georger

Funny. 377 Holy Cow! I gather he thinks Cooper came from Henderson MN. No doubt he was a Brown. Danuel 'Joseph' Fletcher Brown! There. I named him.

Damned near brilliant. The golden mean. The rest is only application ... and fear of impending failure. Landing gear giving out or some-such piece of crap! You just gave Safecracking 30 more videos to make.

Duane told me he was DAN Coooper. I held the ticket and a Sea Tac stub in my own hands. Duane told me about the bad things in his life in the 3 rd person. But, when we were in WA. he used the first person referring to who he knew and where he was and the kind of work he did. Duane Weber lived and worked in that area for a long time and not within the confines of a prison. The Key lies in Coure'd Alene, but I don't have the time or the money to look for the "key". . Nope. The key is in your taking a Polygraph. The polygraph would tend to say you are telling the truth, since there were no witnesses to anything you say. That is the most you can ever do. The problem in your case is your Obsession. Your Obsession is larger than Duane being Cooper! If Duane were proven to be Cooper tomorrow people would still wonder because 'Duane being Cooper' would arrive as a mere anticlamatic anecdote to the rest of your stories and your tactics you have actively employed during the last 15 years. Duane being Cooper is almost beside the point, at this point. It would almost be a relief if Duane was Cooper! (Would the rest of the shit stop?) That kind of thing tends to undermine even the best Polygraph results. I think Blevins is using you as a foil, to enhance his own chances of getting a foothold in the publicity wars which attend all media adventures. He is the owner of Adventure Books, after all. So which is most important to you? Having Duane be Cooper? Proving the FBI is a bunch of incompetent corrupt fools? Proving your stamina? Proving your credibiity at something? Or something else? And does any of this even matter at this point especially in the light of other pressing matters. All of us face the same question every day.

Two things. First, when I started investigating the case, I had no pre-conceived notions. Skipp Porteous just sent me out to do interviews. It wasn't long before I realized we might be on to something, due to people freely offering up info or else trying to lie to me and then getting caught in their lies. Like Bernie, for example. I especially liked the part where his ex-wife Margie came running out to me to my car and said this: Of course he was. I believed that, too. But I didn't believe the letter she sent to our office a week later saying that even if KC were aboard Flight 305, he was just doing his job as the purser, and yes...we kept the letter. I interviewed this lady five times between January and August of 2010, and I was convinced she knew everything. But she's afraid to tell. She's an old lady and she believes if the truth comes out she could lose her ranch, her home, everything. But she knows, I am certain of it. I tried to convince her that the statute of limitations on all of this is long gone, but she is still afraid. This is a lady who puts padlocks on the interior doors of her house. Or maybe Bernie's own sister (Dawn) telling me that she figured KC was the guy right from the start. And admitting to receiving all that cash from him only five months after the hijacking. The part where Bernie got caught by History Channel execs telling his sister Dawn she needed to retract everything she said was a good one. That's how they got him to agree to an appearance on Decoded. He knew he was busted, so he tried to convince them he wasn't involved. Truth Time: The show's producers decided it might be better NOT to name him as the accomplice, since it was a lot of he said/she said. And although the cast says they believed Bernie's story, I received emails from the producers later setting me straight: They thought he was lying, but they couldn't prove it, so they took the easy way out, with the cast saying they thought KC was the guy, but that Bernie was not the accomplice. I saw the sense of that, in other words, it was the only way they could end the show. Or perhaps Helen Jones telling the Decoded guys that Kenny smoked Raleighs, and verifying that both KC and Bernie disappeared over the weekend of the crime when they were supposed to be eating dinner at her house. Boy, was Margie pissed off about THAT, she said. I think Margie found out that the two of them did it later, and then was forced to keep the secret for decades. I wish Decoded would have used the video I provided them in my last interview with Margie, when she finally admits she believes KC was the hijacker. I kept a copy anyway. Second, all of the information I was able to obtain came from live witnesses, many of whom had no motivation to lie, with the exception of Bernie. They were generally ordinary folks. I don't know how many times I have to explain this to people. They had no axes to grind, they weren't seeking glory or money. They just WERE. One of the really strange things we discovered was WHO KC bought his house for cash in Bonney Lake from. His name was Joe Grimes, and (surprise) just happened to be a good friend of Bernie's. KC got the adjoining lot a year later for ten dollars. Sure he did. I think it was a bit more, but paid under the table. We have all the property and mortgage records. NOTE: Comcast filming date is set. I wish I could tell you where we're going and what we're doing, but I can't. But I think you'll agree we may get to the bottom of things. Personally, I just want to finish this stuff and move on. I am much more excited about our sci-fi book that is coming out in three weeks. 48 stories, 44 authors from around the planet, and that beats the Cooper deal anytime. That one was a pain in the ass. This is fun, and cost us a LOT less money to do. I've presented my case on KC and that's pretty much the end of it. I have to leave it to others to see if we hit the mark. Only time will tell. Just like Myers and Dvorak presented their case on Teddy Mayfield. Not one of their socalled circumstantial facts proved correct much less sufficient and complete. You are "convinced" Margie knows everything! Everything what? Margie isnt talking but you are glad to fill in the details anyway based on your 'esp' about human psychology and this woman in particular ... while also avoiding more plausable fact-based scenarios which dont happen to fit your need to prove Kenny was Cooper.? You have been at this for months and have yet to even give your 'criminal profile' on Kenny. First week candidates of any State police academy do that! You evidently think its not required ... in your methodology. And you still avoid even mentioning several of the core facts of Kenny's life which any profile of Kenny must account for, especially as regards motive. Margie and you need to put Kenny on the plane. Like Geestman, you are hiding something important.

