FLYJACK

sure it is.. Hayden was not a secret or any new revelation.. Cossey was a known fibber. There was nothing new about Cossey in SKYJACK that would cause his murder.

Cossey was serial liar according to somebody who knew him well.. Cossey being killed because of the book Skyjack claiming Hayden supplied the chutes makes no sense.. Hayden supplying the chutes was no secret.. it was previously reported in the media, the FBI files and books.. In fact, in Tosaw's book it states Cossey told Lee that he had recently packed back chutes for somebody at Boeing field.. So, the back chutes and Hayden wasn't a secret, a coverup or any reason to murder Cossey.. Over the years Cossey told lies and different stories to different people including Carr and the FBI, it was his character. There is no evidence his murder has anything to do with the Cooper case..

No, that passage is not about NORJAK but the 727 in general.. Rataczak said he was manually flying the plane, he levelled and slowed the plane for Cooper just before he jumped... that proves it was at a minimum not on full autopilot settings. It states that there are different modes and that some planes didn't even have altitude-capture.. The argument is that if it was on autopilot Rataczak wouldn't have felt the hijacker on the stairs and that might move the LZ.. this is false, Rataczak did feel the hijacker on the stairs and was manually flying the plane. Further, Rataczak joked about the crooked path of the plane because he was manually flying it,, that indicates no autopilot modes at all. And 305 flying dirty with the rear stairs down is an extreme configuration, to fly in autopilot doesn't make any sense..

"The Boeing 727's autopilot could be engaged in either pitch or roll mode or both. We often would disconnect only the pitch mode to manually make changes like leveling off or beginning a descent. This is because hand-flying was smoother than the autopilot. Also, the 727's antiquated autopilot could not be relied upon to level off at the preselected altitude. Some didn't even have altitude-capture capability. "

You aren't neutral and I do have proof Reca isn't Cooper. I have lots of research I am holding back. The plane did not fly to Cle Elum, it is absurd to claim it did.

Yes, guilty, I am a shill for the truth... It doesn't matter what the route to Reno could be.. it wasn't East. Carl researched the case before the Reca tapes, he even talked to Carr.. In the interview tapes he clearly led Reca who seemed like he had early onset dementia.. Unfortunately, Carl's research was poor and he got the facts wrong which Reca repeated. Reca is a manufactured narrative that doesn't fit the case evidence, end of story. I have evidence that eliminates Reca and most of the high profile suspects. but advocating for a suspect in an intellectually honest way is fine.. You are not, you are a shill. You have an agenda. Why, You claim to be just asking questions and using logic. This is dishonest. You mimic the Reca narrative including the gross errors. You are trying to undermine established facts that contradict the Reca narrative to breath oxygen into it.. Reca CPR.... paddles,, clear... You have ignored any criticism or problems with the Reca narrative. You aggressively defend the Reca narrative when challenged including gross errors. You claim you are neutral, but everything you post is designed to support the Reca narrative. Do you really think we are that stupid.. The Reca/Peca story is a joke, it is made up and patched together with chewing gum and pine beetle spit,, there are no facts to support Reca being Cooper, just claims and the crucial facts presented do not fit the evidence.. Reca is easily eliminated...

because you are shilling for Reca... When Carl fed the case info to Reca for his recordings he made a big error and got the side door and rear bulkhead door mixed up. He misunderstood the FBI information, either from the files or media reports. He also got the flightpath completely wrong, the plane never went East.. that was it,, The Reca story is BS.. add in Reca's speech/cadence, grade 8 education, it is a joke. Reca was not Cooper and Lauren pulled a scam. It is like somebody claiming to have assassinated Kennedy with a knife in Fort Worth, Texas... then when caught being wrong claim an FBI coverup. People shill for suspects all the time but don't pretend you're not. When you got the door wrong, you exposed your agenda. At least pick a legitimate suspect..

Let me guess RECA/PECA... But sadly you are wrong Cooper thought the chutes were coming from McChord... and Cooper never specified where the chutes were to come from. They were having trouble contacting the right people Thanksgiving eve at McChord and somebody (not FBI) reached out to Cossey at home,, who said get them from Issaquah (backs too),, meanwhile Hayden was also contacted and agreed to send in the two backs, Linn Emerick was told that they only needed the fronts. Cossey didn't know that his backs were not used until later but he just never corrected the record. So, I guess McChord, NWA, Emrich and Hayden are in on the coverup as well..

My research shows that he took the slightly newer one after checking the packing cards, Nobody else figured this out including the FBI.

He told Bruce he thought were the same but he never looked at the chutes inside.. So, the same means similar not exactly the same. Both were Pioneers. Different colours.

I am not speaking for the FBI. I am addressing the facts. Obviously, you are going to say it was all a big FBI coverup...

I knew you were a Reca shill.... just asking questions are you. Reca or Peca can be eliminated based on the side door error, his accent/speech, the LZ, I have other evidence unique to Cooper that eliminates him.. What does knowing Cossey have to do with anything.. or jumping in Seattle.. Age, height, weight and parachute experience could be tens of thousands of guys... He is not Cooper.

