Ron

I know you are a brit, but ever heard of "innocent till proven guilty?" I can't understand how you keep making statements you can't back with any evidence...Thats not very scientific. I expect this kinda crap from some low life or someone with political ambitions, but not a Professor. Well, thats because you have not been able to provide any, but keep lying anyway. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Why would you want a bag that can actually increase the chance of a mal? What types of mals would these bags SOLVE? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

The accused is supposed to follow the rules that are placed on them..Saddam didn't. The UN didn't do their job either. Saddam used WMD's on the Kurds and the Iranians....Do you doubt that? Actually thats not my assertation...But thanks for assuming you know what I think. If you were right it would save more time. However, you are wrong. But thanks anyway. I think that he had been hiding them and sneaking them out of the Country for years. People do that all the time. They hide things not on their property since they know they are being watched, and their property could be searched. Still if you want to look at who is at fault: 1. Saddam for not complying with the UN resolutions...Say what you want, he never complied. If he had there would have been no reason to invade. 2. The UN for not doing the job they claim to be able to do. They should have made Saddam comply 3. Bush 1 for not finishing the job he started. He caved to World pressure and stopped short of removing Saddam in 91. 4. Clinton for at best sending a few missles, and destroying our intel community. He likes the UN, but not enought ot make it do the job it claims to be made for. Clinton getting rid of HUMIT in favor of high tech toys left a gigantic hole in our ability to gather intel. 5. Bush and the current Admin....For not doing a better job of reading the intel. You can claim that they only went after sources that said what they wanted...But if you have proof, go ahead and Impeach him, if not quit making claims you can't back up with proof.....BTW some Brit memo is not proof. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

I can't believe you think 360 Tons can just go away but a few Tons could not have. Un-believable. Never forget he had them and he never complied. But the fact you can admit...Hell you even tout that the toops let 360 tons dissapear....But you can't admit that a few tons of WMD could. WOW! "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

This is the logic I love....What 360 TONS of high explosives were found to be "missing" after we knew where there were right? Where did they go? I mean 360 TONS just does not dissapear does it? Now how hard could 10-20 tons of Anthrax be to hide if 360 TONS of stuff can dissapear? How hard would it be to get it across a few borders? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Hopefully the Impeachment process would prove one way or another the criminal intent. I would LOVE to see the truth presented. However, a memo from a Brit is not proof anymore than A.A. Milne's books are proof of a talking teddy bear and a 100 acre woods. S'OK "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

No, what we have here is you taking a quote and using in the way you want. Compare that to: "If I have a chance to draw my weapon..., I am not going to miss." Same thing. You of course see the anti Bush spin, I see the other side. That does not mean you are right. Now here comes all the shit about WMD's not being found, how the "intel" was good and ignored, and the required calling people sheep. For fun you could ramble about how "Intel" is not the right word. Further just trying to avoid the fact you have no proof of any illegal activity on the part of the President...See if you did, we have this thing called "Impeachment". Like I have said before, if you have PROOF he did something illegal, present it. Hell if its good enough to prove to me he is guilty, I'll even join you to Impeach him....Until then he is innocent till you prove otherwise. Edit to add: Here is the name of who I think is your Congressman : Rick Renzi 418 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202-225-2315 (office) 202-226-9739 (fax) Please send any proof you have right along to him...In fact if you do get some proof, I'll even send it to my Rep as well. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

612 mpg....? Mis type, or did you get that water powered car working? Ready for this? I agree. Sit down....I agree. Key being SIMILAR driving habits. If I drive my Hummer 2 miles a day, and you drive your Prius 40...I use less gas. So he is correct. You are correct that big ass cars are a waste. I hate SUV's for around town. SUV's should have to fit all regular economy standards. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

He did his job. He wrote a story that got tons of exposure. The kid,if guilty should be treated according to the law. I would kill him for the little girl. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

