Gravitymaster

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, remember?

This will help explain quite a bit about potheads. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9426205/Cannabis-smoking-permanently-lowers-IQ.html Researchers found persistent users of the drug, who started smoking it at school, had lower IQ scores as adults. They were also significantly more likely to have attention and memory problems in later life, than their peers who abstained. Furthermore, those who started as teenagers and used it heavily, but quit as adults, did not regain their full mental powers, found academics at King’s College London and Duke University in the US. They looked at data from over 1,000 people from Dunedin in New Zealand, who have been followed through their lives since being born in 1972 or 1973. Participants were asked about cannabis usage when they were 18, 21, 26, 32 and 38. Their IQ was tested at 13 and 38. In addition, each nominated a close friend or family member, who was asked about attention and memory problems. About one in 20 admitted to starting cannabis use before the age of 18, while a further one in 10 took up the habit in the early or mid 20s. Professor Terrie Moffitt, of KCL’s Institute of Psychiatry, who contributed to the study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, said “persistent users” who started as teenagers suffered a drop of eight IQ points at the age of 38, compared to when they were 13. Persistent users meant those who used it during at least three of the ages from 18 to 38, and who said at each occasion they were smoking it on at least four days a week. She said: “Adolescent-onset cannabis users, but not adult-onset cannabis users, showed marked IQ decline from childhood to adulthood. “For example, individuals who started using cannabis in adolescence and used it for years thereafter showed an average eight-point IQ decline. “Quitting or reducing cannabis use did not appear to fully restore intellectual functioning among adolescent-onset former persistent cannabis users,” she said. Although eight points did not sound much, it was not trivial, she warned. It meant that an average person dropped far down the intelligence rankings, so that instead of 50 per cent of the population being more intelligent than them, 71 per cent were. “Research has shown that IQ is a strong determinant of a person’s access to a college education, their lifelong total income, their access to a good job, their performance on the job, their tendency to develop heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and even early death,” she said. “Individuals who lose eight IQ points in their teens and 20s may be disadvantaged, relative to their same-age peers, in most of the important aspects of life and for years to come.” The cognitive abilities of the 10 per cent of people who started in their 20s - who could loosely be classed as college smokers - also suffered while they were still smoking. However, if they gave up at least a year before their IQ test at 38, their intelligence recovered, suggesting their brains were more resilient and bounced back. Prof Moffitt said adolescent brains appeared "more vulnerable to damage and disruption" from cannabis than those of fully mature adults. Reliable figures on cannabis usage among today’s British teens and twentysomethings are hard to come by. But Prof Moffitt said there was growing concern in the US that cannabis was increasingly being seen as a safe alternative to tobacco. “This is the first year that more secondary school students in the US are using cannabis than tobacco, according to the Monitoring the Future project at the University of Michigan,” she noted. “Fewer now think cannabis is damaging than tobacco. But cannabis is harmful for the very young.”

Yeah, too bad they didn't make a movie about killing Bush. That would have been real popular here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzHAlwEK7a4 Here's a tune for all those still suffering from BDS and all of us that laugh at their pathetic defense of Obama. Enjoy

Try turning off the spell check on your Blackberry.

Agreed.

This guy was laid off a year ago and suddenly he decides to come back and shoot his emplyer? Something doesn't add up. I suspect there's more to this than an employment issue.

Only an idiot would smoke crack.

Personal attacks say more about the person making them. It says that person cannot control their emotions. Very similar to Hitler comparisons.

OK, make that 2 people baffled.

Where have I ever said they should be in jail? Lot's of ASS-U-ming going on here.

It's only baffling to you.

No, that's not what was said. What was quoted was: "A spokesman at Dutton, a division of Penguin Group, said proceeds from the book will be donated..." "PROCEEDS", not "THE PROCEEDS". Significant difference. Great, let's hear your definition of proceeds. What is your definition of proceeds? Do you think the statement means the author will make no money from the book? I have no idea, do you? No, well neither does SD. How many more times would you like to have this explained to you?

But the coal burned to power them does - and it gets emitted into the atmosphere. They contain tungsten, too, another heavy metal. What do you think most people would do if they dropped a bulb containing mercury and it broke?

Good it wasn't a case of legitimate rape.

He's saying his statements are libelous. See, that's an old SC trick I learned from you. The master of distraction.

They don't contain mercury.

yes, given that we have tried YOUR apparent ideology and it is not working. Whatever, it's still the lesser of 2 evils. What would be ideal is if people would quit tokin on the crack pipe altogether and work towards being a productive member of society.

You wouldn't understand if you have never been to a book club meeting. You are the one making slanderous statements about "proceeds" (as opposed to "the proceeds") and are unable to back them up. Libelous. Good to see you finally admit it. That only took 2 pages of tap dancing. Kallend would be proud of you.

Really, it's simple mindedness made me laugh.

You wouldn't understand if you have never been to a book club meeting. You are the one making slanderous statements about "proceeds" (as opposed to "the proceeds"0 and are unable to back them up.

No, that's not what was said. What was quoted was: "A spokesman at Dutton, a division of Penguin Group, said proceeds from the book will be donated..." "PROCEEDS", not "THE PROCEEDS". Significant difference. Great, let's hear your definition of proceeds.

Great article. Is this the type of source you get your news from? That and DU, I mean.

I think you may have already disqualified yourself by claiming proceeds and profits are the same thing. Plus, have you even been to a book club meeting? I think Amazon.com has a special on dictionaries. And yes, I have been to many book club meetings. Have you ever been to an NA meeting or done anything that would even qualify you to have a laymans knowledge of crack addiction?

Your misreading clear hypotheticals is your own problem. Best bring that up at the next meeting. Right, this personal attack is clearer. Thanks.