FLYJACK

Liar.

Hahneman is irrelevant, I blocked you for the same thing last year. Your arguments are a rats nest of nonsense, what I don't like is your lies and complete distortion of my posts. You have no self awareness. You just don't contribute anything worthwhile.. that isn't a requirement here but you cross the line with your event spam. Go have your party in the woods, we don't want to hear about the model of generator you will use endlessly for months. Ok, don't say you weren't warned..

I blocked you last year when you started your endless event spamming.. Many of us have discussed this, and we will report you en mass and block you if you do like last year. A mention here and there isn't a big deal but flooding the forum with lengthy and endless updates for your event for months is spam and this is not the place for it. I already want to block you again. You aren't adding anything to the Cooper case discussion and using this place as your personal facebook page is disrespectful.

How about this Flyjack? Be there in July, or be square. I figure you are either Canadian, or pretty close to it somewhere. Not asking, just an educated guess. If so, you should know all about camping. And July is easy for such things. I am Canadian, I camped lots when I was younger, I hate it now. What you are doing isn't camping, it is a backyard party in the woods.. You are trying to buy friends, up to you but that isn't Cooper related and doesn't belong here. If you are going to flood this forum with this spam for the next 8 months, I will report you and recommend everyone block you.

True, I didn't explain it. Cooper was probably in Vietnam and a very common "grudge" for retuning men was disillusionment with the war.. Nixon announced the wind down in 1969.. although it took five years it began before NORJAK. I also have other pieces evidence that supports this idea but since it can't be proven I don't feel like sharing the theory.. and being accused of crazy things.

Ouch,,, a big misfire from you.. and what a completely nutty post. Typical Blevins. It has to be unwound completely to straighten it out. Cooper was 45-50 for NORJAK, right, that puts him at prime age for WW2. Regardless, it is most likely Cooper was in Vietnam, but at that age he probably wasn't a low level soldier. Hahneman was in WW2 on an aircrew, he was also in Korea and Vietnam. He was a radar/communications tech and claimed paratrooper experience in Vietnam but I have not been able to confirm that. I was the one who dated the tie at around 1965, I never said the the tie dated to WW2 or Korea.. that is ridiculous. My point was that somebody of Cooper's age in Vietnam wouldn't be a low level soldier but would have advanced to the higher ranks or as a specialist, perhaps a contractor. They could have worn cheap clipon ties 1965-1971.. I agree with Parrot, the young soldiers wouldn't be wearing ties. So, your critique of my comments is shear lunacy, it really shows a complete lack of comprehension on your part. You are trying to ridicule me and have completely misunderstood and distorted my comment.. Do you actually believe what you wrote? You are just not a serious person.

US Government Corruption in Vietnam and elsewhere..

That was just what Tom Kaye said.. it was sodium chloride but not regular table salt. My understanding is sodium chloride tablets are different.

Cooper was 45-50,, probably in WW2 and/or Korea.. not a regular soldier, he would have been a higher rank, specialist or a contractor at that age. They could have worn ties, clipons. The tie was about 6 years old when left on the plane, the particles probably accumulated from many environments over that time. People keep trying to make them fit one event/environement. That is unlikely.

The Cooper tie was loaded with sodium chloride,,, not table salt. Sodium chloride tablets were used in Vietnam for dehydration.

Another consideration I forgot to mention was the McCoy hijacking occurring weeks before Hahneman. The FBI caught McCoy and went full into trying to tie him to NORJAK.. meanwhile Hahneman was on the run in Honduras but unidentified. The investigation into McCoy was thorough and well documented in FBI docs while virtually nil on Hahneman. If the FBI thought McCoy was Cooper and focussed resources on him that may have caused them to drop the ball on Hahneman. They did make a public claim for Hahneman that was 100% false, I don't know if that is why he was eliminated or even if he was eliminated. But, that claim, if believed would have eliminated Hahneman. This probably played at least a partial role in it.

