georger

Before you get disappeared, Bobby, could you tell us when Curtis gave Marla the lie-detector test? Month, year??? Thanks. Good Luck in the Witness Protection Progam or wherever the feds send you. Might be a FEMA camp, too. Tina's old convent in Eugene is a sweet place, too. How the hell should I know the exact date? Ask the Seattle FBI. Or ask Marla. You already said she hung up the phone on you. Maybe if you'd try to approach sources reasonably and politely, they'd allow you a second chance at them. That is not my fault, but yours. Establishing a source and then alienating them on the first contact is generally not a good policy. That's an opinion. Non-Cooper: I'm calling for the black boxes on Flight 370, should they be found...NOT be turned over immediately to the Malaysian government. Bob, you need to enlist a cognitive emotive archivist to locate the rest of your mind. As noted by many, your logic program is flawed/corrupted. The whole world can't be WRONG and only you RIGHT ! Your fear of the FBI raiding you or AB Books to get your socalled work is ill-founded. It is far more likely that you have been profiled as a possible threat to yourself or the community ... guys in a white van might show up to do an evaluation. It sometimes happens to famous genius writers like you! Trust us on this.

Robert, If you don't like comments about Auburn School District, Books for Kids, Gayla, your cat, your cleaning business and Auburn days, why do you post about them here? Nobody else posts details of their personal life here. If you stop talking about those subjects, maybe people will leave them alone. I like your thought process.Nail hit on head. Would you like the lyrics to la Traviata?

Thanks for the lyrics, Georger. I never got that song straight, but now I've got it. By the way, have you made any phone calls to your bretheren in the FBI? Just askin'. We'd all like to know why the feddies said Uncle LD was DB and then changed their mind. Lastly, what does sophistry mean? Is that like being a chicken-shit smart-ass? Just askin'. Glad you like lyrics. I try to fit the music to the level of mendacity of the post being replied to. 'Sophistry' can be found on the internet. Sophists (Greek). I need to finish the dishes so must be gone 12.4463538325 minutes.

Robert, If you don't like comments about Auburn School District, Books for Kids, Gayla, your cat, your cleaning business and Auburn days, why do you post about them here? Nobody else posts details of their personal life here. If you stop talking about those subjects, maybe people will leave them alone. I like your thought process.Nail hit on head. Would you like the lyrics to la Traviata?

Really? It's MY job to go back four years and figure out your answer to a reletively simple question? You don't have an opinion? You had one before, just a few posts back and you acted as if you didn't even realize Marla had been interviewed multiple times on national television. Why don't you man up for once and give an actual answer. (I mean one where I'm not the Main Subject, LOL) This, of course, was in-between your personal attacks on raising books for poor kids and shelters, and talking shit about the city of Auburn, what I do for a living, and nearly everything else under the sun lately. You are being challenged, Mr Cooper Investigator featured in the Geoff Gray book. That's just in case you haven't figured it out, Mr I Went To College and They Turned Me Loose With Students and Stuff. I've personally had quite enough of your BS regarding Amazon, 377, B and G Housecleaning, the Auburn School District, Books for Kids, My Sweet Girlfriend Gayla, My Cat Hobo, and everything else. As well as you calling me dishonest. Either get real, or head back to the Dead Zone. I know a ditty nutty as a fruitcake Goofy as a goon and silly as a loon Some call it pretty, others call it crazy But they all sing this tune: Mairzy doats and dozy doats And liddle lamzy divey A kiddley divey too, wouldn't you? Yes! Mairzy doats and dozy doats and liddle lamzy divey A kiddley divey too, wouldn't you? If the words sound queer And funny to your ear, A little bit jumbled and jivey Sing "Mares eat oats And does eat oats And little lambs eat ivy" Oh! Mairzy doats and dozy doats And liddle lamzy divey A kiddley divey too, wouldn't you? A kiddley divey too, wouldn't you?

