funjumper101

Members
  • Content

    1,348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by funjumper101

  1. A load of bullshit from a right wing conservative site. Shrub did more on these lines than Obama ever could. Stupid right wing moron reposting lies again. Don't you asholes ever even TRY to think critically? Apparently not.
  2. Once again, the False News Network dupes the gullible by LYING!!! According to the article linked, many folks were convicted of election REGISTRATION fraud. Right Wing Morons, registration fraud means that an attempt was made to fraudently REGISTER to vote. Election fraud is when an ACTUAL VOTE is cast fraudulently. One of the two things can actually affect the outcome of an election. The other can't affect the outcome of an election AT ALL. Can you tell which is which? Are you morons so incredibly STUPID and easily deceived? The answer is obviously YES WE ARE. When you idiots come up with actual examples of widescale ELECTION fraud, there may be something to be concerned about. The recent example of WIDESCALE election fraud occurred in Ohio in 2004 and resulted in Shrub getting another four years to destroy the USA, a task at which he was quite successful. You complete dumbasses are an embarassment to anyone with half a clue.
  3. WWWAAAAAHHHH, you hurt my FEEEELLLIIINNNGGSSS What are you, some kind of closet liberal whiner? I DESPISE the so called "conservatives" that know squat about morals, ethics, and consistency in their positions. WWWAAAHHHH my feelings are hurt!!!!!! Harden up and take the insults and demeaning attitude like an adult. You right wing dimwits sure don't pull any punches when referring to liberals and progressives. Insulting me because I read and understand history, and have lived through a good part of it, happens often. Fuckin pussies... they can dish it out, but they can't take it AT ALL The worthless right wing followers HATE Pelosi because she is really, really good at her job, and the RWC leaders can't stand that. The right wing dickhead that accuses Pelosi of violating the rules is a complete and utter moron. The Senate is the one who jacked up the rules. I thought you RWC shitheads believed in "majority rules". Situational ethics are indefensible, and yet there you go. You useless motherfuckers will rot in hell. Permanent ban coming up.... goodbye you useless bastards. Thanks for ruining the USA.
  4. I totally understand the hatred of Pelosi from the Right Wing Dimwits that get their information from the RWC echo chamber. That woman was and is one of the most effective SOH this country has ever had. Every single major issue that the Administration wanted to get through the house made it through to the Senate. The Rescums in the Senate grossly abused the rules to block further progress, so we ended up in the current really fucked up condition. The Rescums successfuly marketed their disgusting abuse of Senate rules as a failure of Democrats. Marketed to the credulous dimwits that consistently vote against their own best interests. RWCs absolutely HATE effective government. According their so called principles, the less government, the better. The primary goal of the movement is to allow the wealthiest and most powerful to continue to skew the economy to their benefit, at the expense of the average citizen. As the rich own the media and essentially control the message, RW dimwits buy the marketing of policies that are REALLY BAD for them and their families. Blame is assigned to "liberals", when the reality is quite different. We, the USA, are well on the way to becoming another Mexico or Argentina where there is a very small cadre of really rich families that control the economy. The rest of the population scrapes by on the crumbs left by the extremely wealthy. Rich people can't safely travel by ground transportation in much of Argentina. Gated communities and private security/armies are the norm. Is that the USA you want your kids to live in? Congratulations, you're going to get it, thanks to your support of policies that are really bad for all who pay FICA taxes on 100% of their income. A perfect example of RWC insanity is the battle they plan to wage over the expiration of the Shrub tax cuts. These are the same assholes that spew about the horror of budget deficits, while, with straight faces, plan to add 700 BILLION in borrowed money to the budget deficit, to pay for the tax cut extension for the extremely wealthy. ALL of the tax cuts should be allowed to expire. All of them, for everyone. We can't keep mortgaging the country to China, or we are screwed. The entire country would appreciate it if you dimwits actually woke up and started to hold your team to some semblance of accountability with regard to their stated positions. When what you PLAN to do is totally at odds with what you SAY you believe in, it should not be allowed to pass unchallenged. Thanks to the RW dimwits, the country is on the road to ruin, cheereed on by the dimwits.