I am not one who is confused here,, Besides lying about me you claimed a thoroughly investigated McCoy could be Cooper but Hahneman couldn't because he would have been discovered. You can't even admit your argument is flawed. My point about books is that I don't need to defend a book, there isn't one. I don't have the same motivation as you. You are projecting your motivation onto me. I didn't dodge the question, I gave you two reasons why I am not publicizing my research now. It will jeopardize advancing the case, there are still some things I am working on. and I have thousands of pieces of information, there is no way all that info can be presented properly on a forum like this. I don't owe anybody on this forum anything, that is a crock. I have already done a lot to advance this case. The evidence eliminates KC and most other suspects,, not me. After discussions with you over the years I have zero respect for you. You are a liar, you are incapable of reason and when I have explained things you just ignore it. I don't care what you think, I just don't like your lies. Pointing out the facts of the case is not promoting Hahneman. It isn't just a few lines on a wanted poster. What little is publicly known about Hahneman does not eliminate him, what is known about KC does eliminate him, same for most other suspects. You don't ask polite questions, you outright lie and fabricate... I answered your questions and you just ignore it.. any rational discussion with you is futile. Your agenda is to defend your KC narrative not to uncover the truth. and I don't think you or anyone should accept Hahneman as Cooper, please just reject Hahneman but don't be dishonest and hide behind lies and bogus arguments, and if you have real evidence, not assumptions, that eliminate him let me know. Your lack of credibility doesn't eliminate KC, the case evidence does.

This isn't your personal facebook page..

Listened to Darren’s podcast with Dr. Robert Edwards..https://thecoopervortex.podbean.com/e/db-cooper-and-flight-305-dr-robert-edwards/ Overall very good, agreed with nearly all of it. Obviously there is more in the book. Some notes, mostly agree, some minor additions. Absolutely, easily survivable jump. Cooper had jump experience, military. Oscillations were felt for most of the trip, the report of oscillations was a rapid increase of needle fluctuation on the gauge which ended with the bump felt in the ears. That bump was simultaneous with the gauge needle at the extreme. Essentially, the bump being simultaneous with an extreme needle oscillation which would have occurred in seconds not minutes. 305 stairs were not locked down. The light was red/amber, red/amber is unlocked. Green is down and locked, no green light noted. Further, the stairs would have been damaged during landing if locked down, the damage was only minor scrapes on the end. The Placard was not inside Norjak. 100% fact. I have a photo. There is no debate, it came from the outside of a passing 727/737. The parachute description came solely from Cossey, he is a proven liar and unreliable. The wind at the LZ was an estimate. Reconstructing the wind drift is valid. The flighpath had a plotting error of 1 mile, it is in the FBI files. In 1973 they discussed recalculating with a 0.5 error using a new method. The common plotted flightpath is generally accurate along v-23 with that 1 mile error consideration. The Dan Cooper magazine was not published in english, but it was published in Mexico in Spanish for Latin America. The French language angle is a red herring. Since Cooper was desribed as Latin/Mexican that becomes more significant. Hahneman worked for the IGY in Latin America which was sponsored by Herge, the Dan Cooper publisher. So there is a connection but I agree the probability is still low, so Darren's comic connection may still be alive, barely. I also have a more likely source for the Dan Cooper name..... NASA. True, the TBAR money most likely came from the River upstream. Although, I did find that the mouth of the Lewis was dredged and dumped above TBAR. One of my theories has the money entering the Willamette.. another the Columbia but the Willamette has a gravel bottom vs the Columbia with a sandy bottom.. if anybody could do an abrasion test for the rounding of the packets that might help. The problem with the FBI/files as data.. there are errors, these are not conclusions but research notes. So, they have a built in error potential.

Blevins, It is not my responsibility to educate you, do you understand that. I have zero interest in sharing my work with you. Hahneman was or wasn't Cooper based on the evidence, not my opinion, advocacy or research. I research this case for my myself, not to flog books or convince other people I am right.. that is your game. You project your game onto me. I just pointed out the Cooper case evidence and that evidence eliminates most high profile suspects and especially KC. The evidence eliminates KC not me.. That isn't putting them down, that is stating the facts of the case. KC was not Cooper, he doesn't match the evidence. It is that simple. KC is a complete waste of time for anybody serious.

