Robert99

Meso and Moderators: I am going to report this as "Spam" although that is probably not the correct way of putting this. A vulnerable 16 year old kid has no business being on this thread and posting such messages as the one above. Robert99

Jo, Specifically what job functions did Duane perform when he was supposedly working for San Diego Aircraft? Don't give me a run around on this point. Just the facts, Jo. Give you answer some thought before replying. I imagine you can figure out why. Robert99

Blevins writes: Christiansen's family is behind us 100%. It isn't 'slander'. They just want to know the truth about him. We're trying to find out. Blevins, I have a question for you. How do you, or KC's grieving family, manage to get his height from 5'8" up to 6'0"? Have you developed a new snake oil product to produce those missing 4 inches of height? If so, forget KC and just sell the snake oil. You'll make a lot more money that way. Robert99

Danielle1010, I get a little emotional myself when I see such posts from a self-described 16 year old boy with autism. In my opinion, you need an intervention from your parents or appropriate adults. You fascination with Blevins and obsession with allegations he makes about other people, without proof, is an ominous move in a very dark direction. Get help! Robert99

Blevins, You have been "off-topic" since day one here. Your last paragraph, above, implies that you feel you have a "right" to publish a book on anyone who is deceased and to try to prove that person is a criminal even though you don't have any evidence whatsoever. And if you can make a buck with false claims then it is just good business. Earhart and Shackleton were "public figures" in the sense that they sought publicity and public support for their endeavors. Frank Luke was a genuine WWI hero and died in that war. I don't recall a single instance of a writer claiming that these three people were common criminals. Nevertheless, that is what you are claiming in the case of KC. You have not been able to prove your claims about KC but you continue trying to find suckers to sell your allegations to. If you feel you are a great writer, then demonstrate your abilities by writing something meaningful. And you are not doing that by making false claims about KC who, conveniently for you, is deceased and cannot refute your slanders. Robert99

What I have noticed is Blevins and Jo suck the air out of every room they are in! Very soon people just wear out and move on, because there is no point (or reason) to say anything. This is what I meant earlier when I said: "Well Blev you (and Jo) pretty much have DZ to yourselves." Because what is left to say? What can anyone say? NOTHING! Blevins and Jo have said it all, thousands of times! And nothing anyone else says matters in any event. That is called "sucking the air out of a room". They need to find a new room with new people to market their BALONEY. Easy come - easy go. You are no better than the people you talk badly about. Virtually your every post has the word 'Blevins' (often misspelled) in it somewhere. I can't remember the last time you made a postive, contributory post to this thread. And even when someone posts up harmless or actually POSITIVE remarks, you mostly respond with nonsensical responses, song lyrics, or straight-up insults one after another. That is a fact, sir. And the evidence on it is clear. One subject header after another. Blevins this, Blevins that, with some shit insult line in the header. I can point you to a minimum of twenty examples over the last year. I actually have a Word doc going where I copied them over. Not the posts, just the subject lines. You would be amazed. Perhaps instead of whining about other posters you could do two things: 1) Cease your endless insults and smart-ass responses to legitimate posts. 2) Lay something positive on the thread instead of constant negative comments aimed at others. Otherwise, what are you doing here? If you don't like the company, maybe you should confine your research to the alternate site. Of course, I've heard Shutter doesn't allow unwarranted and unsupported attacks on others, so I don't know if they could keep you entertained. As far as 'sucking the air out of a room,' much of that is your own doing. And it isn't true anyway. This thread is viewed by thousands of people each week, even though they may not comment. This should be telling you something. Blevins, Have you made a "positive, contributory post to this thread" on the D.B. Cooper search in the four years you have been here? TO THE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHO VIEW THIS THREAD EACH WEEK: The purpose of this thread is to advance the discussion on resolving the D.B. Cooper hijacking. This thread does not exist for the sole purpose of providing RobertMBlevins with a forum to discuss completely unrelated events in Auburn, WA, the number of books that he may have edited, his science fiction writing efforts, or to provide a place to post pictures of his cat or whatever. His efforts to tie KC to the hijacking have been a complete failure, but he is even now writing a "movie script" in an effort to sell it to Hollywood so he can make a buck over KC's grave. And everyone who has come in contact with Blevins on his KC claims are now running as fast as they can to disassociate themselves from Blevins and his claims. Blevins has not come up with a single piece of evidence that supports his allegations. Robert99