  5. So what is untrue about that ad? Further on the original question . . . Even ABC questions if the comment was fair. Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? What you posted is quite funny. The liars who have been caught are saying that they didn't really do what they did, even though the facts say otherwise. Their own financial statements are what one can use to establish a FACTUAL opinion. The statements show that the USCOC accepted international donations, deposited the funds in their general account, and used funds from the general account to pay for the advertisments in question. Transferring equivalents funds to other accounts is not accepted accounting practice for the type of organization the USCOC is. If a progressive or Democratic organization did such a thing, the howls of "MONEY LAUNDERING" from Faux news, Lush Rimjob, etc, would be deafening. It is amazing what you can get away with when the right wing media machine dislikes the truth. The USCOC is saying "Trust us. We have internal accounting procedures to launder the donations, so what actually happens is not what is shown in our own financial statements." Are RWCs really that gullible? Answer = YES!!!!
  6. Prove a negative? Sure as soon as you prove God doesn't exist. In other words, in your opinion, the content is untue, but can't come up with any facts to support your OPINION. There are plenty of individual facts available that show each point of the advertiment to be true. The summary of the facts = the USCOC is spending foreign donations on advertisments in support of Republican candidates. That is against US law. The folks responsible should be held accountable. RWCs have strong opinions that usually have little to no basis in fact. Here is yet another case of that rearing it's ugly head.
  7. Can you identify what portion of the content you believe to be false? If one reads factual news content, and international news content, one knows that none of the content of the TV commercial can be proven to be factually wrong. Give it a go and report back for us. Details and cites as to the source of information that factually debunks the ad content would be good. PR postings on the USCOC's website doesn't count. Kinda sucks to be on the receiving end of this kind of public relations campaign for a change, doesn't it? It had to start happening. At least the DNC uses accurate info that can be verified. In other words, they haven't yet acheived the ability to lie shamelessly, as the the RWCs have. The USCOC has been taking foreign money donations, mixing it in with domestic donations, then taking advantage of the new rules of spending implemented by the psychotic Roberts court. The spending is on ads that will influence voters. The USCOC denied the facts, but their own financial statements make a lie of the denial. The USCOC is severely Right Wing Conservative. They are no friend at all to any person who pays FICA tax on 100% of their income.
  8. Yawn.... so 2000. And STILL totally made up. 1. "Court packed with father & son appointees" Your math is not very good: Ginsberg selected by Clinton. Scalia by Reagan. Kennedy by Reagan Breyer by Clinton Sotomayor by Obama Kagan by Obama That leaves 3, 1 by HW, 2 by W Bush. 2. "which in fact "elected" the son" Your history is not very good..... "W" could not have appointed any until AFTER he was elected. Typical... and totally wrong. RWCs labor under the illusion that Reagan was a good president and that he actually was in charge during the time he held the office. The reality is that he was all fucked up by Alzheimers disease when he was elected. It got much worse during his second term. Bush 1 was running the show. Anyone who thinks otherwise was not an aware adult during those times. Bush 1 was blackmailed by Clinton's team into running a really shitty attempt at a second term. Clinton won the battle, but lost the war, as the rescums went after him for jacking around Bush 1. RWCs have been busy ruining the USA since Reagan "won" the election. The results of the war on the middle class got us where we are today. The RWCs are leading the charge right down the toilet. They are VERY proud of their success in ruining the USA.
  9. I'm not a big fan of Bush, but I'm on his side on this one, at least in terms of his right to have made that decision. It would clearly be unreasonable to interpret the 1st to mean that the president has an obligation to listen individually to the views of each and every one of the 300 million Americans. Even in 1790, when the 1st was written and the population was only 4 million, that would have been unreasonable. Clearly the founders intended that the president be able to make choices in who he listens to. Since he is properly the boss of the Executive Branch, he gets to listen to anyone he chooses to in carrying out his duties. She wasn't denied the right to express her views. Bush simply refused to listen. That was certainly his prerogative. A more complete lack of comprehension of the facts of the matter cannot be possible. RWCs simply can't hang with facts. Then they spew tripe that has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Awesome... This country really IS fucked. People this clueless vote in elections...