I agree,, I started looking at Hahneman thinking that there must be something obvious that eliminates him.. there wasn't, the case got stronger and stronger.. I can't explain the FBI's role.. but all the stuff I have found is overwhelming. I know that elimination based on assumptions is a rookie error. In most solved cold cases, the criminal did previously cross the path of investigators. A few of the facts.. most of these I have already mentioned. A US Government official said he had planned the hijacking for a year. (pre-dating Cooper) Hahneman was looked at by the FBI. The results are not disclosed. Hahneman is redacted from FBI files even though he died long ago. Unlike other dead suspects. The FBI made a 100% false statement that would eliminate him from being Cooper. I don't know why. Hahneman had help/connections at a very high level, they intervened on his behalf. Howard E Hunt was questioned during a hearing on CIA activities about Hahneman's work during the Guatemalan coup. He was in Guatemala. Nobody ever claimed Haheman was Cooper except the hijacked flight crew. Hahneman cut a last minute plea deal and had most charges dropped. The money from his hijacking was hidden in Honduras, recovered a year later. He was only caught because a relative turned him in for the reward. He was not talking and even ordered his attorney not to talk. I have a lot more than newspaper clippings, thousands of pieces of information. He had high level security clearances. I suspect, based on his movements/locations, connections and employers that he did contract work directly and indirectly at times for the CIA.. Was it a simple error or some very high level coverup? If I had to guess, based on what I know, the FBI was likely fed false information from higher up undermining their investigation. But I don't know.

Your post is hodgepodge of nonsensical arguments. You did lie.. I posted your lies.. this is not challenging a suspect. You claim I don't give the FBI credit for wondering if Hahneman was Cooper, I said they did look at him. You claim I believe that the FBI bypassed Hahneman, I never claimed that, they did look at him. You claim (my idea) that the FBI was dumb. I never said that. I said I found either a gross error or a lie. You claim I said the FBI never looked at Hahneman, I have said that they did. You claim the FBI ignored Hahneman, they didn't. You claim I have nothing, you don't know what I have. You claimed all I had was newspaper clippings, I have far more than that and have said so. I am not asking anybody to believe Hahneman is Cooper, they shouldn't, nobody has enough information. It is not my responsibility to educate you on Hahneman. Sorry Blevins, I am not doing this for you. You really make so sense,,, I can't dismiss another suspect because I haven't revealed the case for Hahneman. On what world does that make any sense. This has to be one the nuttiest things I ever read here. Hahneman is completely irrelevant to other suspects, the facts of the case eliminate KC. A suspect being Cooper or not has nothing to do with the credibility of the researcher.. it is the case evidence that determines it and there is no evidence for KC and the case evidence eliminates him. As for credibility, I have much more than you,,, you just don't realize it. The case facts are clear.. you can't challenge them so you attack me. Cooper was Latin/Mexican in features and characteristics and swarthy/olive complexion with a full head of wavy/curly/marceled hair, thin lips and protruding lower.. KC WAS NOT COOPER. He is a complete waste of time. Not only nothing there but the evidence eliminates him.. If you don't believe Hahneman was Cooper based on assumptions, that is fine with me. In fact, I prefer it. It is not my responsibility to change your mind. You just need to stop lying..

You did lie.. repeatedly... you made many false claims attributed to me and continued even after you were corrected. I listed them.. You just ignore the facts,,, to support an irrational argument. I have always said I believe he is based on the evidence that I have short of forensics and I don't expect anyone else to think that.. how can anyone form a conclusion without the information. I have thousands of pieces of information. and I am not insisting Hahneman is Cooper, you have manufactured another lie.. all I do is point out the facts of the case. Those facts eliminate KC and most other suspects. But to protect your KC narrative you can't refute the facts so you attack the messenger with lies. KC was not Cooper, Jarvis's opinion real or imagined, a nod or wink is completely irrelevant.. some agents thought it was McCoy.. Opinions aren't evidence. Meaningless. There is NO evidence for KC and the facts eliminate him. KC is a complete waste of time.. one of the worst Cooper suspects ever pushed. There are suspects that are NOT Cooper like KC, Reca, McCoy, Sheridan, Weber, Barb Dayton, LD Cooper, and there are some that there is not enough info on.. If your suspect is not Latin/Mexican in features and characteristics and swarthy/olive complexion with a full head of wavy/curly/marceled hair, thin lips and protruding lower lip then he is NOT Cooper.. deal with it.

We don't know what the FBI itself concluded about Hahneman. I know they made a false statement about his whereabouts and redacted info that shouldn't be (he's dead) and I know there was (attempted) very high level intervention above the FBI level in "national interests". I also know this case is extraordinary and something extraordinary occurred for it not to be publicly solved. Whatever the FBI concluded, if anything substantive, is mostly irrelevant, they could be right, could be wrong, could have been influenced by other factors. We don't know and unlike other dead investigated suspects they seem to be hiding it. Blevins not only assumes he was eliminated by the FBI but that they are also correct. Neither are a proven fact. Suspects should be eliminated based on facts.. not assumptions. It is that simple. Blevins relies on assumptions because he has no facts. I am not aware of any facts that eliminate Hahneman..

