SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. I didn't call him a liar. In my first post on the subject I clearly stated that if he claimed to be a professor, that would be a lie. I also said that claiming to be a professor when you are not is a lie. I didn't say he claimed to be a professor. I do know others do. Which makes for an interesting question. If other publicly call him a professor and he doesn't counter that, does that still make him a liar? I think so.
  2. I am ready to believe the numbers, but respected research would include definitions of the sample. Until we have that, the stats mean nothing.
  3. I know quite a few people around me who have all the qualifications to become a cop, even do very similar work. I wonder what would happen if they identified themselves as a police officer and tried to arrest some one. Certain positions hold a particular prestige and or/ require a very specific applications and approval process. Claiming to be one, when you are not, is a lie. Yes, he is well educated. Yes, he has worked at prestigious institutions. No, he doens't appear to be a professor. Micro, nice play on words and a thinly veiled personal attack. I said in anotehr thread that you are one of the few on this board I actually respect. It would appear I spoke too soon.
  4. Uhmm, that was the original question with regards to the conspiracy theory. To debunk it a snopes website, without any sources other than newsprint, is posted. When that is questioned your answer is, well if you don't agree with it debunk it. That would just bring the loop back to the first post. That one contained just as much evidence.
  5. assistant professor and professor are not the same. My assistant has nowhere near my qualifications or experience. If she went out and claimed she held my position, that would be a lie.
  6. does look like he isn't a professor, so if he has been claiming that, that would be lie number 1.
  7. In all honesty, the snopes article is just as bad. It doesn't offer anything to back up their side of the story, other than some newspaper articles. They are just saying it is false and are leaving it at that.
  8. without a specific statement that geographical areas were similar in all three countries, the stats in the article are completely bogus.
  9. lol, I wasn't really replying to you in particular
  10. just like those idiots who want to make sure that evolution doesn't show up on the curriculum.
  11. Good luck at the hospital...hope all is well!
  12. so what happens when you believe that not one party is better than the other. When you believe that change is good and sometimes conservatives should be in power and sometimes liberals should be in power?
  13. yes it does suck.... going through the first one right now...
  14. did the survey indicate in which geographical areas in each country respondents were contacted?
  15. I didn't think you would get it......
  16. no, there would be significantly fewer. Which I think you will find is the case.
  17. very funny coming from a guy whose every second word is fuck.
  18. part of that is true. However, a tougher stance on crime seems to resonatewith most people in Canada. If the liberals object to it too much and the conservatives don't say or do anything stupid during their tenure (which they have been known to do), the conservatives will easily win a majority government in about 2 years. I don't think the Libs will oppose too much, judging from the feel of society.
  19. Because unfortunately that is part of how canadian Law works. That is the part that needs to be changed. Hopefully witha conservative government (even a small minority one) that can be accomplished.