FLYJACK

Nice try, it was an estimate he said "about". I measured it 28 miles from Portland is about 8:10. Rataczak also praised the FBI calculation of the quadrangle for the drop zone.. It is over, you gave it a shot and challenging things is a good thing and part of the process but part of the process is accepting when you are wrong. There is no question or doubt about it. Rataczak supported the FBI LZ,, and since the crew saw the lights of Portland they knew where Portland was so they would have known if the "pressure bump" was over the Columbia. This is simple stuff. I have given you the evidence, if you want to ignore it that is up to you but it diminishes your credibility, some Cooper sleuths don't care about credibility.

I have the DVD of his presentation, it is about 1.5 hours long.. He said.. the exact quote. "about 28 miles North of Portland he (Cooper) jumped out of the airplane" We both know if Cooper jumped over the Columbia based on the "pressure bump" timing Rataczak would have known. The pressure bump could not have occurred over/near the Columbia based on Rataczak's statement.

Now you are just consuming your own credibility. Ridicule isn't an actual argument. This isn't difficult,, they crew noted the lights of Portland, therefore they knew where Portland was. Rataczak was manually flying the plane which turned right before Portland. He would have known if Cooper jumped over the Columbia.. He said Cooper jumped about 28 miles North. So, that is very clear. You just have no reasonable argument, none. Check Mate.

Here in the notes,, olive complexion, latin in appearance, black curly hair, normal cut, parted on left. That rules out most higher profile suspects.. Everybody has ignored this...

Donna Elliot is unreliable.. ignore that. The pilots were not taking orders from anyone other than Cooper,, they were given full authority. The notes are legit, the question is if they are accurate.

If Cooper jumped over the Columbia, the pilots would have been in the Portland glow so they would have known where they were. Why are you having such a hard time with this.. you gave it a good shot but it is time to move on... there is no evidence to support your argument. All you have is sowing doubt in contradictory evidence. If that is your strategy I can only assume your goal is not to get to the truth.. Blevins said TBAR. The plane flew over the Western side of Portland not West of Portland.

I was reviewing this video and there was a strange statement that jumped out.. This guy had the Sheriff's notes.. he read the top line on one page "ordered pilot to fly over I5" We have always been told Cooper never gave path instructions.. the path did generally follow I5, it drifted East N of Portland but followed more closely S of Portland.. Either this was an error or it is true and was held back by the FBI. It does make sense in that Cooper could potentially know where he was if he could see I5. He may have ordered the pilot over I5 with the expectation that he could determine his location. Whether he did or not is another question. from 2:45.. 4:08 "ordered pilot to fly over I5" Hard to read but the top line says... ordered pilot to fly over next line I5.

C'mon, you really think Rataczak gets it wrong by about 28 miles.. You think he didn't know where the Airport or Portland was. They saw the glow... Rataczak said he was flying the plane by hand. and they would have been very very close the Airport.. they made that turn West around the Airport and over the Western side of Portland. Ratazcak would have known exactly where he was to make that turn. Tina saw the money and held it, she confirmed "bank style bands around each package". Guys, it is 2021, not 2011, it is time to give up your old theories and accept reality, the case has moved on. You can create doubt with virtually anything but at some point the evidence becomes overwhelming.

Rataczak said during his speech at NWA.. "about 28 miles N of Portland he (Cooper) jumped out of the airplane" If the "pressure bump" occurred over the Columbia River Ratazcak would have known it. THAT clearly indicates Cooper did not land near the Columbia River. Rataczak also said he just talked to Himmelsbach and the money was in a paper wrapper.. (bank bands) when given to Cooper. That means the TBAR rubber band frags attached were holding the packets in one single rubber banded bundle. AND the TBAR money likely arrived as one rubber banded bundle of packets..

Robert, you fail to recognize the goal.. The purpose is not to dispute or debate others (unless they lie about me), that has proven to be useless. The purpose is to inform everyone else about the facts so everyone can determine the truth based on being informed. I post info for everyone else. In this case, the info confirms what the FBI has claimed and what most of us have believed. If others choose to reject that info that is their problem. In fact, I prefer that some of these prominent Cooper personalities continue to get things wrong in the face of contradictory evidence..

The who isn't important.. that is noise, The fact is the FBI lab determined approximately $5800 or 3 packets.. and the bills were in the same sequence and packaging.. as given to Cooper. "Under the proposed judgment, which must be approved by U.S. District Judge Helen Frye, the federal government would keep $280 for use as evidence should anyone be prosecuted in the unsolved 1971 hijacking in which $200,000 was paid as ransom. Ingram and Globe Indemnity would split the remaining $5,520 equally." https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-05-22-mn-6995-story.html

Why do people push nonsense.. read the files.. FBI lab approximately $5800 on TBAR.. 100 bills per packet, that is 3 packets with one missing a few. There is nothing to support 2 packets,, The misinformation in this case is off the charts,

Oops, how did everyone miss this clue for 50 years, seems to be very important. Cooper.. 1 inch high black hair... that doesn't fit most suspects... (and adds an inch of height as well)

Chaucer, Chaucer, Chaucer, MiniG... So wrong. So sad. Chaucer talked to his expert and announced that the Lewis R was laughed at so it must be eliminated.. The Lewis River has the East Fork which runs South of the Lewis and had an historic flood in 1972. the East Fork passes very close to Heisson. Right in the FBI Cooper LZ.. The mouth of the Lewis was frequently clamshell dredged and material barged upstream. Chaucer claims to be the voice of reason and logic,,, he asked his "expert" the wrong question and ran with the wrong answer, eliminating a potential TBAR explanation. Ask your so called expert about the East Fork Lewis in 1972,, then apologize.

