SkyDekker

It means that Canadians are too fucking stupid and will vote liberal again and we will end up with the same crooked administration in a minority government held up by the fucking socialists NDP. The conservatives are stupid too, they have to get rid of their party leader, Harper< and run Peter MacKay....then they may actually have a chance. For our American friends, who will just take this as American bashing, many Canadians are worried that voting for the conservatives will make Canada more similar to the current climate in the US, which many view as a negative.

they are dogs, they can get aggressive at any time...it is an animal not a plush toy. Some breeds are more prone to agrissive behaviour than others. The owner is at fault for allowing this to happen.

Looks like this poor guy gave his girlfriend the kiss of death.... Poor guy....

Exactly and until the government tells you the truth, don't you worry abouta thing....

I wouldn't and it is the prime reason why I am against the death penalty..

Then truly make it life in prisoin and get rid of the death penalty....

Ohh, here I was thinking that it was a deterrent for those who were still among the living...silly me, it is a deterrent for those who are dead...now it all makes perfect sense.... Those that are put in jail for life never repeat their crimes either.....

That death penalty has worked really well for you guys...just look at how few people get killed in the US on a yearly basis....great deterrent....

What the fuck does that have to do with the intelligence the president gets, which was what Bill was talking about??

Why, you have run from difficult questions from reporters before?

uhmmm....NO I'll be voting conservative, just like the last federal election, I said they could do themselves a favour and run MacKay and do better...didn't say that meant I wouldn't vote for them....assumptions...... In stead of voting party line, I think it is important to look at what the country or province needs. I have no issue with voting liberal one election and voting conservative another election. Many a voter here will say that all politicians are crooks and therefore might as well vote liberal again, because the same would happen under the conservatives. I agree with them to a certain point. If you keep the same group of people in power for a long time, they start to feel invincable. When that happens, fraud and theft starts to occur. This doesn't only happen in politics, it happens on a large scale in business as well. Hence, it is important that regardless of personal opinions and feeling, the group in power changes so these things don't happen. I voted Liberal in the last provincial election, cause it was time for a chance.....I voted conservative in the last federal election and will do the same this time around.

I agree, I can't believe people in Canada are even considering voting Liberal after all that has been going on. Unfortunately, the Conservatives are notdoing themselves any favours. If they would get rid of Harper and run Peter MacKay instead, they would stand a much better chance.... People in most jobs do not get hired for having the best credentials....usually things like fitting into the team, boss' perception, recruiter's comfort zone etc, play a much larger role than just qualifications. The speech of hiring the best person is great, but not very realiztic. Let me give you an example.... I am the General Manager of one of the biggest malls in Canada, in one of the most multicultural environments in Toronto. My customer base comes from many, many different ethnicities. I have a security department comprised of roughly 30 staff members. Let's say all the best candidates turn out to be caucasian males. So now I am saddled with 30 white men in a security department dealing with mostly visible minorities a situation that is a recipe for disaster.....

I think that we are missing a lot of the back ground in that little snippet...if it went just like that, then it isn't very smart. I do believe that specially in provincial and federal governments, the workforce should be a reflection of the population. It is naturally easy to hire people you are comfortable with, so sometimes rules are needed to break that barrier. When it comes to the lower level jobs at Public Works, qualifications aren't the biggest concern.

I have a blackberry with direct connect and love it. It synchs wirelessly with my outlook...email...contacts, calendar...everything.....

That's funny...obviously haven't ever been to the Toronto or Vancouver area....have you...

So Robertson is a democrat...or are you trying to say all democrats are religeous kooks? You are making no sense whatsoever.... You discount what Robertson has to say because supposedly everybody think he is a religeous kook and not worth listening to....yet your President made time in his busy schedule to meet with him (unlike meeting with fellow politicians....which really does make more sense considering his job) Sp. why would the President meet with a religeous kook during one of the busiest times of his presidency? He must see some value in his views and opinions, enough so that alledgedly he even made assurances to him to appease him....

But you think that false claims injurous to a whole group are free speech? Just so we are clear here....if you hurt one person it is not free speech...if you hurt a group of people, it is free speech....you are right, that makes perfect sense.... Funny, you seemed to have no objection to objecting to laws and rules in other countries......On top of that, the US and Canada are slightly closer related than the US and Austria....but to use one of your favourite line...if I have to explain it, you wouldn't get it.....

A good friend of the family was a jesuit priest...was great talking to him, he was always willing to listen and discuss without blindly following the party line....

Really? Then why did your President take time out of his busy schedule to meet with him personally before invading another country?

I am not the one proclaiming my love for free speech...as a matter of fact I think speech should be limited in certain cases. Slander and Libel are direct infringements on free speech. How come you don't have an issue with those? Wow, you're in the state, there is a pretty clear infringement on free speech....yet you as the big proclaimed lover of free speech know nothing about it....but you criticize a country 5,000 miles away for a supposed restriction on free speech......you are right, not hypocritical at all

Yet when some one says: Bush lied......some of the regulars here react like you just fucked their mother up the ass in front of them......

Then, do you think it should it be a crime to claim falsehoods about specific people? Do you think it should be a crime to discuss sexual activities with youg boys and girls? If Free Speech is as incredibly important as many americans claim it to be, then why is dicussing the proper use of a dildo forbidden in the great State of Texas? Why is there not an uprising of support for free speech? It's hypocritical, since you make all these comments about how you believe in free speech and how important it is to you, yet you don't seem to be very active to change it in your own country.......

But at the start of your self proclaimed rant you say this: Because you said nearly now it is not a generalization? What a joke.... PS....on this board alone there would be quite a few americans who would be pretty pissed off if a non-american came on here claiming americans are fat and lazy....

Such hypocritical bullshit....there are all kinds of restrictions on your free speech in the US...this holier than though shit is quite laughable.... Just publish a magazine and claim that Michael Jackson likes to get it up the ass from Cheny after George Bush sucked him off and swallowed his cum.. Or publish a magazine about how you would love to rape your neighbours 6 year old daughter and have her done over by the german shephard that belongs to your other neighbour..... Or write a great story about how you would like to kill the President and exactly how you would like to go about doing that.... Or try and tell a person in Texas exactly what a vibrating dildo should be used for..... Or ask a female police officers if she will give you head for $40.... Free speech my ass.......

there are reports of civilians being killed by it though...