DaVinci
-
Content
3,518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by DaVinci
-
Oaf is an attack right? You can't play fair so you attack people. You wanna talk about contempt? Act like an adult, or don't play in an adult world. Saddam killed many people. Just because it happend does not make it right. YOU, not me think he should be tortured. I realize he was a criminal. But, I don't think defending the thought of torturing him is a good reflection on you. I am done here. You support the right to torture and then attack anyone who disagrees with you. Grow up.
-
You were THERE and saw that? Or are you going off of one guys word? Maybe he ran the red light and the cop let him off that charge? He admitted to TAKING IT OFF and then trying to SNEAK it back on. reread what he wrote. If I saw a guy trying to SNEAK something, I would not bet he did it right the first time. Well he ran a red, not a yellow according to the cop, and he was seen putting on his seatbelt after he stopped. You mean like running a red light?
-
No, wanting a guy to be tortured so you can feel better is just as bad as what Saddam did. I wanted justice for Saddam, but torture was unneeded and wanting it makes you as bad as him.
-
Fact is that stops people from driving drunk. What, you think they are not looking for clearly drunk drivers? They do both.
-
Hey stud. In this case the guy ran a yellow or red light (not an issue since he didn't get a ticket for it. The ADMITTED to taking it off and then trying to sneak it back on. The cop sees a guy try to sneak his seat betl back on and thinks he didn't have it on in the first place...How many folks try to sneak on a seat belt when stopped? He would have had a much better change to just claim to have taken it off than trying to claim he was sneaking it back on. As for the license, cops do not need to know laws from other states. Sheesh.
-
Has anyone here proved retaliation for going on disability?
DaVinci replied to dweeb's topic in Speakers Corner
You can be a pain as long as you don't violate acceptable conduct rules. I have had employees I really wished I could have fired, but they were well within their rights to say or do what they were doing. -
No soup for you!!!!
-
You credability just went to zero. He was *elected*, twice even. And he will be out of power in two more years. Of course if he is in power in three years I will be wrong and will appologize to you. But for right now....Keep smoking what you have been smokin'. Good luck with that.
-
Then you become as bad as him.
-
Has anyone here proved retaliation for going on disability?
DaVinci replied to dweeb's topic in Speakers Corner
I'd like to know if he got fired for: 1. Being Gay 2. Going on stress leave. 3. Arguing the point. 1 and 2 I would think he has a case, but #3 maybe not. It all depends on how he "argued". He could have easily violated his companies acceptable conduct rules. -
It is not anything other than showing respect and doing everthing you can to make the cop feel safer as he approaches the vehicle. You don't have to do it, but it is nice and they have a hard and dangerous job. Simple fact is he saw the seatbelt being put on. The person admitted to it. I guess you think cops should have Xray vision.
-
sure, but so should guys with 1,000's of jumps always get gear checks. That does not happen either. It is human nature. I doubt he would lose his job. I work with professional drivers and have gone on check rides with them. They don't follow all the rules ALL the time. In fact, I bet very few do.
-
I provide logical reason why, you answer with nonsense. Do you really think that the Iraqi's could provide the same level of security as the US Army? Being that Saddam was maybe the largest Profile Prisoner in the WORLD. Add in that Saddam was being held in the middle of a WAR ZONE. Don't you think the most secure troops should be guarding Saddam?
-
Why you like snuff films? I am glad the guy is dead, but have no real desire to see it.
-
Yes, but in this case we have a guy claiming to run a yellow...Could have been red or yellow, we don't know. But he didn't get a ticket for that, so it is not an issue here. Then he took of his seatbelt, and then claims to try and put it back on. If the cop saw him putting it back on then it is easy to assume that the cop thought he was trying to pull a fast one. The license being expired... The cop may not know Ohio law. That is not his fault unless he is in Ohio. None of this could lead to this cop being "crooked".
-
Not really. If the US and Britian had tried him, Gaddaffi would be saying the Iraqi's should have.
-
Not a puppet, just not as able. It makes sense for the group that can ensure security to pull security. It only points out how the Iraqi's and not as good as the US in the security of prisoners, not a "puppet" anything.
-
There you go confusing the haters with facts again...How dare you? Also, what is wrong with ALLOWING a book to be sold? It is not required reading, it is an option to buy one if you like. I do like the quote above about not having a problem with God, only his fan club...Thats some funny shit!
-
Coke vs new Coke. God said 'eye for an eye', then comes Jesus saying 'well now just turn the other cheek'. So God was wrong? An Amendment to the Bible? Three things about True Christains for ya: 1. Inquisition 2. Crusaides 3. Witch Trials
-
Maybe it is just like experienced jumpers do not always get gear checks? They spend so much time driving that they most likely let things slip.
-
There are conflicting reports on who has control. One Iraqi offical noted that the US will maintain custody until minites before the execution. An AP release said it had already been done. Rumors point to Saturday.
-
And you don't bother looking at anything else as normal. You are just pissed you can't do something and ranting again. That's clear, you also don't use critical thinking at all. You post your opinions, yet expect people to give them the same weight as evidence. As soon as someone questions the validity of your statements you cry it is just an opinion, but act like they should just accept them. Sheesh.
-
Proof, or are you just ranting again? You try and hit me for making it personal...What the hell is this then? I just used your own words..."How abiut the fact that they write tickets for the very thing they do? I feel seatbelts are a hazzard, but if I do not wear mine ans gte caught, I get a ticket." Sounds personal already to me. OH PLEASE, give us your vaild reasons then....I'll wait. Plus I already tried to explain that if you have a good reason you will not get cited. You, of course, ignored anything that disproves you...AGAIN. You are the one using the poorly written article as "proof".
-
More impressed than a guy with no education.
-
You mean like you just did in this same post "I expect my President to be pretty positive about the causes to which he commits our young troops and countless civilian lives. And that cause ought to be something signicantly more important than trying to prove he's got a bigger dick than his father" Do you have proof that is the reason? Valid bitch, but you are not all. I know people who supported the war and now are against it just due to the length. GWB and Co made some really bad choices. No argument. But, people who supported the war need to accept that they also own part of the situation. Lets not forget that GWB and Co was voted in again. What kind of message do you think that sends? He has a BA from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. Also he is President and has been elected TWICE. So he may be smarter than you claim.