FLYJACK

and cigarettes... There were shoes available at the time that looked like loafers but had corrugated (military style) commando soles. The circumstantial elements fit well. It was 1 mile from a found chute in river next to railway, store was right on the rail tracks and within the potential LZ...

There are still better pics of the part out there but the first is a right side pic, the last has a subtle part on the left..

What do think of those shoes I posted earlier? Vintage brown loafer like with corrugated (military style) commando soles..

Somebody did try to take a secret pic of Hahneman during his hijacking, it didn't turn out.

I know what you mean, suspect descriptions aren't definitive or conclusive on their own. They are part of the picture though. You need to take everything in. Some funny things.. Hahenman had a scar on his hand,, the witnesses claimed he had no scars. The pilot positively ID the wrong guy from photos. The hotel staff rejected a pic of Hahneman as George Ames, it was him.

First off, I have never said anything about a Hotel lobby. Maybe others have.. The name "George Ames", Hahneman's alias was tracked to the Hotel, not Hahneman. Interesting point, Hahneman's pic was later shown to Hotel staff and they said it was definitely not him... it turned out it was. Witnesses aren't entirely reliable. Hahneman was identified by a tipster for a reward, rumour is it was a relative, maybe a cousin but I haven't confirmed that 100%.. FBI is really trying to hide that.

That is just not true, I have the facts correct. I have an FBI document, newspaper reports aren't always accurate. FBI - "Approximately 1:15 P.M., plane left Dulles with crew members, which included three male and four female' members and other items demanded by hijacker. Hijacker, shortly after the plane became airborne, expressed dis- satisfaction and requested plane to return to the vicinity of Dulles Airport. Plane circled vicinity of Dulles Airport until his demand for one hundred $1000 bills, two hundred $500 and five eighty-five $100 bills was met. Shortly after 7:30 P.M., the plane again landed at Dulles Airport at which time the new ransom money was placed onboard and a stewardess and flight engineer were replaced with new crew members." Can you understand my frustration discussing Hahneman with people who have no idea what the facts are.. I have thousands of pieces of information on Hahneman. You have reached bogus conclusions on incomplete, mis-information and assumptions... I am not interested in going through all my info and sorting it out all out for you. The fact that nobody was found who saw or remembered Cooper before the hijacking is irrelevant..

There is a subtle left part in the earlier Hahneman pic. YOU ARE BLIND. Other pics show a more pronounced part. I don't have to prove squat to you.. you are irrelevant to me. A nothing. If I posted those pics you'd just make up some other irrational nonsense to reject Hahneman.. Frankly, you have a bad attitude and use poor logic. Otherwise I would have posted more. The one thing I don't respect or have time for is poor reasoning and bad logic. Your logic, if I don't show what I have you can use that reject to Hahneman,, that is great.. idiotic logic, but go for it. I am not in this to play these childish games. Fact is, Hahneman's hair matches the description of Cooper's, if you don't think so that is your problem, not mine. I don't owe you anything. Do your own homework,, .

I don't know if he checked the money or considered going with what they gave him then changed his mind, he also jumped with 2000 cigarettes. To claim Hahneman wasn't smart is ridiculous. He is described by people who knew him as very intelligent. You don't know what his decision process was. You are making assumptions and creating a conclusion from those assumptions. That is piss poor logic. The fact is the denominations he requested were available, he did get it. HE WAS RIGHT. He was very intelligent, he survived a jump out the rear of a 727 at night over the jungle with $303,000.. The FBI Id'd him from a tip and he turned himself in for fear of being killed in Honduras by people looking for the ransom.

Store break in.. The claim was.. military type boots with a corrugated sole.. That is most certainly from shoe prints,, that doesn't mean they were military boots.. There were also non military "shoes" with corrugated soles. They were also called commando soles... date back to the 1940's May look like loafers but have a corrugated sole...

because you are denying reality,,, It does match Cooper's hair description.. it is parted on the left, the only thing it isn't is slicked down in that image. I do have many other better pics but I am not interested in convincing anyone of something I already know.

