DaVinci

Your morals are so flexible that you could support something that you normally would not support? So how do you meet halfway on say abortions?

And that might mean something if she was being charged with anything close to murder... But she is not. Fact is that if the race baiters didn't create the outrage that this case might have already been settled. There would have been no website to get donations to fight a court battle that would not have happened. Or a left winger that thinks he knows what is best for everyone else......

And equally stupid to only blame those that came before him.

Ah, so you can explain so you insult? Your argument falls flat since 'asshole' would work with either race. "Nigger" only works with one. Also, a black person will get more angry at a white using "nigger" than a black using the same word. I don't know why it is so difficult for you to admit a double standard exists here.... It is readily apparent to anyone that bothers to look and is not trying to make excuses. FACT: For a black person it is more insulting to be called a nigger by a white person than a black person. FACT: it is "OK" to have a group NAACP, or "Blacks for Obama", or the Congressional Black Caucus, or a Black University... But a group ANNWP, "Whites for Mitt", a White Caucus, or a "White Only" school would cause howls of racism. Ignoring that simple set of facts is just silly and serves no purpose what so ever.

Again, I don't live on here. Don't like it, don't read it. Nope, your own source proved my point.... Out of the top 10 degrees... Not ONE was liberal arts. FACTS do not support your BS. I will give you some credit... You have finally avoiding using personal attacks.... BRAVO!

And I do not want them telling what I can and cannot do either. But once the Govt has control over your HC, they WILL have a say in what you can and cannot do. It is a simple and logical extension of the consequences of providing HC. I wonder how many that support govt HC would be OK if that it also required a person to take drug tests, not be allowed to smoke, not be allowed to drink, and they had to show they were exercising and had mandatory 'weigh ins'?

Why? Is it only wrong if it is done in a black/white part of town? Does being in a predominate race area nullify the 4th?

You have proof of CHEATING there? I have seen lots of errors, but no evidence of cheating. Maybe you should send your data to the SC?

Read: ME and people like ME and for MY reasons are fine... Anything else is not. Please refer to: http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/seven-vars-2.htm And Now given the history of your country... One would think that you would understand the importance of liberty and the ability to defend yourself.... Yet for some reason Germain's have a trait that compels them to follow authority figures.... It is this reason that so many Germain's followed the rantings of Hitler and committed so many atrocities. Instead of swearing never to put so much trust and faith in the Govt.... They instead have chosen to believe that the Govt will never again be so stupid and to willingly follow it again. Americans just cannot comprehend how someone can trust that much in a Govt. (Although there are subsets of Americans that do exactly that, and I would theorize that in Germany there are some that do not walk lockstep with the general flow either).

He has a valid point. African Americans for Obama - Thats OK, and to call it 'racist' is wrong. Whites for Mitt - That group would be questioned and accused of racism the second it was founded. There is a double standard, just like the use of the word "Nigger". To approve of one group and bash another for the same use of the same word... Is the very definition of racism. Yet it is 'allowed' Racism will exist as long as this is allowed and anyone that dares question it is told they are wrong.

Defense team != Zimmerman. You are calling Zimmerman a 'douchebag' for the acts of someone else.

Several economists think that giving people more money will cause them to spend it.... Clinton thought Bush's tax cuts should continue. You may not agree, but that does not make you automatically correct. It is capitalism in practice. You may consider it an insult, but I fail to see why you would be emotionally hurt by a company taking steps to both advertise and protect a public park. Cutting expenses is a tried and true method to fix a budget deficit. Also, you seem to forget that he was not found guilty of anything. Privatization has been shown to reduce expenses AND raise standards.... Again Capitalism in action. Maybe you like the idea of a budget running in the red and big govt... Not everyone agrees.

It CAN, that does not mean it DOES. I seriously doubt that any amount of money spent would get me to vote for a true 'Communist Party' candidate. Money will only bring DATA. People will still have to interpret that data and decide. Others will vote party line no matter what.

YES.... You may finally be getting the idea!

Many civilians have more training than the police. And EVERY civilian shooting is investigated. Even the SYG cases are investigated, just not by GJ. Do you have an example of a single person using SYG more than once? The law has been in place for quite a few years now. And that is NOT covered by SYG. In fact a woman just got 20 years in FL for leaving, getting a gun and then going back into the house to get her keys. The 20 years is WAY to much, but it shows WHY SYG was needed. See FL has a 10-20-life law. If found guilty of just having a gun during a crime then you get 10 years. Shoot it and you get 20. Shoot someone and you get life. This lady gave a warning shot to prevent her BF from attacking her.... And that was found to be illegal and now she is facing 20 years in prison. The SYG law was put in place to protect people that lawfully use a weapon in SD. The problem is that "duty to retreat" is just not that simple. In the report listed it seems like a large portion of cases were "unsure" if the person could have retreated. It seems you are not alone in not totally understanding the SYG law.

Harassing the woman... Yes, you should say something. Graffiti? No, walk away and call the police. The law was never intended to make citizens the police. It was intended to not allow an overzealous DA to ruin a guys life because he defended his life when attacked. It was never intended to allow a criminal with an illegal gun to use the law. This might be the only problem with the law.

He only went after PUBLIC unions since he saw them as a major issue to the STATES budget. Fire and police were exempt only because it was the only way the bill would pass. Even FDR tried to prevent public unions for the same reason Walker went after them.

You have any data to back up that claim?

Seems like you do not know the GOP platform at all. And trying to use a COMMUNIST country as a GOP dream??? Really? You clearly do not know the GOP platform.

No, I have no been on for a few days. I do remember you saying you bought a pistol while in Miami and that you claim that you only used a credit card for the process. Which raises a few questions. If you think guns in private hands are ban... Why did you buy one? And if you think guns are only for hunting... Why did you buy a pistol? Well, it is really simple. You seem perfectly fine with OTHERS not being allowed guns. But you think YOU should be allowed. You think only YOU can safely own these items... It is called elitism. You only think YOUR level of comfort is allowed for all. Plus, you have broken your own "rules" buy buying a handgun in the US while decrying the ability to do it.

Actually, he has a very good point. Germany is a prime example of how a bad Govt takes control and it leads to many innocent deaths. Hitler could not have killed 6M Jews without having disarmed them first.

If a group created a website, "White Americans for Mitt".... How do you think that would go over? How long would it be before some of the regulars on here called it the "KKK"?

Simply put... If you are going to expect the Govt to pay for your HC, then you should also expect that they are going to have a say in your lifestyle.

Outlawing large drinks is not what a business would do. My position is consistent.

Companies do not tax. And even taxes can be looked at as a freemarket situation... Hence the Facebook founder leaving the US, or people leaving CA for places like TX.