OHCHUTE

You said the example I provided never existed. I said no one knows. So then since you said my example never existed means you know about what gay men do. Right? You wouldn't make a very good Supreme Court Justice, nor an attorney either arguing a case. Lookie here, even the one who brought the case couldn't say how they were even harmed by California's decison: yet they say all of California was harmed. Not such a good answer. (Last sentence) There's also talk about Kids in the conversation as well. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/26/supreme-court-gay-marriage-hearing Good luck trying to promote your liberal agenda, even to the point of pushing it on an unwilling court that decided to hear it, not because there was standing, but because of loud noise. I'd say back to California for the state's decision. I really think this is about getting health care via a spouse, but that's going to be covered under Obamacare anyway no matter if you are married or not no matter the sexual orientation.

I can see now why younger folk think they way the do. They simply don't have experience. Here you go, just as I suspected and posted. The hints are coming out about what the court is thinking, and based on hints the jury may be out for a while. No any decison on Constitutional right for gays to marry. And here I started talking about gays having kids, when they can't even get married yet. Sorry for jumping the gun, but it would seem child raising would be a part of the conversation about right to marry etc. http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/26/17460260-supreme-court-hints-that-it-wont-issue-sweeping-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage?lite

I guess the dealer felt Kelly wasn't ready to downsize. Here you are trying to be funny and you don't make sense. See how easy this is...

So a white kid shooting other white kids in the face is a regular example? You are all over the place with the way you choose your editing and responses. You don't have a clue about what might exist. No one does. This conversation might turn towards the purpose of marriage. You are married right. Why did you get married?

CNN search show last story was last week in FEB. Were are you getting 355 now that we are so off topic discussing what was intended as a joke. http://www.cnn.com/search/?query=sandy%20storm&sortBy=relevance See, liberals attack you even when your trying to have a little fun. Even Williams said: "opened for business even is there was anyone there to ride it, as it was raining or snowing the day it reopened from the looks of the sky when they showed the ride. Your motives aren't working for you.

, Billions that the Red Cross paid out on Sandy? Your pulling numbers out of your ass. Billions as in millions.

You develop irregular examples in drawing conclusions about normalcy.

If you watch Night News NBC with Brain William you would have perhaps the same impression as I have. BTW....some time has pasted since the opening of the Cyclone. Has there been one story whatsoever on any news network about what's been done with the 60 billion? I've not seen one story.

Looks like having kids, and raising kids are primary topics of discussion with the Supreme Court. Not so different to what we've been talking about here. I think the SC will avoid making a decision leaving it to the states to decide. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-case.html?_r=0

It's really surprising they can get any to join the military. First off they're doing to soldiers what they did in Vietnam. Dropping off young kids so they can be shot at and killed for no good reason when the end game is cheap labor making shirts for US consumption. The new wars are they get shot at but don't die and are left with life long disabilities. Hundreds of thousands of returning vets are disabled and gov't cares little. These rape cases are horrible, but people keep signing up. IT MUST BE THE DOD ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN THAT MAKES BEING A SOLDIER SOMETHING DESIRABLE.

It's not until this map is 51% accepted (DARK BLUE) that one could say that gay marriage is the norm. As it is not the norm currently. And based on that fact, adoption by gays has not yet reached any critical mass. YET, on the eve of Supreme Court case hearing about gay marriage, the GAY community advertises that gay marriage is normal when it is not. As much as what they hope people to believe, gay marriage is not main stream normal. And it couldn't be as it's illegal in most places. This is not to say that Gay marriage will never become normal. It's is just that it is not the norm now. The Supreme Court might push back and not be out in front of this social conversation about legal gay marriage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_by_country_or_territory

For your reference here it is again: OK a male gay, and a born female, who becomes a man, who is also gay, if you can grasp the idea, both get married and adopts a boy, what about the boy. What will he become being in the presence of a male gay and transgender. On top of that, lets say the male gay is more feminine than the transgender woman who is now a man. And lets add one more layer. The transgender is bisexual! Meaning that eventhough born as women, who is now a man, will do it yet with men and women.... Hope I got all that right... The jury is out about what happens to kids raised by other than heterosexuals, but while everyone is talking about how great it is that same sex couples should get married, these people are going to want to have kids. Have the democrats thought about that? What about the boy? Should same sex couples be allowed to raise children?

