jakee

Members
  • Content

    24,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jakee

  1. What? White privilege does not mean that every single white person is always treated better than every single black person, and it is indeed pure nonsense to suggest that any individual examples disprove it. Amazing the lengths that racists will go to convince themselves they're not racist.
  2. Yep, I talk about issues, you talk trash. Both true to form. Do you think you're the only one of us who has lived experiences? Or you think you're at the perfect age where you've experienced enough to know stuff, but anyone younger definitely hasn't? Either way, you seem to be having a major sense of homour failure. Happens a lot with you, eh?
  3. Too bad we only have a limited understanding of it.
  4. Ok.... Well, um, congratulations on being old?
  5. Solidly in the minuses. Relevance?
  6. Someone did. Holly came from Miami, F.L.A. Hitch-hiked her way across the U.S.A. Plucked her eyebrows on the way Shaved her legs and then he was a she She says, "Hey, babe Take a walk on the wild side" Lou Reed, 1972
  7. jakee

    COI

    You didn't say what his logic was. Though given the evidence you've presented here on numerous occasions, it probably was indisputable.
  8. Yeah, and cops who think about crime all day are by definition criminals.
  9. jakee

    COI

    You seem to have some more specific point you want to make. What is it?
  10. Of course I know you’re talking about him. Now you’re just trying to confuse the issue even further. And again, how can you make a black and white statement that he is always a rat when your evidence (that he is just dishonest) is unrelated to him currently being a rat? And even further, how can you judge that a one time rat and current liar is always a rat, when you vehemently disagree with the judgement that a one time fraudster and current liar can’t be trusted? And yet you didn’t know the thought process behind my statements when you judged them to mean no one ever changes (even though you suggested that far more strongly than I did), that they were black and white, and that they came from lack of thought. How did you come to that conclusion? Do you think you’re special? Can you see my thoughts but I can’t see yours?
  11. It's nice to see you're keeping up your solid track record of backing up your arguments with substance. You must be so proud of yourself.
  12. You say that... but what on earth were they thinking was going to happen? They bought him on to talk about cancel culture because his Twitter was suspended, they knew full well it was suspended because he wouldn't shut up about election fraud, then they tried to ask him specifically about the suspension of his Twitter without letting him talk about the election fraud theories that led to it being suspended. How did they picture it going any better than it did? Not only is the irony delicious, but Newsmax by the end of the clip are like a guy who's just spent all day digging a massive hole in his yard and now wonders why he's stuck in a massive hole in his yard.
  13. Funny that a guy currently hanging out with lots of untrustworthy criminals wouldn;t want them to know he once ratted out some criminals. But even then, it doesn't mean 'once a rat, always a rat' does it? How can you be so black and white even about just him when your only evidence is unrelated? Because saying something completely different to what you originally said is not clarification, especially when you continue to insist that what you originally said was completely correct.
  14. Why do you think they should be so special? Why do you want the elites to be so far removed from the common life experience?
  15. That's fine. If insane people want to elect an insane person that's up to them. That's wrong. She's a politician in a national assembly, with input on national policy who votes on national matters. It doesn't matter that only her district can elect her, she is in a position where her actions can effect everyone in the country, so everyone in the country can say whatever shit they want about it. Further, the problem with Greene is not just that she was elected, it's that the rest of the Republican party instantly rewarded her for being a lunatic. A hardcore school shooting denier being rewarded with a place on the education committee (not just the Georgia education committee, the everywhere education committee)? It's beyond perverse. BTW, the saying Jerry was searching for is not "there's a bad apple in every barrel" it is 'one bad apple spoils the barrel", and right now her rot is spreading fast.
  16. You know 4 people who found the vaccine in the trash and somehow administered it to themselves?
  17. You're being dishonest and slimy again. You said either through vaccines or exposure, while you were arguing against lockdowns. Since without intrusive NPIs and lockdowns the pandemic would have been far more widespread even than it is now, you have been advocating for us to try and achieve herd immunity without vaccination simply by letting anyone and everyone be infected and screw the death toll. That is what you were arguing, and to try and say now 'oh I only meant herd immunity through vaccination' is clear and obvious bullshit.
  18. You have just described one major component of what white privilege is. A white racist judge who has not been arse kicked, removed or otherwise sanctioned is someone who white defendants will be privileged to stand in front of. So unless you either believe he is the only white racist judge around, or that there are just as many black racist judges as white racist judges (both absurdly unlikely) then yes, this is also about white privilege in general. How could you possibly say otherwise?
  19. And did you not bother to look into any of those sources beyond those snapshots, or did it not bother you that you were quoting people who's interpretations of the same data lead them to state that the virus was disappearing all on its own?
  20. Point of clarification - were you being deliberately deceptive when you justified your anti-lockdown stance by quoting a guy who thought Covid was going to disappear last spring, or are you really that bad at evaluating sources?
  21. Hehe yeah, it's funny how the Right is always projecting these days. They believe the Democrats stole an election because they know their own party would have done it in a heartbeat if they could, and they believe the mainstream media is part of a coordinated pro-democrat plot because they can see their own journalists acting as the propaganda arm of the Trump administration and the MAGA movement.
  22. That is no different to what the media is reporting. And there's two things here - the fact that some members of the crowd had planned in advance to assault the Capitol does not mean they would have managed it if Trump had not incited the rest of the crowd to join in. Second, the reason that some people were planning to assault the Capitol in the first place is because Trump had just spent months telling them the election was stolen and the people in the Capitol were facilitating the theft. Now I don't see any real prospect of Trump being criminally tried and convicted over this, but it is crystal clear that it is his responsibility. He made it happen. What's the alternative explanation - the first time in 150 years that a candidate loudly and continuously claims the election was stolen by fraud is also the first time a violent crowd invades the Capitol during the counting of the votes but it's all just a big coincidence?
  23. No. Zombie was saying that a person who was convicted multiple times for theft and fraud, and is the current leader of a violent domestic terror group could be trusted implicitly, but a person who once helped convict other criminals is a rat, a liar and cannot be trusted at all. I disagree with that idea. Not the way it was presented or the words used to describe it, the idea itself. The semantics started later after he got all pissy about black and white ideas right after having posted a black and white idea.