NCclimber

Members
  • Content

    4,456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by NCclimber

  1. He said: Can't talk now. I'm off to blast long held symbols of peace outta the fuckin' sky!
  2. Fixed it. This is fun. Keep 'em coming.
  3. Tha key law in this case says that if you are participating in one criminal activity and a different crime is committed, then you are an accomplice. Kenneth Foster had been driving some friends around, who had been robbing people. He knew one guy had a gun.
  4. What should happen to Bush and Cheney, then? How many dead in Iraq due to their actions? Oh look... There's a worm... It's stuck on a hook... That's tied to a string.
  5. Yeah... and Clinton got a blow job.... which is about as relevant as your post is to anything previously addressed in this thread.
  6. Cute. Again, do you have any evidence that the construction of the stadium had any impact on funds potentially allocated for bridge maintenance? Or is this just another unsupportable attack on the status quo? You crack me up.
  7. What percentage of all murders do serial killings account for? 1/10th of one percent?
  8. Playing the ball indeed. QuoteYou would go be with the President in a heartbeat.....says a lot about things now doesnt it.. As I said its about the company you keep..... and sionce you apologists drool for the chance to be with your Great Leader.... go right ahead. ***
  9. Oh, I hate this kind of corporate welfare. Building stadiums on the taxpayer dime is a sleazy power grab. What I question is whether funding that stadium prevented the necessary repairs to that bridge from being financed. Kallend's OP implied as much. Correlation does not prove causation. Prevention is not the issue - priorities are the issue. Pirana is right. Do you have any evidence that the maintenance of that bridge was a low priorirty... that the construction of the stadium had any impact on funds potentially allocated for bridge maintenance? How about it, Kallend?
  10. You mean when you're not accusing other's of PAs? Especially when they're responding to your "dishonest" charges?
  11. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Now that right there is some funny shit....... If only we were all as civil and courteous as you.
  12. You need counseling. I hope we never meet. You need a lesson in basic moral truisms like what is right for one is right for all. A lesson in international law. A lesson in the role of the US military and a lesson in US foreign policy. I hope we do meet. Is there anything about the USA that you admire or consider worthy? If you have anything positive to say about this country, I'd love to hear it.
  13. Some people have a knack for missing the obvious intent of the speaker (or writer). They seem to think this makes them look smarter. Ironic.
  14. I'd guess most religious people are willing to express their doubts, in a non-threatening environment. This forum doesn't qualify. if the belief and doubts you may harbor cannot stand harsh scrutiny and criticism by those who do not share them.. then what value do they (the belief or the doubt) really carry?? Everything in context, Einstein.
  15. This is little more than a domestic issue. Who cares?
  16. No I think the "whoosh" is on you!!! Bill seems to think his crappy analogies aren't just that.
  17. I thought they got rid of all the guns in England.
  18. Right after 9/11 some polls showed Bush's approval at 88%. I think he problably set the record for peak to valley decline.
  19. Hostile peaceniks.. Leather wearing Vegans.. GW alarmist skydivers.. Hypocrites
  20. How about a Gravel/Paul ticket? And I'm only half kidding. I'm voting write-in for Knotts/Conway ticket Don and Tim? I could go for that. We deserve it This is taking on a Point Break feel.
  21. If you're honestly interested in a discussion, not just in stirring the pot, you might want to put some parameters of who you're talking about... like limiting it to industrialized nations... or democracies. It seems to be too much of an open field to look at the entire world. Similarly, looking at the economic conditions of certain groups of Americans, on an all-inclusive worldwide scale, wouldn't be a good comaprison. Pointing out that household income of the poorest Americans is higher than 75% of the rest of the world (just a guess - to illustrate a point) doesn't give an accurate representation of their situation.