rhys

Explain so I do not repeat please. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Eeeeer, I would have thought the discovery if highly engineerd incendiaries, the residue they produce and in abundence in the rubble would be exactly that. You are ignoring that fact. Are you really that ignorant? Or are you blind to things that do not fit with your belief system. This entire thread fits the desciption of your request. but you chose to ignore it like everybody else that is up to thier eyeballs in guilt for not seeing reason earlier, and are responsable for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people. These murders are also ommited from the daily news and, replaced by drug addicted crack whore actresses doing stupid things to keep you all entertained while crimes of vast proportions are carried out with your name on them. Ignorence is bliss, but you have the blood of many peoples lives on your hands by ignoring tangible evidence. your call. I'll keep my integrety while you stick you your straw man arguments, ignoring facts (and the entire thread) and defending corrupt criminals that could care less about you. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

why do you thin people steal stuff when they are on meth? They steal stuff because it is illegal and highly addictive, this pushed the price up, so they need more, and with no money they tend to steal other peoples property to get the funds to purchase it. So now you have goods and revenue in the black market making illegal drug cartels very influential, leading to much worse crimes like murder to defent their powerful position. If it was legal, the price would be low, the crack heads would not have to steal to get it, and the vicious circle would be broken. This is a similar scenario to what happened with alcohol prohibition. You are too 'inside the square', and need to think about thigs little more in depth. Propoganda is the reason you think the way you do, not reason. Hemp, has much more benifits to our society and ecology than , cotton, crude, plastic etc... I bet you don;t even think about that? "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Awesome rigging on that boat. the pirae costume is a nice touch. Cool photo "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

So 'many sizes' equates to uniform size in your mind? Or are you saying you beleive random occurences can produce completely uniform results, and can be formed by incineration and produce a composition that is highly reactive to fire yet unreacted? Do you realise how extremely unlikely your suggestion is? How are the samples questionable? and what is subjective about tangible, photgraphed and documented evidence that has been scrutinised by professonals with expertise in the field of such analysis and tested with repeatable results? Do you even acknowledge the credentials of these guys or do you assume nobody can know more than you do? I think I found a picture of you (attached) "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Ok then sherlok, show us one example of these types of particles existing 'together' that are uniform in size, shape and composition and bound in a carbon matrix. On one side here i getting, this is paint, and on the other side i am getting these are naturally occuring substances. neither arguments are acknowledging that Nanothermite is only produced by dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process. Once again showing thier complete ignorance. I have given you the recources to know this stuff, but you don't wish to acknowledge it. why? "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Good on you bro, i see your enthusiasm has not deminished one little bit... great to see. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano-thermite The chips are constructed of these particles, and uniform is a scientific term. Your argument is weak and ignorant. If you are forced to tweak the information in order to push your point then you must ask youself why. Once again you ignore the composition of the subsatnce; thermite. It ingnites (violently) and produces the same iron spheres also found in abundence in the dust and clearly pointed out in the paper with photographs of them actually fused to the chips. This substance may well have been painted on the steel, but generally iron oxide is not good for anti corrosion on steel and alumino thermitic coctails are not good for fire protection. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

What like half of building 7 being scooped out by the debris as reported by popular mechanics and then somhow emitted from the final NIST report? Or Popular Mechanics reporting that the terrorist hijackers were identified by DNA evidence So they found the remains of the hijackers (unreported) and had a dna sample before hand to identify aganst? think about that for a minute... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WULRQCgvsdE Tell me one fact I ignored that is relevant to this thread, we are talking about the Nano thermite paper. I have questioned plenty of things about 9/11 and there are threads about them, pull them up but this thread is about the paper and how you object to it, and what evidence or information you have to do so. I beleive none of you have the ability to debunk the paper. It is easy to say "you said this and you said that" but you are still ignoring the nano thermite. You know, thermite that is made of 'uniform' particles only 100 Nm across, that can only be produced by very technical processes. If you don't know how big that is, 100 Nm is .0001 of a mm or 0.000003937 inches. These particles discovered are very uniform and are binded in a carbon matrix, and in abundence. The Begium guy suggest particles of this description are in abundence everywhere. Begium guy is kidding kimself. Please avoid moving the subect matter away from the subject "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

so you are saying that these elements are in abundence everywhere in uniform shapes and only 100 nanometres in length? NIST says this is paint, you say it is residue. neith of you acknowledge the 'nano' aspect of the evidence, it is there for you to study. and it is there for you to refute. yet you choose to continue to ignore this fact as your theory is renered useless once you do. UNIFORM paticles 100 Nano metres across. UNIFORM and very very small, meaning they were costructed with advance technology. Try again. Show me you peer reiviewed journal that refutes it, not simple words ignoring the FACTS. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

straw man. you are weak mate. keep the the subject. there is another thread for this debate keep it there. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

You need to read up on your history, if it were not for the CIA there would be no al quaeda, no taliban and these terrorsits would probably not be a problem. The IMC have been itching to get into the middle east for decades, this has been on the cards for decades. do you really beleve iraq was attacked for WMD's and the freedom of the iraqi people? do you really think the war on terror is primarily to reduce terror on the planet? or do you think it has contribited more? Use your brain. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

what more do you need than a peer reviewed jounal n the subject. it is up to you to show mw evidence that it is incorrect. I do not expect you to know or prove it yourself, but if you can show me where the content has been refuted professionaly, not straw manit is just paint assumptions, but thourough analysis. Unlike you I do not wish to assume anything, and any answer I could provide would simply be that. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

