DaVinci

Members
  • Content

    3,518
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DaVinci

  1. Sorry, I don't live on here. you are free to ignore posts older than a week if you like, that does not mean I have to. Considering the 2000 election was decided by 100-400 votes depending on the criteria used.... I'd disagree that there is no impact.
  2. Read the GCA 68. You are trying to use a false analogy to make an emotional argument. Ah, the best you can do now is insults?
  3. False, if that were true then these semi versions would be falling apart in the same manner due to semi fire.
  4. You can't see the difference between the two of those?
  5. And your claims do not support your actions.... Don't blame me for your actions.
  6. "Reasonable" and "should" was not the question.... The question was how many have that in cash.... Especially in this economy.
  7. Govt backed student loans should only be for degrees like engineering, liberal arts do not have the ROI.
  8. The trigger matters more than the caliber when trying to hit the target.... Yes, 9mm is more a more accurate round than say a 40, but the difference is not significant to most shooters.... The weak part of the system is the shooter, not the round. Worthless in an SD weapon. At the ranges you are shooting drift adjustable sights are just one more screw to get loose. Glocks are hard to beat for an SD gun. One thing most people do not consider is the actions AFTER the engagement. Guns like 1911's need to be put on safe before you put them down or reholster. SIGS need the hammer dropped. When all hell breaks loose, you are not going to be calm... Simple is better. Glocks, the Springfield XD are good examples of simple "point and click" weapons.
  9. That is exactly what they want. Look at Feinstein, she is trying to stop a reciprocity bill even though she used to carry a gun for protection and is now protected by a bunch of guys carrying guns.
  10. How many people do you know that have 15k lying around?
  11. Yes, the 2nd should really be all we would ever need, but the left does not see it that way. And I am for States rights, are you?
  12. It is fun to watch the Martin supporters try to ignore things like a head wound and pretend that a dispatchers suggestion is the same as a lawful order.
  13. Because shooting for any other reason is not a reason to shoot. 1. If you think your life is in danger, you don't have the time to pull off a trick shot. 2. If you have the time to pull off a trick shot... your life is not in danger. 3. When your life is in danger, the chance of you being able to pull off a trick shot is astronomical. Shooting to wound is next to impossible, might not stop an attacker, and legally is actually harder to defend your actions.
  14. No, sorry. Florida law does not allow you to strike a person because you think he is following you.
  15. Hey look... Judge and jury right here. Wouldn't that be self defense? I thought you said there was no self defense here? Fact is that, if anything, there was too much self defense here not a lack of it. I find it humorous that people claim there is no self defense, then use self defense as a reason why there was no self defense.
  16. And my comment was that liking it or not has NOTHING to do with its CONSTITUTIONALITY. And YOU replied to ME about THAT. Same to you.
  17. Yes, numerous times you have said that not everyone should be allowed to carry everywhere. A prime example is right in THIS thread where you state I didn't have the right to carry a gun at an airport and that it was OK since I VOLUNTARILY went there.
  18. And you are ignoring the police and the paramedics because you want to..... BTW http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_george_zimmerman_head_dm_120419_wmain.jpg Seems to support Zimmermans case AND the police and paramedics report AND the witnesses statements.
  19. Yet the witnesses claim to have seen Zimmerman on his back with the kid on top, and NONE of the witnesses claim Zimmerman did any damage to himself. Yet only you are really ignoring the available data.
  20. So you would be OK with a citizen carrying a gun into a courtroom, an airplane, a jail? Because you have failed to explain HOW you would determine who is qualified. Even when flat out asked about it you avoid answering. The hints you have given show that you think anyone that wants a gun should have to PROVE they are worthy.... A limit that you refuse to put on any other right in the Bill of Rights. But back to the point of THIS discussion (that you are ignoring).... You would be fine with a guy that was arrested for a fine violation being allowed to carry a gun into the courtroom or the jail?
  21. I know what they said during oral arguments.... Go fishing for yet another strawman.
  22. This from you.... AWESOME Please show your proof. You claimed people liked it, I claimed that does not make it CONSTITUTIONAL.
  23. I have long since stopped expecting you to be honest when you are proven wrong... I didn't expect you to be so open about it. Seems to me that you were trying to argue that people liked the provisions. And my point is still valid that just because people LIKE it does not mean it is Constitutional.
  24. In that case you put yourself into a situation where it might be needed. Fact is that an innocent person CAN be attacked by a criminal without asking for it. Yeah, it worked out great in Norway right?