Seattle had over all case management. Technically, the agent at Vancouver had 'jurisdiction' as the find occurred in his territory. Portland assisted. Seattle had 'case management' control. The senior Vancouver agent was very competent and informed - had actually studied the Cooper case. Vancouver was a small two person office and the agent in charge there was long tenured. Portland stepped in immediately to assist and did the initial interviewing and locked the scene down at Tina Bar. Seattle agents were dispatched also. By February 14th (if not sooner) everything was being managed out of the Seattle office. It was the Seattle office who technically managed the excavation at Tina Bar and all evidence collected. Himmelsbach's retirement was incidental to these events and protocols. Vancouver, Portland, and Seattle all worked very closely together right from the start. Press coverage came out of both Portland and Seattle, and Washington. The Vancouver agent was fully involved and active. Himmelsbach didnt go over anyone's head but worked closely and effectively with everyone. If anyone has better information, please post it.

Very true. Unlike many others around this thread, I never said for sure that KC was the guy. Truth is, I don't have the smoking gun that could prove that he was. My gut feeling tells me he was involved, and that Bernie G probably helped him. Much of this comes from catching Bernie in numerous lies and the fact that practically everyone I interviewed (whether or not they appeared in the book) were of the same mind about Kenny, even from the beginning. There is also the matter of the circumstantial evidence, which is substantial, but probably not enough to convict. However, if KC had been brought in for questioning by the Bureau maybe ten or twelve months after the hijacking, he would have had a lot of explaining to do. Personally, I think he was a very lucky guy. Update: Filming for the Comcast show is next week. Where and exactly when is a secret, due to those annoying confidentiality agreements. You will be surprised at what I have in mind, though. I made some requests from Comcast about what I wanted to cover and how we should do it...and they went along with this plan. They gave me plenty of time to think about it. What is the essential difference between you and Jo Weber? You have to have been there to know?

(DEEP sigh....) The gamma radiation output alone already stripped the thread of its atmosphere - life ended here eons ago. The survivors continue in their mediocrity, certain of the inevitable. Who will become the head cockroach with the last piece of gibberish? Im betting on Blevins.

No one asked them to. However, I would count History Channel and Comcast Cable as 'major media'. But I never asked them for a single buck except for gas. You are WAY off base and know me not at all. Never had to use a Juju board to present my case. It was done through living eywitness testimony, certified documents, circumstantial evidence, and pictures. Which is a hell of a lot better than anyone here has presented lately, I might add. and with that last statement you scored a point, a big point, with me at least. We can agree to disagree. I have never accused you of being a liar - just biased and forming conclusions I dont think your 'circumstantial' evidence entitles you to draw. You disagree. The world will not be moved off its axis in any event. All this is is people with hypotheses, for the mostpart. We could go on all day Robert. I just dont see that as productive. You have made your points and I accept them. Time will tell. Thanks, G.

Uh, I didnt say one word about money. My reference to lottery was a reference to "statistical odds" of betting vs winning. You seem to equate losing your money with truth? That may be a very poor example. The very opposite may be more true? Had you made money that might correlate with people's perceptions of the truth. But since no major media outlet jumped on your book as "the solution to the DB Cooper case" I guess the public did not rush to buy a piece of history. You could have done in a simple white paper what turned out to be a media event. It was all their fault. Obama can't decide who "who" is! What would Cooper Anderson and Eliot Spitzer do with this? imho, any real solution to the DB Cooper case is going to involve real media people, answer basic questions, and make sense. And you won't need a Juju board to figure it out!

Maybe Georger does indeed think what you have been doing to the Cooper investigation is copy writing it Freudian isnt it. In order of failure, bringing forth a Cooper candidate has to rank above opening a restaurant which is somewhere close to buying a lottery ticket. Its an enterprise full of huge logical leaps ... which falls in a separate catagory from misspelling werds? Blevins is quick to leap at trivia ... which he insists can only be viewed one way, his way.... Because none of us was there? In a similar vein, is Blevins stocking hat on backwards, in his avatar? That paradox should keep Blevins, Decoded, and Comcast busy for at least six years? With plenty of viewers of the archane and impossible. What has any of this to do with Cooper or KC ? Blevins plainly says 'he doesnt care', but then he keeps coming back, looking for trivia to remark about, and caring. Nobody actually wants their lottery ticket to fail. Even Freud knew that!

I enjoy these reports from Delphi. How are the other oracles and oraclettes? Keep it coming. Will you be copywriting the Cooper investigation?

