DanG

Members
  • Content

    6,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. Seen the tax code recently? I'm done with this, it's a silly argument either way. Use all the hyperbolic rhetoric you want, I won't call you out on it. - Dan G
  2. That article is really weak. It doesn't provide anything to back up the headline whatsoever. - Dan G
  3. Yeah, but it's super bad ass. The caption says they're exiting from 1,400feet. That takes balls. Lame. - Dan G
  4. Okay, whatever, who fucking cares? There are more regulations regarding the acquisition of money that there are of the ownership of guns. What does that have to do with anything? - Dan G
  5. It says active duty, retired, or discharged. That implies no reservists. Maybe I'm wrong. - Dan G
  6. My lawyer will be in touch. My point is that this thread is essentially a carbon copy of another one about how "they" are hypocritical about Libya. "They" get annoyed by reposts. - Dan G
  7. How many different threads do "they" have to register their disapproval of the Libya mission? I've already done it once. - Dan G
  8. I don't jump anymore, so I'm not eligible, but I wonder why you seem to be excluding National Guard and Reserve servicemembers? - Dan G
  9. And how many straight marriages have fallen apart because you two have ruined that sacred institution? I'm guessing none. - Dan G
  10. You're right, the Coach is not supposed to teach the canopy control portion of the higher categories. However, the Coach observes the student's pattern and landing during the Coach jumps, and is probably the one who debriefs the student on their canopy work during those levels. I think the Coach Course should definitely focus more on teaching canopy control. - Dan G
  11. Why just don't you just use the standard SC Parse subroutine? Any idiot can tell what you meant was that "Driving" is a one D activity. It is also a one R activity, two I, one N, and one G. Then spend the next four pages defending to the death your newly defined position. - Dan G
  12. Well, since the OP's question is bullshit, it's kind of hard to answer it. No one has called for Obama's impeachment for war crimes. Some have said that our participation in the No-Fly Zone over Libya is unconstitutional since he didn't receive Congressional authorization, but there has been no claim of war crimes that I am aware of. - Dan G
  13. Why was everything Bush did okay, but (as you claim) Obama does the same thing you don't like it? - Dan G
  14. Abu Ghraib was a systemic and intentional committing of war crimes from the highest level down. The situations are not the same at all, and the media should not treat them the same. Please respond. - Dan G
  15. Can you write a complete sentence for once? You are not making an argument, so I can't respond. Get back to me when you have something to say. - Dan G
  16. This was an isolated group of as few as two men committing atrocities. Abu Ghraib was a systemic and intentional committing of war crimes from the highest level down. The situations are not the same at all, and the media should not treat them the same. - Dan G
  17. You're a skydiver when you stop caring if you're a skydiver. - Dan G
  18. You want to stay close to them, but don't orbit around the student. Your job is to provide a stable reference point. If you orbit while they turn, they'll never realize they are turning. - Dan G
  19. How would privatization of liquor sales affect availability? I'm not getting how one is related to the other. I agree that reducing or eliminating the drinking age would probably result in less binge drinking and drunk driving behavior. We also need to enforce much stricter penalties for drunk driving. - Dan G
  20. That's what she said. Sorry, I couldn't help it. This is Bonfire, right? - Dan G
  21. I have never, ever, ever claimed to have evidence related to the existence of God. My position, which is clearly different from Ron's, is that no such evidence exists either way. I don't argue very vociferously about this at all, you must have me confused with someone else. I just don't like to be told that I'm ignoring evidence that doesn't exist. - Dan G
  22. This is why religious people are so maddening. You ask them a simple question, and they never give a straight answer. If my point is not obvious enough, here it is: your personal experiences can't be taken as evidence by anybody but yourself. Stop trying to claim you have evidence of the existence of God. Just man up and admit that your faith is based on faith. It's okay, I really don't care what you believe, but to insinuate that other people are being foolish by ignoring your evidence is obnoxious. - Dan G
  23. Do you believe that the trinity of Jesus Christ, the Holy Father, and the Holy Ghost is the only true God? If so, you must accept that the Hindu is either lying, delusional, or God has tricked him. None of those cases allows you to accept his statement and not change you own beliefs. - Dan G
  24. But if a Hindu claims he spoke directly with Vishnu, how can you accept that evidence without it impacting your own beliefs? - Dan G