That soft spot is from him kissing your ass. The cigg stains may have been a hold back that got out inadvertently.

You are trolling Blevins. I was just trying to be helpful and post the facts for the wider Cooper community, if you guys copy it and choose to reject it that is up to you. Don't blame me for your confusion. But, you have to laugh at Georger's misfire, classic Georger. Mr misinformation. and Snow, if you notice Georger never has anything himself other than criticisms or praise, he rides on others work for attention,,, heads up.

That isn't necessarily attributed to the stewardess in the doc. The Cooper game is 3d chess, you are playing tiddlywinks.

No Snow, Your dismissal is hereby rejected. Dan Cooper: cigarette stains on right hand. and Georger agreed... you guys need to up your game if you want to solve this. OK, this is hilarious Georger tried to mock me for posting the facts but he reads the wrong description... the top one is Eugene Cooper, the bottom one is Dan Cooper.. I am being ridiculed from a position of shear ignorance.. can't make this stuff up.. HAHAHA... I can't take it.... this is hilarious. Learn to read FLYJACK,, HAHAHA.. stop it man you are killing me. Snow is still lost,, what a train wreck.

More dredging mysteries... 2 other distinct layers.. washed up rather than dredged.. frequently dredged and often floods.. there is that continuously dredged thing again. Clay layer probably the 1974 dredge operation. But it was further South, wasn't it. US Army Corps of Engineers.. only one dredge operation in 1974,, oops.. somebody is wrong. Unless there were different operations. They state in the vicinity... hmm what could that mean. Would not pass through the "Washington" dredge.. more mysteries. Oops, the money spot is marked wrong on the map. It is well North of the 1974 dredge spoils, even Ulis figured that one out. What do we do, this is too complex,,,, well, form a committee, apply to the Gov for research funding (they just print money anyway) throw in climate change (scam), social justice and nonbinary gender discrimination (marxism), that'll get it done. Do a thorough forensic study to be published and peer reviewed and then, only then can an authorized opinion be rendered 10 years from now.

This is just getting to complicated for mere mortals... Wait, what.. dredges carried material upstream from the Lewis,, can this be? This is just one of my theories.... can't be right.. that would destroy the western flight path, Washougal and Columbia landing theories.... and make too much sense.

Took the bait,,, now they take my work and don't even mention me after trashing me for holding back info.... hehehe.. psychos. Wet money doesn't make it through a suction dredge in that condition. Remember guys, 1974 was the last TBAR dredging before 1980, however it was not at the money spot it was South of the money spot. Maybe they can figure this out. Hint, there was also material barged UP the river and dumped on shores and in the middle of the River above TBAR, if you wanna go with a dredge theory. and the evidence does not support a Columbia River landing no matter how many times you guy's pat each others back.. Didn't you guys criticize speculation? Except when you do it of course. The FBI analysis based on the jump test, crew comm's and testimony support about an 8:11/8:12 jump time AND reject the claim that Cooper went back up the stairs to jump later. If you carefully analyzed the evidence it is clear. The big "bump" felt and seen on the gauge was Cooper jumping, it was not Cooper going back up the stairs. It is unfounded speculation to reject the FBI jump time analysis with NO evidence.. people are trying to make the TBAR find fit the flightpath by rejecting evidence. That is Ulis's specialty. But realistically, TBAR will never be solved beyond a few good theories. Have fun, do your own homework handwritten double spaced due Dec 31.. no cheating this time, and thank me later. Edit,, and Georger's work will not be accepted unless it is published in a reputable journal and peer reviewed.

Snow is just trolling you..

Here it is... The dredging was continuous until October 1974. So, the TBAR spot was hit (continuously) with dredge material between NORJAK and Oct 1974. Everyone was focussed on the 1974 dredge spoils South of the money spot. There was dredging before that. Game changer.

Just like Georger, apparently Mr Snow-hole can't read. I said if I post it I expect it to be shared. What part of that are you having a problem understanding. The dick move was was your disrespectful comments after using my work. Are you that dense.

A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. The frog lets the scorpion climb on its back and begins to swim. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature." There are lots of scorpions in the world, the Cooper world has its share, they can't change it is just their narcissistic nature. Unfortunately, they lose and everybody loses. That is the reason I DO NOT share most of my research.