Belgian_Draft

I never claimed to be "the ultimate patriot". You are assuming again. A little impossible to prove a person's actions that will happen in the future, don't you think? Why don't you prove that relations are NOT hurt and that the international community is and forever will be a nicey-nice endeavor after all this. That is, after all, what you are trying to tell us. Yes. If you don't know whay then it is useless to try to explain it to you. Here you go again with your naive assumptions. The chances of that happening are virtually none. Spoken like a true American. NOT. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

None. Chronic back problems due to a small birth defect prevented military service. I guess according to yoiur standards that means I can't love my country. BTW, history is filled with people who served their country but turned against it. They also did damage to international relations unrelated to any war that will take years to mend, if ever. What good does exposing the lies after the fact do? Were you so naive to think everything the government tells you is the truth? So...whose side do you stand with? Your country? Or the POS who leaked thousands of your countries confidential comminucations wih other countries? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

You assume everything he leaked was the truth. That's a lot of assumption. Standing up for the Constitution and standing up for someone who leaks confidential information WITHOUT REGARD TO CONTENT, INTENT, OR CONSEQUENCE are not the same thing. That idiot son of a bitch can kiss my ass and any citizen of the United States of America who supports him is a FUCKING TRAITOR. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

You can't be fucking serious. The only thing that douchebag deserves is a mallet to the head. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Old Fashioned Apple Pie Recipe Ingredients: 2 9-inch pie crusts (one for the top crust, one for the bottom crust) 1/4 cup all-purpose flour 3/4 cup sugar 1/2 teaspoon ground cinnamon 1/2 teaspoon ground nutmeg Dash of salt 2 tablespoons butter 6 cups thinly sliced and cored apple Directions: 1. Preheat oven to 425 degrees F. 2. Mix sugar, cinnamon, nutmeg, flour, and salt. Stir in the apples. 3. Place into pie crust, dot with butter. Cover with top crust, and slit evenly to let steam escape. Seal the top crust to the bottom by pinching the edges together. 3. Cover edge of the crust with a three inch strip of aluminum foil. 4. Bake 40-50 minutes, until crust is brown and juice begins to bubble through top. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Thanks, I didn't know that. It would still be a piss poor way to go. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41377119/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/ It hurts to even think about how that was done. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Fixed it fer ye. you've got to get help for that pararnoid complex... Irony scale: +10 HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Fixed it fer ye. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

I asked you first. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

You do realize the donut shop is NOT directly federally funded, right? And that it was started and built with private moneys, right? And that the success of the donut shop depends not on who the patrons work for, only that it has patrons? BTW, what are your views on the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11/01? Your postings read a lot like someody who hasn't been seen on SC in a while. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Yep. And I'm just givin' them all the coffee they can drink. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

1981 to 1988 is 7 years. If you want 8 years you would need to state "1981 through 1988". or you could say 1981-1988, inclusive. Or one could actually read for context (Reagan Administration) and not drag out the obvious over a semantics concern. No such context is given in his sig line. Therefore, fair game. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

1981 to 1988 is 7 years. If you want 8 years you would need to state "1981 through 1988". HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

That's what I was thinkin'. Maybe, instead of banning texting while crossing a street, we should require it. That would thin out the herd pretty quick. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

We also have exceptions in each case. Some people take to skydiving like they were born with wings. Some people pick up a baseball and can throw it at 90 mph with pinpint precision the very firt time. Some people graduate from college with a business degree and a year later are VP. And some young people commit premeditated, cold-blooded murder and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences. In each case a very strong argument can be made that the person involved should not be held to the same standards as everyone else. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Most children do not understand as well as adults. I stated as much in my post. So, if some people are capable of being acting in a responsible manner and understand the consequences of their actions at a young age, why can we not try those few as adults? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

You are assuming, incorrectly, that all "children" are the same and that no person is capable of being a responsible person until they reach some predetermined age. While true in most cases it is not unusual at all for a very young person to be mature far past others their age. When I was 12 I was working on the farm doing the same work as my dad. I operated tractors, combines, grain dryers, etc. on my own. I was killing and slaughtering livestock. I was, for all intents and purposes, fully capable of being self sufficient. I also knew that murder was bad and that the penalty would be the loss of my freedom for probably the rest of my life. Do not fall for the delusion that no "child" can understand or comprehend the results of their actions. Many, many can and do understand as well, or even better than, adults. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

ok, when the question is all about debating the legal definition of children vs the legal definition of adult, your argument isn't circular - it's moronic. Or at least it's moot. It's not an argument, it's a statement of fact. The morons are those who think renaming children as adults makes them adults. Even a child who commits a particularly heinous crime is NOT an adult. Excuse me, but the morons are those who think just because a person has not reached age xx they are incapable of premeditation and extreme intentional violence while knowing exactly what they are doing and what the ramifications of those acts are. Who really gives ashit if the criminal id called a child, an adult, a juvenile, a cabbage, or a potted plant. The person on trial is accused of a crime that demands that persons permanent removal from society if found guilty....period! A big problem with the world today is a bunch of bleeding heart liberals crying, "But he is just a baby" and wanting to let him off with a slap on the wrist. Sorry, Professor, but the person who committed this crime needs to be removed from society regardless of age. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

BV and Kallend love circular arguments - it's dizzying. It's much easier to argue what you want . What exactly is circular about saying "A child is not an adult"? Children are NOT adults. That's all there is to it. And cold, calculating murderers are not children...regardless of physical age. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

When a person, regardless of age or race is a foreigner and committs terrorist acts then they are treated as a foreign terrorist. When a person, regardless of age or race, committs crimes in an adult manner then they should be treated as an adult. Seriously, Bill, it is some fucked up thinking to say this kid should not be tried as an adult unless he is proven to be criminally insane. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Except when that "child" has committed a crime so cold and calculated that he/she is determined to be a threat to society far past any term of incarceration given a juvenile. Shotgunning a sleeping pregnant woman would certainly qualify in any normal person's book. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Calling a child an adult does not make them an adult. Calling a murderer a child does not make them a child. A rose by any other name..... HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

I thought it says a lot about religion regardless of the authenticity of the signs. BTW, if there are no dogs in Heaven then I don't want to go. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

It is only spam if you don't like cobbler HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.