FLYJACK

This ad is hilarious... A fake bomb you wire into a car for fun.... DOES NOT HARM THE CAR Today, you get cancelled on social media or fired for telling the truth.

Yes, I found other issues.. A character's name in a single article about an aviator, not a jumper like the comic and being used 34 years later sounds like a real stretch.. but I think the comic is a stretch as well..

Not necessarily, everyone is focussed on the French angle but the Dan Cooper comic was also published in Mexico, in Spanish for Latin America.. Cooper was described as swarthy and Latin American.. plus his demand was to fly to Mexico... but, I still think the name is a random coincidence.. we will never be able to find any connection beyond speculation. It is still interesting.. Here is an article on the publication, it was out of NY, https://thepulp.net/pulp-articles/i-flew-with-bill-barnes/ I am still trying to figure out if Dan Cooper was a character in only one edition or an ongoing character.. it looks like only that one issue.

That is interesting, Cooper would have been around 10-15 years old at the time.. looks more like an adult piece.. Probably a random coincidence.. but worth looking into more. Was the Dan Cooper character in a recurring series of pieces or just the one.. Here is a link to it.. https://ia902905.us.archive.org/28/items/bill-barnes-air-trails-v-07n-04-1937-01/Bill Barnes Air Trails v07n04 [1937-01].pdf and ironically,, there is an International Correspondence School ad in it... same as the matchbook.. The "Air Trails" publication ran for roughly 10 years and was reprinted in Canada.. http://www.philsp.com/mags/air_trails.html

Yikes,, sure you aren't Blevin's Florida cousin... The document was not created to be disseminated, 45 years later a due to a lawsuit it was released. The document was not created to be disseminated and it was part of an investigation, not a conclusion.

Wrong again, it wasn't disseminated it was an internal communication between offices.. one agent was passing on what he heard from somebody at NWA.. it was not a conclusion, a lie or false information from the FBI. Read the FBI files before you make inaccurate claims..

oh brother,, it wasn't a lie, it wasn't from the FBI if you actually read and understood the evidence. They stated what they were told by somebody at NWA who was likely assuming..

305 was not on autopilot, the plane was flying super dirty,, it would not be appropriate. Ratazcak changed the flap settings and when Cooper was having problems with the stairs right before jumping he adjusted the level and speed... that confirms he was manually flying the plane as he stated. Further, Ratazcak felt Cooper on the stairs.. The statements in the FBI files by an agent about it being on auto pilot were very early Dec 2/71. Yes, it matters because some are trying to claim Ratazcak did not feel Cooper on the stairs because it was on autopilot.. and therefore Cooper jumped further South. He did feel Cooper, he was flying it manually and Cooper did not jump further South.

The primary Sage computer data had to be converted to GEOREF by the Air Force to make a map,, that data was used to plot the points on the "FBI" map... those plotted points are data. They later went back to the AF and were able to use a more modern method of conversion which reduced the error from 1 mile to 0.5 miles.. but it was virtually the same.. they very slightly altered their search area. You have,, 305 crew Chase plane COMMS and pilots multiple ATC contacts and tracking the crew COMMS Ground COMMS Air Force NWA There is no way the plane went East. Claiming a massive conspiracy is just a way to cover for Carl Laurin's error and bogus story..

Then Joe Koenig, Vern Jones and Lisa Story are wrong.. If you can't find any evidence for the flightpath then you aren't looking in the right place. Start here.. https://vault.fbi.gov/D-B-Cooper ?b_start:int=40 Let us know when you have finished reading...

Yes, if Mr Slim King wants to advocate for a suspect that's all good, but it is dishonest to present no evidence, uber-crazy speculation and misinformation.. we are far too knowledgable on the case here to fall for that nonsense.

No, people here often disagree on different aspects of the case but everyone agrees that the plane flew South and Reca is an absurd suspect.. Not everyone is a shill, there have been a few.. and you can advocate for a suspect without being a shill. If you believe there is a massive conspiracy to cover up for the plane flying East instead of South then you've already failed... and rejected logic and reason. you have the flight path wrong.. you have the airplane door wrong.. you have the distance to the LZ and Cle Elum wrong.. you have a suspect narrative with no evidence.. you have a suspect that doesn't match the suspect description.. and you expect success... well, good luck It is all yours go ahead.. lay out all your evidence..

