Robert99

Blevins, Since you joined this thread on August 1, 2010 and Jo Weber joined it at its creation, the two biggest posters on this thread have been RobertMBlevins and Jo Weber (Skyjack71). You and Jo have accounted for 50+ percent of the posts here. And both of you have the habit of posting the longest ones possible. So did you see your and Jo's usernames on the "filthy comments" page that you keep referring to? Robert99

Blevins, Since you didn't join DZ until August 1, 2010, you could not have posted here prior to that date and the claims you make above could not have happened as you allege. Also, you have repeatedly mentioned 300 or more "filthy comments" that you claim posters here made on other web pages. From what I can find out, you are the only one who has seen those comments. Did you post them yourself? After all, you claim to have great skills at hacking and such. Robert99

Roberto Nine-Nine! How can you say that? I thought my regal status was self-evident. Although my therapist wants me to talk more about that...she keep using words like delusions, fantasies, grandiosity, etc, but I simply consider my beliefs as "visions of greatness." Don't you? She did stump me last session when she asked, "So, Bruce, when you can levitate, where are you going to go, and what will do when you get there?" So, I'm going back tomorrow. I don't have an answer for her, per se, but it's a process, ya know.... Bruce, Stick with your shrink. And see if she can help get Jo Weber to another one. Robert99

Reichenbach, Assuming that you are addressing all those questions to Robert99, as opposed to RobertMBlevins, I'll try to answer the ones that I have direct information on. First, there is no such thing as "Cooper Royalty". Second, you will have to address RobertMBlevins about the square sports parachute on the cover of the dust jacket. And you might want to check into his statements on the back side of the dust cover. Third, you will also have to address RobertMBlevins about his claims concerning Gray's book. While I have read Gray's book, I didn't find anything that would be of interest from an investigative standpoint. Fourth, I have read Tosaw's book and it's probably the best book on Cooper from the point of a researcher. Tosaw was also a former FBI agent and he spent quite a bit of his own money investigating Cooper. Fifth, from what I have seen, McCoy was not involved in the Cooper hijacking in any capacity. Sixth, I agree completely with you about the vast majority of Cooper book writers. Seventh, this thread (and an earlier one also on DZ) was set up originally to provide a discussion forum for people who were interested in helping the FBI in the Cooper investigation. It was not set up to support the writing of books on Cooper. And it sure as hell was NOT set up to help RobertMBlevins peddle his book. Blevins and one other person on this thread have accounted for about 50 percent of the posts here in the last few years. And these two people have been so disruptive that the real research on the Cooper hijacking has now been moved to another web page. Robert99

Blevins, Are you acting as your own lawyer here? I believe the burden of proof is on you to prove that your allegations are true. And basically you don't have any proof. If you think Geestman is going to have to prove a negative in court, I think you will be the one in for a big surprise. Robert99

Jo, Your statement that Medicare does not help with the medical aspects of home care is simply not true. You claim there is no solution to your problems which is pure baloney. You need to make up your mind on one point. Do you want to get your medical problems taken care of or do you just want to continue to whine and bitch about everything? If you want to whine and bitch, you can probably find a better and more receptive web page than this one on which to do so. Robert99

*** I do not know how I will handle a cast from mid upper arm to the tips of my fingers for 6 wks - I have no one to help me. I can't afford to hire some one & then HOW long before you can do normal things. Jo, In Senior Citizen Florida, there is undoubtedly something like a Visiting Nurse Program to help people such as yourself. So check with your Doctor about it and it will probably be covered by Medicare. Robert99

Jo, It didn't happen and couldn't have happened the way you claim. Your whole post is just a product of your hyper-active imagination. And your claims of knowledge of "missing communications" only originated within the past few weeks. The Portland International Airport tower was not involved in communicating with the aircraft since the aircraft was being controlled by the Seattle Air Traffic Control Center. It was also in contact with NWA in Minneapolis by means of a phone patch through the ARINC radio system. Now you are trying to blame Sluggo for disappearing communications after previously blaming him for the disappearance of Duane's supposed DNA/pocket lint from a pocket knife. Dream on. Robert99

Blevins, You are the one who is attempting to re-create and change history. If you had gone to the original sources (documents, etc.) on KC, you probably would never have done anything further. We are going to the original source and that source is NOT Rataczak. Robert99

Blevins, You are quite a joker. Have you read the back side of the dust cover for your book on KC? Robert99

Jo, Answers to your above comments: 1. It is obvious you don't give a hoot about being factual. 2. You apparently can see things that I can't see because they don't exist. 3. It is obvious that you haven't researched the facts of the crime. And now you claim that your bitching to 377 about Duane wearing underwear that could receive VOR signals is not technical stuff? Maybe 377 would comment on that point again just to keep the facts straight. Finally, just what is your job here? Robert99