Irony score: off the dial. Let's have a vigorous public debate. This simply helps level the playing field for that debate. It's money fighting money. Money used to market, advertise and spin. It's about power and influence. He attacks the general population claiming social ills are the fault of people, yet he is hands-off the stock firms that pay his way. And stock firms are mostly responsible for societies problems. If people are going to die young from guns, and soda pop, business will be sluggish selling stocks. Bloomberg Inc. (Wall Streeter)

No. It's not "the main story". It was one story, on that outlet, on that day. Quick!! There's someone under your bed!! Better go look. Well goofy, that "one story" "on that outlet, "on that day" was hysterical considering the 60 billion the gov't paid, and the billions Red Cross paid, that the Cyclone is now open for business. No other story achieved such mention on national TV during the disasater funding talk. You TRY to be funny on here, but when someone else is joking, to you it's not a joke. Typical liberal mentality.

You sure could! Johns Hopkins grad, IVF founder, Hair and Beauty concession manager, ultra-experienced gay guy wrangler and committed homophobe... if I was a publisher I'd be giving you an advance on your autobiography right now. Just a shame we can't make your life story into a film where you're played by Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis. You read wrong: I didn't invent IVF. "Some like it Hot" was classic. Unbelievable the lives some of us have had and continue to have outside of web forum chatter. What's your story besides being the DZ foreum provocateur.

You are perfectly welcome to love anyone you want with no objections. Now back to discussing the storm Sandy. The ride, the Cyclone was closed. And Coney Island, including the amusment park, were damaged. http://politicker.com/2012/10/sandys-aftermath-in-coney-island/ Now the purpose of the threads was to point out, that after billions have been paid, the main news story about any reconstruction or clean up was that an amusement ride was reopened. Not that a million tons of sand was moved, thousands of houses rebuilt, the lights turned back on, etc., but that the roller coaster was turned back on. Get it now?

Like SO every went away. Funny. Looks like there becoming one firm again.

See that's the liberal talking. It would be a lot cheaper to be a little proactive than to have 100 police, morgue truck, city officials show up to deal with a murder and talk to witnesses. It's fun watching TV and chit chatting on the web.

I could write a book. Here's Danny, one of the funniest guys. He worked out of Phil and NYC he was on our styles directors team that engineered many new hair fashions that were marketing thought out the business including the one for Dorthy Hammil the Olympic skater cut by Jean Louis David. Danny is since deseased and only came by this video researching past people I've known. Not sure the reason he died. I probably have more experience dealing with gays than anyone one the planet, at least in a work environment. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHbZSGn8Sv0 OK see you.

http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2013/03/25/columbus-pro-gun-control-advertisement-featuring-columbus-coleman-spurs-debate.html Here is more about the ad campaign. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/24/bloomberg-gun-control-ad-blitz-nra

It never hurt standard oil as ole Rocky got stocks in all subsequent firms. He made even more money...

No movie bro. 1200 beauty shops world wide including Harrods in London. In all in the best department stores in the country. I hired lots of gay men. And fired many too. Especially when they didn't show up. But many skipped around anyway as they were so unstable when it came to employment. They'd meet a guy and off they'd go... here and there.

So I have to report to the state when I sell you my chain saw, woodchipper, fish cleaning knife, arrows, stones, and broken bottles. And when I want to give my son the gun my dad gave me and his dad gave him that was used in the Revolutionary War I have to report that to? Why not put to death the perp that murdered all the people. Why not detain violent criminal, instead of letting them out to kill people. Why not just for once, park the cop car outside the night club in DC where there's been a lot of shooting so to prevent shooting instead of having to drive up there at 3am to clean up a shooting! Why not do community policing? Bloomberg is waging war with the conservative establishment with his advertising and marketing. Wall street wants to run this country , and their going to use the liberal agenda to enslave the populace. Small business will be gone forever.

100 gay men? Unless you were managing a gay strip club then demographics would suggest you had a workforce of at least 1000 under you. How did you manage to get to know them all so well? (As an aside, it's amazing how many walks of life you have direct experience with that just happen to be relevant to whatever subject you're discussing at the time. You are a true goldmine of anecdotal evidence.) Now there's a good lot of guys that could raise kids, gay male strippers. I had 10 gays in one store. One day the store manger called me and told me to get down there as two of the guys were fist fighting in the salon. There were hair curlers all over the place and blood. The one guy was my top producer. I ended up sending one of the them to another shop. Again.... none that I knew then ever expressed any desire for family. My cousin who died of aids never did either and of course he probably wouldn't have made a good dad lying in bed with AIDS after what was reported to me by my sister who visited him in San Fran that just about everyone did him. Now all of a sudden the gay world wants to act like, well, the heterosexual world... conservative with family values, enough so to someday raise kids. Go ahead... get homosexuals in office and you'll have your way.

I don't know where people are getting this idea that no background checks are performed. Who is saying this and why? It's required. What is not required are private sales in some cases but in some states, private sales must be recorded.