davjohns

Which really doesn't mean a lot to him, now does it? OK. THAT really did make me laugh. I think the underlying lesson is that if things aren't broke, don't fix them. If two people are happy together, why invite the government in to mess it up? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Twelve Monkeys "Tell us where the talking llama is and we'll burn your hut down. Don't you mean, "Tell us where the talking llama is OR we'll burn your hut down?" Fine. Tell us where the talking llama is OR we'll burn your hut down. Well which is it? That's a pretty crucial conjunction." I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Spaceballs "Why do we even HAVE that lever?!?" I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

0/2/0 Jumped a couple Saturday, but wasn't really feeling it. Sinuses kicked in a headache and I called it. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Better Off Dead with John Cussak "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Seriously? Yes. I considered the fact that he actually helped stage that as a joke. If you look on youtube for his address to the White House Correspondent's Dinner, he has a great sense of humor. He had an impersonator play an internal monologue of him while he gave his address. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Wow. I thought the whole point of a relationship was a relationship. I thought sex was just part of it. I guess I now know where I've gone wrong in the past. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Why you gotta post our shit out in public like this? Besides - that was a GOOD helicopter! Sorry about the bruise. Way to go. I spit on my screen when this caught me off guard. :) I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Well, now. I think that depends. Are you saying they need to learn technique? Do they need to learn to be more attentive? Or do they think the things you want to do are an abomination before God and you are going to hell? I would think that if they are only focused on themselves and oblivious to your pleasure, it would show throughout the relationship. If they have some kind of strong aversions, they might not be unlearned. Otherwise, I expect adjustments could be made. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I don't know if that's real, but I'm sure he would find it hilarious even if it isn't. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You're assuming the law means something other than what it says and then using that assumption to justify your conclusion. And you say I'm giving you too little credit for intelligence because of this? I'm using pure logic. You are inserting an emotional reaction. I do not mean to be insulting, but you do not appear to be using your intelligence in this matter. As long as you use emotion-based arguments, there can be no logical discussion. The law is perfectly legitimate as written. We have courts to re-direcgt any who abuse it. We've been through this many times in American Jurisprudence. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I laughed out loud when I saw this. I can only hope it is someone stirring the pot. If the majority of crime is committed by minorities, are all criminal laws racist? Should we do away with them? In Mexico, most laws are broken by Mexicans. I guess Mexico should do away with all laws. It's a logical tool called reductio ad absurdum. Look it up. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

If any party or group who advocates, advances, prepares for or executes a plan to kill others solely because of the way those others pray or fail to pray or because the party or group believes they have been ordered to kill the others by some deity, spirit or other supernatural being, that party or group is a threat to my peaceful existance and the peaceful existance of others. In that case, I would appreciate it if they would all gather in one place for a regretable, but necessary, pre-emptive strike. To keep from mincing words - there are some viruses that can only be eliminated by incinerating the bodies that contain them. There are some strains of religion and politics that catch hold so strongly and propogate so virulently that the only preventive measures are both repugnant and mandatory to the survival of those who are threatened by them. We hate to admit it. We hate the fact that it is so. But some people must be killed to end the spread of their taint. The difficult part is drawing the line. I have taken a stab at it in the first paragraph. It is off the cuff and far from perfect. Feel free to pick it apart. You will not hurt my feelings. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Many people seem to be ignoring the elephant in the room when it comes to the Arizona law. I have posted the pertinent parts of the law in this forum, but people continue to believe wild opinions over easily obtained facts. Here is the problem with your scenario - you left out reasonable suspicion. The law is clear that (like every other crime) the officer must have reasonable suspicion that you are in the country illegally. It specifically prohibts racial profiling. So, the officer will not ask you for documentation unless there is a reason to believe you are here illegally. To do so would be the equivalent of an illegal search and the charges would never stick. Moreover, the officer would have opened the department up to action for civil rights violations. All this law does is require Arizona law enforcement to enforce the immigration laws that have been on the books for ages. This whole presumption that LE are all corrupt and will abuse the law is ridiculous. All laws could be used improperly and have been in the past. The only logical solution to that ridiculous argument is to eliminate all LE and head straight into anarchy. Stop making stuff up. It makes you a liar. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Mrs. Doubtfire I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Schwarzenneger in Commando "When we get out of the eighties; the nineties are going to make the sixties look like the fifties!" I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Saw the late showing of Iron Man II (very cool). Will be crashing soon. Wanted to check out the boards here. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You have to wonder how that criminal negotiated the difficult process of getting a firearm legally in England. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

+1 I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

sama as it ever is . . . BOOBIES!!! Well now I have a new dominant thought. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

The instant thought is that you meant DOMINANT rather than DOMINATE in your subject line. My most prolific thought lately is, "what am I doing for fun next?" I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Nice concept sketch of a wing suit on the cover. An article about Jeb Corliss and his attempt to land without a chute is central to the piece. It mentions stuff like the Integrated Glide and Landing System, BASE, Yves' wing, tandem pioneer and hang glider pilot Mike Barber and other stuff. I had to pick it up. dwj I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Think he wouldn't have gotten the snack in my house. If you aren't willing to help, you aren't going to eat. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

US Army 1984 to present I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Ronald Reagan - Captain, US Army George W. Bush - Jet pilot, National Guard Jimmy Stewart - Army Air Corps and then Air National Guard - Brigadier General George H. W. Bush - Navy Fighter Pilot (and skydiver) Jack Palance - US Army - Had his face burned off in WWII - That's why his skin looked like leather John McCain - Wild Weasel pilot in Vietnam - Retired Naval Captain (O6) Working backward - GWB- NG Pilot Clinton - Draft Dodger GHWB - Navy pilot Reagan - Army Carter - Navy Ford - Navy Nixon - Navy (though he qualified for an exemption as a Quaker) Lyndon Johnson - Navy Reserve and then requested combat duty in WWII although he was in Congress JFK - PT Boat Commander WWII Dwight D. Eisenhower - General of the Army Harry S. Truman - Army Artillery WWI If you want to go back to Teddy Roosevelt - Extreme badass Army Go all the way back to George Washington and you will find he was known for leading from the front, returning with bullet holes in his clothes and no horse (poor beast having been shot out from under him). General Washington, however, rarely received a scratch. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.