Belgian_Draft

Back in the '40s, '50s, and early '60s. One chart here: www.truthandpolitics.org/top-rates.php AKA the best, sustained economic years of the US. When money is taken from one entity by another, it is normal for the taker to be better off. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

It's still Bush's fault, Clinton still did it first, and Obama still can't stop any of it. Take that!!! Except Obama will try to spend his way out of debt. And Hoover/McSame would cut taxes out of debt. And some people still don't understand the concept of living within one's income. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

It's still Bush's fault, Clinton still did it first, and Obama still can't stop any of it. Take that!!! HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Back in the '40s, '50s, and early '60s. One chart here: www.truthandpolitics.org/top-rates.php If you think that tax rate was used mainly to fund "socialism" in the US during that time, you're wrong. After World War II, that was principally to fund the (largely peacetime) massive military buildup that morphed into the Cold War military-industrial complex. In the US, unlike the UK and most of Europe during the 50s, those taxes were not used mainly to fund domestic social services programs like the other nations' comprehensive national health services. Eisenhower (Republican), who was President from 1953-1961, could have put the brakes on that, but did not. I never said the taxes were used to fund socialism. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Back in the '40s, '50s, and early '60s. One chart here: www.truthandpolitics.org/top-rates.php HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

rhys....lucky.... HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

You need a better tax accountant. Smaller government would be better. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

How would lucky feel if Iran came over to the USA and freed us Americans from the government that has been known to take 90% or more of a person's income? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

He says to the guy who doesn't know junior high poli-sci. This denotes his knowledge in other areas too, he tries to claim he knows about aircraft than a lifelong acft mechanic who currently works as one. And all teh neo-cons who believe him - hillarious. I never claimed to know much about politics and, in fact, have stated as such right here in this forum more than once. Just because you have spent the last 20 years changing the air in the tires on a 152 doesn't make you an expert in aircraft structures. You have proven that many times. Or does that CJ "degree" cover aviation as well? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

-How ironic...you giving spelling lessons. -Autogenous welding is most certainly not obscure by any stretch of the imagination. -You are correct...no need to avoid using filler. Unless, of course, you want to optimize your process to make suitable weld in less time and at less cost. -Where must it be used? Only a handfull of circumstances but it is a viable alternative in far more. -Do you realize the book you qoted from is 110 years old? Welding and soldering are two completely different processes. One does not weld with solder. -Bill corrected me and I acknowledged his correction. You, on the other hand, keep digging yourself deeper and deeper and deeper into a hole. Want a fresh shovel? You funny. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Or about hwt and his thinking MSNBCBS was a real media outlet? Or Belgian thinking an impeachment was a conviction? See, we can all stray offtrack when we're outta substance, but I choose to stick to the issue; how bout it, 500M jobs lost???? Obvious misspeak. Or Lucky thinking the ONN was an actual news source? I don't think anyone can ever beat that one! Or lucky's suggestion, "if you can't autogeneous weld it, then just Tig it". HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Calvin and Hobbes. (Can't live without my daily fix.) The Weather Channel Navigation Aviation Weather & Decoder For work... Calculus Tools RealCalc Stopwatch & Timer The camera isn't too great. I've managed to take a few good quality pics but I took a lot of fuzzy ones to get those. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

I thought you were suppose to run downhill when being chased by an alligator. Wouldn't downhill lead to the water the 'gator probably came out of? I can't remember who said it, but it went something like "If a predator attacks, stand your ground. If you run you are prey. Very slow prey." I often wondered how one stands their ground against a large toothy reptile whose only tasks are to kill, sleep, and make little reptiles? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

As others here have said, Fezzik will let you know when it is time. It can sometimes be hard to accept the massage they give you but accept it you must. It is our responsibility to endure the emotional pain in order to spare them the physical. Try not to dwell on the loss and what might have been, rather rejoice in the life you had together and think of how your life would have been without him. I have been where you are and know it is not easy. In one case my canine companion gave me the greatest gift ever. After consulting the vet and making the appointment for euthenization, I awoke the next morning to find my friend had passed during the night in his sleep, sparing me the task I was so dreading. Your friends will be a great help in getting through this. Do not hesitate to call on them for support. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