I think not. One wonders why Eng appeared to be such a Marla endorser originally but there are plenty of possible explanations that do not include sex. Marla gets treated pretty harshly here with a lot of "slut" innuendo eg "twisty butt" and now inferences that she may have had sex with an FBI agent who was investigating her claims. I don't think she deserves it. She is attractive but that's not grounds for character disparagement. I only saw Marla at the Portland Symposium and she wasn't "twisting" her butt or acting inappropriately with anyone I saw. I think Blevins did a good job poking holes in Marla's LD story by interviewing family members who were present for LD's Thanksgiving arrival. Blevins (AKA Venom Magnet) gets attacked all the time here, but gets little praise for doing what all the national reporters failed to do: check Marla's story about LD's disheveled injured arrival at the family home right after Norjack. He did check. Nobody would corroborate it. 377 National reporters? What "national reporters"? Billy Bob Dorm- Roome and Cinder Ella? Give this slop-jaw a rest! Come on, Georger. And you call yourself a 'Cooper Investigator'? What a joke. Didn't you notice Marla appearing multiple times on national media being interviewed or what? No one asked her the obvious question: 'Can anyone who was at the house confirm your story, any detail about it?' People slam on me about this, but it's frickin' obvious. Hold up and count on your fingers... How Many People Were in the Little House on the Semi-Prairie for Thanksgiving in 1971? This is how many I am aware of: Mother, father, LD, Uncle Dewey, Marla, her brother, her sister. I think a grandmother as well. That is eight people. Five adults, three kids. And no one noticed anything? Mother knows nothing? Brother makes fun of her claim? Sister says nothing? Riiiiiight. Marla said LD did not leave the home until Saturday morning, a few days after the hijacking. However, she's also said that LD was staying at the house temporarily and had his own bedroom. First it was a wall full of Cooper Comics. Then it was one or two on a door. Whatever. They landed near Sisters, Oregon. Uh, what about the money found up north? No...it was Tina Bar up in Washington State. They drove a Triumph. Snow on Forest Service roads in WA in November? Oh...it was a truck. You are constantly judging content of evidence in the Cooper case not by its possible validity, but who is the presenter. If you don't like the person, the evidence must be crap. Isn't that your attitude? This is foolish beyond belief, especially when such evidence can be supported by the subject's own words. I've asked you multiple times if you believe Marla's story and why you do or don't....and by God you've dodged that question more times than Lindsay Lohan trying to duck paparazzi at the courthouse. Same thing on the Amboy chute. Why? Not because I might be right...but because you don't like it that it came from me. Well...too bad. Live with it. To everyone else: I don't support the misogynistic comments directed at either Amazon or Marla Cooper. As far as Marla, her beauty is not the issue. Her claims are the issue, which in my opinion I find seriously lacking. Pure sophistry. I replied to you (at your urging) clear back in 2010. Go back and read and maybe shut up with your sophistry, for a change.

I think not. One wonders why Eng appeared to be such a Marla endorser originally but there are plenty of possible explanations that do not include sex. Marla gets treated pretty harshly here with a lot of "slut" innuendo eg "twisty butt" and now inferences that she may have had sex with an FBI agent who was investigating her claims. I don't think she deserves it. She is attractive but that's not grounds for character disparagement. I only saw Marla at the Portland Symposium and she wasn't "twisting" her butt or acting inappropriately with anyone I saw. I think Blevins did a good job poking holes in Marla's LD story by interviewing family members who were present for LD's Thanksgiving arrival. Blevins (AKA Venom Magnet) gets attacked all the time here, but gets little praise for doing what all the national reporters failed to do: check Marla's story about LD's disheveled injured arrival at the family home right after Norjack. He did check. Nobody would corroborate it. 377 National reporters? What "national reporters"? Billy Bob Dorm- Roome and Cinder Ella? Give this slop-jaw a rest!