Sort of, it was exposed early on in the newspapers that the back chutes came from Hayden.. everybody just forgot about it.. The FBI files were clear that the back chutes came from Hayden.. Cossey's lie was subtle. He claimed they were his, he did pack them and we don't know if he made/owned them before Hayden bought them. Cossey often lied to the media.. So, it wasn't a big secret that the back chutes came from Hayden,, everybody just lost track over the years. Exposing Hayden in "Skyjack" wasn't a big deal.. it was already out there. There was no coverup or reason to off Cossey. Apparently he was big gambler, that is more likely what got him killed.. Nov 26, 1971

Reca is probably the worst Cooper suspect there is.. worse than Kenny Christiansen The Reca team narrative is that the plane flew East, Cooper wanted to jump out the side door and it was big FBI coverup... those are same things you are claiming. Coincidence? The Reca team is only people that I know of that got the door wrong. Carl misread the FBI docs and got Reca to say the wrong door... oops. Reca a not a legitimate suspect.

Let me take a wild guess,, Based on... discrediting the flightpath and pushing an Eastern path,, you knew Carl Lauren,, you got the side door wrong,, you have provided zero evidence except black holes and coverups,, there is a new book about Reca... You are likely shilling for Reca.. Am I close.

Logic requires you actually have the facts right. You have the wrong door.

11. Thou shall not make up their own evidence.

Wrong. He did agree to the flight plan. Side door is Reca propaganda.. he demanded the rear bulkhead door leading to the airstairs open, not the side door. See, when you think you have it all figured out, you aren't even close.

That is false. It is in the files,, I was just looking at it.. he didn't set the route but he agreed to it. The predicate was a discussion about flying to California to refuel but Cooper rejected large airports, so they agreed on Reno..

The FBI or Air Force does not have to prove anything to you, that is not their purpose. The AF flightpath radar data had to be deciphered and plotted by a military expert, that primary data was not supplied and is useless to us.. I am sure it was classified. The FBI even went back and had them redo it using a more modern analysis, it reduced the error from 1 mile to 0.5 mile and very slightly altered the search area.. So, it was plotted twice, that is data. The communications confirm a flightpath down to Portland then Red Bluff and over to Reno. The only alternate path put forward is the Western Path which is claims a slight deviation West in Washington, there is zero evidence for it. So, the AF plotted map is data (plotted twice), the crew comms is data, the FDR is data.. The FBI files are NOT conclusions, they are a collection of all investigative notes, so there are opinions, errors and conflicts. There is no conflict in the FBI flightpath. The FDR was analyzed and its data was used with the flightpath to create the LZ. Bottom line is you aren't using logic,, you are using your inexperience and lack of case knowledge to engage in confirmation bias.. this is what the Vortex does to you. It happens to everyone. How do I know, because you have zero evidence and many before you have tried the same thing and have produced nothing. You have no logical argument, none. Claiming there are black holes isn't an argument. Claiming you are using logic isn't an argument. So, you are going to have to produce some actual evidence to support an alternate flightpath. The WFP argument relies on creating doubt or a negation of evidence, not a positive argument. It failed, it has failed for a decade. It is no different than claiming there is no proof/data there even was a hijacking. Lots of black holes.. and what about the moon landing. We don't really have proof.

I have an F-106A spec doc that states minimum speed is 150 kn (power off).. that is probably true airspeed but doesn't say.. NORJAK was at 165 kn.. indicated airspeed.. So, 305 was going too slow to safely follow.

Robert99 had been pushing the western flightpath for at least a decade, it is a slight deviation from the "FBI" flight path (10-12 miles west in WA). He has provided zero evidence in 10 years.. Eric picked up the Western flightpath theory and made factual claims that were false.. Everybody knows the "FBI" didn't create the flight path, this is hyperbole. We call it the "FBI" flightpath because it was accepted and used by the FBI. It was plotted by the Air Force.. it was also sent to NorthWest Airlines to help compute the LZ. Robert99 is using redactions in the communications to claim they are hiding the Western Flightpath.. the redactions were communications unrelated to NORJAK. The tough questions have been asked and completely rejected because there is no evidence to support an alternate flightpath, just speculation and conjecture. It has been over 50 years and there is no evidence for an alternate flightpath. Robert99 doesn't have it and Eric doesn't have it.

The coverup/conspiracy about the flight path comes up now and then but there is just no evidence or valid argument for it. And I think the world is full of manipulations coverups and conspiracies...

The map is data, it is the points plotted by the Air Force using GEOREF.. Why doesn't it jive,,, you can always find some doubt in everything but you need actual evidence to dispute it.. Eric has no actual evidence, he relies on conjecture, exxagerates it to claim it as fact, then builds more conjecture on that pseudo-fact. That is his history and MO... Eric's claims always need to be triple checked. It all jives to me, if there is actual evidence that it doesn't beyond weak conjecture I haven't seen it. Claiming it was all a coverup doesn't cut it. You had too many people, too many organizations and too many resources involved, North West Airlines, the Air Force radar, SAGE, the Air Force pilots, NORJAK pilots, ATC, the FBI... then they did the massive search based on the flight path. Flight path is solid, not sure exactly why they chose that route but they did and were discussing several other refuelling spots in California prior. So, down to California and dog leg over. The FBI files say Cooper agreed to that route... maybe it is just that simple.

Flight path is solid.. it was plotted by the Air Force. It has a 1 mile error. The plane was being tracked, including SAGE. 727 had a simple Flight Data Recorder and it was examined, they found a "little bob" at about 8:09. The "escorts" didn't have visual but had it on radar. The crew had established they were going to take V23 and Portland radar confirmed they were a few miles E of the center at one point.. it was 10 miles wide. Rataczak confirmed the flight path map by inference, he joked about the jerky movement. Cooper had agreed to a flight plan to go down v23 to Portland to red bluff and over to Reno..