No it isn't... The plane took off with the wrong denominations, Hahneman demanded the denominations he originally requested while the plane circled in the air. He did receive the large bills he requested... they were available. Your statement is false. Your conclusion is nonsense. In no way is it evidence that he wasn't Cooper.

Found interesting info from Palmer.. Reports of fragments found at 3 feet,,, Palmer claims there was no evidence and surmised it may have been deposited by the excavation process. Money was deposited with last year. Money was worn like driftwood. Soda cans were found with the money, Sioux City Sarsaparilla not sold in area and a Nesbitt's Orange.. There is no dating on the soda cans to determine burial date but cans do sink in water.. the cans and other "fresh" debris probably came from the river. To claim that packets of money can't self bury or come from the river is nonsense. According to fisherman TBAR has lots of garbage including shoes...

Hahneman initially demanded $300,000 in higher denominations to keep the weight down but the authorities gave him smaller ones. Hahneman demanded his request be met and they did.. the money was swapped and Hahneman ended up with $303,000. If Hahneman was Cooper and he lost some/all the money or otherwise struggled due to weight, it makes sense to ask for larger denominations for a larger amount of money. The denominations Hahneman asked for and received isn't evidence Hahneman couldn't be Cooper. Hahneman was described by people including a CIA agent as extremely intelligent... ..

You are making some false claims and poor assumptions.. and reaching bogus conclusions. There are legitimate arguments against Hahneman, but the hair isn't one of them. Claiming you know Hahneman's hair type because of your friend is nonsense. Hahneman's mother was Honduran but his father was of dark complexioned German descent.. Witnesses did claim Cooper's hair was slicked/greasy or looked odd (Mitchell) First thing you need to do is read the FBI files... Even the indictment describes Cooper's hair as "greasy".. I have pics of Hahneman with hair at various lengths.. very short it looks flat and straight, as it gets longer it gets wavy/curly and looks marceled... one he has a hard part on the left others he has it slicked back. Hair is a match except he had slight greying on the lower sides, but in some pics that isn't noticeable. It looks like he may have covered it up. Bill Mitchell thought Cooper's hair looked odd, the colour.. He used some product in his hair to slick it and probably covered up the slight grey on the sides as well... Hahneman's hair is a perfect match to the witnesses description of Cooper's. The only difference is slight greying on sides.. that wasn't reported by any witnesses. Robert Gregory.. hair SLICKED, looked like Nixon and George Raft movies... pic below George Raft/Hahneman/Nixon

There were no boots stolen from the store.. where did that come from.

Here is problem with the placard. First, it was never confirmed to be from NORJAK. For many reasons already discussed it is unlikely but possible. Assuming it came from NORJAK, the western flightpath theory uses the FBI wind "ESTIMATE". yes, it was an estimate derived from Salem and Portland far from the placard location. I find it somewhat ironic that a distant estimated wind proxy created by the FBI is used as evidence to claim the FBI flightpath is wrong.. Anyway, here are important docs,, The FBI wind estimate was derived from Salem and Portland.. yes an estimate averaged over an hour from far away from the placard location. In other words, virtually irrelevant. The other doc shows that the wind nearest the placard location and time at Toledo was SSW shifting to S at 8 PM. In summary, if the placard did come from NORJAK it would indicate the wind was from the S at that location, not the plane was many miles West. The placard argument is built on several bogus assumptions.

Of course Portland was tracking NORJAK..