Ok, Bob, I can accept that. But what do you want to say about the FBI's handling of the Marla file? Don't you want to comment on why you think the Bureau said LD Cooper was their best suspect? Don't you want to comment on why they dumped him? Don't you want to poke around the case a bit and see why the Bureau gave so much weight to a file given to them by a detective such as as Arlen Dorney, a guy who doesn't even know how tall his perp was? And doesn't even care. Do you care? Well, sure I care...to a degree. And the answer is I just don't know why the FBI said those things. One reason might be because it wasn't Marla who originally approached the FBI. She used a LEO front person and maybe the FBI originally bought into it for a while. They gave her the polygraph AFTER the DNA test was a fail. You would think they would do this first. If the DNA test was a fail, why did they ask her for a polygraph afterward? My thought is: To see if she sent them on a wild-goose chase. My thinking is that Marla probably passed the polygraph, which is strange enough in itself. Means she REALLY believes her story, or is possibly working from emotional issues. On one of her Facebook posts she talks about being on Adult Attention Deficit Disorder medications. Who knows? If she had failed the polygraph, it's possible the FBI may have ended up charging her and holding out their hands for the money it took to check her story. On Facebook, her own brother sees her posts and says, "I'm not going near this one..." NOTE: He was at the house in Sisters, OR the same weekend. Her mother and brother and sister have never supported a single item of her story. And that's a real frickin' problem because they were all there for Thanksgiving dinner. Marla said LD didn't leave the home until Saturday, and was badly injured. And no one noticed this except Marla? Her mother was her only supporter, and just barely. Mother is quoted as saying, 'Years later, I thought maybe LD was DB Cooper...' But no statements from anyone who was in that little house about comics on a wall, a guy coming back injured, or anything else Cooper-related. Not a single thing. If Marla's father knew LD was the hijacker, there's no way he could keep that a secret from his wife. He said NOTHING to his wife? For decades? He tells his little daughter, but his own wife knows nothing? She's either Sergeant Schultz from Hogan's Heroes or just tossing that 'maybe' statement out to the media to save face for her daughter. The FBI got burned. The exact circumstances on how it came down are confusing. But what happened afterward is not. The Seattle office backed off on their free-and-easy-friendly policy on answering questions related to the Cooper case. And that...in my opinion...is Marla's doing. You blame Marla? Well of course you would. She was your main competition now wasn't she! That Bruce omits that is like omitting the 20th century from world history! You forget one factoid - your whole gambit on Kenny overlapped and soon over-shadowed anything Marla was doing. Go back and read the posts of the time. At length you condemned the FBI was paying too much attention to, and being duped by ....Marla vs paying attention to you! You and Marla go hand-in-glove time-wise as competitors during the same time period.... duhhhhhh. Or am I missing something? It was in your interest to take on and defeat Marla. Play it again Sham Wow. The facts are the facts whether Bruce sees them or not. The FBI clammed up as much in response to YOU as they did because of Marla. Go back and read your own diatribes on the subject. They prove the point. But all of that, is long over with and ancient history. In the meantime nothing new has emerged, has it? Nor is anything new likely to surface. Its just RobertMBlevins rehashing things .... endlessly ... night after dreary night .... day after day ...like the other lost soul here, named Jo Weber. You made your mark. It's over and done with, forever. And you have nothing else to move on to! Blah, blah, blah. Back to the Phantom Zone for you, I think. We can but hope you cease picking on book collection for kids, the City of Auburn, or anything else that comes into your sights regarding your Blevins Obsession. I may not always be right, but I will always give it to you straight. Drives you nuts, doesn't it? (*laughs*) "Phantom zone? I will always give it to you straight." ? The only obsession here is you, and the other one. You just cant stand the truth! You took on Marla and Cook etc and the FBI on multiple fronts ... to force attention on your circus act, claiming flawed research and bungled history by the FBI on everything from Marla to the Amboy parachute et cetera, Marla was a liar and deceiver, and 100% sound research and moral righteousness for yourself; even comparing yourself at times to "Tom Kaye" and "Geoff Gray"! What a crock. The thread is your record and speaks for itself. Go back and read your own history, Blevins. It is very clear now what you did and why. It was very clear at the time what you were doing and why, and it did not matter to you who you trampled on. Now you're trying to avoid responsibility while posting total garbage day after day to Dropzone. It's all history, Blevins. It's over with. There will be no 2nd and 3rd and 4th chance! No more revisions possible! You made your nest. Now sit in it. You are welcome to it!

