Lucky...

You call me names and I'm supposedly the troll? You make sense Limbaugh-style. I love how you avoid the Michael Fox issue where he made fun of him. Yea, hard to support garbage dressed as a human after that - i Hear ya. As for you speaking for the lefft, you obviously don't get it. I expect the drones from the right to follow Lush aimlessly. I believe most lefties feel that way, but you get to martyr Lush when you make you assertion. Nice try - it's laughable.

QUIT THE PA'S, COP. Awww....did poor widdle Wucky's feewings get hurt? Nah, just trying to follow the rules. Why is it you blocked my PM's? Oh yea, you claimed I was saying mean things and making you cry, was it? Of course when I post both my PM's to you in the forum, you clam up. I see.

But like fascist Rushy, I want things to fail. Diff is, I want him to fail and the US to succeed. Where are you at? The side that *doesn't* hope someone dies just because they're from 'the other party'. But Lush is more than a typical, sociopathic Republican, he makes fun of people with genetic diseases, drug problems and is a racist as discovered by his McNabb remarks. The world would be better off w/o due to these reasons, not because he is a Republican. I understand your narrow interpretation tho.

But like fascist Rushy, I want things to fail. Diff is, I want him to fail and the US to succeed. Where are you at?

AKA as: you don't have a clue as how to address my points so you build a straw man. For those who don't know the defintion of straw man, YOU, here's some help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position. Sit down. kid, ya bother me Yep, these things run exponentially. I bet if we graphed this we would see an exponential dive starting in late 2007. Remember, the start of the Great Republican Recession? Yea, you guys say late 2008, it's really mid-late 2007 as the NBER, Kallend and those with knowledge and underestanding say. Ironic, that's when unemp started to shade off, and we all know jobs lag going in and lag coming out. So the slow and modest drop starting in early 2008 adds up. Glad to see you so excited about the 10.2 to 10.0 drop and start of jobs recovery; you must want America to fail like heart attack boy does.

QUIT THE PA'S, COP.

_ Drug addict - Obeese for most of his life - High stress - Piece of shit SO yea, he has been building his casket for a long time. What do they say - only the good die young? Well, if fascist Rushy dies soon, that guy didn't know WTF he was talking about.

Oh no, I think it's awwwweful when fascist pigs who make fun of others with drug problems and Parkinson's end up possibly dead from the same kind of ailments they chide others for. Classy and fascist Rushy don't belong in the same zip code, but I am sorry your hero is on the bubble.

He'll likely end up there, but no reputable historian is going to rank him when he still is in the realm of current events. Who'll end up there? Obama or Bush? If you mean Obama, no historian will rank anything current. But to rate Obama's job as negative is a joke. To be fair, Obama had small shows to fill; Clinton left big ones for Bush.

We can all hope so. Unfortunately, it can also be a false lead, and since government (deficit) spending has been the primary prop, the recovery hopes can't be that optimistic. Much of the market rebound stemmed from the oversell last year. Better a 20% rise than a 50% drop. Bush's economic legacy is dismal, almost as bad as his foreign policy legacy. Not for nothing is he ranked among the worst presidents of all time. That 7% unemployment and 400 billion deficit he left is looking a WHOLE lot better than what we have now. Fuzzy math is a nice thing to call a blatant lie. http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=LNS14000000 7.6 in Jan to 8.1 in Feb 09 shows a freefall. Not to mention 7.6 is not 7%. With many things tenths are semantic, but with unemp 6/10 is huge, esp when it was 4.9 1 year prior and a full 1% lower just 3 months prior. This shows a major freefall in joblessness, so to assign whatever blame to the successor is, well, very Republican of you.