  10. Shrub's staff is allowed to be the thought police? You can be excluded form a "public appearance" by the President, simply because of what the staff believes you may or may not think? That seems like a funny Saturday Night live skit. It sure isn't anything that should have actually happened in the USA. If you, the President, are too chickenshit to speak to all of the citizens, not just your followers, you aren't qualified to hold the job. The fact that POTUS is a PUBLIC SERVICE job, where you are President of all of the citizens, not just your minions, used to mean something. They work for us, remember? All of us. They can speak to all of us. Intentionally disruptive people can be arrested and removed as needed. Penalties for such behavior should be severe. Blocking part of the public from "public appearances" of elected politicians is quite simply wrong. Especially when the criteria for preventing attendance is so randomly judged and applied.
  11. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sc-dc-1013-court-speech-20101012,0,2098135.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fmostviewed+%28L.A.+Times+-+Most+Viewed+Stories%29 She was removed from the audience because of an antiwar bumper sticker on her car. The justices, on a 7-2 vote, let stand a ruling that the action by Bush aides did not violate the 1st Amendment. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court turned down a lawsuit today against aides to former President George W. Bush for having ejected a Colorado woman from one of his public speeches because her car had a bumper sticker that said "No More Blood for Oil." By a 7-2 vote, the court let stand a ruling that held the president is free to select his audience at public speeches and to have his aides remove persons who may disagree with him. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, saying the Constitution does not permit officials to exclude persons simply "for holding discordant views." The Bush White House had a policy of excluding dissidents and protesters from the president's public appearances. In several lawsuits that arose, aides said they wanted to prevent critics from disrupting his speeches. In the Colorado case, however, there was no allegation that Leslie Weise, a clean-energy consultant, had protested or threatened the president. She had obtained a ticket to an event in Denver in 2005 where the president was due to speak about Social Security. But when aides to Bush learned of the bumper sticker on her car, they had her removed from her seat and escorted away
  12. Why wait? Ignorant RWC fuckwits already blame Obama for everything else. Too bad for the fuckwits that the man has actually done more good for the everage person in the first two years than Shrub, Poppy, and Raygunz did during all of their terms. Not that RWCs ever let minor details like FACTS affect their opinions. Keep watching Faux News and listening to the drug addled gas bag. It is totally obvious that they have the best interests of the average citizen at the core of their values... NOT!!
  13. Turnover and term limits have been proven to be a disaster where they have been voted into existence. The California budget FUBAR can be directly attributed to the lack of professional politicians in Sacramento. Two terms and gone means no one is around long enough to really understand how to make the system work. No one is around long enough to get to know each other and learn to work together. No one is around long enough to build any kind of coalition to actually accomplish anything meaningful. Constantly hiring new rookies for the important job of governing is insane. You don't intentionally hire a rookie heart surgeon, car mechanic, house contractor, or other professsional. Why would any sane person want to constantly hire rookie politicians? The results of term limits does tie perfectly into the Republican concept that all government is BAD, especially effective government that actually taxes fairly, and guides and directs the economy for the benefit of all. By making the government completely ineffective, the incredibly wealthy folks behind the Conservative movement keep control of the wealth of the country. Funny how they keep getting a bigger and bigger slice of the economic pie, while the rest of us keep getting less and less. It used to be that a single income for a working person could support a nuclear family. Not anymore... And so many of the folks that are getting fucked by the wealthy are lubing themselves up, bending over, and hollering for MORE!!!! The facts show that the best economic times this country has ever had is when taxes on the highest earners were in excess of 50%, with really generous writeoffs for spending that income. Low taxes are no incentive for spending, as in, low taxes are not the correct answer for a consumer based economy.