Jo, If Blevins posts aren't "spam", then they are at least "baloney". And so are yours. Robert99

Really? I don't think that is the situation here. Cook has said he has plans to come with a camera crew (not allowed) and an audio crew (not allowed) to the theater during a public event simply to create a stunt. This type of thing, i.e. attempting to trash a perfectly nice annual public event for your own selfish purposes...is NOT a 'catfight'. It's idiocy. It's also wrong. You want to defend that type of behavior from a guy who is a member of the bar, go ahead and try. But few will listen. I'm not going to quote the source for you. Personally, I don't care whether you believe the Rataczak quote or not. But you might want to ask yourself whose imput they took into consideration before launching the search. Of course, there were others involved, but Rataczak was one of them as well. Blevins, Cook is NOT the reason you cannot cite a source for your Rataczak claim. You simply don't have a source in the first place. As has been repeatedly pointed out by the flight crew members themselves, they didn't know WHEN Cooper jumped. That also means that they didn't know WHERE Cooper jumped. Your quote fabrications are simply a desperate attempt to keep KC as a possible Cooper candidate. And KC is just not a valid candidate. Period! Robert99

R99 COMMENTS: I don't have the slightest idea if Cook speculated in any way about flares. But if Cooper actually did throw a flare out of the aircraft to 'test the wind direction', he would have found that it was blowing toward the rear of the aircraft at about 225 MPH. Blevins continues: R99 COMMENTS: What is the actual source for this claim? You can't cite your own book as the source for the claim. When and where do you claim that Rataczak made this allegation and how can this source be verified? Blevins seems to be interested in expanding the cat fight between himself, Jo Weber, and Marla to include Cook. It's a "My candidate was Cooper and yours wasn't!" argument. In reality, none of the four candidates sponsored by the people mentioned in this post was Cooper. Robert99

I'll bet that Lisa, of Ice Road Trucker fame, was actually Cooper, after he had spent a lot of that money for some sessions with a really good plastic surgeon. So it is easy to see why Cooper has never been found. Robert99

Shveddy, thanks for those links. This thread's own writer, book editor, screen writer, real estate records expert, commentator on all subjects real or imaginary, who can see things that don't exist and never actually happened, general know-it-all with a really big ego, and the star of our thread, RobertMBlevins, now has a real life role model. With a lot of hard work and study, perhaps Blevins can actually succeed at equaling Tommy Wiseau's masterpiece. If Blevins actually manages to get something published or filmed (his "books" on KC don't count), then there will be an annual reading and/or filming of his masterpieces at the Auburn Theater in Auburn, Washington each August. All of his showings or readings will begin at midnight. The entire August Event will be recorded for later showing on a Decoded segment(s). Thanks again for the links. Robert99

Blevins, With your persecution complex, I'm sure that you managed to do the time travel thingy and ended up even identifying the crew of the UFO. I'll bet the UFO Captain's name was Georger. Although he was killed in the initial UFO crash, was autopsied, and spent several decades frozen solid in the refrigerator at WPAFB, OH, the USAF eventually thawed him out and revived him. Then they dipped him in something or the other to conceal his origin and gave him a new assignment. Today, he teaches physics at a university in mid-America. Unfortunately, he teaches only Earth physics and claims he never heard of any other kind of physics. Robert99

