Ron

Ah, thats a BIG part of wilderness survival. Whats next, not going to teach them to build a fire? Those parents are twits. I hope they don't eat meat of any kind then. What a fucking crock. Next they will not learn the proper ways to care for and use a knife or build a fire.... Jesus. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Talking about a war with Iraq...The war against Saddam and his troops did not last long. Insurgents, but not against Saddam. The "War" against Saddams empire was quick. Dealing with Insurgents is not. Two seperate issues that are related. You choose to treat them as the exact same thing. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

There was already a thread that discussed flag burning. In fact this was just a spin off of that thread with a PA thrown in. I am just wondering why one "attack" was OK but the others were warned. Michele you are 100% correct in this, I find the whole thing stupid and I wish people would take attacks to PM. But how some were allowed I was confused about. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Who cares what %? We still gave more. Those are only GOVERNMENT dollars. Got info on the private sector? One country 9.4% of the TOTAL sent. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Then quit using IBM products. Don't buy anything that is not stamped "Made in the USA". Lead with your pocket book and maybe others will follow. I find it quite funny that people who bitch about this many of them drive foreign cars and type on computers made in China. (Not saying you John....just in general) "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

?!?!?!?!?! Oh never mind "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

And that is also an attack. I agree. This was a post to ask: 1. How is one person getting away with it? Its quite clear she has an issue with him.... 2. Why bother? We know who hates who around here. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

And you don't see how one person, starting TWO polls about a single person BOTH with negative spins are attacks? Quote "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

She has started TWO threads where she had a Poll about Rhino. Both were negative. Also she said she was going to write Lisa's name on a flag and burn it...Why? Cause Lisa told her burning a flag is wrong...How is that not both an attack (buring an effigy of someone) and a statement that was only to incite anger? If you started a thread: "Who thinks Ron is stupid about 4way?"....It would be an attack. But it has not happend in this case...She has been able to threaten others and attack them and when others do the same, those threads got locked, but hers did not? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

ALL of them are. The What will Rhino Do, and the ones by Rhino and Lisa ALL are pretty stupid. My question is WHY are only Rhino and Lisa's getting locked when its quite clear that Jen's are of the same ilk. True but posting ABOUT a person is don't ya think? And this was not a post, but TWO new threads this person started. Here is one: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1674879#1674879 Here is another: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1706056#1706056 TWO polls both from the SAME person, both about the SAME person and both are attacking his character. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

You don't see how that Poll was an attack on his chracter? What other reason whould you start such a poll? A Poll to point out a persons "Conflicting Values" IS an attack. So why do others get locked for the SAME thing, but she does not? Its actually a valid quetion. It has happened several times on here where a relationship heads south and one starts attacking the other person on here. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Talking about an action, not a person. The second, hell its quite clear that she has a problem with him. Just like how you have a problem with me. Till she gets it right? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

After making a personal attack of her own while trying to call people names for doing it. Case in point "She's just playing by the rules, same as you and Rhino. Apparently the rule is you can be as much of an asshole as you want, long as you don't directly name call." "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

No, my question was "How can one person do something, but when others do it they get into trouble". Not an attack on Lisa, Rhino, OR Jen....It just happens that Jen seems to be getting away with what Lisa and Rhino can't. I wondered why? and asked as much. Nope again, MAYBE Rhino and Lisa did, but mine was a question about how some things for some people are allowed and from others they are not. She said she was going to write Lisa's name on a flag and burn it...That is an attack. Its like burning an effigy...But nothing happened to her for that attack....Why? Nice try though. My "did you sleep with her" comment was a question to see WHY she has an issue with Rhino. I wonder WHY she feels the need to bait and attack him. As you can see I have not taken a side...In fact I jumped on Rhino several times about some of his statments.... Im just wondering how some can say things that gets others warned and not get in trouble? Or how some can clear harass someone and not get in trouble? Or how some can make threats against someone and not get in trouble? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

How can "jenfly00" make a clear attack on other posters and not get the thread locked or get banned? Yet when other do the same (Yes, stupid, and immature) bull shit they get locked? Its quite clear that "Jenfly00" has a hard on for Rhino....Rhino, did you fuck her at a boogie and not call back? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

If you would not stop a male attacker, then you are using a double standard. And while I can CLEARLY see her attacks against you...I mean she has started two threads against you...And I have no idea how she contiunes to be allowed to do it since they are clear attacks on you. But if you claim to defend women, but not her... Its a serious double standard. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

You have posted TWO threads that are direct attacks on him. Yes you are Vindictive... Also your quote is way fucked up....It should be the actors name, not "President".... Sheesh, you probley don't know the difference between the two. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

While making attackes and threatening gestures? Anyone know how this woman can make threats and not get banned? Anyone? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Your cite is wrong. It should be the actors name, not "President blah, blah" "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

I guess you would rather just hand money out to lazy people for having kids. I can see a need to help people, but what you want is an allowance from the government for eveything. You want to spend Uncle Sam's checks like they were your own....I'd rather you not have access to MY accounts. BTW Congress voted on it. Thats how America works. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

I would hope he ignores it...Like I would hope he igones this whole slanderous post. WOW, a whole THREAD to try and attack someone? Not even I have earned that. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Scores? Damn it sucks to be away from a meet. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Its not the courses...The courses just allow you to do the job. If a person prepares like they should, and they go back with the idea in their heads that they now have a license to learn. If the Evaluators are doing the job. Then they will be fine and and a cookie course will be OK. Bram is holding this course....I think anyone that gets a rating from Bram....Really earned it. So as long as the standards are met, and the newly minted "I" does not get a big head.... Its fine. If the standars are not met, and the "I" gets a big head....It does not matter how fast they got the ratings. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Thats because your "evidence" is crap. Go get some good stuff and then make your claims...So far all you have is some hints that might prove what you want to prove....And you are only looking at that stuff...The same thing you are claiming Bush did...How is that for Irony? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Derek, you and I both know that no USPA course is going to make anyone a good, or bad instructor. The course is only to allow people to learn how to teach. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334