cvfd1399

That wasn't a two step, the WMD were there in 98 said Clinton, so answer me this where did they go. Those statements from YOUR side not the right.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. "There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002, "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002. "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ... Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp#88tKo51dw3ucAsmY.99 Guess Kerry and Hillary both believed GWB....

I thought your people respected the elders?

Well your missing out on a lot, he's probably the wisest and oldest here

No answer me this if Clinton had evidence(which I have never heard you dispute) where did the WMD go from what was it 98 to 2003??

Do you deny that Iraq ever had WMD at any point from say 1990-2001ish? What was Clinton looking for? Did they find the WMD then? Because your link was talking about bush looking for the trailers and it being hydrogen generators. Why reply to one thing with proof for another? Was it related to what Clinton was looking for or not.

But the people at CH in France were heros in this forum for standing up to Muslims, and posting insensitive cartoons on a daily basis ..... Consistency problems much?

I say "alleged" because just like you I wasnt there, and I don't have my hands on the top secret Intel. A few things we do have is General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force who said he personally knew about 57 flights to Syria transporting WMD. We also have http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/18/inside-the-ring-syria-iraq-and-weapons-of-mass-des/?page=all

What's your answer for the alleged 18 wheelers caught on sat driving to Syria while we "talked" for months about going over there. Also there were alleged flights that flew to Syria.. Youn know chemical weapons like the ones recently used there.... http://mic.com/articles/62103/how-did-syria-get-chemical-weapons-did-they-come-from-our-old-friend-saddam

Bzzt your projecting like kallend. 30k is right there the average starting salary just look....

Ok, so you still don't think it's a good thing for cops to stop and think about whether they're allowed to assault people over 'bullshit little laws' that they're not even sure exist? Yes, I did ask you to show me where in that link you got the 35k figure. From what I can see under national entry level average you are out by about 20% What were you looking at? Yes I think it's a good idea that they know their job I never fucking said that or hinted towards it, your putting words in my mouth just to stir the shit pot like usual. The only thing I said was your never going to be 100% on a law that can be changed by another group of people, and has no automatic accountable notification to the people who use them. Ok 30k then from that link hell I was giving you 5k towards the omg they are overpaid category which is what most most states give as hazard pay on top of their local salary. It makes my case even stronger.

I think you are the one that needs to go re-read your not making any sense, your the one that asked me to show you where I got that number from. It was in that link and it showed average staring salary to be ~35k for the US. Stop being lazy and find it for yourself within that site, like you said before, and that's all I have to say about that.

I don't think it attracts those types of people it's just the simple fact that you can't bottle Mother Nature up, people have needs and if you try to not let it take course it will mess up their head. People gotta fuck plain and simple. Look at what happens in prison.

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Police_Officer/Salary Sorry forgot to add it in post #30 besides like you told me before stop being lazy and Google for yourself isn't that what you said????

I'm not sure I believe it was Afghanistan. The premise is that back 50+ years ago parts or all of it(I wasn't there only saw old photos) was a modern society with for today's standard of Islam a lax in modesty and women's oppression. I'm guessing the landscape was changed by the wars, but what made the society change? Women back then were encouraged to talk, went to school and wore calf length skirts.

Three handed priest from Fukushima.

He can't answer a false statement presented as a question. Take a hint that's why he hasn't answered it. Possibly retry and ask him about the resolution vote, that has facts in it, and the facts show it was bipartisan vote along with overwhelming support from Americans. Regardless of what bush stood up there and said Americans wanted blood, and in the process got rid of a lot of bad people, and a ruthless dictator in the process. Quit blaming this on bush if anything blame it on American thirst for blood and revenge!

What happened in the Middle East since the 50's iirc. People show pictures of them at the beaches, out socalizing, the city's are landscaped, irrigated, women are not rolled into a bed sheet, it almost looked civilized. Was it a reimmergance of religion that put them back in the stone ages?

Walking is another story, but a cop looking to pull a vehicle over does not have to make up a reason in America. You wait a mile or two and every driver will eventually speed, not use blinker, tailgate, text, cross divided line, not have seat belt on, etc, etc

You think salaries and cost of living has always been high ever since San Jose existed? These generally go up together over time, and what you said makes no sense. We are comparing salaries and cost of living which is basically purchasing power, and as long as they are equal in a certain area which in both of my examples they are your buying power is the same, and using that 75k starting salary to try and say cops are paid too much isn't being truthful when the average as I have shown is around 35k. High cost of living-high salary~low cost of living-low salary.

Please tell me the cost of living difference in Baton Rouge vs San Jose. Then insert those two salaries, and reevaluate your comment. As stated above cherry picking salaries without taking this into account is deceitful.

"The truth about Benghazi"-What does it matter anymore. By Hillary Clinton.

Not sure if real life, or a screenplay for a bad cop movie!

I have no clue...it was a joke I'm agnostic.

Nice