  14. It depends on the context and the artist involved. Here is a clue for the nitwits whining about art displays that they may find offensive - you don't have the right to NOT be offended. Just as I have to tolerate the presence of christian sayings and the glorification of christian religious objects and symbols, you have to tolerate the mockery of those very same objects and symbols. If christian displays can be hosted in publicly funded art museums, then those same art museums can host art that mocks those displays. The USA is very diverse and has lot of different kinds of people, with different kinds of beliefs. That is what makes this a great country. Forcing everyone into a certain way of thinking or being is not the American way. Quite the contrary. WTF is wrong with people these days? Is the concentrated ownership of the media, and the unified messages presented by them, that convincing to the people these days? Whatever happened to independent thinking and critical anaysis? Too much TV, not enought reading, video games and test based education seem to have withered those qualities away.
  15. I found the statute in regard to dealing with trespassers in Texas. Basically, it states that the property owner must have his property posted and in the event of a trespasser(s), the property owner can verbally tell them to leave and should get good descriptions and report it to police. Actually, it says to 'avoid' confrontation but nothing about holding them at gun-point. Chuck So, in other words, you parroted the RWC talking points on this matter. Talking points that have little to no basis in fact. The talking points sure sounded real good, right up until you fact checked them. Then you come to the realization that you have been lied to, and have repeated those lies in error. You might just be able to break free from the RWC mindset and start thinking for yourself. BRAVO!!! The lesson for ALL RWCs is that fact-checking is really important, when it comes to the information presented to you by your preferred sources. Faux News is STILL litigating to establish the right to force newsreaders to broadcast information that the newsreaders KNOW to be factually incorrect. This is quite a departure from the journalistic ethics to which respectable organizations adhere to.
  16. When it comes to law enforcement, RWCs always pretend to act like they think that the standards should be applied equally. When the USA engaged in kidnapping and torturing folks, nothing was done while it happened. After a good portion of the facts of the matter came out, I don't recall hearing anything from the RWCs that called for the perpetrators of the crime to be held accountable. Quite the opposite. I heard nothing but EXCUSES as to why the perpetrators of this international crime should be allowed to get away with it. Spare us the bullshit about equal treatment under the law. RWCs don't actually believe that for a minute, as shown by ACTIONS, not words.
  17. I suspect the application of the law is different. As I mentioned to Billvon, it seems that way. In my search, I found several cases where illegals sued land-owners because the land-owner held them for authorities. One illegal recieved $77,000.00 in 'damages'. Noone took into account that the illegal had a very long rap-sheet! Sounds to me like too many 'liberal' judges! Chuck I am really looking forward to the links to the factually correct, well documented cases of tort abuse Chuck writes about. For the record, my results in searching concur with GeorgiaDon's results. RWC bullshit rearing it's ugly head from some weird blog? Faux News content? What will the links go to? I am really looking forward to this.
  18. Today's challenge to ignorant right wing conservatives is - What criminal law has been broken when a person enters the USA and establishes residence without the proper documentation? Note - this is a trick question as it requires one to know the difference between civil and criminal law. A larger hint towards the correct answer cannot be provided. It will be interesting to see how many of the BRILLIANT RWCs come up with the correct answer to the question. Illegal entry is, by definition, illegal whether it's a criminal law or civil law (such as 8 USC 1325) being broken. Nice attempt at a misdirect, though.j Today's challenge to ignorant left wing liberals is - Realizing that illegality isn't solely a matter of breaking criminal law. Ignorant RWCs can't tell the difference betwen right and wrong, and the difference between facts and falsehoods, much less civil and criminal offenses. Facts matter. The facts are that illegal immigrants have committed civil violations, not criminal violations. To anyone with a remote understanding of the law, that is a huge distinction. RWCs claim to belive in law and order, when it comes to issues important to radio entertainers and Faux News. RWCs have ZERO concern when it comes to the crimes of GWB, Cheney, Woo, and the whole criminal conspiracy that was ShrubCo. In other words, RWCs have NO standing when it comes to complaints about illegal activities. You actively engage in them, and support and defend the most egregious criminals of this century. I don't understand why RWCs HATE this country so much. If you actually cared you would try to do something about the crimes, like quit voting for the scumbags.