We can all hope so. Unfortunately, it can also be a false lead, and since government (deficit) spending has been the primary prop, the recovery hopes can't be that optimistic. Much of the market rebound stemmed from the oversell last year. It's Jan 20, 2009, you just inherited the 2ns worst economy in US history, all indicators are down, unem is freefalling up; what do you do? - TAX CUTS, MY FRIENDS Reagan and GWB did this; we know the outcome - DO NOTHING Hoover did this; how many died? - DEFICIT SPEND Obama is doing this and all indicators are going the right way, unemp is even shading lower. So tell me, what is Obama doing wrong and why? What would you do?

You're absolutely right - tripling the deficit and ruining the economy is SO much better. S&P 500 UP 36.6% since Obama took office. S&P 500 DOWN 53% during Bush's presidency. Ruining the economy was YOUR guy's specialty. S&P is up, deficit is up, unemployment is up.... damn, it's a new Golden Child Age!! You guys are great for comedy. Hell, it took GHWB and Clinton 12 years to level off fascist pig Ronnies shopping spree. You act as tho this breater mess can be fixed in 2 weeks for 2 million dollars. Mike, meet reality; reality, Mike.

You're absolutely right - tripling the deficit and ruining the economy is SO much better. S&P 500 UP 36.6% since Obama took office. S&P 500 DOWN 53% during Bush's presidency. Ruining the economy was YOUR guy's specialty. Your guys = Reagan and GWB

Reagan and Bush were basically the same president.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091231/ap_on_re_us/us_limbaugh_hospital This is awwwwweful

As well, connies are posting rhetoric about their 18 year job and then nothing else. We're supposed to hang on their every word due to pseudo-qualification. Such meaninbless responses - usual. These ridiculous arguments are a joke. Let me ask....how so? Point I was makign for the guy you're protecting is that 18 years exp measn shit w/o substance. Again, how so? It's really fun to have reference to support your lies.

Thanks for playing to type. See my post #5. I added that after seeing your ever repeated Rant! Ya can always count on a lib to follow chant that they learn with the kool aid, , so thought I'd join in! Hey, did ya hear about the new city park? Yea, and they can run HC too? Hardly. Hey, did ya hear the gov weather svs said it would rain today? Well, it didn't and now they want to run HC when they can't even predict the weather correctly. The sky is falling.

And the system works? And these people think they can run health care too! Only 13 posts; what took so long? How about the 600B/yr military, it usuallyh works but costs 8 times that of #2 and basically run by private corps by way of contracts. 300B B-1 bombers that don't work. Yea, private corps have it nailed.

She sucked worse as governor, I can cite reasons rather than just, "Napalitano; believe her?'

No, it's kinda like conservatives saying, "Pelosi; believe her?" It's a cult, not a viable political ideology.

Nevermind the 2 monther - he resurrected a 5 year old thread. PhillyKev briefly lived again. I don't even know who he is, I was looking for this genius thread and read that - sounded good. Hmmm, wonder why conservatives don't like history? http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

I hate more when a person I don't care about PM's me garbage like I care. So I have to see the thread up again and get PM's from Lucky..... no more tho.... Lucky is blocked. I get enough junk mail. Lucky is blocked. Owwwww, you're a sthcary dude - you blocked PM's so I can't remind you how wrong you are with your stock predictions. Hey, if ya hate Obama, stick with your allegations of him being a Musslim terrorist or about the death squads, leave out stock predictions that are ridiculous at best. BTW, how are those shorts doing?

When someone makes a prediction, unless you have a crystal ball, that is necessary.

Which website, I probably posted several. Yea, I realize you're being sarcastic, but love how me mans-up and admits his stock prediction was incredibly wrong. Just a way to attack Obama: FAIL. Now he blocked my PM. Goes to shjow, kids, don't make ridiculous predictions in areas you know little/nothing. The market can fluctuate/decline, and if ya hang around long enough it will tanb again, probably following/during the next Great Republican Recession/Depression.

+1 But don't think I'm advocating any drug use or that I enjoy being around druggies; I don't. I just don't see drug use as a crime unless you are driving or in a responsible postion for kids, etc. That goes for prescription pill poppers too.