davjohns

I have an instinctive lack of desire for easy women. I figure if they jump in the sack with someone quickly, it is likely because they don't have the personality, intelligence, charm, warmth and other things that would attract someone. They jump in with easy sex because it is all they have. Obviously, this doesn't have to be true. It's just my instinctive position on the matter. I prefer a woman who considers a physical relationship something that follows a real relationship; not begins it. I suppose the woman could also be jumping into sex for the same reason most guys do. It's all they want. In which case, I'm still out. Just me. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Will do. Keep positive. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Well . . . DUH. I'm at the other end of that spectrum. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I went from Virgo to Leo? That can't be right. I looked up Cheach's birthdate. When did OompaLoompa become a sign? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Wow. Of all the criteria that float around in my brain, money is not one. And the fact that we are not having sex is another one that does not come up. I have these oddball ideas about compatible sense of humor; mutual interests; intelligence; personality; lack of bad habits; and a host of other things that can not be measured like money and frequency of intercourse. Wow. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Asking for signatures can be a bit awkward sometimes. Yeah but how else are you gonna find out what their name is? Sometimes it's not good to know names. You get them confused later on and, for some odd reason, that always leads to problems. Call 'em all darlin' or baby or honeypot but never use real names. Okay Sweet Cheeks. . OWNED! I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Heaven only knows what those Keebler Elves were doing to you while you slept. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Complete strangers. Keep in mind that I am a former police officer, I was an attorney (dressed like one) at the time, and have been military in reserve component and active for a long time. I carry myself like a respectable individual. I had people recognize me in other venues who would ask if I had my gun and let me know that they supported such conduct. Again, it was probably connected to my appearance. If I looked like a thug, they would probably have a different view. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Alabama law requires a permit for concealed carry or carry in an automobile. There was an Attorney General opinion under Charles Graddick that said open carry is perfectly legal in Alabama. I carried open in downtown Birmingham from the car lot to the law office and back for years. People told me from time to time that they liked it. Made them feel safe. Some states might pretend that open carry is disturbing the peace depending on local constabulary feelings on the matter. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I think the audible would go off when the woman is about to, so the man knows it is time to 'pull' at the same time. Just my thought. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Rather curious what the log on that device would track. My ProTrack records time in freefall, max speed, opening altitude and such. Would the SexTrack record session number, foreplay time, sex time, length of climax, number of her climaxes? I suppose it would have to interface with the computer to record who you were in formation with, formations formed and such? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I have long known that I was a woman trapped in a man's body. And that woman is just as gay as she can be. I just wish the lesbians would let me attend the meetings. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I see lots of talk of racism in this thread. It might help if Americans understood that much of the world is quite happy with it's racist stances and doesn't seek diversity like the US professes to. I've spent some time in the middle east. They like hating each other for reasons of racism, religion, tribe, geography, etc. Denegrating a Jew for hating Arabs when that Jew grew up surrounded by Arabs who want him/her dead is really pretty silly in my view. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm generally OK. Sometimes start to get cramps and know I need to have gatorade before and after a run or such. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I know these ideas are rising from different quarters of the government...but really? I am reminded that Senator Feinstein of California is a vehement opponent of my right to carry firearms, but she has a California concealed carry permit and gun to protect herself. I wish I had been born part of the aristocracy so my safety was important to the government. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

