beowulf

They all make that claim.

Yea I have been checking them out. I doubt that I could do half that many points in 4 way.

All this RW stuff is cool, but what I am really waiting for is the VRW 4 way to start up.

Duuude get it right, he's after your lucky charms!!!!

I don't know why, but would it make any difference?

And religion and believing in God has done that???

Would you like that in five sentences or less?

That's just no fun. With out Steveorino and Pajarito who am I going to argue with? How will I fill the time while I wait for the next error to show while I am debugging the current program I am working on? You're just not religous enough Billvon. Although I am certain Pajarito disagrees with your take on God, maybe he will jump in here.

I still have yet to see any evidence or reason to believe there is a god. I don't find the Bible to be all that profound.

So many people have interpreted the Bible in so many different ways how do you know your take is the right one? Bottom line is you don't know, you just believe your take to be correct. If there really was a God why would he have his only message be so ambigous? If he really is the one true God (cause face it there are lots of gods out there) then why would he only show himself to one small group of humans? That sounds kind of biased to me. If the Jewish God which Christians base their God off of was really the one true God then why would he be so biased towards one small group? It would make more sense if he had a single clear message that went out to everyone.

So does that mean God was bullshiting them with that story? or do you think the writer misinterpreted what God said (in that case God wasn't speaking clearly). If there was a big miscommunication then that would make the rest of the bible suspect also. Apart from a few selected passages, I don't think God dictated (spoke) anything. Really!! How do you know which passages were dictated?

So does that mean God was bullshiting them with that story? or do you think the writer misinterpreted what God said (in that case God wasn't speaking clearly). If there was a big miscommunication then that would make the rest of the bible suspect also.

So did you test both routes and then make a decision? It was already asked but which is it? subjective or scientific? You can only have one or the other, not both. Maybe you should try to understand scientific reasoning and critical thinking before you claim to make use of them.

As far as I can tell you haven't established that spirituality exists, but you have just renamed it. Emotions equal spiritualism. I think many people would argue with you over that. Your definition of spiritualism seems to be at odds with the dictionary definition. spir·it·u·al·ism /ˈspɪrɪtʃuəˌlɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[spir-i-choo-uh-liz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. the belief or doctrine that the spirits of the dead, surviving after the mortal life, can and do communicate with the living, esp. through a person (a medium) particularly susceptible to their influence. 2. the practices or phenomena associated with this belief. 3. the belief that all reality is spiritual. 4. Metaphysics. any of various doctrines maintaining that the ultimate reality is spirit or mind. 5. spiritual quality or tendency. 6. insistence on the spiritual side of things, as in philosophy or religion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Origin: 1825–35; spiritual + -ism] —Related forms spir·it·u·al·is·tic, adjective spir·it·u·al·is·ti·cal·ly, adverb

Looks like you are equating emotions with spiritualism? You still haven't made a case for god being real.

uhh I am not sure Justin has completely recovered from last years Jagerator usage. But I am sure he will be happy to bring it out.

You're assuming that the drug laws work and if they weren't in place that lots of people would be doing drugs who otherwise wouldn't be. For myself I wouldn't use illegal drugs even if they were legal.

Just my 2 cents. I think you should just bite the bullet and get it all done legally. If you don't do it now you probably end up having to do it later and it might not be amicable thing. Trying to do the notorized thing doesn't seem like it will last and most likely won't hold up in court.

Who wrote the Bible really doesn't matter, because it was written by humans and which humans specifically wrote it won't help it's credibility as far as the supernatural claims it makes.

What do mean change? I just told you who I thought created the Bible.

Who do you think wrote the Bible? A group of Rabbi's took and put together a bunch of stories and writings and made the Old Testament then the Catholic Church added the New Testament.

In a sense but not really. This requires an understanding of the Trinity. There is only one God who has shown himself to exist in three distinct persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit). Now there is a concept that someone pulled out of their ass. Three people in one. That really doesn't make and sense.

What evidence is there available? As far as I know the only thing you have is the Bible which only proves that someone wrote a book.

And you believe these stories? They sound farfetched and have no evidence to back them. Anyone can write anything they want. It doesn't make it fact.

Ok Then he was praying to himself.