(emphasis added). I've been looking for industries that used stainless steel and titanium together. This led me to AQUEOUS HOMOGENEOUS REACTORS, devices which can use ORDINARY URANIUM ORE (not enriched isotopes) to produce power. ***A heavy water aqueous homogeneous reactor can achieve criticality (turn on) with natural uranium dissolved as uranium sulfate.[citation needed] Thus, no enriched uranium is needed for this reactor. from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueous_homogeneous_reactor Above quote from from: http://web.ornl.gov/info/reports/1960/3445603615210.pdf No proof that Cooper worked in nuke power or research but you do find the tie materials there. Now back to our main focus, Blevins bashing and personal bickering. 377 Then we have been told that there were three individual DNA profiles that were extracted from the tie. I do not have a source, but remember reading, or being told that in the past. There are still unanswered questions that we may never know about the tie. 1) Was it Cooper's tie? or 2) The tie was Coopers, but it was purchased from a thrift store shortly before the hijacking? or 3) It was Coopers and he was a person who worked in an industry where these metals were abundant? I would like to comment on Vicki's last two questions. Back in the hijacking time frame, those clip on ties could be purchased even in drug stores for only a buck or two. I think someone has indicated that this particular tie was a more upscale one that was sold by Penney's. The fact that it was a clip on tie does not necessarily mean that Cooper worked in a machine shop. In my opinion, a clip on tie (or no tie at all) in a machine shop would be a good idea from a safety standpoint. Nevertheless, for ever clip on tie you show Tom Kaye, he can show you pictures of machinists wearing fully knotted ties. The uranium is probably the best clue of all about where Cooper worked. The tie would be supporting evidence if it turns out he did work in a machine shop that had a safety rule requiring clip on ties. Robert99

In January 2011, I purchased some NB-6 related equipment from Western Parachute Sales and exchanged several e-mails with someone there but I don't have their name readily available. Whoever was on the other end of the e-mails figured out why I was interested in the NB-6 and told me that the parachute Cooper used had the shroud lines sewed to the risers. I was inquiring about separable links on the risers among other things. To me, that alone was evidence that Cooper used an NB-6. And that Cooper's parachute was similar to an NB-6 that I had owned until about a month before the hijacking. Bruce, if you talk to this fellow make it a point to keep your hat in your hand and maybe you will learn something. I doubt very much that he will be awed by your press credentials (if you have those). Robert99

A lack of trust of certain people does NOT make someone fit your copied-from-the-internet description. One of the reasons I don't trust some of you is because of the bullshit postings many of you have been making about me (and to an extent, Jo Weber) over at the alternate soiree. I have seen them ALL, even the most recent ones. Some site...you didn't want me around, or to even view it, and made noises about being different, and that you weren't going to engage in that crap. And yet most of you did. Robert99 and Shutter seem to be the exceptions. Phonies. Not to be trusted. My assessment on SOME of you (not all) was accurate all along. The rest of you simply went along with all the garbage because you don't like me. Robert99 says in part: ***'Danielle, or whoever is pretending to be Danielle, why don't you just forget about Bernie and Cooper and get on with your life right now. If you are a teenager with autism, or whatever, you shouldn't be on this thread in the first place...' Excuse me, but who the hell are you to say who should post on the internet or not? I thought you were a great researcher. You must have missed the part where I posted up his real name (Andy), that he was verified through Facebook and the special school he attends in the Atlanta area, as well as a link to the article about the school graduation ceremony. Blevins, Do you have trust problems? Is there a single person on the planet you trust? Your main problem with the other site is that Shutter won't let you control it. If you have described Danielle correctly, then his parents, guardian, or whatever, should be notified about what he is doing on the Internet. I doubt if his stating that he wanted to piss on people's graves, etc., would be part of his therapy. Robert99

Danielle, or whoever is pretending to be Danielle, why don't you just forget about Bernie and Cooper and get on with your life right now. If you are a teenager with autism, or whatever, you shouldn't be on this thread in the first place. And if you are not who you claim to be, then you are sicker than you say.