About the last Cooper post out here. Something is brewing! I can smell it all they way down here in the deep Ole South. The strange aroma might be coming out of N.Y., WA., CA., Alaska or Iowa. Or OR, CA, WY, MT, AR, KS, Spain? Everyone is interested in Cooper & Eagles!

[ Do they share the sitting duties? I couldn't tell but in one video of the hatches it looked like one left and the other took over..but I guess it could have been the editing? . yes they do. One or the other is always on the chicks or tending them. If both are there one tends the chicks while the other sits off to the side and they trade places at least once a day. Barely a day goes by without one or the other taking off and bringing back food. When one leaves they may be gone for quite a long time before returning. I havent picked up a solid pattern yet except food always shows up within 48 hours of the last time. Sometimes you can hear the other one near by (like right now chirping) but not showing up in the camera. The stamina of these birds is impressive.

Now that is awesome!! I love the video collages of the hatchings. Amazing. Thanks for sharing! So far mom and dad have brought in large fish, ground squirrel, half of what looked like a ground hog, msc birds and what looked like half a pheasant, and one good sized racoon some think was climbing up to inspect the nest (big mistake!). The camera is controlable, can sweep and auto focus when one of the eagles is flying around ... at night they switch to Infra Red which is what we are seeing now ... the eagles evidently cant see IR? At times the chicks are a circus and funny to watch .. keeps the parent on guard busy.

Im enjoying all of this. Never had one problem antenna-neighbor-wise. Over the years have even got the local utility to make changes to accomodate my hobby. yep. Try this for a hoot. Eagles and barn owls and chicks. Millions of visitors, schools, ... enjoy. http://www.ustream.tv/decoraheagles attached taken 5 mins ago live - storm is moving in so everyone is anxious to know how they do .. can hear wind and thunder in the background ... big storm through Sunday... Ausie and California owl links on the same page, all live. Falcon at Rochester NY, etc ... That eagle nest is over a ton and 8 feet wide for scale, 80 feet up.

Im enjoying all of this. Never had one problem antenna-neighbor-wise. Over the years have even got the local utility to make changes to accomodate my hobby.

He likes being an FBI CLEARED Cooper suspect with lingering doubts among jumpers about the validity of the FBI's conclusion. 377 And that interests me a lot. It shows (I think) that agents were not sticking strictly to the physical profile but looking at all kinds of people ... not like tv! (our guy has one ear, missing right arm, and a peace symbol carved in his forehead with a Bowie knife ... drives a Pink Austin)! The FBI, which means agents, were looking at all kinds of poeple, but what's the common denominator (s)? Im willoing to bet if you got 50 agents in a room they couldnt come to a common explanation? So did they not believe in the profile and sketches? What is going on? So like Smokin I stick to the sketches - what else is there that is concrete? Food service worker? Nasty vile guy? Hitler's doppleganger?

I have no qualifications other than a long-time general interest in the case, but I'd sure like to be there.

Georger, Your thoughts on the photos? Ears? 377 See the attached - The Cooper sketches show a different amount of mass in Cooper's earlobes vs. the candidates shown. This difference in mass and geometry or shape, extends from the mid portion of the ear down through the lobe. I attached an anatomical chart of the ear. You be the judge.

Is this a photo of Sheridan? Maybe someone knows who this is ... Let me work something up here to illustrate what I will say. http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/l/lawnchairlarry.htm 377 Ok - thanks. Its pretty difficult to catch everything that crops up here - glad you have that in hand.

If I could prove 100% that KC was the guy, I would have presented that by now. I only offer a theory based on the evidence, which is mostly circumstantial, but also substantial in nature. Pictures, certified documents, and living witness testimony, not conjecture, guesswork, or bull. I am guessing, that Kenny has no criminal record and had no discipline issues either in school as a child or later during his entire work life? Do you know? I am guessing Kenny was gay and that dynamic had a role in his life with other people? Do you know? I am guessing Kenny (and Lyle) were raised with traditional rural upper Midwestern values, especially of a practical material nature as regarded the ethics of work, saving, and financial responsibility? Do you know? I am guess Katy Watson has a 'not so secret' thing for Kenny and saw him as a reliable source of compassion and consistency, as compared to most men in her life - especially her husband? Do you know? I am guessing Bernie Geestman is not the total lying rat you portray him as, but has some positive traits and accomplishments to his credit in life? Do you know? Lets stop there. Or you can continue if you wish ???

here are a couple of new ones -

Is this a photo of Sheridan? Maybe someone knows who this is ... Let me work something up here to illustrate what I will say.

I see the same eyebrow clump - see my comparison. Wasnt it Snow who first posted the younger photo, of Pete? Remember Snow posted a number of photos at the time to run through facial comparison software and he included htis photo of Pete - thats how I remember this??? In any event, I see similar traits and proportions ... will come back later and we can discuss this. Here also is a blowup of Smokin's photo - cant see much. Ive stretched the photo as far as I dare on the software Im using, without losing all detail.

attached - different cranial proportions, note the thick bushy eyebrows ... stocky .. how tall is Pete/Dan? Friendly looking guy ... eye color?