Ok, Bob, I can accept that. But what do you want to say about the FBI's handling of the Marla file? Don't you want to comment on why you think the Bureau said LD Cooper was their best suspect? Don't you want to comment on why they dumped him? Don't you want to poke around the case a bit and see why the Bureau gave so much weight to a file given to them by a detective such as as Arlen Dorney, a guy who doesn't even know how tall his perp was? And doesn't even care. Do you care? Well, sure I care...to a degree. And the answer is I just don't know why the FBI said those things. One reason might be because it wasn't Marla who originally approached the FBI. She used a LEO front person and maybe the FBI originally bought into it for a while. They gave her the polygraph AFTER the DNA test was a fail. You would think they would do this first. If the DNA test was a fail, why did they ask her for a polygraph afterward? My thought is: To see if she sent them on a wild-goose chase. My thinking is that Marla probably passed the polygraph, which is strange enough in itself. Means she REALLY believes her story, or is possibly working from emotional issues. On one of her Facebook posts she talks about being on Adult Attention Deficit Disorder medications. Who knows? If she had failed the polygraph, it's possible the FBI may have ended up charging her and holding out their hands for the money it took to check her story. On Facebook, her own brother sees her posts and says, "I'm not going near this one..." NOTE: He was at the house in Sisters, OR the same weekend. Her mother and brother and sister have never supported a single item of her story. And that's a real frickin' problem because they were all there for Thanksgiving dinner. Marla said LD didn't leave the home until Saturday, and was badly injured. And no one noticed this except Marla? Her mother was her only supporter, and just barely. Mother is quoted as saying, 'Years later, I thought maybe LD was DB Cooper...' But no statements from anyone who was in that little house about comics on a wall, a guy coming back injured, or anything else Cooper-related. Not a single thing. If Marla's father knew LD was the hijacker, there's no way he could keep that a secret from his wife. He said NOTHING to his wife? For decades? He tells his little daughter, but his own wife knows nothing? She's either Sergeant Schultz from Hogan's Heroes or just tossing that 'maybe' statement out to the media to save face for her daughter. The FBI got burned. The exact circumstances on how it came down are confusing. But what happened afterward is not. The Seattle office backed off on their free-and-easy-friendly policy on answering questions related to the Cooper case. And that...in my opinion...is Marla's doing. You blame Marla? Well of course you would. She was your main competition now wasn't she! That Bruce omits that is like omitting the 20th century from world history! You forget one factoid - your whole gambit on Kenny overlapped and soon over-shadowed anything Marla was doing. Go back and read the posts of the time. At length you condemned the FBI was paying too much attention to, and being duped by .... Marla vs paying attention to you! You and Marla go hand-in-glove time-wise as competitors during the same time period.... duhhhhhh. Or am I missing something? It was in your interest to take on and defeat Marla. Play it again Sham Wow. The facts are the facts whether Bruce sees them or not. The FBI clammed up as much in response to YOU as they did because of Marla. Go back and read your own diatribes on the subject. They prove the point. But all of that, is long over with and ancient history. In the meantime nothing new has emerged, has it? Nor is anything new likely to surface. Its just RobertMBlevins rehashing things .... endlessly ... night after dreary night .... day after day ...like the other lost soul here, named Jo Weber. You made your mark. It's over and done with, forever. And you have nothing else to move on to!

Well, here's one person who HAS spoken to the FBI: Marla herself. And she said that Agent Eng told her the FBI doesn't think the DNA samples they found on the tie even BELONG to Cooper. That was her response on Facebook after she was asked about the test coming back a no-match. She also said Eng told her he thought LD was the hijacker anyway, and that the FBI would be closing the case soon. Neither of those quotes she attributes to the FBI or Eng are true. If you want to see her Facebook posts on this again, I will be happy to provide. http://www.rxlist.com/victoza-drug/warnings-precautions.htm

Thanks for the tip, Georger. We have clear skies here in Cooper Country, too! Times for Cooper Country: Show begins at 11 pm, full eclipse at midnight, over around 1 am. By the way, G, you still haven't said why you think the feddies said they had their most promising lead in June 2011. Wassup? I havent weighed in on the above because I really know nothing about it! My suspicion is there is more to it than anyone here knows, or has posted to date. For example I see no posts by anyone who has actually talked to the FBI! Duhhhhhhhh. Isn't that what Marla told Blev when she added: 'Chew that!' Still, the paucity of facts has not kept Cooper orphans from projecting ... as you very well know!

Another cheapshot from Cinderella! Oh well. You Greys (your icon) and Blevins worshipers might be interested to knowe: Lunar Eclipse tonight. The total phase will last 78 minutes, beginning at 2:06 a.m. CST Tuesday morning and ending at 3:24 a.m. ... good luck to all bored tinfoil haters!

It's easy to find people these days if you know their exact name and at least a state where they lived. Otherwise, it's a nearly impossible task. I have sympathy but many of these requests are LOI-heavy. Lack Of Information. I don't mind contributing some search work time for you if you wish, but you have to give people more to go on.

It's easy to find people these days if you know their exact name and at least a state where they lived. Otherwise, it's a nearly impossible task. I have sympathy but many of these requests are LOI-heavy. Lack Of Information. I don't mind contributing some search work time for you if you wish, but you have to give people more to go on.

None of the above ?