Jo, A "vector" is a distance (or quantity of some kind) in a specified direction. Supposedly, you are referring to the "Victor" Airways which are used in low altitude navigation in the USA. So it took you 18 years to learn that Tina described the bomb as being on the left side of the briefcase? Her description is given in the "FBI Notes" which have been around forever. Apparently you didn't have time to read those notes due to all of your other important research. Or just maybe you learned about the bomb being on the left side of the brief case from the "FBI Notes" quote that I included in post #57490 on February 25th, which I think was just two days ago. Also, if left-handed people sit on the left side of the aircraft and right-handed people sit on the right side of the aircraft, then about 90 percent of the people would sit on the right side of the aircraft and 10 percent on the left side. Using your logic, Cooper was right-handed since he sat on the right side of the airliner. Robert99

Excellent! You're learning fast. There's hope yet for you.

" ______________________________________________ Gosh..this Cooper case is a labyrinth and I aint a Cooper royalty ...I seriously have no clue what are you taking about...help me understand where can I read more about what u saying...the film etc. Thousandthings, Oh come now, even after only 39 posts you should be aware that there are several certified screwballs on this thread. What are you surprised about? Robert99

Here is an entry in the "FBI Notes" for 7:55 PM PST with Tina back in the cockpit. "MSPFO asked for stewardess best recollection of exact content of HJ briefcase. She got on radio [this would be the radio patch to MSP thru the ARINC network] and gave following basic information: - Eight red sticks, about 6" by 1" in left corner of briefcase, 'look like big firecrackers.' Two rows of sticks, four on top of four. - Wire attached to dynamite with red insulation. - Battery 'like flashlight battery, but about 6" high and as big around as my arm.' - Red sticks are about the color 'of my uniform.' " My interpretation of Tina's remarks are that the sticks and the battery were about the same length. The battery was probably the same kind as Sluggo has pictured on his web page. Perhaps the battery's length can be found more accurately and provide a more accurate estimate of the length of the sticks. The wires that ran from the battery to the sticks had red insulation. And the color of the sticks was about the same shade of red as Tina's uniform. Himmelsbach looked at a NWA stewardess' uniform and got the impression that Tina might be describing road flares. Robert99 Road flares have a cap on top and writing on them. The instructions for use. Even if you take off the plastic cap, there is still the black ignitor on top. Easily recognizable. And they are longer than six inches. Just saying. Blevins, Do you understand that Tina was describing what SHE saw in the briefcase? Under the limited conditions she had to view the items in the briefcase, no one would expect her estimates of 1" in diameter and 6" long to be exactly correct. Which is why I suggested that the battery proposed by Sluggo, if its measurements can be located, would be useful in determining the actual lengths of the sticks. Further, Tina did not mention the "top" of the sticks or how the wires were connected to the sticks. So don't jump to conclusions. And it was Himmelsbach, not Tina, that suggested the sticks might be road flares. Just saying. Robert99

Here is an entry in the "FBI Notes" for 7:55 PM PST with Tina back in the cockpit. "MSPFO asked for stewardess best recollection of exact content of HJ briefcase. She got on radio [this would be the radio patch to MSP thru the ARINC network] and gave following basic information: - Eight red sticks, about 6" by 1" in left corner of briefcase, 'look like big firecrackers.' Two rows of sticks, four on top of four. - Wire attached to dynamite with red insulation. - Battery 'like flashlight battery, but about 6" high and as big around as my arm.' - Red sticks are about the color 'of my uniform.' " My interpretation of Tina's remarks are that the sticks and the battery were about the same length. The battery was probably the same kind as Sluggo has pictured on his web page. Perhaps the battery's length can be found more accurately and provide a more accurate estimate of the length of the sticks. The wires that ran from the battery to the sticks had red insulation. And the color of the sticks was about the same shade of red as Tina's uniform. Himmelsbach looked at a NWA stewardess' uniform and got the impression that Tina might be describing road flares. Robert99

Blevins, As I understand it, you feel your job is to make the allegations. Then you pass the buck to the FBI. Of course you will continue to try to sell your screen play, "KC is Cooper", to anyone who is dumb enough to pay five bucks for it. Robert99

Probably for the same reasons some posters on this thread do the same thing. This is true. I heard about some guy who thinks the plane actually overflew the Columbia...before it reached Portland.

Jo, You have previously claimed that Duane woke up one night screaming "I left my fingerprints on the rear stairs.", or some such thing. The "rear stairs" being those on the 727. So how do you explain the discrepancies in your stories? If Duane/Cooper sit on the left side of the aircraft, it would be because he wanted to sit in Bill Mitchell's lap. So how do you explain that one? Robert99

Probably for the same reasons some posters on this thread do the same thing.