With all due respect sir, I'm having a little trouble buying your story. It reminds me of a bad student/independant film where the director/editor failed to establish the propper rapport between the main characters and the audience. First...In your plot, the world seems to be over populated with speed demon christians that bombard the roadways cutting everybody off and flipping them the bird and flashing pictures of bloody fetuses. It is so overbearing that it causes the main character to grow so exasperated and weary that it leads him to abandon his faith. Second...Your character sounds like he doesn't want to identify with christianity because it is all about dead babies and giving people the finger as they try to brainwash you while confined in a straight jacket. The third reason I'm not buying the story is that it almost seems analogous to saying "I quit identifying with being a good person because there was this one guy who said he was a good person, but one day he got really ticked off at somebody and told them to piss off!" But see...I don't think that's who our audience wants. I think they want a man who is solid in his convictions...who is steadfast and stands firm. They don't want somebody that's so easily swayed by a couple nutjobs as to negate his whole belief system....However, I think I'm starting to divert a little too much from the essence of the character you oringinally proposed. So here is my professional opinion. I think it would be a more believable plot if the main character altogether just didn't identify with christianity. He simply just doesn't believe. But rather than being comfortably confident in that mind set, there is a struggle deep within the receses of his mind. There is something naggin him...a vexation that is causing him to become more and more uneasy about his disbelief...and he hates it...he wants it gone! So instead of reconciling this concern with the postive aspects of christianity, he dwells on any and every negative aspect that can be even remotely associated with christianity so that he can simply feel better about his disbelief. ...Now this is your film, this is your baby. I'm simply a consaultant that's been in this business for 15 years...but if you like what we have to say and would like to see our ideas of your masterpiece come alive on the silver screen, we have a very large network of some very talented directors and production staff that can have this rolling out on the red carpet this time next year. Just make the check payable to Dr. Coreece at Divine interceptation media consultation and I'll have Andy and Lawrocket take care of the rest. Regards... (btw, I'm not trying to be a smart ass...I'm just projecting my boredom with being an editor. I think I want to get back into the pre-production aspect of the entertainment business...you know, the big collaboration meetings and brainstorming sessions...just making shit happen. Hopefully my point didn't get too diluted and that you found it a tad entertaining?) That was cute. I enjoyed it tremendously. My point was that I see too many openly declaring themselves to be Christian without walking the walk. There is a Jewish concept about this that was ordered by Rabi Yeshua, but Christians are unfamiliar with his teachings. They mostly know church doctrine; the groundwork for which was laid hundreds of years after his death. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I hate when people call and start asking who I am. You called me. Introduce yourself before you start demanding my information. I always start out with a greeting and introduction before asking for assistance. IE: "Good morning! My name is David Johnson. I'm trying to find Sam." I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

UPS and FEDEX can be worse. Both have told me it is illegal for me to ship blackpowder pistols. They are wrong, but don't care about facts. I had to explain to the US Post Office that I can ship a firearms straight to a manufacturer and make the guy look it up before he would accept the package. Even then, he insisted the weapon had to be taken apart, which is not true. I suspect the guy was just getting into your business. I've never had them ask exactly what was in the package. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I am so relieved to see that other people think double digits are high. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I have a half gallon container on my desk. I usually drain it once before lunch and once after. Then there's the water in the protein shake and what I drink at meals. It's close to two gallons a day sometimes. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Whey protein shake first thing after waking. Six boiled egg whites and fruit for breakfast. Non-fat milk. Whey protein mid morning. Lunch is lean meat and veggies. Whey protein mid-afternoon. Lean meat and veggies for dinner. Whey protein before bed. Sometimes cassein protein if I have it. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Happens. When i was a police officer, I stopped to help a guy change a flat in the rain. The next day at role call, there was an APB for the driver of that vehicle and tag number. I ran the tag before helping him. No hits. It happens. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

The recent thread about gun control got me thinking. Lots of thread on here discuss how government (often mis-labeled as 'society') should deal with something. It's true with unemployment / welfare, firearms, violence, and a host of other things. In the past, the community or family handled much that we now look to the government for. The family disarmed you if you were dangerous. The community dealt with you if they knew you were a worthy person out of work due to unfortunate circumstances or disabled. Your family or community whupped your rear if you were an ass. If you would not work, you generally did not eat. Today, taking care of business at the lowest (I say 'most efficent') level will get you charged in a government court in some cases. In the case of faked disabilities or refusal to work, government automatons process your paperwork and dole out money. Sometimes, we have government programs that tell you how to get money out of those who do work. Are we really better off? Will we ever get back to local responsibility? When my daughter and I go for a walk, we carry trash bags and pick up garbage. I've seen her friends throw stuff on the floor and declare, "They have people to pick that up here". (You can imagine how that went.) I've changed lots of tires on the side of the road for people. I've watched plenty of people go right past a very pregnant woman with a flat. So, is it your community; or is it the government's? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

see? there we go again, inciting apocalypse. Now if someone goes off and apocalypse's'es someone else - you'll be to blame Thanks for the laugh. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

For the sake of discussion, is the old method ever going to be viable again? Once upon a time, the community and family would take weapons from people who might be dangerous. Now, we seem to look to the government for these things. I maintain that an involved family and neighbors could do many things better than the government that intervenes today. I don't know if we can get back to that state without some apocalyptic event. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.