ok you liberal goat fucker I know for sure I could not get away with that one. Jusst sayin No doubt, calling someone a neo-con is a political opinion, calling someone a liberal is a political opinion, calling someone a goat fucker is an overt PA. I agree. Calling someone a neo-con, or any other political label, is not a PA....with one exception. When the person being called a neo-con, or any other political label, has made it known that they do not subscribe to the beliefs and doctrines of said political group it is clearly an attempt to work around the forum rules to continue to refer to that person as such. You are a perfect example of this, lucky. More than one person here has made it known to you that they are NOT a neo-con and consider it a PA when you refer to them as one. It is plain that you continue to use the term in reference to those members as a way to insult them. But I wouldn't expect a Fascist like you to understand any of that. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Bill corrected me, i told him he was correct. End of that story. Swell and draw can be used to describe many processes. The process you are familiar with is but one. Are you so ignorant you think there are no others? You said welding was never used to join skin on aircraft. You are wrong and i gave you an example. You said that"if you can't autogeneous weld it, then just Tig it". You have no clue as to what you are talking about and that one statement is proof. You defend Clinton as if he were a god, hence the question do you feel perjury and sexual harrassment are not worth prosecuting? I see from your other posts that you have narrowed the definition of neo-con down to three criteria. Must be so you can fit more of those who disagree with you into the pool. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Hahahahaaha, the preudo acft sheetmetal mech can't answer. To break from our forum neo-con, I will answer: Yes they are and under Clinton they did pursue the perjury (the sexual harrassment was never pursued, something Belgian will figure out as soon as he graduated high school) and came up empty as far as a conviction went. To give to the, "Give Belgian a political education" fund, I will help you with all 4 charges brought before the House: Upon the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote)[14] and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote)[15]. Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote)[16] and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148-285 vote)[17]. Four Republicans opposed all four articles, while five Democrats voted for three of them and 1 Democrat for all four. Upon passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton became the first elected U.S. president and the second U.S. president to be impeached, following Andrew Johnson in 1868. (In 1974, Richard Nixon resigned the Presidency before the House impeachment vote.) 2 passed, meaning they were political indictments, there was no sexual harrassment pursued nor indicted. Now, we'll all see you look sillier and for the 4th or 5th time dodge my question: WERE YOU FLAT WRONG, WITHOUT EXCUSES, WHEN YOU WROTE THAT AN IMPEACHMENT IS A CONVICTION? 1: We have already established in another thread that i have forgotten more knowledge about aircraft sheetmetal than you will ever have. 2: I never stated Clinton was brought up on charges of sexual harrassment, but he was being investigated and eventually settled out of court. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Answer the question: Do you feel perjury and sexual harrassment are not worth prosecuting? HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Can't admit i was wrong? You didn't read my response eto Bill, did you? I thought not. You don't remeber well, do you? I still remeber watching senators from both parties being interviewed and saying they knew Clinton was guilty but did not feel his crimes were worth removal and therefor they voted in his favor. Tell me, how does it feel to think sexual harrassment and perjury aren't worth prosecuting? How does it feel to think some people are above the law? Amazing what we forget just so our idols can remain untarnished in our minds, isn't it? You can keep guessing as to who my favorite Pres was, but I'll give you a hint: Nobody on this forum was alive when that man died. Keep guessing and playing lawyer/market guru/mechanic/financial whiz/banker/political expert/pilot. We are all allowed to fantasize. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

Yes, you are correct. But that does not alter the fact that the majority of the Sanate believed he was guilty but voted 'not guilty' because the Constitution only allows for the removal of the impeached and they felt his crimes were not of a serious enough nature to remove him from office. I happen to disagree. Allowing a President to get away with perjury and sexual harrassment only sets the stage for future Presidents breaking the law and expecting to get away with it, ex. GWB. A person found not guilty by a court of law is to be just that...not guilty. They are found neither guilty nor innocent. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok. Yea, basicaly the entire world thought it was pathetic to persecute the guy for that. I guess you're saying the you selectively agree with the process. If a guy you want gets convicted, it's a good system; if a guy you want covicted get acquitted, it's a non-functionin g system. Amazing how he left and holds > a 50% approval, whereas your favorite president is probably < 30% and never was impeached. See, silly neo-cons focus on silly issues; the rest of us focus on substantive issues like the economy, social need, etc. No, the world did not think it was pathetic, only the goat-fuck-stupids did. Sexual harrassment is no joking matter, Bubba, and neither is perjury. He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Please advise as to who you think my favorite President was. And, for the last time, I am not a neo-con and consider it a personal insult. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

How the fuck do you know what I believe and what I don't? Only a very small part of my beliefs have been made public here on this forum. It's a pretty simple concept, lucky. You want the government to provide things to people that they can't or won't provide for themselves and you want to tax the hell out of those who actually earn their money to pay for it. I, on the other hand, am in favor of minimal government intrusion and that includes stripping spending back on benefits so as to only provide to those who cannot provide for themselves as well as infrastructure and defense. Cut the spending. It is a very simple concept that you and your heroes in DC can't quite get a grasp on. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

I am not a neo-con and I take it as a PERSONAL INSULT. You have proven, once again, that you think everyone should agree with you 100% or they are a neo-con. I don't need to provide you with data to give you my opinion of Clinton. You asked if I thought he did a good job, I answered. What excperience in business do you have that gives you any credability to determine if a tax deduction is legit? A CJ degree? Give me a break. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.

I understand them a lot better than you. You make the claim that high taxes are important to send the top wage earners scrambling for the tax shelters, but at the same time you whine and bitch and moan and complain when they do and especially when congress doesn't slam the door shut on these tax shelters. People who make enough money to have extra laying around can do several things with it. They can keep it under a mattress, which does no good for anyone. They can keep it in a savings account, which gets them very little return, or they can put it in higher risk/higher potential return investments. It doesn't take the threat of the money being taken as taxes to get people to invest. Since you are such a big supporter of huge government spending, Reagan and Bush should have been your heroes. No, I do not think Clinton did a good job. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.