar 19 08. Safecracking brings up 'wig' to Ckret but Ckret doesnt reply. Backthread PMs ask about 'bald' and there is some discussion. More private PMs and exchange of info and links to Bremerton article. There were several people doing Google searches of old newspapers at the time ... 7. Jun 22 08. Wig - Bald - Snowmman. Bremerton article is cited maybe first time on the thread. Ckret still hasnt replied - 8. Oct 22 08. wig. bald. Bremertom reference. all by Snowmman again. 9. Sep 30 10 - bald - Farflung Original issues: makeup and wearing a wig (not that he was bald!). FBI search and questioning related to WIGS not bald per se. People were talking about this issue clear back in the 1970s ... Ted Mayfield was an original suspect. Phoned H the night of the hijacking to advise H he "was not the hijacker"! Mayfield was a professional skydiver who had dressed up as a clown and worn makeup from time to time during public parachuting demonstrations. Note* Both Sluggo and Snowmman should know about this and can add-in as they want.

I dont think Jo needs your help or advice about anything. That's what I think. I gave my thoughts about the KC Theory a long time ago. I see no need to rehash it. Nothing has changed. As was the case with Dvorak and Myers and their case against Teddy Mayfield, the whole thing was based on anecdotes and coincidence; it failed when it got to the media and KING-News. Myers & Dvorak didnt even bother to make a submission to the FBI, so far as I know. I see your case against KC and Geestman in a similar light. The wig story you have raised could apply to Mayfield as well as to Kenny, I think. I dont know that the wig story has ever been adequately ex- plained. But, the wig story is just one of a number of back-stories which developed during the Cooper investigation, another was the 'hotel story', and there are other stories ... I have always felt those stories are legitimate grist for a good investigative journalist (which could even be someone like Carol Abraczinskas or a retired FBI SA) ... Every major expedition in human history has involved miss-steps and wrong-assumptions, time spent persuing false leads ... Columbus thought he had arrived at China! Marco Polo wondered if he had arived somehow on to the Moon! What I dont like, and what I dont think is effective, is trying to use one of these backstories like the wig story, as leverage to try and force the FBI or anyone else into admitting serious errors, all for the purpose of trying to pressure the FBI into admitting 'this or that', or forcing the FBI into finally endorsing some person as a serious suspect; all as a political concession! You cant criticise Marla for running her case in the media, then turn around and do the very same thing, or give the appearance of doing the same thing, and expect a different result. Bottom line: if you ever dig up Kenny and find Cooper twenties in his front suit pocket, in his casket with him, then give Curtis Ng a call! That is my analysis of this whole thing. And lay off red-haired step children and Comcast reps!