Eric is using poor logic to make up stuff.. "Well, I'm quite certain somebody F'd up somewhere somehow. After all, the money on Tena Bar doesn't lie. The placard doesn't lie. The fiberglass skirt doesn't lie. The haven't-found-a-damn-thing-in-50-years along the FBI Flight Path doesn't lie." EU The FBI flight path is drawn erratic because it is plotted points, it is not exact but it is very close, there is a small margin of error. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR does not prove an alternate flightpath. You are committing a logical fallacy.. not finding anything on the flightpath is the same logical fallacy. There is no confirmation the placard came form NORJAK. IMO it is unlikely for many reasons but possible. If it did, the SW wind direction ESTIMATE from the FBI you are implying is a guess for the jump location. Closer to the placard,,, Toledo wind was from the S which means the Placard would have landed right on the flightpath. Finally, the part you claim with no evidence is the side curtain from NORJAK was rejected by the FBI. It was even the wrong size. You just made it all up. It is all conjecture and poor quality.. We are to believe that the FBI, Air Force, Sage, chase pilots, ATC's and Boeing are all wrong based on a few very weak assumptions and logical fallacies.

I have two different pics of Hahneman in a thin black tie pre-Norjak, neither is particular unique, just a thin black tie. The tie was purchased 1964/65, so it had six years to accumulate particles. It it is likely those particles came from more than one single exposure but an accumulation over the six years. In 1965 Hahneman worked as an electrical engineer for military/undustrial level radar and communication systems. He worked on the construction and operation of an Apollo radar tracking system for NASA. The radar sight is covered with rare elements including Yttrium which was a ceramic coating for radomes and radar systems. He later worked as a manager at an electronics manufacturing plant in Korea up to August 1971. They made and marketed electron tubes, capacitors and other electronic parts.. those things can contain all sorts of rare particles. The money,, Hahneman did demand specific denominations, he was given the wrong ones.. they couldn't get the right ones so they gave him what they could get. He didn't like it and had the plane return to get the right denominations. Hahneman asked for specific high denominations to keep the weight down. He had asked for $300,000, but ended up with $303,000 when they swapped the bills with him. I suspect the extra $3000 might have been to pay off the crew, but that is speculation. The reason Hahneman demanded large bills was to keep the jump weight down.. 6 pounds. If he was Cooper and this was actually his second jump it would have been a reasonable adjustment with a higher ransom amount to demand higher denomination bills and keep the weight down.. $20's would have been about to 30 lbs.

On Eric Ulis' recent youtube video.. March 20 Overall very good summary by Eric, very minor errors. Cooper initially demanded 2 parachutes not 4, he changed to 4, FBI docs Cooper initially demanded rear airstairs lowered in flight. FBI docs The FBI never confirmed the placard was from Norjak. No rational explanation for the TBAR money??? lots of rational theories exist..

the chutes.. Early, FBI agent Carr believed the chutes belonged to Cossey.. from his house, he talked to Cossey. It doesn't necessarily mean it was true.

Cooper's clothing.. Cooper initially asked for Airstairs down after takeoff plus the fact that he wasn't dressed for a PNW climate indicates his initial plan was to jump further South into a warmer climate.. There is nothing to indicate he initially planned to jump ASAP into the PNW. Hahneman was dressed exactly the same for his hijacking in May.. Dark suit, thin dark tie (he even left one behind), white dress shirt, overcoat, dark sunglasses and dark brown "dress" shoes. (and a briefcase bomb)

Eric, I never claimed you stole my Singapore bank account research.. you can't read. I claimed you altered your claim with no evidence to maintain your narrative when I showed you it was wrong. I don't give a crap about Singapore or anything Sheridan related, IMO, it is all nonsense. It was only the tie stuff you stole. Dating it to approx 1965+- based on analyzing the labels. I never claimed you pled guilty to enter the Domestic Violence Diversion Program, I only asked if you did? You were arrested for damage relating to Domestic Violence.. you entered a domestic violence diversion program. That isn't made up. YOU ADMITTED IT. You are so clueless you didn't even look up the 1983 construction date for the Lake Vancouver flushing channel before fabricating some grand "TBAR was a virtual island" theory based on ignorance, bad research and gross speculation.. I wouldn't give any of your ideas any attention except for the fact that you attacked me with smears for a year now. Nobody else is challenging your nonsense.. most educated Cooper sleuths have just ignored it because it is baseless. Stop harassing me or my next letter will be to the History Channel with the facts. I can prove that I disclosed the tie dating info long before you.. you are the liar, Eric. I don't mind people using my research, even without attribution but maliciously attacking my character repeatedly for a year, calling me a troll and liar has consequences. and I didn't initiate research into your past,, it was sent to me by people close to you,, obviously not Blevins

