Gravitymaster

Members
  • Content

    13,097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Gravitymaster

  1. I did - personhood rights for zygotes excludes all abortions for all reasons- that's yer boys stand.... Which has zero to do with Akins statement.
  2. I am convinced the Author is going to make money off the book, which is what I called "cashing in". If I find out the author is not making any money off the book, I'll happily retract my statement. So you are OK with making unsubstanciated, wild accussations and smearing someone without ANY evidence and then your response is someone has to prove YOU wrong? Nice standards you have there.
  3. Nice tap dance, so I'll ask again. Do you support legalizing Crack cocaine?
  4. You have proven nothing. Akins remarks had to do with whether a woman could get pregnant by "legitimate rape". All you have done is show that some within the GOP do not support abortion under any circumstances.
  5. I'd just like people like you to accept that it's none of your damn business what a woman does with her own body. There are lots of things that are illegal for a person to do with their own body. . Indeed, and it's just more busibodying. So you have no problem with legalizing Crack Cocaine?
  6. No I read that. I just figured most people understood there is a difference between proceeds and all proceeds. In the extreme example, if you donate 1 cent out of every 1 million dollars, you are still donating proceeds. So you have no idea how much of the "proceeds" are going to the familys but you still felt OK about accusing him of "cashing in"?
  7. "I'm not being spun by the media. Look, here's an article I found in the media to prove it". Precious.
  8. You are allowing yourself to be spun again. http://factcheck.org/2012/08/another-abortion-falsehood-from-obamas-truth-team/ http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/23/President-Infanticide-Dem-Plank-Partial-Birth
  9. It's going as well as can be expected since we ignored the conflict in favor of dick dancing in Iraq for the first seven years. At this point, however, we might as well pull out and prepare for the invasion part II, which I predict will happen in about ten years. That will be in response to the next terrorist attack on US soil planned by the Afghans or with their support. I wish the US had the balls to devote the proper resources to Afghanistan, but it looks like we'll have the 1990s all over again over there. Thanks in large part to ignoramuses like you. At least I can discuss something without the personal attacks. Personal attacks are an admission of a weak position. But, no surprise there.
  10. Fucking disgusting use of casualties for political points. Par for the course for you, however. BTW, the casualty count will tend to go up when you're acually prosecuting a war, as Obama promised to do. Yep and it's par for you to fail to understand the difference between then and now. We got Bin Laden, why are we still there?
  11. Right, back then our main goal was to get Bin Laden. Or did you forget?
  12. Nope. Back then we had an objective and a plan. Can you tell me what our objective is now? BTW I seem to recall most left wingers supporting the invasion of Afghanistan.
  13. I'm going to assume that in your zeal to slam him, you didn't read the entire article. I think this guy was wrong to write this book and publish it without being vetted by the Military and other intelligence services. I hope they prosecute him and anyone else caught divulging secrets.
  14. That is a simple statement, which contains no science of any sort. Can you prove me wrong?
  15. The desperation of the left wingers to spin this into some kind of referendum on the RNC has gotten pathetic. Here's the latest list on those condemning Akins. http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/ I wonder what the body count in Afghanistan will be this week under Obamas "leadership". I wonder how many more will lose their jobs between now and November? I wonder how much more will be put on our childrens credit card with China?
  16. WoW! I guess she could be put in jail for kidnapping if she tried to move and change her name? What a living Hell. I really admire her for persevering and trying to raise her kid under the circumstances.
  17. Try reading the post I was responding to next time. The claim was made that Legislators an "especially the leadership" shared Akins view. I asked to name a leader who had not condemned Akins. Using your definition, Maxine Waters represents DNC leadership.
  18. Nothing except the number of monthly deaths of US Troops has tripled since Obama was elected. The fact you didn't know that illustrates my point.
  19. I said leader. Surely if there is this vast amount of support for Akins you should be able to find dozens of leaders who support Akins. Admit it, once again, lefties are being spun so the DNC is distracted from Afghanistan(remember?) unemployment, the economy, the deficit etc. I think the Amrican public isn't as stupid as you think they are.
  20. Show me the science behind OJ's hand not fitting the glove. Blood makes leather shrink.
  21. Name one Republican leader who hasn't condemned Akins remarks.
  22. 83.7% Feel free to prove me wrong. Ok you are wrong. Now prove me wrong.