You have to have passed Kinderschool, Snake Charming:101, Pots n Pans Sales:304, and can't speak in tongues to take one of my classes! Being able to add and subtract is mandatory - not being on the run from Authority or chasing Ambulances on your roller skates also helps! Aren't you a little old for that behavior? Did you ever meet any Authority figure you did not Hate, liked, or could work with? Name one! You may NOT cite Cinderella or 377 as a reference! IMHO you deserved that reference. You never have anything positive to say on practically anything. Almost every post you make at DZ is about me, which indicates...after SO many of those posts...that you are obsessed. You've tried picking on my signatures, what I do for a living, even my girlfriend. Since making those kinds of posts are forbidden by Shutter over at the alternate site, you simply show up here with them instead. The one time I revealed who you really were, you went to the moderator about it, but you somehow believe you are free to make personal references whenever you wish about me and think it's justified. What is good for the goose... There is no goose and no gander. THERE IS JUST "YOU". Your whole scam is to DIVERT people away from yourself toward others ... so you can escape scrutiny and gain attention. You pepper that with useless speculations and conjectures and wrong facts trying to pretend to be informed and important. You are a dishonest fool.

You have to have passed Kinderschool, Snake Charming:101, Pots n Pans Sales:304, and can't speak in tongues to take one of my classes! Being able to add and subtract is mandatory - not being on the run from Authority or chasing Ambulances on your roller skates also helps! Aren't you a little old for that behavior? Did you ever meet any Authority figure you did not Hate, liked, or could work with? Name one! You may NOT cite Cinderella or 377 as a reference!

Marla's appearance at the Portland Symposium and the big publicity surge that followed was bad news for Geoff's book and he knew it would be, yet he let Marla have center stage at an event he arranged and paid for. I took that as a benevolent/alruistic move by Geoff against his own self interest. The Symposium barely promoted his book and did not restrict participation by critics or opponents. How do you see it Bruce? I am still puzzled by the FBI spokeswoman's initial enthusiasm about Marla's story. Hard to explain that one. Maybe she had too much coffee before she spoke to the UK reporter. 377 Hmmm. Strange. Could it be you are missing the obvious? Him whose name shall not be mentioned. Him who protested violently - for years! Him who could not put it down - and still can't put it down! Thee person whose work and book were affected the most. Him whose book promotion was undermined by the FBI & Marla! And the name is ............................................ He wrote them both lotsa nasty mail right here at DZ. Aw shucks. I have forgotten his name. The guy you dubbed the Venom Magnet. The one with more venom than a truck load of cobras. The one whose very life was threatened! Death threats phoned into Auburn City Hall? Pictures of Bruce Smith passed out to Auburn cops!! THAT GUYS! "Wage earner sheeple". His name will come to me soon ..... damn! Just can't think of it. Slapped down red haired step children orphans .... THAT GUY! You know who I mean! Galen Cook! No. That's not right. The guy who hates Galen Cook! That one. You know who I mean ..... The guy who sneaks into public websites he's been banned from... THAT GUY! What happens when you freeze pineapple? THAT G'FUY!

Yur long long long post is too long to read. DID IT SAY SDOMETHING!???

Also, he does not resemble the sketch. Yes, he resembles the one that is always used when trying to make a case against KC. But Florence Schaffner said that sketch was not accurate. The one that was done later, with her help, does not resemble KC at all. For the record, I believe Marla's story. Good for you! Very likely Marla and her law enforceement friends has photos of Blevins/Danielle ... just in case.