I guess this would be a bad time to menton I just bought a Hummer? Kidding "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Maybe he is the black chick in question "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Yep, since she passed the unmarked police car like it was standing still. Also radar and its limitations have NOTHING to do with the broken tail light, windshield, or the stupid woman driving on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. She was a criminal (Driving on a suspended license), driving fast (Who cares what the *Exact* speed was...It was faster than the speed limit), with a broken tail light, and a bad windshield. Please, try to explain how her driving on a SUSPENDED license could have been done by the radar gun. She did not get tazered because she was black no matter how many times you claim that. She got tazered because she was resisting arrest after breaking multiple laws. But please, do try to explain them all away, your replies are quite comical. And your self promotion makes me laugh. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Would I get a retirement? In both Canada and Austrialia, could I move there for work and get on that countries retirment programs? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Should be good. Go get some. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Oh, I know. I tend to ignore any super burner rounds since they inflate the average of a 6 round meet. I just talked to Billy and he said they were gonna finish the draw tomorrow, should be very interesting. Good for them. You have Thomas? Are you so lazy that you could not bother to click on the team name? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Still take away round one and they did a 20.4. So I guess this weekend you have your "coming out?" "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

In a word....Panic. You might not with all your SCUBA training, but most people will freakout when they end up under water. The helmet ,while yes it could protect you from an impact injury, is weight (even more so when the liner absorbs water). And if you flare to at least half brakes and are prepared to PLF I don't see to much impact risk in a water landing where a helmet would help.....I could be wrong, but I would say the odds favor not needing it. In a panic, I bet few will be able to maintain calm enough to remove the helmet once they are in the water. They will be quite busy trying to get out of the gear. And yes it could snag a line or fill with water (If its a full face). With half shell designs you could just unsnap it. But I'd ditch everything I didn't need. Might be a good test for someone to try...Take a factory diver to the next pool training and see if people can remove it. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

He knows something about crying: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1693209#1693209 "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

I hate RSL's....But I'd jump a Skyhook. Even with a video camera on my head. Watch some test footage...WOW. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

If you are going to land in water: 1. First DON'T. If you must then get as close to shore, or a boat as possible. Land in the FRONT of a boat, unless they have a skier people don't look back much. 2. Ditch weight, helmet, gloves...ect...GET RID OF THEM. 3. Take off your chest strap, and loosen your leg straps. 4. If there is a visible current, land INTO it. It is much easier to ditch the harness by swimming up stream and you will roll out of the harness. If you are being drug face down you will have to roll forward out of the harness. 5. Flare for the top of the water, if you can't tell where the top is go to half brakes. 6. Prepare to PLF as soon as your feet hit. 7. Take a deep breath. 8. When you hit the water sweep your arms back like a track, and swim UP stream with your legs. The harness will slide off. 9. Screw the gear...It will float for a few mins, but with all the lines and the fact that once it starts to sink it will drag you down...GET AWAY FROM IT! If the canopy lands on top of you, Go to the surface and take a breath. Find a seam and follow it to the edge of the canopy. 10. Jumpsuits are good. Guess what? They hold air. You can bring the neck up to your mouth and inflate them....This works with cotton suits as well once they get wet. I have stayed afloat an hour with a cotton long sleeve shirt with this trick. 11. Hope someone likes you and will look for you Instructors...Am I missing something? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Never anyones business: 16 : 1 : 17.5 16 jumps, 1 new rig, 17.5 avg. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

This statement shows you know nothing about flying. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Yep, and WOW! It is gonna be some meet in Russia Good for them "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Well sure, whatever. Do you deny that she was resisting arrest? I mean it is on the video clear as day. Also why you might be able to say she was not speeding...Yeah, she blew by a cop in an undercover Cobra....She WAS driving on a suspended license...Which BTW is illegal, and grounds for arrest. So she IS a criminal. We have video of her driving at a speed that appears to be above the limit...So hey, don't write her a ticket, just arrest her for driving without a license. Yes. Like I said I have a working knowledge of Radar. Ever hear of video proof of a person who is driving without a license and resisting arrest? Hard to argue with video. Quit making excuses for criminals. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

My handy dandy desk dictionary has Racist defined as: 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion. He seems to fit. "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334