Jo, When you get there, be sure to put a torch in the window for me so I can find the place. Robert99 I know where I am going and it is not to hell! Portland?

Jo, When you get there, be sure to put a torch in the window for me so I can find the place. Robert99

Blevins, You continue to claim that I used that phrase. Could you cite a source. That phrase is NOT one that I would use under the circumstances related to the hijacked airliner. Robert99

Sure...the airliner crossed the Columbia River. Everyone knows that. But you will have to demonstrate where Soderlind and Tosaw came to the conclusion that this crossing was miles north of Portland in the Tina Bar area...or where the flight path map shows...over PORTLAND. And by the way, I do know east from west. Unless proven otherwise by you, I still have to agree with the current available data showing that 305 was EAST of the Columbia River, as well as the Interstate 5 freeway...at the time it passed by the Tina Bar area. You claim the flight may have taken a shortcut and somehow headed southwest once it passed the point where the placard was found. That's a theory, and so far no proof has been presented on that. Anybody seen this 'second map'? Is is available for viewing anywhere? Just wondering. If no proof is available that the flight took a shortcut to the southwest, then you could say that MAYBE Cooper bailed over the Columbia in the Portland area. But there are problems with that scenario as well. First, no one searched that area after the hijacking because from all the evidence Cooper jumped farther north. Second, even if everyone is wrong about the jump point, this still doesn't explain how at least three bundles of the ransom were found miles downriver in exactly the same spot. Anyone who doesn't believe the Tina Bar money raises more questions than it answers...well, I think it does. But simply MOVING the flight without supporting proof just to explain both the money find and Cooper's fate...is a pretty big stretch. Blevins, As you well know, I have NEVER said that the airliner flew to the "southwest" after passing the Mayfield (now Malay) Intersection. If the airliner flew direct from the Mayfield Intersection to the Canby Intersection south of Portland, its True Course (which is measured with respect to the "grid lines" or lines of longitude) would be 178 degrees or just 2 degrees EAST of true SOUTH. All of the above has been discussed on this thread at great length for years and years. Contrary to your statement, the money find at Tina Bar answers plenty of questions. And this has also been discussed on this thread at great length for years and years. Your last paragraph is just more nonsense and shows your absolute need to keep the flight path far, far to the east of Tina Bar to support the idea that your Cooper candidate survived the jump. And you have no proof for that flight path. Robert99

It is not MY claim. It is the flight path shown on the map held by the FBI. The one that just about everyone agrees is reasonably correct. I know which way the river runs in that area, yes. I also know every flight I've taken to Portland when you get south of the Chehalis area...you can see the Interstate 5 freeway out the right window until you get close to Vancouver. And it's miles away, and even further west to the Columbia at that point. What you are saying is that the flight took a sudden diversion to the west instead of continuing south from the point where the placard was found, and there is absolutely NO proof this actually happened. You want to ignore the Sleuths' evaluation? Fine. The guy handling the radar who the Sleuths' interviewed? Okay. The search for the hijacker, which was nowhere even ClOSE to Tina Bar? Go for it. ***'IF the flight diverted...' Pretty big 'IF'. Unproven. I have not personally seen the Tosaw book, but I will soon. I have a copy on the way via Powells Books in Portland. I also know that Tosaw developed a theory that Cooper may have pancaked into the Columbia because I know he did some searching in the river after the money was discovered. But he found nothing. And he also wrote his book a few years after the discovery of the money. However, when this book arrives I am going to search it thoroughly for any references where Soderlind tosses out the route and says no...the plane went over Tina Bar. I don't think I will find anything like that, but we will see. Your quotes from the book are not proof of anything so far. They are mutual back-slapping statements by a couple of the principles and say nothing. I don't understand why you keep putting this 'claim' thing regarding the route the plane took to Portland on ME. It is not my idea, my invention, or my claim. It is what exists via the FBI, the Citizen Sleuths' research, the radar data, etc. It is pointless to argue with ME about it. It is THOSE entities you dispute to support your theory, not me. You could ask the co-pilot, as I suggested. In fact, this should have been your first stop once you decided that Cooper must have jumped over Tina Bar. What you are proposing is pretty radical if you think about it. If the FBI or NWA knew that the flight could have overflown Tina Bar...and that's why the money ended up on the beach there...don't you think there would have been some mention of this after the money was discovered? This has never been mentioned by anyone at the time it was found. Why? Because everyone knew that spot was miles off the established flight path. Radar says so. Map says so. Sleuths say so. The friggin' ground search for the hijacker says so. You say no. Okay. But there is no proof of that so far, Robert99. Blevins, EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST, but you apparently don't know WHICH is WHICH. The flight path you mention has the airliner EAST, not WEST, of Tina Bar and the Columbia River. Do you have a source for your quote, "If the flight diverted . . ." I don't believe I have used that phrase. Robert99