Robert, I don't support anyone's story. If you asked me to make an up or down declaration on each of the suspects, I'd say I doubt each and every one of them. All of them have too many holes. I'm not commenting on Marla to support her story. I usually comment on here when you're the pot calling the kettle black. You say Marla is making up a story so she can write a book. You did make up a story and did write a book. You claim Jo has no witness testimony. Jo says Duane told her he was DB Cooper. Whether you agree or not, that's someone telling her something about the hijacking. You can write very long posts, but none of your witnesses will say anything definitive about the hijacking. You accused Shutter of using a fake name on DropZone, even though it was not to pretend to be someone else. You've used a fake name in order to pretend to be someone else. The Jane Smith identity you created on Facebook (although, I do see why you felt the need to do that) was one example. You then did it again on Shutter's site. Your accounting of Decoded is also suspect. You say the cast only said Geestman wasn't involved to avoid being sued. When you watch the episode (and read the Decoded book), they don't just say Geestman likely wasn't involved, they are adamant that they believe him. One more thought on those with favorite suspects. There are those who stumble on some information and they sincerely believe they've discovered the identity of DB Cooper. As Smokin99 describes, these people then massage every piece of information to fit their suspect and downplay those that don't because, hey, the honestly believe they know who DB Cooper was. And, that includes Marla, Jo, the Foremans, Sailshaw, and yes, Robert, you! I know you don't think of yourself that way, but instead as someone just trying to find the truth. But, I ask you, when Shutter and Smokin99 both tried to help you find the truth (by researching property records), you did not want to hear that information and refused to release any new Kenny yourself until your Cooperland book came out -- even though that book is not about Kenny! You're entitled to your opinions. I just wish you'd look in the mirror when you question the motivations of others. You are not only twisting around the facts here, but you didn't answer the question: Do you believe or NOT believe Marla's story? If so or NOT so, why? Here's what I think: Marla made fools out of the hard-working folks at the Seattle FBI, as well as some members of the media, in a selfish, lying effort to land a lucrative book deal with a major publisher. And it bombed on her. I don't mind being direct. So what if used a false ID at Facebook to find out her true motivations. Maybe if the FBI would have done that they could have dismissed her claim in short order. But all that happened was she wasted everybody's time and tax dollars in an effort to deceive strictly for greed. I think that's plain enough. As far as new info on Christiansen, I said I would present whatever was available at the theater in August. If you can't attend, you can catch the video on YouTube because all 30 minutes will be there. By the way....Geestman and some of his finances have been investigated. I just haven't said anything about that yet. The truth is, I don't mind discussing the case but I no longer trust some of the people who post here, so I answer some questions privately, not just toss out everything on the internet anymore. The Decoded cast: What I said was that the director was instructed by Go Go Luckey's legal eagles to tell the cast off-camera that saying Geestman was involved - unless they could get him to admit a key point on something - was risky, and that maybe they shouldn't do it. Later, producer Pete Berg gave me the story about the legal team but I had to keep quiet until he was no longer working for GGL. So I kept quiet. After Berg moved to his own production company...that's when I emailed Scott Rolle and Buddy Levy and asked them if they actually believed Geestman was involved. I alluded to what I had heard from Pete Berg, but didn't give them the details. They answered anyway. Here is what they said: Scott: Buddy: Even though these are not firm endorsements, they are neither strong opinions on Geestman's innocence. After I received these messages, I sent both of them a copy of the KC report. You said this: 'You say Marla is making up a story so she can write a book. You did make up a story and did write a book...' No, and I take exception to your statement saying I 'made up a story'. The interviews are accurate and so is the book. A few of the details regarding the hijacking that have nothing to do with Kenny's guilt or innocence are probably inaccurate. But you get that with practically every article, every news account containing the story of the hijacking. I didn't say Marla made up a story to write a book. I said she made up a story in order to get a lucrative offer from a big-name publisher, which would have meant an advance...and outright fraud as well. People want me to provide this and that. But these same people wouldn't know the truth on something regarding the Cooper case if the Book of Truth Instructions on the item dropped into their laps. Why? Because many here don't judge anything posted by whether they believe it or not, or whether it's true or not. They base their response, positive or negative, on personalities. For example, I brought up some good reasons why the FBI's conclusion on the Amboy chute was suspect at best. Everyone blew that off. Then I pulled the covers on Marla and people got mad at me because I did. This kind of thing only happens in Cooperland. It's a weird place sometimes. If the truth on Cooper were actually discovered, I think many in Cooperland would be disappointed and wouldn't know what to do next. Me? I'd just move on to the next editing job.

Ah, clear, concise impassioned focus. I love it. Go get him tiger! Well, I don't think there's any doubt Geestman has told a lot of lies. Whether he did that to distance himself from the hijacking is another matter entirely. I wouldn't worry. The truth will come out sooner or later. On this point, I am entirely confident. You've been entirely confident since the day you arrived and your record is 99.999999999% wrong with your savants soon to be after your heels. Good show Miracle Man.

Ah, clear, concise impassioned focus. I love it. Go get him tiger! Funny! When he figures it out he's been deceived he may switch his view and go after Blevins with a vengeance!

Not true - was never true. It was a CONSENSUS of the group. Bruce was just one vote. There was a MAJORITY who said they would not participate in the new group if you were allowed there. And of course Blevins was the other primary reason. So you can stop peddling your falsehood above too! Or, you can continue to peddle gobblewobble. Nobody really cares. Of course. But few view the posts publicly except for the members themselves. You forgot to tell her that. It's a private discussion site for the case populated by people who (many of them anyway) were banned from Dropzone. No one cares. I certainly don't. If you come up with something substantial in the case, I'm sure it will eventually end up here.

Not true - was never true. It was a CONSENSUS of the group. Bruce was just one vote. There was a MAJORITY who said they would not participate in the new group if you were allowed there. And of course Blevins was the other primary reason. So you can stop peddling your falsehood above too! Or, you can continue to peddle gobblewobble. Nobody really cares.