FLYJACK
-
Content
5,236 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
32 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by FLYJACK
-
Doesn't look like a film artifact.. probably a smudge... time had passed, it might not even be the same towel.
-
Ryan, you are smarter than that.. There is no evidence in that patent that TiSb was actually produced in the 18% or any % for that patent. Patents are written that way to capture possibilities,, You guys have misrepresented the information in the patent.
-
The towel for Cooper's seat was extremely dirty/soiled/stained.. vs the next one. I can't imagine anything the FBI doing anything.. is there any test that would produce that. Was it dye from Cooper's hair??... ala Mitchell
-
It is not personal, that patent has been one of the biggest red herrings in the Vortex... surpassing all the previous ones Eric has conjured up...
-
This TiSb patent is a disaster... there is ZERO evidence TiSb was ever produced in any percentage. This Antimony statement is not integral to the patent, it is a general statement to cover possibilities.. besides 18% as an upper bound it also states normally 2-3%... I have read the entire document and there is NO EVIDENCE a TiSb alloy was ever produced in any % related to this patent..
-
You keep defaulting to the percentage,,, The composition DOES NOT MATCH.
-
It seems you don't understand the patent process and requirements.. process was never mentioned until I brought it up. The patent is not for any new alloy. The full particle composition (if they are an alloy) not just the percentages, DOES NOT actually match the patent.. only a partial composition match to a reference to vague percentages of Ti and Sb. Patents require precision. You are claiming that the particles are close so by inference it must be related.. that isn't true, it needs to be exact to make that claim. I am just stating, based on the facts that the patent is not evidence of anything... it still may be possible that the particles came from a metallurgy environment but that patent is not evidence.. the fact that the particles do not fully match it indicates that the patent is NOT related.
-
You are correct,, it was Ulis that claimed the only source of those particles was that patent. But, you guys have also overplayed the patent somewhat.. more-so NickyB,, patents are NOT a comprehensive proxy for the existence of that alloy, (if it is an alloy), they don't actually match the patent, the patent doesn't even claim a new alloy. It is purely a process patent. IMO, those particles can be eliminated from that patent because they do not match and there was so little. Yet, we are told the reverse, mostly by Ulis.. The particles could be from a metallurgy environment but that patent is not evidence of that in any way. They might not be from a metallurgical environment at all. That alloy could be a "Trade Secret" or military... It could be trace material picked up on the plane or even later.. Whether Cooper was the one wearing the tie during exposure to those particles is a separate issue. My point is that based on the facts, that patent has been overplayed as evidence.
-
I was very skeptical about the RemCru patent actually matching the TiSb particles... After doing some research, it doesn't.. To patent a new alloy it requires very specific elements and percentages,, the RemCru patent uses vague percentages and doesn't actually match all the elements in the particle,, and that is if it is actually an alloy. Most of these alloy patents are for the process... and a patent isn't always used for a new alloy, an inventor can use a trade secret... The Titanium Antimony (alloy) part of the patent isn't patentable.. The patent is for a new process and it is written right there. The claim that this is the only source for those tie particles is completely false and further the patent does not match those particles and it is not for for a new alloy, it is for a process. It does NOT say anywhere that the patent is for a new alloy. The TiSb particle/patent is another Cooper Vortex red herring.
-
Can you name those that think otherwise.. I agree patents can give you a lead, I check them myself but the universal lack of comprehensiveness and vagueness renders a common sleuth with a falsely heightened illusion of confidence. An new alloy patent must be very specific, most are the process or too vague.. an alternative is a legal trade secret which many choose.. then there is non Commercial or military stuff.. A patent search just doesn't capture the universe of possibilities for a specific alloy.. they are a poor proxy.
-
I don't think patents are a comprehensive proxy..
-
Silver Chloride,, used for electrodes and photochromic lenses, antimicrobial, pigments.. (fingerprint powder)
-
Aft lights remained out entire time...
-
Lots of MG(35%) Si(30%) Al(20%) and Fe(5%) on the tie.. Anybody identify a corresponding alloy..
-
Photochromic Lenses were invented in 1966,,, Looking for use circa 1971..
-
When exactly were the rear cabin lights first out.. The window shades were lowered.. The fuel driver said rear was dark,, Al Lee said lights were out,, Tina said lights were out when Cooper stood up and ordered her to the cockpit.. Tina also said light were out when she went to get the chutes.. Two things, it makes it hard for Cooper to see with lights out and sunglasses on and harder to determine his height when standing. 727 rear lighting..
-
It says so in the document.. read it. CRAFT is an acronym..
-
BOOM.. The Raleigh/BelAir coupons were only good in the USA.. but available to APO and FPO mailing addresses. "APO and FPO are abbreviations used by the US Military Postal Service to deliver mail and packages to military personnel overseas." So, Cooper could have redeemed coupons from overseas through an APO/FPO. Written in the lower right text..
-
Robert,, read..
-
Not sure what Edwards means.. the new file confirms the Air Force map was received Nov 25th,, but we have had the document confirming the Air Force map on Nov 26th for a long time.. It only moves it up one day.. he seems to have questioned that it came from the Air Force, we already had confirmed that.
-
Tina used the interphone/intercom while seated.. wanted small bills?
-
It is nearly impossible to refute certain statements.. particularly concerning prominent deceased persons. It is equally virtually impossible to positively eliminate many suspects.. and indeed Seattle has reopened several previously eliminated suspects... because of new evidence..
-
I did read it, you have zero evidence the Air America or any 727's had cockpit controls for the ventral stairs. The FBI comm states CRAFT maps, also the Harrison notes does.. CRAFT is acronym for the IFR procedure. Those maps were requested and delivered, they were CRAFT maps because that is what they called them whatever procedure they actually used.
-
1986 prints no value case closed.
-
The C-22 military version didn't even have cockpit controls for ventral stairs.. it is beyond speculation to claim the Commercial 727-100QC Air America planes had cockpit controls.. and also claim Cooper was familiar with them. You need some evidence. When the stairs were replaced with a slide, there were no stairs to control. The IFR procedure requires maps, that is what they were referring to.. the maps not the IFR procedure itself..