Eric Ulis started attacking me with the troll label a while back when I pointed out that I figured out the date for the tie.. long before he claimed to do it. He called me a troll and a liar to deflect.. Eric Ulis had to discredit me to obfuscate the truth. I figured out the tie was manufactured and sold around 1964- 1965 and I disseminated that info several times beginning in early 2017.. not to take credit but to add to the Cooper case knowledge. To be clear, I have no problem people using it, I don't even want credit... What I think is fraudulent and dishonest is Eric Ulis claiming credit, monetizing it and distorting it to advance his nonsense theory. On top of it, he calls me a troll and liar,,, that is the character of Eric Ulis. Accuse me of what he is doing. ERIC showed up here to troll, he is trashing DZ on shutter's site.. this is the real Eric Ulis. WE lie non-stop?? "You're on the wrong site GEORGER. You need to hang out with the children at the DZ. You know, the ones who lie non-stop, whine and pretend they're relevant and that anyone actually gives a damn what they say about the Cooper case." EU, Eric Ulis Did Eric claim this was his research in the upcoming History channel production? I don't know.. but it explains why he got so aggressive and tried to discredit me. My posts on it are on Shutter's site over 3 years ago, well before Eric claimed he did it. In addition, I emailed it to a few people including Tom Kaye over 3 years ago. Fortunately, I still have that email exchange and his response.. "That is some nice work ______! I am not surprised it is older considering the amount of particles on the tie. Thanks, Tom" Jan 2017 one post of many... I explained the tie dating 1964/65. Pics and links were available to members, Eric joined later. I believe he first claimed it was his research in 2018.. Georger even helped a bit... Beyond Eric's nonsense.. I always thought the significance of the tie date was under appreciated by the Cooper community. The vile and dishonest behaviour and attitude from Eric and a few others towards me is why I don't reveal everything I have publicly. Why is this important?? The FBI claimed the tie was less than a couple years old so a suspect would have had to have been exposed to the particles very recently.. the FBI did a poor job, they asked a Penny's manager and got an opinion.. what else did they get wrong?? I deciphered the tie labels and determined the tie was manufactured from 1963 thru 1965.. Later with more research refined it to Spring 1964 thru 1964. It was not in 1963, that is what Eric was claiming to pin it on Sheridan. The purchase time frame is an assumption with some variability. It was likely purchased 3-6 months after manufacture. That means the tie was obtained roughly mid 1964 to mid 1965. Since the tie was obtained around 1965, it had 6 years and potentially multiple environments to obtain the tie particles.. We may be able to match a suspects environment to those particles.. I did. Fast forward.. When I did that tie research I wasn't even looking at Hahneman, but when I started looking into Hahneman his work profile matched the exotic and unique tie particles. Hahneman was an electronics engineer who worked on short term contracts, maybe up to a few years. He did not live at home with his family. He was estranged, worked abroad and visited his family rarely. Remember the tie obtained = 1965+-, Hahneman, an electronics engineer, worked from 1965-67 installing and manning Apollo tracking sites for NASA. He later worked as a manager for an electronics manufacturing company in Korea. When he was home which was rare, he would take apart the television... I have pics of him wearing a thin black tie in the 60's. He wore a thin dark tie for his hijacking and even left one behind. Does all that prove he is Cooper, no, but is far beyond any other suspect and it is beyond amazing that Hahneman who hijacked a 727 for ransom worked in rare environments which matched the exotic particles found on Cooper's tie. I am considering posting more details on the tie dating before Erics' History channel show airs to set the record straight before he potentially falsely takes credit for it again. I have more info than was in my original public posts on it over three years ago. It was not 1963.