Jo, You are the one who always insists in secrecy for yourself. Have you ever considered the possibility of being a snake oil salesman in a carnival sideshow? I think you would make a very successful one. Robert99

ROBERT, I am the only one who has done any indept research on Duane Weber...NO one has done what I have done....I found things with the help of many others - the FBI missed altogether.... The FBI actually just GLOSSED over Weber! If Georger has MORE than I do - then he is HIDING it! The FBI did NOT keep up with records on the older felons - but, tried to play catch up in the late sixties with the new fingerprint system, but the paper work was never finish on some of the older criminals - really not necessary in the day...but had proven to be insturmental in the more current crimes and to chase down the past of repeat offenders. Jo, Just between you and myself, what are you getting out of this? You have never come up with a single thing to support your allegations that Duane was Cooper. So even if you now know ever girl Duane held hands with since he was 12 years old, you still have nothing to connect him to Cooper even with "18 years of in-depth research" on the matter. So you are getting something out of this or you are just simply nuts. Which is it? Robert99

If another movie is ever made on the Cooper hijacking, an expanded version of the above should be the theme song and included in the original DVD release.

I have seen this behavior in postings by Georger as well. But I don't think his job is to do a coverup on Cooper. In my opinion he simply dumps his garbage at Dropzone occasionally. He may be trying to deliberately sabotage the thread because he wants everyone to post at the alternate site. Traffic there is fairly light, and mostly the same faces. Source: Google cache of the homepage, which is updated about every two or three days. The problem I have with this behavior (I don't have a problem anymore with the alternate site itself) is that it reveals two separate internet personalities. One legit, one rather vindictive. Blevins & Jo Weber: The above nonsense is actually laughable. And I'm not kidding. Your posts on KC and Duane Weber take up about half of the space on this thread. While in reality, neither KC or Duane had any connection whatsoever with the Cooper hijacking. Both of you are desperately searching for straws that would even hint that you candidates could have been involved in some manner with the hijacking. And both of you have failed to find those straws simply because they don't exist. I can state from personal experience in working with Georger that he wants to solve the Cooper hijacking. He has done an enormous amount of original research that I am aware of that has not been reported on any thread. Maybe he knows who Cooper was and maybe he doesn't. But with Georger having repeatedly posted on this thread that neither Duane nor KC was the hijacker, I think it is funny that Jo is apparently admitting that it wasn't Duane. On the matter of the number of posts on the two threads, how many months, or maybe years, has it been since a serious post related to Cooper appeared on this thread? Just running your mouths about your candidates does not constitute research. Robert99

Jo, Are you now claiming that Georger is the brain behind the whole Cooper hijacking? If so, you are admitting that it could not be you, Duane, or KC/Blevins. Robert99

Blevins, pardon my morbid curiosity, but how long do you think it would take the FBI to conclude that the late Andre the Giant was not Cooper? Do you think they would even bother checking his finger prints or DNA? And the same with Cossey and his fast rejection of the Amboy parachute as being related to the Cooper case. Do you think Cossey would do lab tests on the canopy to confirm something that he could see by a 10 second inspection of the canopy? Robert99

I think the USAF made a good call on that one. I'd be hesitant to give Mythbusters anything more lethal than a slingshot. They have repeatedly demonstrated an inability to run safe experiments. It's one thing to endanger willing participants and quite another to put a cannon ball into the home of innocent bystanders. They could have EASILY killed someone in that demonstration of lax attention to detail. Part of a good safety culture is figuring out what will happen if something goes wrong and taking steps to mitigate the risk. They rely on insurance more than physical risk mitigation. "Hey, we are Hollywood Rockstars. Our lawyers will clean up any mess we make." (not an actual quote) http://www.cnet.com/news/the-mythbusters-long-history-of-accidents-and-mishaps/ 377 Along the same line, if Amazon.com or anyone else starts delivering packages or whatever by drones, the lawyers are going to get even richer than they are already. And the insurance companies dumb enough to insure such things will go broke fast. Robert99

Maybe it will work now. The closing "quote" was on the wrong side of the "/url". Robert99

Blevins, to make a long story short, KC was not Cooper and you don't have anything but your imagination to suggest otherwise. Even the great Jo Weber got that right earlier today. Neither Georger or anyone else has anything to fear from your so called "investigation". Your time would be better spent if you got yourself a good dictionary, learned how to use it, and looked up the meaning of some of the words you have been tossing around lately. Robert99