  19. Today's challenge to ignorant right wing conservatives is - What criminal law has been broken when a person enters the USA and establishes residence without the proper documentation? Note - this is a trick question as it requires one to know the difference between civil and criminal law. A larger hint towards the correct answer cannot be provided. It will be interesting to see how many of the BRILLIANT RWCs come up with the correct answer to the question.
  20. Being a witch, no problem. Being a crazed individual that will say anything to get attention and on TV, speaks quite a bit about her motives to do anything. I realize we live in the country of "Jerry Springer", but let's not have those people running our government; ok? ...... Says the party of Al Franken and Allen Grayson Oh wait, they are Normal Democrats. Time to circle the wagons, defend away..... When RWCs whine about Democratic politicians, one can be sure that the Democratic Politicians are intelligent, wel spoken, and really smart. These characteristics are the opposite of the Republican politicians. Ignorant idiots like John McCain and Michelle Bachman are perceived to be worth a shit by the moroins who are RWCs. Quite the opposite is true. RWCs are too stupid to really understand the issues. They parrot talking points with no comprehension, then wonder why us smart folks laugh at them and call them names. You scumbags are dragging the country down. You copntribute NOTHING positive to the political discourse.
  21. I guess that there are many out there that don't understand the US Census Bureau and what they do. They don't understand statistics, especially when the statistics show things that they don't like. They don't bother to educate thenselves as to what the real meaning of the statistics are, how the conclusions were reached, and what the causes for the drastic changes were. Instead, they post ignorant bullshit on Internet forums. Bullshit that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Bullshit that attempts to compare apples to ju-ju fruit candy. The USA slips ever faster towards second world economic status, cheered on by these very same people. Very depressing...
  22. You're ignoring the sensitive nature of the locations of these two respective establishments. That gives just cause to reconsider the placement of them. The so called "hallowed ground" of lower Manhattan hosts porn shops and bars within the "two blocks from Ground Zero" zone. Porn shops that have been opened since 9/11/01. There is a gay bay with an S&M theme about a block from the site. According to what I have heard, it opened in 2004 or 2005. Given the REALITY of zoning in lower Manhattan, the concept of lower Manhattan being "hallowed ground" is a fiction marketed to credulous nitwits by callous politicians. There definitely is no shortage of credulous nitwits on the right. Clearly the folks who have fallen for this particular marketing scheme have never been anywhere near lower Manhatttan.
  23. ShrubCo used reconciliation to pass TEMPORARY tax cuts, because they could not pass them any other way. Reconciliation, you know, that horrible trick that the evil Obama administration used. The TEMPORARY tax cuts are to expire, as scheduled, and the rescums are whipping the ignorant sheeple into a frenzy over the issue. How can it NOT be ShrubCo's fault that the Democrats are going to allow the tax cuts to END AS PLANNED, in the legislation that passed? Are you people really that stupid and easily led? The answer is a resounding YES, WE ARE!!! You bitch about the record defecits, but want to borrow BILLIONS of dollars to pay for the tax cuts for the top three percent of households in the USA. It is hard to believe that you all are that stupid, but there it is, the facts don't lie.
  24. Why don't you give credit where credit is due? Your beloved rescumlicans took a quality health care bill and twisted into the fucked up piece of crap that passed. If you sons of bitches would get out of the way, the country could make real progress towards cleaning up the mess CREATED by the rescumlicans. Corporate ownership of the media means the message delivered make the sheeple blame the Democrats for the lack of progress. They don't say much of anything about the complete obstruction of EVERYTHING by the rescums. Thanks for cheering on the ruination of the USA. I am sure you are very proud of the success in this endeavor.
  25. Are Right Wing Conservatives too stupid to comprehend the most excellent news source called "The Onion"? The answer is YES, WE ARE!!! and proud of it.