On Reddit Carr is mocking the claim of a Cooper suspect involved in the Bay of Pigs and a CIA operative.. Unfortunately Carr is wrong.... again. https://www.reddit.com/r/dbcooper/comments/wx43sx/additional_clues_on_db_coopers_identity/ His name is Bradley Earl Ayers. He was investigated by the FBI but both stews rejected his image. last line in FBI doc "who apparently participated in the Bay of Pigs Invasion and other CIA sponsored activities." Here is a rabbit hole for somebody to go down.. CIA files on Ayers.. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4178918/CIA-OP-FILES-ON-BRADLEY-EARL-AYERS.pdf and regarding Flo, she was hounded by somebody trying to prove the Cooper suspect Coffelt was Cooper, somebody he was in prison with claimed he was Cooper, so perhaps the two "suspects" got conflated in the story. It isn't clear..

Unless you have evidence of something new and based on facts, I am not interested in your alternate reality,, sorry can't speak for others of course..

Your vacuous and caustic bromides don't advance the case knowledge base which is the purpose of this forum. Suspect narratives like Reca and others that are easily dismissed are a waste of energy. as for failure, you have no idea what research other people have done that is not shared publicly. The Reca narrative is out there and it fails on all fronts due to lack of evidence, false/misleading evidence and exculpatory evidence. Just because the Government lies, is inept or hides evidence does not give you or anybody cover to make up your own reality.. Reca/Peca is not a legitimate suspect, your 15 minutes are up. We need to get back the actual case.

You are trolling, you keep repeating the same unfounded nonsense over and over with passive aggressive attacks toward people that aren't falling for it.. You are wasting your time here though, this forum is far too knowledgeable about the case to accept the BS Reca narrative and inaccuracies. Anybody who claims the plane went East is completely discredited..

All you have done is mimicked the unsubstantiated Reca narrative including the gross errors.. There is evidence and data for the southern flight path and claiming it is a big conspiracy to cover up the Eastern path is just ridiculous... At this point you are just trolling this forum.. repeating unsubstantiated and ridiculous claims over and over gets nauseating.. The butts were destroyed after testing and the hair sample was lost.. Reca was not cooper and yes I can prove it,, and no I am not giving you my research.

No, it isn't "basically the same distance" not even close.. SeaTac to Cle Elum is 66 miles,, SeaTac to the drop zone at 8:10-12 is 103-109 miles.. Only a fool would claim it was the same.. So, you guys need to dream up another narrative patch for your Reca fiction...

or the logical fallacy.. argumentum ad nauseam (also known as: argument from nagging, proof by assertion) Description: Repeating an argument or a premise over and over again in place of better supporting evidence. Explanation: Restating the same claims, even rearranging the words or substituting words, is not the same as making new claims, and certainly does not make the claims any more true.

There is data and evidence, it is not in question. It went South, not East. Of course the Reca narrative has zero data and evidence just a wild story from Carl leading Reca for a book, and he got the case info wrong and was weak on details.. Reca can be eliminated easily..

305 didn't fly East... Reca was not Cooper...

305 didn't fly East, you are embarrassing yourself..

305 did not go East, claiming so is ignorant of the case.. Why do you keep pushing something that is patently false? You are just wasting peoples time with that nonsense.

Your immature and silly little digs don't work. You have exposed yourself as a RECA shill,, everyone can see that. I just don't like shills and frauds, if you actually want to advocate for a suspect do it honestly and present a cogent argument.. you haven't because you can't. Instead, you rely on creating doubt, false information, crazy claims and a massive conspiracy theory involving virtually everyone... all of it not to advance case knowledge but to advance the Reca narrative. So, you just clutter the forum with misinformation and disinformation. We have too many bad suspects to get bogged down in the nonsense.. The people here are too smart and informed to fall for your little scheme. Your audience is really the uniformed Cooper folks, they may be more susceptible to your agenda. Reca/Peca was not Cooper, there is no evidence and the evidence presented is not just ridiculous, it is false. Carl pulled a scam, got a book published and now there is an incentive for people to shill for the Reca narrative.. with another book coming out. Carl screwed up on the case facts because he was a poor researcher,, you repeated Carl's errors just like Reca did.. that was your downfall. Nobody outside of the Reca camp thinks the plane flew East and Cooper wanted to jump out of the side door. Both are false.

Shill... Lots of people have claimed to be Cooper, are related to him or knew him.. What is common in all these instances is zero evidence.. Nobody here will fall for your RECA/PECA nonsense, try the FACEBOOK group..