Nonsense, First you still don't recognize your lies.. and you repeat some. You don't know what I have. You have no evidence for KC, opinions are not evidence. You assume that I want to convince people of something. You do, that is your objective, not mine. It is not my responsibility to educate you. IMO, you are incapable of understanding. The actual Cooper evidence eliminates KC. Fullstop. KC was not Cooper. I have already told you, I started with the question.. Why was Hahneman eliminated... and I expected to find something obvious in short order, that didn't happen. So, if you have actual evidence, not assumptions that eliminate Hahneman then let me know. We have actual evidence that eliminates KC. The Hahneman evidence I have makes me believe he was Cooper short of forensics putting him on the plane. I don't think anybody else should believe what I do because they don't have all the info I have. But, putting a suspect on the plane is the clincher and that is extremely difficult to impossible now. However, that is what I have been trying to do. Further, there are still some important lines of evidence I am chasing down and disclosing my case now absolutely puts that in jeopardy. At some point I will be able to explain this.. not now. You just have to trust me, I know what I am doing. I have been moving the case forward just not publicly. You keep assuming that because I haven't revealed all my evidence that I don't have anything.. I don't really care what people think now, I just don't like lies you keep spouting. KC and McCoy were investigated and the FBI kept looking for Cooper but you think they could be Cooper. So, your Hahneman argument is fake, a fraud. The amount of evidence I have is overwhelming and complex and it requires a lot of work to pull it all together into an appropriate form. Hahneman aside, the fact remains Cooper was Latin/Mexican in features and characteristic as well as swarthy/olive complexion. He had thins lips and a protruding lower lip. Dark eyes. He had full hair, wavy/curly/marceled. Sketch B is the most accurate one. Just these things alone eliminate KC and most other suspects. You can spin it, deny it, ignore it and distract from it but it is 100% true. KC was not Cooper, you have no case. There never was one, even Lyle initially told the FBI he had no evidence.

Hayden receipt of Pioneer back chute SN 226, April 21,1975

Expert.. Cooper could have drifted 5 miles along the wind line if a clear and pull jump. The Heisson area East Fork Lewis River chute find is within 5 miles of the flightpath right about the 8:11/12 time..

You still repeat the same nonsense.. and fail to recognize your statements contradict your own argument. I have said many times that I don't expect anybody to believe Hahneman was Cooper because they don't have enough info to judge.. I can't reveal my research yet because it jeopardizes advancing the case in ways I can't mention. This forum is not the right place and this not the right time to make the case.. it is premature and far too complex. You asked some questions that I answered but you just ignored them and repeated the same falsehoods.. it is clear you weren't looking for answers but needed a distraction. and then you kept lying... over and over. How do you feel about liars Blevins? You claim I don't give the FBI credit for wondering if Hahneman was Cooper, I said they did look at him. You claim I believe that the FBI bypassed Hahneman, I never claimed that, they did look at him. You claim (my idea) that the FBI was dumb. I never said that. I said I found either a gross error or a lie. You claim I said the FBI never looked at Hahneman, I have said that they did. You claim the FBI ignored Hahneman, they didn't. You claim I have nothing, you don't know what I have. You claimed all I had was newspaper clippings, I have far more than that and have said so. You claim that if Hahneman was Cooper they'd be able to hang it on him, but not KC or McCoy. So Blevins, why do you keep lying and just make up stuff after you were corrected? Is that how you conducted your KC research? I really don't like having to correct your lies over and over and over.. it isn't very productive for the case and becomes toxic. Have you ever wondered why so many people don't like you.. you are incapable of reason. We have lots of evidence that KC and especially McCoy were looked at by the FBI and you think they could be Cooper, but with virtually no evidence for Hahneman you assume he can't be because he would have been discovered.. Do you even realize that your argument is a contradiction. Are you that unaware. What is really going on is you are going through a cognitive dissonance, the facts I point out about Cooper (not Hahneman) eliminate KC, you feel threatened but can't admit it, you are too emotionally invested.. You can't attack those facts, so you attack Hahneman with an ignorant irrational argument and me, the messenger, with persistent lies... all to protect your investment in the KC narrative. It is futile. KC is dead. Let poor KC go,,,,, release him. Set his soul free. He was not Cooper. You know it.

Irrelevent. The wind data was used for an estimate. That is just a fact.

Priceless.. checkmate Blevins.