FLYJACK

The media has an insatiable demand for commodifying cheaply acquired content.. the truth is irrelevent.

I know.. They had no maps going south. I read somewhere in the FBI docs about maps for Medford.. So, the maps they requested were for the trip south. The plane route was never intended to go south of Portland, so they didn't have the maps.

Yes, the passenger piece is the booklet in the folder,, the desk and gate rip out their pages.. That means it was unlikely Cooper even touched the gate ticket portion they have..

On the tickets.. They were not signed by the passenger.. Cooper's ticket was :773 and Mitchell's :778, only 5 tickets later. They both appear to have been written by the same agent. Cooper's ticket is likely retained by the gate clerk.. "Flight Coupon No. 1" The top original is retained by the issuing agent. Mitchell's is the "Passenger's Coupon" retained by the passenger. Mitchell paid a student fare. Both are carbon copies ripped from the book, not the top original. There were no prints of value found on Cooper's ticket.. it was probably removed from the book by the gate agent. Mitchell's ticket still has the book edging attached.

Tom has the similar tie and is still working on it.. There are so many particles and combinations it renders them almost useless.. The takeaway is the fact that there are so many...

Not necessarily an alloy.. could be a coated particle.

I sent Tom Kaye a mid sixties Pennys tie as a control, made with the same Dacron Polyester material for testing.. some of the particles are used in fire retardants, fabric dyes and in the manufacture process of Dacron Polyester. It is dark blue though and not black...

The spreadsheets are bit tricky at first, Particles are listed for stubs, they are listed by the primary ingredient then the other ingredients are listed and then broken down by percentages. With 100,000 + particles you get a massive number of combinations.. almost unusable. Ulis claimed the very very few particles of Ti SB are unique to one patent and plant, they aren't. The theory is good but the attribution is incorrect. IMO, with so many combinations you can find almost any combination and those combinations aren't necessarily alloys. The trick is to pick out a unique, rare or pure one.. and track it down.. but there are so many sources known and unknown, it is impossible to be definite. A few other problems.. We don't even know if Cooper was wearing the tie when some or all the particles were deposited. Safe to say Cooper left the tie but some particles may be pre Cooper or post Cooper. and the particles may not be from the source,,, but downstream exposure.. Like a mustard stain doesn't mean he worked in a mustard factory.

Not sure,, If I share it publicly, it will blow up this case and be stolen by others... I need to protect this for now. It is never seen evidence from a witness that can be used to eliminate a suspect but not necessarily point to a specific individual suspect.. It narrows down the suspect pool to a very very small cohort. I think it is the biggest piece of case evidence I have seen in decades..

The new evidence I have really rules out all the high profile suspects... (not that this evidence is actually needed)

Really mixed on these docs... good to see people we know but there isn't anything new.. They never move the ball.. always a rehash of what we know or often misinformation. usually disappointing, and a movie about Tina in the works... meh.. I am working on something that presents a real solution with new information.

The FP is 2 miles W of Bald Mountain

Bald Mountain not mentioned.. The tattered pants found 25 feet up in a tree were found at Green Mountain, ruled not linked to Cooper.

Nobody ever said PDX was on the westside.. PDX is roughly in the middle of Portland on the North edge, the "FBI" flightpath goes on the west of PDX and the west side of Portland. There is no conflict here. You keep making straw-man arguments.

The "FBI" flightpath has the plane passing on the west side of Portland and west of PDX... So, that is consistent and in no way supports the WFP. I really don't think you have any argument whatsoever for your WFP theory.

I understand very well, When I asked you about your WFP, you claimed the "FBI" map can be dismissed because no airliner would fly like that.. your argument was essentially that the "FBI" map was not legit. So, it was your argument and clearly you can't defend it. The map wasn't created by the FBI but was used and presented by the FBI so is referred to as the "FBI" map. We all know that. We also know it is plotted points connected by hand drawn lines.. it is a crude representation of the path. It can be smoothed within the 1 mile error to represent the path of a jet. The smoothing does not increase the accuracy and is not intended to do so, it only demonstrates that given the 1 mile error it does represent the smooth path of a jet rather than the jagged and abrupt path we see. Rataczak said he was hand flying the plane and Portland ATC said it was up to 2 miles E of the center of V-23.. So, your argument and dismissal of the "FBI" map is not justified in any way.. in evidence or reasonable inference.

That comment is intellectually dishonest and just discredits you... Everybody knows the FBI map is unsmoothed plotted points and no way supports your western flight path theory.. Nobody needs to convert you, your argument exposes you.

Wrong, the airliner did not stay on the center of V-23 per Portland ATC. It was hand flown by Rataczak not on autopilot. You just can't dismiss something because you have the facts wrong. The jagged and abrupt nature of the "FBI" map is because it is 1 min incremented plotted points.. somebody just joined the points, it is not the actual path. It is a crude representation. It can be smoothed out within the 1 mile plotting error to accurately reflect a jet's path..

Not the WFP.. The most Eastern point on the "FBI" path is a few miles from a creek that connects to the Washougal, but it is a tiny creek, more like a ditch, goes into Lacamas Lake. Very hard to imagine money that sinks making its way all that way, across the lake down another small creek to the Washougall and into the Columbia..

Not simple, that isn't the actual path, it is a connect the plotted dots made to roughly represent the path,, there is a 1 mile error in it. If you take the 1 mile error and extend the points within the error, it can be smoothed out to represent what a jet path would look like. Something like this.. The pink line is within the plotting error.. may not be exactly the path the jet took but close.

How can it be dismissed..

and have you moved from that position from 2010...

Interesting,, What does this mean.. "once airborn".. did he say this in the air or before or both??

No we don't know.. FBI files and witnesses were all over the place.. "black rain-type overcoat or dark topcoat;" Mitchell said raincoat.. A raincoat is water-proof or water resistant while an overcoat is for warmth.. It was probably a raincoat given the weather/temp but it may be a distinction without a difference. He probably put the chute on over the "raincoat",, but witnesses never said.