no i have shown that they are false, because the evidence speaks for itself. You just won't listen to it because you prefer ignorance. I agree there are plenty of confict in 9/11 truth positions, i have posted thing of interest for public scrutiny. The flyover theory at the pentagon for instance was a theory that i posted but do not beleive. there are no witnesses of a plane flying over the other side and there is a highway there.... Some peole truly beleive some things that are wrong, they have not evidence of them, and others are purposly inflitrating the movement taking advantage of the more gullable band wagoners. the true patriots you will find are stcking to the more concrete evidence. Buiding 7, its absence from the media, and it rate of collapse. the thermitic residues and the lack of reporting of the said evidence, What is it about a new investigation that everyone opposes? If 'truthers' are so wrong, where are the video tapes of a plane hittng the pentgon, you know the building that controls your militray.' the bigest military on the planet. The famous five frames do not prove anything, if anything they pose more questions. Wher eis the other footage? The NIST say there was no evidence of explosions, yet they were just forced by a FOIA request to release 5-10 terabites of data, which has firefigiters, the New york head if the fbi and other first responders all reporting and discussing secondary explosions, in the lobby of the towers. None of this makes sense. we have been lied to, people are dying and no end is in sight of either of the wars. Wouldn't some clarification be in order. Why was the collapse 'after' the initiaton not explained in the 50 million dollar NIST report? NIST have claimed the red grey chips are paint. and so have official debunkers, then why is it made of nano particles? why do they ignore the explosive composition of them? Why does primer paint ignite violently with a laser or blowtorch? why with the use of an electron micoscope can people that have expertise in the subject identify the explosive composition of the material? Is this the fireproofing that was applied the years leading up to the attacks. Gee, nano paint no expense spared there huh. Once again straw man arguments, bullshit lies,namecalling and chldish behaviour, then throw the emotional, what about the families card in there; to make the likes of you happy, and no acknowledgement of the content of the well drafted and thourough article explaining the composition of the nano thermite discovered in abundence in the dust, the iron microsperes which are the result of a aluminothermic reaction. Shyam sunder tries to say that the spheres were created in the esulting fire, yet they are found on rooftops blocks away... just keep on ignoring. She's all clear cut in your mind, but you are subject to propoganda, and mis-information. your call. It is ignored by NIST not because they are ignorant, they have vast knowledge of this type of material, they ignore it becasue they have commited high treason, and will be sujected to the death penalty, when found guilty. You ignore it because you decide to be ignorant. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

I want people to realise that the reasons we are told by the MSM for the wars are bullshit, and the real reason is recources and influence. the public won;t agree with that reason so false flag attack are neccesary to gain public approval. Do you believe they acyually thought there was weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? You opposed that war, why? "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

I gave an example, you made a tangent, i made a thread, and you continue straw man tactics because you cannot refute the evidence. Simple, I am over getting pissed about it, i'm just pointing out the weakeness of your argument. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

yes, i do realise that. But when the aluminium plates and iron oxide particles are uniform and only 100 nanometres across, as specified byu the paper you are trying to refute without actually having read it. This shows that you are simply trying to refute something that you have not acknowledged, read, understood or comprehended. befoe you try to refute something, I suggest you actually acknowledge what its content is, otherwise you look like an idiot. Rhe rest of your post is rendered useless and hypocritical, as you have proven that it is you that is the attention starved individual that wishes to push a stance on a subject that you have no knowledge of, and you try to ridicule scientists, engineers and professors that have the evidence, have studied it in great detail, ignoted it, determined it exact composition and published peer reveiwed jounals. You have doen none of this, and cannot even be bothered reading the very paper you are trying to refute. No one can refute it, it consistes of repeatable, scientific obsrvaitons. Ignoring it is all you lot can do. You can attack my integrety but you cannot attack my proof. Very exprienced professionals have composed it, I have simply read and comprehended it. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

ignorance. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

I care that a trillon or more dollars has been spent killing innocent people. Nothing has ben achieved but terrorism from allied countries on poor innocent people. You ignore the real prolems of this world, because you are subject to and a victom of intense propoganda. You place yourself higher than those that are dying in the name of profit, power and corruption. Shame on you. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

ignoring the subject and throwing insults without any substance again... typical. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

It explains that those that have taken the time look at the components of the dust in great detail have discovered red grey chips, these red grey chips ate composed of iron oxide and aluminum plates that are very uniform and about 100 nanometres in width. They ignite with a blow torch and the ignite with a laser. The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in the dust samples) 9/11 - Debunking the Debunkers - Exploding Primer Paint? NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away from the complex. There are plenty of people like yourself, and every one that has bothered to reply to the thread so far that wish to supress this evidence, teh spheres are acknowledged but unexplained. but the nano thermite is ignored as there is no reasonable explanation for it being in the dust saples other than the thermite being deposited in the buildings prior to the impact from tha airplanes, which renders the official story useless. You, have to ask me to explain because you have not even taken the time to study the evidence of this material yourself. That makes you ignorant. I do not now why I bother replying to you as you continue to ignore, and I know your stance on the subject, you ignore what you were taught is School, and you listen to lies from criminals. Unplausale lies. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

I am pointing out evidence that is tangable, documented, peer reviewed and published. it was determined with scientific and repeatable obsevations. it is there for you or anyone else to confirm. but instead you wish to be ignorant. that is your call. I suppose it is easier to be ignorant and childish, than aware. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Example please, as the title suggests, you need proof to bck up your words. i ignore stupid comments like the majority here use that try to discredit my argument with lies. If one lies to argue thier position then theier position is a lie. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Opening with a straw man statement like that is quite pathetic, keep it to the subject please. Strawman. there are no such thing a leprechauns, you need to stick to your medication you are making up fibs again. you are mixing science and religon, two completly different subjects.keep the straw man distrctions aside please. ot is anice attempt but being dishonest and putting words in someone elses mout make you a dishonest liar so your argument is rendered useless. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

You need to ask this of yourself. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix